The Regime Media continue to do their level best to boost Kamalamania into the atmosphere. On ABC This Week, senior campaign correspondent Rachel Scott openly salivated over the prospects of a Harris-Trump debate.
Watch as Scott rehashes the campaign’s “prosecutor vs. felon” narrative, and speculates over whether Trump will even debate Harris:
ABC THIS WEEK
8/4/2024
9:46 AM
SUSAN PAGE: I moderated the last debate she did in 2020. The vice presidential debate. She is a good debater. She is confident. She uses a little humor. She made Mike Pence be quiet, which was something I really struggled to do, and she comes across in that debate as a prosecutor, and that is a good message for her.
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: That seems to be her sweet spot.
RACHEL SCOTT: Yeah, and imagine that on the debate stage where you have a prosecutor possibly facing off against someone who has just been convicted, right? And that's the sort of image that of course, Democrats are hoping that they can actually have on the debate stage, but yes, and thinking back to her taking on President Biden when they were running against each other in the Democratic primary. Democrats see her as someone who can thrive potentially on the debate stage. The question is, does it actually happen?
STEPHANOPOULOS: We will see, Thank you all for coming in. We’ll be right back.
“Imagine that”, Scott says. One imagines the Regime Media cohort feeling onanistic pleasure at the idea of Harris taking down Trump in a debate like it’s the last minute of a Law & Order episode. A political debate is a wholly different proposition from a criminal prosecution, where defendants don’t often directly rebut their prosecutors. Here, Scott openly indulges her imaginations.
Recall that it was Scott that launched into a tirade to open former President Donald Trump’s forum at the National Association of Black Journalists’ convention in Chicago. As our colleague Alex Christy noted during his recap of the event, Scott kicked off the event by asking:
“You have told four congresswomen of color, who are American citizens, to go back to where they came from. You have used words like 'animal' and 'rabid' to describe black attorneys. You attack black journalists, calling them 'a loser' saying the questions that they asked are, quote, “stupid and racist.” You've had dinner with a white supremacist at your Mar-a-Lago resort. So, my question, sir, now that you are asking black supporters to vote for you, why should black voters trust you after you have used language like that?”
This is clearly the advancement of narrative, as was Scott’s gross swooning over Prosecutor Harris. This wasn’t the only time during the panel segment that Scott did that, either.
Earlier, @RachelVScott praised the “nuance” of Kamala Harris: “It has been really notable for us reporters who have picked up on the nuance about how she has responded to some of these attacks, questioning her racial identity....putting it back on Donald Trump...” #ThisWeek pic.twitter.com/MMXwH5ZvwG
— Brent Baker 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 (@BrentHBaker) August 4, 2024
Never mind all the swooning over “nuance” and Harris’ response: what pivot to the issues is Scott even talking about here, other than abortion and maybe price controls?
As is Mary Bruce to Joe Biden, so is Rachel Scott to Kamala Harris. The most Democrat-sycophantic network has a new chief apple polisher in town.
