Emily Ratajkowski is one crazy lefty. The supermodel, actress and political activist just had her baby, but no one, not even her, is going to know what gender it is. No, it doesn't matter what Ratajkowski’s child features in terms of anatomy. Only the baby knows what gender it is and we will all find out in due time.
Gee, this kid should turn out great. Ratajkowski is already the world’s best mother and she’s only three days into the job.
Yep. It’s insane. Ratajkowski is such a good progressive that she’s letting her child pick his or her own gender. According to a report from British rag The Independent, the 29-year-old supermodel recently gave birth to her child on March 8. Anyone who paid close attention to the Instagram post which documented her child’s first moments of life will notice that not one detail was given as to whether it was a boy or girl … well, besides the name.
Ratajkowski’s caption read, “Sylvester Apollo Bear has joined us earth side. Sly arrived 3/8/21 on the most surreal, beautiful, and love-filled morning of my life.” Ok, so that’s a boy's name (right?) but the baby is wearing a pink hat. Hmm, could we get a few more clues please, Emily?
Of course, the outlet reminded readers that the model had all along intended on keeping the baby’s gender ambiguous. It wrote, “The 29-year-old first revealed that she was pregnant in October as the cover star of Vogue, with the model explaining in an accompanying essay that she and her husband didn’t want to know the sex of their baby.”
Oh, well, the question is, how will they avoid that knowledge? Either they’re so elitist that only nannies will ever be doing the diaper changes, or they’ve adopted that progressive mind virus that encourages them to believe that a penis or a vagina has nothing to do with sex.
Sadly, the latter is more probable in this day and age and, of course, Ratajowski had confirmed back in October that only the baby would know its sex because it can choose its sex all by itself! Wow. We are encouraging mental illness from the moment of birth, aren’t we?
Ratajkowski told Vogue last fall that she and her husband, Sebastian Bear-McClard, “hoped that the child would decide their gender themselves when they were older.” Apparently, the age of 18 would be the point at which the child will have told them what it had decided. Oh, sure, 'cause a child raised without any sense on that fundamental issue should sure have it pinned down by then.
Ratajkowski explained to Vogue, “There is a truth to our line, though, one that hints at possibilities that are much more complex than whatever genitalia our child might be born with: the truth that we ultimately have no idea who - rather than what - is growing inside my belly.”
Yeah, who knows, Ratajkowski’s firstborn might end up deciding that it’s a dog or some sort of hyper complex vegetation. At the end of this, Ratajkowski may be forced to refer to herself as the owner of a houseplant rather than a mother. Congrats?
