Taxpayer-funded PBS marked Earth Day with typical liberal scare-mongering on its news programs, hosting a Washington Post “environmental health” journalist who sounded more like an environmental health activist on a quest for so-called environmental justice, followed by a radical environmentalist, with no dissenting guests and few if any challenging questions posed.
First up on Sunday’s News Weekend show was the Post’s Amudalat Ajasa.
Anchor John Yang: For three decades, EPA offices were established nationwide to address the disproportionately high levels of pollution in poor and minority communities. Now the Trump administration is eliminating these environmental justice offices as part of its effort to end DEI programs and to cut what it sees as wasteful spending. Ali Rogin recently spoke with Amudalat Ajasa, who covers environmental health for The Washington Post.
Ali Rogin: ….let's talk about the history of the environmental justice movement and how did it become a part of what the EPA does?
Ajasa sounded like an advocate, not a journalist.
Amudalat Ajasa: Yeah. The history of the environmental justice movement really recognizes the fact that everybody deserves access to clean air, water and the land that they live on. Right. And that was really introduced into the government over 30 years ago by Bill Clinton. He recognized the fact that these inequities needed to be addressed at the government level because it wasn't happening elsewhere. It developed 30 years ago, but folks really felt like their voices were heard under the Biden administration….
Rogin played a clip from the left-wing (though unlabeled by PBS) Natural Resources Defense Council about “a tribal community” having to drink “radioactive” water before setting up Ajasa for the weepy payoff.
Rogin: So how are these communities reacting to these offices now being closed?
Ajasa: These communities are devastated. These communities are gutted….
Rogin’s nod to equal time was reading a statement from EPA head Lee Zeldin, but giving Ajasa the last word.
Rogin: ….He says that environmental justice sounds like a good idea in theory and receives bipartisan support. But in reality, environmental justice has been used primarily as an excuse to fund left-wing activists instead of actually spending those dollars to directly remediate environmental issues for those communities. What do you make of that?
Ajasa: These offices weren't just helping specific DEI communities or, you know, leftist woke communities, but they were helping everybody….
Next up, on Monday’s News Hour, was radical environmentalist Bill McKibben (described by anchor Geoff Benntt only as a “leading environmentalist”) under the loaded online headline “How the Trump administration is dismantling climate protections.”
William Brangham: 2024 was the hottest year on record, capping a decade where almost every year broke the previous year's record high. Carbon emissions, which help drive that warming, are also at record levels. President Trump and his administration argue that this is not a problem and that trying to address it only hurts the economy and puts the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage….While Trump's actions face legal challenges, environmentalists are sounding the alarm. And among them is Bill McKibben. He's the author of several books on climate change, the founder of the grassroots climate campaign called 350.org, and Third Act, which organizes older Americans to work on climate justice.
At PBS it’s just “climate justice,” not “what liberal activists call climate justice.” Once again, there was a nod to the Trump argument, just to organize the rebuttal:
Brangham: What about the argument that this administration makes that the concerns about climate change and the impacts it will have on our world are, they argue, exaggerated or overblown or so far in the distance that to exert energy and money to address them is an enormous cost?
Bill McKibben: Tell that, first of all, to the good people of Los Angeles, say, who watched large parts of their city burn after the hottest, driest weather on record.
PBS wasn't going to bring up that PBS projected Earth had only 10 years to respond to global warming or there would be "enormous calamities"....back in 1990.
A transcript is available, click “Expand.”
PBS News Weekend
4/20/25
7:11:31 p.m. (ET)
John Yang: For three decades, EPA offices were established nationwide to address the disproportionately high levels of pollution in poor and minority communities. Now the Trump administration is eliminating these environmental justice offices as part of its effort to end DEI programs and to cut what it sees as wasteful spending. Ali Rogin recently spoke with Amudalat Ajasa, who covers environmental health for the Washington Post.
Ali Rogin: Amudalat, thank you so much for joining us. First of all, let's talk about the history of the environmental justice movement and how did it become a part of what the EPA does?
Amudalat Ajasa, Environmental Health Reporter, The Washington Post:Yeah. The history of the environmental justice movement really recognizes the fact that everybody deserves access to clean air, water and the land that they live on. Right. And that was really introduced into the government over 30 years ago by Bill Clinton.
He recognized the fact that these inequities needed to be addressed at the government level because it wasn't happening elsewhere. It developed 30 years ago, but folks really felt like their voices were heard under the Biden administration. You know, although some of them felt like the administration didn't go far enough in the legislation that they did pass to make sure that they had cleaner air and water, they felt like for the first time, the risks that they faced were really acknowledged.
Ali Rogin: What are some specific examples of environmental justice policies at work and the types of problems that this office set out to address?
Amudalat Ajasa: Some of the policies at work really limited the amount of pollution that industry would be able to pump into the air, the soot that would be allowed to linger in the air, other specific chemicals that they really went after, benzene and other things that for folks who live in Cancer Alley. That's a day to day reality for them.
Ali Rogin: Tell us about Cancer Alley, what is that?
Amudalat Ajasa: Yeah, Cancer Alley is an 85 mile stretch in Louisiana that is full of industry that is pumping a lot of air, pollutants. And these communities on the front line, they get the name is dubbed Cancer Alley because for them cancer is a reality. Cancer, you know, it's either somebody close to them that has cancer, somebody in their family, or they know people in their community.
So they have these hot pockets of not just cancer, but other health ailments that the normal American wouldn't be dealing with. But because they're exposed to so many chemicals on a day to day basis, that's their reality.
Ali Rogin: I want to play for you. We spoke to a former EPA environmental justice employee. He now works at the Natural Resources Defense Council. Here's how he explained how he worked with community members he was serving.
Matthew Tajeda, Former Director, EPA Office of Environmental Justice: We had a tribal community that was sure that the drinking water that they used for their families and for their animals was contaminated with radioactive toxic elements in it. We worked with them to make sure that were hearing what was going on with this community. We provided them with technical assistance and eventually a grant that supported that community in actually testing their own drinking water for levels of radioactivity. And sure enough, their water was radioactive.
Ali Rogin: So how are these communities reacting to these offices now being closed?
Amudalat Ajasa: These communities are devastated. These communities are gutted. I mean, the environmental justice office really served as a liaison for the community and the government. They were on the front lines in many instances in these regions, really connecting with people and understanding what their local challenges were, you know, considering. Like he talked about water contamination, air contamination, wanting to have electric school buses and solar panels.
So they really understood what was happening on the front lines and they were the voice for those communities and the government. So to have that office be completely gutted for many of them makes them feel like there a lot of that relationship is now being cut. And it's a true unraveling of not only what the Biden administration worked to do, but the 30 years of environmental justice work that has been happening in this country.
Ali Rogin: I want to read for you a statement from EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. He says that environmental justice sounds like a good idea in theory and receives bipartisan support. But in reality, environmental justice has been used primarily as an excuse to fund left wing activists instead of actually spending those dollars to directly remediate environmental issues for those communities. What do you make of that?
Amudalat Ajasa: These offices weren't just helping specific DEI communities or, you know, leftist woke communities, but they were helping everybody. You know, I went to Cancer Alley for a story that I worked on and I was amazed but also shocked by the flares that would go off that kind of lit up the sky, almost like it almost looked like fireworks in a weird way. And the smells that I smell, you know, I got a headache being in those communities for almost an hour of just driving.
And that's experiences were every day. It leaves a lot of people who live on the front lines of these communities abandoned, you know, and it means that for the future that they might be sicker. It means that they have a sicker future. It means that they don't have as much clean air as they were starting to develop. It means that their water could be contaminated and there's really nobody there to help them.
Ali Rogin: Amudalat Ajasa with the Washington Post. Thank you so much for joining us.
Amudalat Ajasa: Thank you so much for having me.
