The crew at Telemundo News earnestly joined their mainstream media counterparts in the collective meltdown over the Supreme Court´s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Yet, in the case of anchor Felicidad Aveleyra, her eagerness to condemn the end of federalized abortion rights, led her to break two holy commandments of the abortion-loving, pronoun-obsessed liberal media: calling women, women- as opposed to birthing people- and babies, babies - and not ‘products’, as they’ve been known to refer to the unborn at Telemundo.
Here we can see a solemn Aveleyra, dressed in mourning black, vent her disappointment at “our modern country - today we are going back almost half a century”, only to confirm the vileness of aborting a three-month old baby. “The states will have the opportunity to decide for their citizens whether or not they will be able to have the right within the state in which they live to be able to perform a termination of pregnancy when they are barely three and a half months pregnant, those babies inside them.”
FELICIDAD AVELEYRA: From here, we actually managed to hear the grief on the one hand, and the joy on the other. It is quite striking to see that in the same country where, a few years ago we all considered it to be a modern country- today we are going back almost half a century, a right for which women throughout the United States fought for so long. What happens today is that this will no longer be a federal right; the states will have the opportunity to decide for their citizens whether or not they will be able to have the right within the state in which they live to be able to perform a termination of pregnancy when they are barely three and a half months pregnant, those babies inside them. So, all these states, many of them are already prepared to fight, so that women there cannot have that right. But other states, such as California, have been preparing their own laws protecting this right for women. What's going to happen? That many women who live in states where it is prohibited, will want to travel to these other more liberal states to get an abortion. The problem is that it costs a lot of money. Taking a trip in these times as we well know, is something with a price which not everyone can pay. And as Arantxa already mentioned, it has been proven that the women who most seek to terminate their pregnancies are those who are at certain lower economic levels, often at levels of poverty.
In her editorial, Aveleyra also validated how pro-abortion facilities succesfully target the most vulnerable demographics, especially those “at certain lower economic levels.”; “Many women who live in states where it is prohibited, will want to travel to these other more liberal states to get an abortion. The problem is that it costs a lot of money. Taking a trip in these times as we well know, is something with a price which not everyone can pay. And as Arantxa (Loizaga) already mentioned, it has been proven that the women who most seek to terminate their pregnancies are those who are at certain lower economic levels, often at levels of poverty.”
Missing from Avaleyra´s opinion piece: unbiased information about the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, including the actual words of the Justices’ decision.
This example of the liberal bias in the Spanish-speaking media is brought to you by Tide. Call them out here.
