My first piece of advice to any editor who wishes to reassure his newspaper readers that things are going to improve at his newspaper is to not accompany such an article with the grim visage of a mortician as you can see in this photo of Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel editor, Earl Maucker. It doesn't exactly inspire confidence in his newspaper. And the words of Maucker, while trying to sound upbeat, are at odds with the reality of a newspaper which has shrunk to a shell of it's former self. Typically the the front section of the Sun-Sentinel weekday newspaper is now only about a dozen pages.
However, Maucker, in response to a reader's question about the Sun-Sentinel's future, performs a rather unconvincing job of reassuring his readers that we will not soon be witnessing yet another newspaper funeral:
Are newspapers really in serious trouble? Is it possible that the Sun Sentinel could become an online-only publication? Is what we're hearing about some papers in South Florida shutting down really true? What's happening?
The mortician editor then attempts to explain why, despite all the signs of imminent death, the patient has many years of happy life left:
The media business, to put it lightly, is an industry in the midst of profound and rapid transition. The culture changes we've experienced have been compounded by the economic recession, which is impacting all businesses.
But no, we are not an endangered species here in South Florida, and the Sun Sentinel expects to be alive and well for many years to come. Ours remains a healthy and profitable company.
Despite all the evidence of the ship sinking beneath us, it will continue happily sailing the seas for many years to come. Mortician Maucker then explains why the patient remains healthy...while applying the embalming fluid.
Like the automotive industry, the banking industry, real estate — you name it — all of us are struggling in one way or another.
The media business and the Sun Sentinel have been hit particularly hard. That's because we face not only the economic downturn, but also fundamental changes in our business model, brought on by new technology and changing reading habits. We have had staff reductions in all departments.
We've also reduced the amount of space in our newspaper, in some cases eliminating entire sections.
Eliminating product delivered is somehow going to improve the newspaper? Next I will be told that the Corvette has been improved by eliminating A/C, windshield wipers, and the radio.
Recently, we announced to the staff that we are going to shut our operation in Havana, Cuba. It was a tough decision, but our limited resources nowmust be focused on more local coverage.
It has been painful. But all these decisions have been made to keep us financially healthy during these difficult economic times.
So, what does this mean for you, the reader?
Stand by for a rather lame but laughable sales pitch.
For one thing, we are relying more on our parent company in Chicago to provide national and international news. Since our sister publications, the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune, oversee our national and foreign bureaus, we now depend on them for that kind of coverage.
You're relying more on your parent company in Chicago? You mean the Tribune Co. which has filed for bankruptcy? Welcome to Zell Hell, Earl.
While we've cut back on space in the paper for news, we've tried to be as strategic as possible to make sure that local sports, business, city and neighborhood news and features are our focus, and get the most exposure in separate and robust sections.
And while we've aimed to maintain a healthy newspaper, we've dramatically expanded our coverage on our web sites to provide even more content of interest.
We've embraced social media networks in a variety of ways, to build communities of interest and create more interaction with readers.
Have you tried embracing the use of video? The evidence suggests that you continue to shun this "innovation" in a big way. As an example, just in your current sports section, you ran a story about American Heritage high school capturing the Titan Classic baseball title. No video accompanied the account. You don't need a professional videographer on hand at the event. Plenty of fans with video cameras and cell phone cameras were on hand and would have been more than happy to upload their videos to a Sun-Sentinel site, it there were one, so that readers could check out the many recordings of this event. The same thing applies to another sports story about the Marlins beating the Mets with a dramatic two-run single in the ninth inning. Again, no video.
And, next week, we launch an exciting television news show, which will air from 5 a.m. to 9 a.m. each weekday on WSFL Television.
And that will somehow attract viewers away from the 24/7 cable news coverage?
With all those resources, we reach an audience of nearly two million each week, more than any other media in South Florida.
Gee, everything sounds hunky-dory over at the Sun-Sentinel. I suppose then that you don't need the input of the space cadet Tribune Co. Chief Innovation Officer, Lee Abrams.
We realize the landscape changed dramatically for us — and all newspapers — in recent years.
Technology empowered consumers to get what news they want, when they want it, and how they want it delivered.
In short, the Internet has changed us forever.
Oh yeah, that Internet thingy which you only grudgingly accepted in a manner much too little and too late. Back to the drawing board, Earl. And you might start by replacing that glowering mortician photo of yourself with one in which you muster at least a slight smile pretending to radiate confidence.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Just the internet? Oh, really!
April 11, 2009 - 08:59 ET by goldenthroat"In short, the Internet has changed us forever."
Just the internet?
Lee Abrams doesn't seem to want to admit that it is left-coast, bleeding-heart, 'do as I say, not as I do' quasi-journalists who have taken over the print media with their half-truths, innuendos, radical opinions and relentless attacks on anything that is truly politically, morally, spiritually and ethically correct that have plunged whatever is left of major newspapers right into the dumper!
Americans have gotten fed up with reading their garbage - is it any wonder their ad revenues are sinking, their subscription cancellations are rising and employee layoffs are increasing? These dunderheads blame everyone but themselves for their pathetic state of affairs!
Well, duh!
Who am us, anyway? - Firesign Theatre
that message wasn't for his readers...
April 11, 2009 - 10:19 ET by puredmashieit was for his advertisers. allow me to rephrase: "please! please! don't shut off our revenue stream! we know our industry has changed dramatically, but changing our antiquated and outdated product takes money that we don't have! besides, we don't know what we're doing, so by all means continue to pay our ad rates! please!"
swing hard in case you hit it.
I confess
April 11, 2009 - 10:29 ET by DelsaMy husband takes Home Delivery of this paper.
Does he like it? No but it gives him something to do while drinking his coffee in the morning before work, he catches up on our local news, he reads the sports, and on Wednesdays, he also gets the sale info for our local grocerie store aka Publix.
When finished, he gives the paper to our neighbor's twin daughters who use it to line their ferrits cage.
Oh yea, did I mention he does not have a clue about the computer?
Toodles! Buh-Bye
April 11, 2009 - 10:36 ET by RR GOPToodles! Buh-Bye now!
Hope you guys do better with your new jobs with the Pennywhistle Press and Autotrader.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
Is this
April 11, 2009 - 10:49 ET by zoro7957........the same thing when a team owner gives his manager or coach a "vote of confidence"? We all know how that usually works out for them........ Not so good.
Nothing more than mullet wrapping
April 11, 2009 - 10:52 ET by BlondeI quit taking this sorry excuse for a newspaper, years ago. My mom, however, still gets it on Sunday.
The other cost cutting measure they've taken, which they didn't mention here, is that they went back to the old-style ink. You know, the kind that rubs off on your fingers, and gets on the white leather? Tough to get off.
Oh, and they also cover the Gators via the Orlando Sentinel.
There's only one columnist left at the NSS worth reading, Ron Haele, the garden editor, and his column has been cut to every other week.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
I hope he fails, too.
You people are making a big mistake
April 11, 2009 - 11:27 ET by StarAZPeople who are wishing papers out of existence are making a huge mistake. We need all the sources we can get. I suspect most are not paper readers. Papers have always had a bias--they endorse candidates and yes, it has crept into the editorial, just as a bias toward paying advertisers has over the yrs. But do you think NewsBusters or Reuters, even, will pay reporters to cover stories without newspaper customers to pay the freight? Are we all going to just go to the BBC site? They are very biased! Who will do whatever digging is done? You may think the NYT is crap or whatever, but believe me, it and other papers are noticed and even feared by politicians, who sure aren't going to fear blogs.
Fear blogs?
April 11, 2009 - 16:26 ET by zoro7957......................if newspapers were actually doing the investigative reporting that they should be doing, i.e.,no matter what political,social,idealogical side of said target(s) was affiliated with, then maybe, just maybe the industry might still be solvent.
The local paper here
April 12, 2009 - 09:06 ET by Massage_Master07jumped from $0.35 to 50 cents for LESS news. Now the ONLY thing that it's good for is either lining the bottom of cages for animals or for drying windows after washing them. That is the ONLY time I buy a newspaper, to dry my windows when I was them.