ABC's Dr. Tim Johnson, 15 Years of Shilling for Universal Health Care

Photo of Scott Whitlock.

ABC's liberal medical editor, Dr. Tim Johnson, appeared on Wednesday's "Good Morning America to boost Barack Obama's universal health care plan and critique the more market oriented proposals of John McCain. Co-host Robin Roberts began the segment by seriously asserting, "We're not endorsing one plan over the other. We're just showing the differences between the two."

But after she mentioned Obama's assertion during Tuesday's presidential debate that health care is a right, Johnson marveled, "But, I'm struck by the language of the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Without good health, and that usually means without good health care, it's hard to have those other rights." Johnson, despite being a doctor, adopts the standard, liberal positions of most journalists and has a 15 year-plus history of advocating universal health care, including once asking if Republicans who opposed the policy were "immoral."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Regarding Senator McCain's idea to give people the opportunity to buy individual plans, even if they don't have an employer, Johnson criticized, "That's a difficult thing to do because there are so many different plans marketed." Accentuating the negative, he added, "So, you've got to do a lot of work on your own and read the fine print. It's a very difficult job for an individual."

Johnson found no such criticisms for Senator Obama's proposal. After describing the various insurance plans the Democrat would offer, he approvingly observed, "But these plans will have been vetted by the government, just like they do for federal employees...But you know they've been vetted for basic care and coverage and that the cost is fair."

On October 19, 2007, Johnson interviewed then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton over her health care proposals and rhapsodized, "She certainly knows health care better, I think, than any other candidate....I'm very impressed with her knowledge base." Speaking of GOP members, he offered this loaded question: "Do you think the Republicans who are against it are immoral?"

On April 26, 2007, the medical expert touted a universal health care plan proposed by Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy and Democratic Representative John Dingell. Introducing Johnson, co-host Roberts enthused, "You’re very happy about this. You say it's bold and politically brilliant."

Going back to the early '90s, Johnson was even more laudatory towards the Clintons and their plans to nationalize health care: 

"So at least from the physicians represented here, you get a 100 percent vote, including mine, for universal coverage." -- ABC reporter Dr. Tim Johnson to Hillary Clinton on Good Morning America, July 19, 1994.

"I say the Clintons are almost heroes in my mind for finally facing up to the terrible problems we have with our current health care system and bringing it to the attention of the public....Most people, I think, will be better off." -- ABC Medical Editor Dr. Tim Johnson, September 24, 1993 20/20.

See an October 21, 2003 CyberAlert for more

A transcript of the October 8, 2008 segment, which aired at 7:43am, follows:

ROBIN ROBERTS: And now, health care. Big topic in the debate last night, with each candidate trying to convince the American public that he had the better answer. So, what are the real differences in their plans? And how will they affect you? Our medical editor, Dr. Tim Johnson, is here to explain. Tim, it's good to see you this morning.

TIM JOHNSON: Thank you, Robin.

ROBERTS: We're not endorsing one plan over the other. We're just showing the differences between the two. Because it's a personal choice, what works best for an individual. What are the main differences between the two plans?

ABC GRAPHIC: Health Plan Fact Check: Which Candidates' Plan is Best For You?

JOHNSON: Well, in this case, there is a profound difference between them, as it regards employers health insurance. [Coughs.] Excuse me. McCain basically wants to move people out of employers' health insurance, into the individual market. And he's going to do this by taxing your benefits, as though they were additional salary. But then, providing tax credits so you can buy an individual plan. Obama, on the other hand, is trying to encourage even more employers insurance. Right now, about two-thirds of Americans under 65 get insurance from their employer. He wants that to be even more. And so, he has a plan he's going to say to big businesses, if you don't provide insurance for your employees, you're going to have to pay into a plan for the uninsured. In the meantime, for those who can't get that, he's going to have individual plans, but in a very different way than McCain. And we'll get to that in a minute.

ROBERTS: 'Cause, we wanted to talk to folks and we did. To get into the details and major concerns. And here's one.

PAUL STEVENS: Hello. I'm Paul Stevens from Princeton, Indiana. Four years ago, I lost my job. I've been unable to purchase any kind of health insurance, due to diabetes and coronary artery disease. I'm wondering what kind of solution the candidates would offer someone like me?

ROBERTS: Tim?

JOHNSON: Well, here, we're talking about the possibility of buying individual plans, since you don't have an employer. On the McCain side, he's going to give you these tax credits. $2500 for an individual. $5,000, for a family, to go out into that vast individual market and buy a plan on your own. That's a difficult thing to do because there are so many different plans marketed. And McCain wants to open up buying across state lines. Meaning you can go to one state and have different sets of rules and regulations. Another state might not have any. So, you've got to do a lot of work on your own and read the fine print. It's a very difficult job for an individual.

ROBERTS: And Obama's plan?

JOHNSON: Obama's plan has on national exchange. Where he's going to have a list of plans, including a public, Medicare-like plan. But these plans will have been vetted by the government, just like they do for federal employees. It's really the basic, same idea that both senators now have. You get a list of plans. But you know they've been vetted for basic care and coverage and that the cost is fair.

ROBERTS: And the criticism there is that he, Barack Obama hasn't explained how he's going to pay for that plan. But first, let's get to another question. Another major concern out there.

JAN STEVENS: Hi. I'm Jan Stevens from Anaheim, California, former registered nurse. I suffer from eight chronic illnesses and pay $500 monthly for prescription co-pays. I also purchase health care insurance for $639 a month, by myself. How will each candidates' health plan help me?

JOHNSON: Well, in general, the larger the group that you can be a part of, the better the negotiation with drug companies were prices. And so, under Obama's plan, there will be these exchange plans. And they will negotiate with drug companies for the prices. Individual plans have less clout. And so, they're typically, not always, but typically, their prices for drugs are going to be higher. In your case, you've got to read fine print, very, very carefully, in buying an individual plan from either source.

ROBERTS: And, quickly, last night, something that really piqued your interest is when the candidates said, Barack Obama said health care is a right. And John McCain said health care is a responsibility.

JOHNSON: Yeah. You know, you could conduct year-long philosophy classes on each of those words. But, I'm struck by the language of the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Without good health, and that usually means without good health care, it's hard to have those other rights.

ROBERTS: And, again, this is helpful for people to know the distinct differences between the plans and to make their decisions.

JOHNSON: And we'll be talking more about it.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Socialized Health

The idea of working for the government is in itself no incentive to become a physician. Their rules dictate your area of expertise, working location, hours, salary... 

The news media does not inform the general public as to how many MDs have retired from their profession and started anew in another field. 

JDW


DAILY WAVE

'Hey Chuck, Stand Up!'

Is the Community Reinvestment Act part of free enterprise?

Year-long philosophy courses?

"Yeah. You know, you could conduct year-long philosophy classes on each of those words. But, I'm struck by the language of the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Without good health, and that usually means without good health care, it's hard to have those other rights. "

Johnson needs to stay away from philosophy. That's a ridiculously broad generalization. Under that "logic," you can include anything. After all, do you (the reader) believe that my right to happiness obligates you, as a taxpayer, to provide it? If so, cough it up, because I'm growing increasingly unhappy. Happiness is money, pal, get a move on.

Besides, I can churn through the ideas of rights and responsibilities in a single class. Won't take a year.

Like that last comment, Johnson is just engaging in rhetoric. It's mere equivocation. That's a philosophical notion based on the technique of using the same words in different contexts, and pretending that the change in contexts doesn't change the meaning of the words. The "right" to happiness in general is not a legal claim on society to provide happiness, as Johnson pretends the "right" to healthcare suggests.

When the government offers

When the government offers teh same exact care the Congress critters and President get then I will be on board.   Until then count me as skeptical.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

If health care is a "right"

If health care is a "right" why pay anything at all. 

The mantra from the left, which includes the AMA by the way, is just that.  That health care is right and whatever it takes - in other words whatever it cost all of us to pay for everyone elses health care - it doesn't matter. 

Meanwhile, bambi (aka 57 states) states further that health care cost, in general, are too high and that drug costs, if bought in bulk, can produce savings.  So, what happens when you pare costs?  Less people become physicans.  That's right.  Presently, there are people standing in line to wait until middle age to make a decent living after more than a decade of college, medical school, internship, and residency and the money to pay for it all.  You take away the high salary that eventually begins to pay back the hundreds of thousands in tuition and all you have left is 80 hour work weeks.  The line is going to disappear in a hurry.

Likewise, if you pare profits to drug companies to nothing you are going to get nothing.  Look what the clintoons managed to do in just a few years of paring costs to companies that produced vaccinations in our country.  When 9/11 rolled around and we needed to ramp up millions of vaccinations to have on hand in case terrorists attacked us, there were no US companies to produce the vaccinations.  The consequence was that our government paid foreign companies exorbitant prices to ramp up the needed vaccinations that amounted to far more than the "savings" that the clintoons forced on the industry in the previous decade.  

Bottom line; if you want Cuban style health care - pick bambi.  If you want market incentive solutions to health care and a vibrant health care provider pool of people and drug industry - pick McCain. 

 

Tim Johnson may look like

Tim Johnson may look like the patrician physician from a Norman Rockwell painting, but he has a heart of Socialism (the gold he keeps in a safe).

 I have stated this before and will state again:  I do not care for this man, I do not care for his politics, I do not care for his patronizing medical opportunism, and none of my fellow physician friends care for what he espouses either.

Dr. Tim makes his nut as a TV whore.  Take the pomp and circumstance and return him to a typical medical practice and see how long he continues his platitudes of enlargening government involvement in healthcare. 

Johnson has forgotten what it's like for the majority of primary care docs in today's business world.  He sits on his lofty celebrity perch and slings jingoistic, melodramatic Democratic talking points totally disconnected from the working primary care physician.

I wonder how well he's feeling since his Democrat buddies screwed the pooch with Fannie and Freddie.  Thanks for hurting us all with your misbegotten and self-serving schemes. 

I pray Johnson and his buddies do not get the opportunity to do to healthcare what they did to finance.

"Dr." Johnson the Constitutional scholar

 But, I'm struck by the language of the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Without good health, and that usually means without good health care, it's hard to have those other rights.  I agree.  So before we make health care free, let's make food and shelter free.  Hey, we don't need a doctor every day - I haven't needed one in close to eight years - but I sure as all hell need to eat every day and need shelter every day.  Without those, I won't have health. 

By the way, "Dr." Johnson, stick to what you know and don't delve into matters Constitutional.  The Constitution is the Constitution; the Declaration of Independence is the Declaration of Independence.

Whoever casts a vote for Obama-Biden is nothing more than a common thief.  Whoever fails to vote against them is nothing more than a moral coward.

unsane...

I guess you forgot that liberals consider the Constitution a living document.

Never mind that separation of church in state is not actually in the Constitution. Who cares
if  "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" are actually in the Declaration of Independence ... they are old documents and should be considered the same. </sarc

If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG.

What did he say??

I still have no idea what he said in reply to the questions and how each of the two guys plans would address the problems. First the premise that the rest of the socialist world has health care solved is an absolute lie. They socialist all in big trouble. Next, a physician who clearly has no idea how the medical industry makes money should not be giving his opinion on TV. This Johnson is clueless. God help someone who would ask him for any medical advice.

Prescription?

"Add a few trillion to the spending budget and call me in the morning." Way to go Doc ... altruism is easy when it's not your hard earned money. 

 

I think...

I think there is going to be a surge in government healthcare propaganda by the MSM if Obama gets elected. In order for the 5th column marxists to destroy the republic they must take over the healthcare system. Taking over the healthcare system does two things, it affects every Americans well being and it has the potential to push income tax up to a 50% level if they can bloat it up enough. If that happens we are no different than any socialist European country.

Obama is running an ad that calls government healthcare "extreme" and it is a lie folks. Obama wants government healthcare; he is just waiting until he gets elected. The MSM has to focus on getting him elected first and after Obama is elected he will count on MSM propaganda to tell people how bad our healthcare system is and then the transformation will start.

The marxists need to do 4 things in order to destroy the republic:

  1. Elect Obama
  2. Implement a bloated government healthcare system
  3. Keep open borders for another decade or more
  4. Implement cap and trade in the name of global warming

I believe if those 4 things happen, it will be over. The marxists already have control over our local, state, and federal judges which was another thing that needed to happen in order to destroy the republic and it is already done.

"Push back the liberal hordes!!" - Mark Levin