New York Times

New York Times reporters Patricia Mazzei and Maggie Astor reported on Monday evening’s one and only debate in the Florida governor’s race, pitting sitting Republican Ron DeSantis against Democrat and former state governor Charlie Crist. But under the guise of fighting misinformation on abortion and transgender issues by Ron DeSantis, the reporters spread their own: "....asked whether…

The snotty headline on the front page of Tuesday’s New York Times, “Sunak’s Ascent Is a Breakthrough for Diversity, With Privilege,” proves conservatives will never pass the media’s lopsided diversity tests. Even when the UK Conservative Party makes history with Rishi Sunak, the first Hindu and first “person of color” to rise to Prime Minister, instead of indulging in the…

Another group heavily financed by liberal billionaire George Soros is joining a growing network of organizations he funds calling on Big Tech to do more to censor so-called election “disinformation” before the midterms.

The New York Times fawned over a wealthy “tax me please” European heiress in “This Heir to a Fortune Wants It Taken Away for Fairness’ Sake.” Emma Bubola’s loving “Saturday profile” piece bubbled over with a strong undercurrent of sympathy for guilt-ridden leftist economics: "By the time her extraordinarily wealthy grandmother died last month, Marlene Engelhorn already knew who she…

New York Times podcast host Michael Barbaro proclaimed -- to among others, listeners on almost 300 NPR stations -- that Republicans were elevating crime and illegal immigration as issue that are "manufactured crises," that the hype doesn't "actually conform to reality."

An elaborately presented New York Times Sunday front-page story introduced the paper’s study condemning the “devil” language of Republican politicians, under the surprisingly moralistic headline “For Trump’s Backers in Congress, ‘Devil Terms’ Help Rally Voters,” brought to you by “investigative reporters” Jennifer Valentino-DeVries and Steve Eder. Once again “election deniers” are in…

The New York Times published a garbage essay by a radical environmentalist defending young climate fanatics for throwing “soup” on a world-famous Vincent van Gogh painting, calling it an example of “creative methods” to stop fossil fuel production.

Harry and Hermione won’t stand up for common sense and for the woman to whom they owe their careers, but the evil wizard Voldemort will. 

The New York Times complained that alternative social media platforms are making so-called “disinformation” more “widespread” before the midterms.

Elitist New York Times economics columnist Paul Krugman whined that high gas prices could doom Democratic Party chances in the midterms, just 15 days away. So much for Americans struggling to make ends meet as long as the correct party’s in power, right Krugman?

New York Times legal reporter Charlie Savage and the paper’s official fact-checker Linda Qiu teamed up on Wednesday’s front page to cover the acquittal of Igor Danchenko for lying to the FBI in “Russian Analyst for Trump Dossier Acquitted of Lying to the FBI.” For the Times, it was a golden opportunity to again bash special counsel John Durham’s investigation into how the FBI…

While the New York Times routinely rails against the "insurrection" on January 6 and sees all "domestic terrorism" as a right-wing problem, it promotes a climate insurrection and left-wing domestic terrorism. They published radical author Andreas Malm, who explicitly champions sabotage and violence -- even guerrilla warfare! -- as an efficient path to ending fossil fuels.

The New York Times front page on Friday sounded a familiar refrain on the perils of conservative “disinformation” in “Exploding Online, Disinformation Is Now a Fixture of U.S. Politics.” But beyond the latest tiresome rehash that reporters Steven Lee Myers and Sheera Frenkel made of what former President Trump is now spouting on his social media platform, the piece also relied on the…

This is a classic example of just how the media giants whip up a frenzy that turns out to be based on a flat-out untruth.