Hey boys and girls! Are you ready to play a fun new game called "Detect Liberal Bias?"
Here's how it works... Just go online to any newspaper or magazine. In their seach engines, enter the term "Strzok." Do you see any search results? If so, then add "insurance" for "Strzok insurance." If you see no search results, congratulations! You have just detected strong liberal bias in the periodical you were searching.
The reason that this is a strong indication of liberal bias is that the story line developed by the mainstream media is that while FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page who worked in the office of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe might have sent virulently anti-Trump texts to each other, those were merely opinions and did not affect their professionalism. Of course, the most notable text of them all which strongly indicated they took action to insure against a Trump presidency is completely ignored by these same liberal periodicals. Here is the damning text Strzok sent to his mistress which the MSM periodicals conveniently leave out of their stories about their messages:
"I want to believe the path u threw out 4 consideration in Andy's office-that there's no way he gets elected-but I'm afraid we can't take that risk.It's like an insurance policy in unlikely event u die be4 you're 40."
To any news outlet not totally beholden to a liberal ideology, that text leaps off the page especially since there is a 99.9% certainty that "Andy" is Andrew McCabe. The "path" thrown out as an "insurance policy" seems most likely to be the Clinton campaign financed Steele Dossier which many believe was used to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on the 2016 Trump campaign. Obviously this goes way beyond merely expressing hatred of Trump which is why it has been almost totally ignored in the MSM.
Your humble correspondent took a shot at playing this Liberal Bias Game by entering "Strzok" and then "Strzok insurance" into various MSM search engines. While they all showed results for "Strzok" alone, none of the following showed results for "Strzok insurance" which means they knew the "insurance policy" text that Strzok sent to Page would contradict their carefully engineered narrative about the texts being merely opinions.
New York Times? Nope. Lots of Strzok texts showed up in their stories except for the most significant one of all.
Los Angeles Times? Ditto.
Boston Globe? Same as the previous two.
Miami Herald, Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel, Palm Beach Post? Same results but since the circulations of each of those South Florida newspapers are well below 100,000, would anybody really notice their bias?
Time magazine? Same result as all of the above.
Exit question: Will the New York Times finally get around to reporting on Strzok's "insurance policy" text by the time their new publisher, A.G. (Pooch?) Sulzberger, is coronated on January 1?
