ABC News announced on Monday that Dr. Tim Johnson, a longtime advocate for government-run health care, will be participating in a primetime special on the subject, airing on June 24 and being broadcast from the White House. The doctor, who has aggressively lobbied in support of universal health care for over 15 years, will also appear on that day's Good Morning America, a show that will feature Diane Sawyer's interview with Barack Obama.
This is the same Johnson, who, on July 19, 1994, talked to then-First Lady Hillary Clinton about a similar health care plan. He gushed, "So at least from the physicians represented here, you get a 100 percent vote, including mine, for universal coverage." On October 19, 2007, he spoke to Clinton again and noted that she considered the issue a moral one. "Do you think the Republicans who are against it are immoral," he wondered. A selection of some of Johnson's more biased health care-related comments can be found below:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓# "I say the Clintons are almost heroes in my mind for finally facing up to the terrible problems we have with our current health care system and bringing it to the attention of the public....Most people, I think, will be better off." -- ABC Medical Editor Dr. Tim Johnson, September 24, 1993 20/20.
# "Everyone is applauding, I think, in the health care community, the emphasis on universal access, because they know that unless they're going to let some people just die in the streets, it makes sense to get medical care early, when it's going to be more effective and less costly....the insurance companies are the focal point for the dynamics of denial that are part of our present for-profit system." -- ABC medical editor Dr. Tim Johnson, January 26, 1994 World News Tonight.
# "So at least from the physicians represented here, you get a 100 percent vote, including mine, for universal coverage." -- ABC reporter Dr. Tim Johnson to Hillary Clinton on Good Morning America, July 19, 1994.
For more, see the October 21, 2003 CyberAlert.
According to TV Newser, network anchors Sawyer and Charles Gibson will be moderating the program, entitled "Questions for the President: Prescription for America." It will originate from the East Room of the White House and feature President Obama.
Sawyer's show, Good Morning America, has a similar record when it comes to such televised public events. In 2007, GMA devoted 64 minutes towards town hall-style discussions with presidential candidates, all Democrats. On March 26, 2007, Sawyer's GMA co-host, Robin Roberts, moderated such an event with Clinton. Again, the issue was health care. The "town hall" show featured a plant from the audience, a member of Clinton's 1993 health care task force. Reading from a card, he asked this stilted question:
ROBIN ROBERTS: What you said then in, in ‘93, many people felt it was just, in some ways, ahead of its, ahead of its time. Somebody that was there, and wants to ask you what is different now, between what happened then, and he is Dr. Steve Eckstat. He is, he works at the free clinic of Iowa. Doctor?
DR. STEVE ECKSTAT: Morning. In 1993, I was a member of the Clinton Health Care Task Force when we were attempting to provide universal health care coverage of all Americans. We were unsuccessful, unsuccessful then and now the number of uninsured, 80 percent of whom are working families and individuals, has risen from 23 million in 1993 to over 46 million. If elected president, Senator Clinton, would you be willing to try again to provide universal health care coverage for all Americans and make that at priority for your administration?
Is there any reason to believe that ABC's upcoming special will be more balanced on this important topic?
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.





DR. STEVE ECKSTAT: Morning. In 1993, I was a member of the Clinton Health Care Task Force when we were attempting to provide universal health care coverage of all Americans. We were unsuccessful, unsuccessful then and now the number of uninsured, 80 percent of whom are working families and individuals, has risen from 23 million in 1993 to over 46 million. If elected president, Senator Clinton, would you be willing to try again to provide universal health care coverage for all Americans and make that at priority for your administration?














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Really?
June 15, 2009 - 12:20 ET by StarAZAn NBC show will be blatant propaganda? Stop the presses. Oh, that's right, we don't have presses anymore.
Welcome to Obama's Bizarro World
June 15, 2009 - 12:27 ET by krendlerWe've officially entered Bizarro Word, where up is down and down is up:
From Reuters...
Obama: Government could go broke if healthcare not fixed
http://www.reuters.c...
"When it comes to the cost of our health care," Obama told the American Medical Association, "the status quo is unsustainable."
Yes, the government could go broke if it doesn't take over failing automobile companies.
The government could go broke if it doesn't take over and nationalize health care.
Unbelievable.
Even more unbelievable is the media giving our Bullsh*tter In Chief a free pass on the never-ending stream of NonsenseSpeak spewing from his mouth.
Don't forget banking.
June 15, 2009 - 12:31 ET by SickofLibsDon't forget banking.
This is the same American
June 15, 2009 - 17:55 ET by ThisnThatThis is the same American Medical Association gathering that roundly booed Obama today when he refused to address one of the major drivers of heath care costs -- malpractice lawsuits.
He also didn't address one of the other big costs -- free illegal Mexican medical services.
___________________________________
Liberals constantly demand that we accept a glaring falsehood as truth; Obama's elimination of the word "terror" will make terrorist acts less terrifying
Re the boos
June 15, 2009 - 20:11 ET by slickwillie2001I read about the booing on Drudge/Breitbart, maybe you did as well. I wonder if the liberal media will dare report that? I didn't see it on Fox News yet but I was away most of the afternoon. Could be a data point for someone to pick up on.
Johnson: "Quack, quack."
June 15, 2009 - 12:30 ET by SickofLibsEvery time there's a "The Sky Is Falling" medical story to blow out of proportion, he leads the charge.
"We're all gonna die from poisonous plastic water bottles" comes to mind.
jessieH
June 15, 2009 - 12:41 ET by jessieHjessieH Shouldn't this be on the "fleecing of america" program? Lookout! Obama's back in town!
ABC? Are they still in business?
June 15, 2009 - 12:41 ET by jazboThose who believe in nothing will believe anything.
Big mouth and small mind
June 15, 2009 - 12:45 ET by sevenDr. Tim Johnson, September 24, 1993 20/20.
He is just another talker. He doesn't have a practice and see patientas. That means he has no clue about filing claims and getting reimbursement. None.
Just as bad as a cowboy that is all hat and no cattle.
Obama Health Care
June 15, 2009 - 13:24 ET by Edward CropperCheck my blog for a look at Universal Health Care as invisioned by Barack & Hillary
A - B - C
June 15, 2009 - 14:50 ET by DoktorFrankenAlways Bias Crap
(With the exception of Jake Tapper, of course.)
Hi Dok... Always biased
June 15, 2009 - 15:01 ET by bigtimerHi Dok...
Always biased crap indeed.
I agree with your exception.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Exceptionally Odd . . .
June 15, 2009 - 16:23 ET by DoktorFranken. . . that Jake is still employed at that network. And I wonder if he's battling to keep his job so that at least there is one honest reporter at ABC. Perhaps that is why ABC keeps him. They can always point to Jake whenever the claim of network news bias comes up.
There will come a time, I'm sure, when it will get too uncomfortable for him there in the heart of the beast. Hopefully he can replace that 'Face' on FNC, Shepard Smith, when that time comes.
Dok... What an
June 15, 2009 - 16:26 ET by bigtimerDok...
What an improvement that would be!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
God save us all
June 15, 2009 - 19:12 ET by mbuel"Do you think the Republicans who are against it are immoral"
Yes we are immoral for opposing a tyrant controlling who lives and who dies.
AND YES, IF WE GO DOWN THIS ROAD it will come to that. It will soon be harder to buy a waffle tommorrow than it is a gun today. (they'll ban guns, deeming them the biggest problem for our "health")
How is the state run media getting away with this? Are people REALLY this blind to the problems of letting the government control everything?
The free market works, Government controls always fail.
How come the libs can say
June 15, 2009 - 21:58 ET by eaglewingz08How come the libs can say with respect to their 'immorality' that the Government should keep its grubby hands off their bodies (gay sex, abortion, adultery, pedophilia, drug abuse)and that the government has no business or authority to legislate morals, but then libs turn around and say that the government has the right to control everyone's health care, what they put in their bodies (food) and that the same is a moral issue which the government must legislate one rule to cover everybody, whether they believe the same to be a moral issue or not (same with the moral issue of global warming hoaxing)? If the government has no business in fundamental right of abortion decision making, it has no business in any other fundamental health care issue. If the government has no right to make moral determinations according to liberals, it cannot impose such a moral determination with respect to health care.
I don't believe that Jesus said that Pontius Pilate or Herod or Rome, or any other governmental entity, should be responsible for deciding whom He could heal, whom He should heal, or how much He could charge or not charge for his health care providorships.
Precisely!
June 17, 2009 - 11:12 ET by mbuelMost conservatives don't care what the sinner does in the bedroom. But apparently Democrats/liberals want COMPLETE control over our lives from where we eat to how we drive (or don't preferably).
The argument is as such:
Conservatives only care about protecting the elderly/sick who want to commit suicide, and the pre-born child that the mother is convinced she wants to abort.
Liberals are therefore more compassionate because they want to allow suicide (which has been proven to be devastating on the family involved.) and pre-born child abortion. But don't worry about that, because they CARE about those of us in the middle of those age groups and only by offing future generations and past generations can they afford to CARE for the rest of us!
They want CRADLE to GRAVE control, and they want to be in control of WHO gets born, and WHO dies. This is already happening in other countries that have socialized medicine.
The free market works, Government controls always fail.
Once this quack gets his
June 15, 2009 - 23:34 ET by fitzfongOnce this quack gets his agenda pushed through, the only treatment available for any ailment will be a good routine bleeding.
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
Enter the
June 15, 2009 - 23:58 ET by bigtimerEnter the Leeches.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart