Column: When The Media's Resisting Is No Longer Rewarded

December 30th, 2020 6:00 AM

As the Trump era draws to a close and not a single journalist has ever been jailed or probed in leak investigations like Team Obama probed reporters and their leakers, some journalists can admit it’s been a pretty rewarding gig to oppose President Trump furiously.

McKay Coppins of The Atlantic – a very partisan magazine – penned an article headlined “The Resistance’s Breakup With the Media Is At Hand.”  He admitted “In the Trump era, many Washington reporters became resistance heroes, showered with book deals, TV contacts, and Twitter followers.” Journalists couldn’t be distinguished from protesters, and the fame and fortune was irresistible

Coppins recounted his own rewarding battle with Trump after a visit to Mar-a-Lago: “My publisher used Trump’s tweets to promote my book; ‘The Daily Show’ had me on to recount my misadventures with 'The Donald.' The further his havoc-wreaking campaign got, the more opportunities came my way—and I was hardly alone.” Coppins also appeared on “Late Night with Seth Meyers” to discuss how the Trump White House was like “The Hunger Games.”

Media elites want to be hailed by the Hollywood Left for their prancing commentaries. One anonymous anchor/source confessed to Coppins that “praise from anti-Trump celebrities on Twitter has become like a ‘narcotic’ for some of his colleagues. ‘It’s important to people that George Takei likes their monologue,’ the anchor said, requesting anonymity to speak candidly about his peers (and presumably to avoid alienating George Takei).”

The press has pretended for half a decade that they’re offering “news” when they’re often unspooling “monologues,” or to use the terms of Jake Tapper, they’re “Murrows,” and on Sundays, “homilies.” In the sacred work of keeping democracy from dying, one can never stop throwing opinionated thunderbolts to please George Takei, and maybe Bette Midler and Rob Reiner, too.

That includes the questions of White House reporters. Coppins turned to Jim Acosta, the loudest screamer in the briefing room. Acosta admitted he didn't expect to bring the same “crusading style” to the Democrats. “I don’t think the press should be trying to whip up the Biden presidency and turn it into must-see TV in a contrived way,” he said.

“Contrived” is a wonderful word for Acosta’s performance art. His book was subtitled “A Dangerous Time to Tell the Truth in America.” as if being suspended from the briefing for a few days was like a human-rights violation.

Acosta said there’s no double standard in going softer on Biden. He claimed it’s not partisan, it’s a “matter of professional solidarity.” He claims Trump’s incessant press criticism was a “nonstop national emergency” that required his throwing lectures instead of questions. “If being at the White House is not an experience that might merit hazard pay,” he said, “then perhaps it is going to be approached differently.”

If Acosta wants a new beat that merits hazard pay, perhaps he should take a cameraman and try to cover an Antifa rally or a Black Lives Matter-inspired riot.

Another CNN activist, the “fact checker” Daniel Dale, told Coppins it won’t be a 24/7 job to”fact check” Biden. He’ll apply the same “intensity and rigor,” but Biden doesn’t lie like Trump does. So he’ll “spend more time debunking online misinformation and digging into claims made by congressional leaders.” Let’s guess that’s Republican congressional leaders.

The field has shifted, and now resisting the president will be the unpatriotic, anti-“democracy” position.

 New York magazine’s Olivia Nuzzi was blunt: “On a purely social level, I don’t know that reporting critically on Joe Biden will feel as safe for reporters.” They’ll have to worry George Takei will not be pleased.