Simple Majority: Liberal Reporters Wrongly Claim 'Filibuster' Stopped Extreme Abortion Bill

May 12th, 2022 8:45 AM

Lindsay Kornick at Fox News underlined an inaccurate trend after the Senate Democrats unsuccessfully pushed to a vote their extreme abortion bill that would have crushed all state restrictions on abortion. The bill went down to defeat 51-49 -- Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) voted no with all Senate Republicans.

Liberal media outlets claimed a "filibuster" ruined the bill. No, there was a vote, but it failed to gain a majority. If 55 senators voted to invoke cloture on the abortion bill, then it would look more like a "filibuster."

Democrats must prefer this filibuster spin because they want to make it sound like a "minority" is suppressing a popular bill...which is not the case here. Sen. Elizabeth Warren complained after the vote "I believe in democracy, and I don't believe the minority should have the ability to block things that the majority wants to do." (The "majority" in this 50-50 Senate is tie-breaking Vice President Harris.)

Becket Adams mocked an Associated Press double-mangle on Twitter: 

This bill went beyond codifying Roe. Last December, law professor Jonathan Turley pointed out "While widely portrayed in the media as codifying Roe v. Wade, this legislation actually goes far beyond the current precedent of the Supreme Court and would effectively wipe out many state laws and state authority on abortion."

CNN congressional reporter Manu Raju also used the filibuster language.

ABC reporter Trish Turner repeated that line:

MSNBC Maddow-show producer Steve Benen also promoted this spin:

Every political reporter and analyst knew this vote would fail to show a majority for the Democrats. The words that reporters could have used was "show vote," if not "stunt." But Democrat reporters support Democrat lingo and feel in their hearts that the Democrat intentions were wonderful.