The Sunday Times reports that many Western countries have been waging a "secret war" against North Korea. That word alone should perk up New York Times editors, who believe nothing can be kept "secret" without their approval.
Intelligence agencies, navies and air forces from at least 13 nations are quietly co-operating in a “secret war” against Pyongyang and Tehran.It has so far involved interceptions of North Korean ships at sea, US agents prowling the waterfronts in Taiwan, multinational naval and air surveillance missions out of Singapore, investigators poring over the books of dubious banks in the former Portuguese colony of Macau and a fleet of planes and ships eavesdropping on the “hermit kingdom” in the waters north of Japan.
But this still isn't saying how these operations are carried out. We all need to know the specifics about how these maneuvers are executed. Cue the New York Times.
Few details filter out from western officials about the programme, which has operated since 2003, or about the American financial sanctions that accompany it.But together they have tightened a noose around Kim Jong-il’s bankrupt, hungry nation.
"Few details" filter out? The outrage. The public needs to know.
There has been almost no public debate in the countries committed to military involvement. A report for the US Congress said it had “no international secretariat, no offices in federal agencies established to support it, no database or reports of successes and failures and no established funding”.
No public debate? But how can a program be successful if it has not been mulled over by the New York Times editorial page?
The program has been successful, so much so that Kim Jong-il has asked China for help.
Kim told Hu Jintao, the Chinese president in January that his government was being strangled, diplomats in the Chinese capital said. “He has warned the Chinese leaders his regime could collapse and he knows that is the last thing we want,” said a Chinese source close to the foreign ministry.
Both Kim Jong-il and the New York Times have the same problem: There is a successful program, with international approval, that needs its nuts and bolts revealed to the world. The New York Times needs to leak the specifics so it can feel it is doing its part in overseeing world affairs. Kim Jong-il needs the specifics revealed so he can take steps to ameliorate the problem.
