In the eyes of the social media mob, you’re either damned if you do or damned if you don’t.
A-list Actress Anne Hathaway recently announced that she is expecting her third child. In a normal world, the birth of a new life would be a unifying cause for celebration.
"You have such a beautiful family, and I see the internet mob get so angry about that, it seems like they're bitter."@RCamposDuffy and @Justine_Brooke ROAST miserable baby hating leftists 🤣 pic.twitter.com/KRje1lCcAC
— Media Research Center (@theMRC) June 28, 2026
But we currently live under the digital tyranny of nosey keyboard warriors who have appointed themselves the arbiters of morality. Hathaway apparently forgot to ask them first for approval, as if she’s living under China’s former one child policy.
On one hand, she’s forty three, which has triggered the terminally online “trad” community because they seem to performatively nudge mothers to bear children, unless the children aren’t born THEIR way. To them, even thirty apparently marks the age where women should throw in the towel on life, family and fertility.
The left, on the other hand, hates the idea of any mother having children at any age, and would rather all women remain barren. Their party of professional eugenics influencers believe in putting every pre-born child down at the first hint of a so-called “glitch,” like they’re returning a damaged I-phone.
Ironically, Hathaway typically subscribes to that second brand of ideology, without realizing they hate success stories like hers just as much as the self-proclaimed online “traditionalists” do. Bitter people hate watching others succeed, because it makes them feel inferior.
Perhaps, seeing someone older and more accomplished giving birth to multiple children and seemingly achieving it all makes others feel like they missed out. It’s therefore no surprise those two factions of the social media mob constantly bark at my new friend, Rachel Campos Duffy, whom I joined in this latest Fox News segment!
