Bay Buchanan Schools Norah O'Donnell on 'Glass Ceiling' in Politics
CBS chief White House correspondent Norah O'Donnell and Republican strategist Bay Buchanan had a bit of a tussle about women in the workplace on Sunday's Face the Nation.
When Buchanan said opportunities for women are currently unlimited, O'Donnell strongly disagreed claiming, "There is a glass ceiling in politics" which led the conservative to correctly point out this is largely due to women's personal choices rather than anything nefarious (video follows with transcript and commentary):
BOB SCHIEFFER: What's the state of women today? You know, when I came to work at CBS News in this bureau, there was one producer that was a woman, one woman that was a correspondent, one woman that worked on the desk. And when one of those three left, they replaced her with a woman. Now, I would say-- what would you say, Norah, more than half the people in this bureau are women, the TCU in our journalism school, seventy percent of the students there going into journalism are women. How would you say women's chances are right now, Bay Buchanan? Is-- is there equality?
BAY BUCHANAN: There is. There's-- the opportunities are unlimited, both through the universities as well as business and professional. And-- and-- and I think what's key for women, there's too-- often too much talk about-- look to see how you're treated and what you can do and you better not do that because so many people will say that's beneath you and they're just asking you to get coffee because you're a woman. It's so much nonsense. I think-- I think the message to young women today is, do whatever you can, learn, be part of the team, be willing.
NORAH O'DONNELL: I would just strongly disagree with that. I just think that women have had, for the past-- past thirty years, equal opportunity in college. We now have more women who are getting medical degrees, PhDs, than men. But you had for the first time in the last election the number of women in Congress decrease. There is a glass ceiling in politics. We only have seventeen percent of women in the House and the Senate. And so while women are the driving force in the economy in terms of consumer decisions, they're not represented in politics or in the White House or in the halls of Congress--
BAY BUCHANAN: But-- but they have a choice.
NORAH O'DONNELL: --and that affects decisions.
BAY BUCHANAN: They can run or not run--
MELINDA HENNEBERGER: And not-- and we're not paid the same way.
BAY BUCHANAN: --and we choose not to run because women in politics have an equal opportunity to win. That is time and again in effect.
NORAH O'DONNELL: That is absolutely true.
BAY BUCHANAN: They have an edge to men, often, because they're more trusted. And so it's-- they choose not to run because of their own personal lives, their commitment to family or-- or whatever small business they might have. So it's ridiculous to say we have to have equal, equal everywhere it is.
Indeed.
Here's something else feminists should consider whenever they complain about how few women there are in politics: look at how the Left and their media minions treat conservative females that dare to run for office.
Start with former Alaska governor Sarah Palin who from the moment Republican presidential nominee John McCain announced her as his running mate in August 2008 was mercilessly attacked by virtually every press outlet in the nation.
You think that makes conservative women want to enter politics?
In the last two election cycles, the press have rallied against every conservative woman including those running against men.
They backed Joe Biden over Palin, Harry Reid over Sharron Angle, Christopher Coons over Christine O'Donnell, Terry Goddard over Jan Brewer, Richard Blumenthal over Linda McMahon, and Jerry Brown over Meg Whitman.
And they routinely attack Michele Bachmann including putting absurd pictures of her on the covers of their magazines.
New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd in October 2010 disgracefully referred to all of these women as "Mean Girls, grown-up versions of those teenage tormentors who would steal your boyfriend, spray-paint your locker and, just for good measure, spread rumors that you were pregnant."
But this misogyny and sexism isn't only aimed at Republicans, for the media's treatment of Hillary Clinton in 2008 once the press had firmly gotten on Barack Obama's bandwagon was almost as disdainful as how conservative females fare.
As such, if folks like O'Donnell really want to see more women in politics, maybe they ought to do a better job of treating women in politics regardless of their ideologies.
Until then, it seems any sane woman wouldn't want a thing to do with this disgusting circus and would instead stay in professions where they are treated with far greater respect.
In reality, if there is a glass ceiling in politics, the media are largely responsible.
Why this isn't obvious to folks like O'Donnell is beyond me.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
➚ I'll just say
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 9:28pm.
Liberal women deserted Hillary Clinton in droves to go goo-goo over the young male hollywood-style creation.
She even had trouble with John Edwards.
Sorry, Norah. You were attracted to a handsome man over an experienced woman. Still are.
Agree 100%, Mr. Sheppard
Submitted by ant on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 10:02pm.
What nerve. The alleged 'glass ceiling' in politics has been broken and the shards used to slice and stab any female politician that does not tow the same ideological line of the O'Donnell's, Mitchell's, Maddow's,....
Dang
Submitted by vote24 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 10:09am.
Solid!
I'm as tired of women whining about this stuff
Submitted by Radical1979 on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 10:12pm.
as I am about African Americans whining about slavery. Women can rise as high as men can, if they make the choices they need to. Is it fair that women have to take time off to have a baby and men don't? No, but life isn't fair. If they choose not to take time off they can do exactly what men do. Whining about it makes women seem weak and doesn't help the cause.
Liberals treat women like dirt under their feet, unless they have a use for them. Obama doesn't pay his women staffers the same as men, but McCain did.
NOD
Submitted by Jerry Mack on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 10:14pm.
Actually I believe NOD was saying that "WE" need more Liberal women in politics. Like to hear her give the names of conservative women that she has supported.
Well
Submitted by KornKing on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 6:30am.
"Everyone knows" liberal women are the only "real" women, just ask Norah
Norah is Larry in a bra.
Submitted by drsamherman on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 10:22pm.
Is there some kind of law that requires all news freaks and entertainers with the last name "O'Donnell" to be raging left-wing lunatics? Must be.
Speaking of Meg Whitman...
Submitted by Guapo Diablo on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 11:04pm.
NOW endorsed Jerry Brown over Meg Whitman who is a pro-choice woman. Left-wingers consider conservatives or anyone with the (R) behind their name guilty. Not guilty of whatever we do or say - just guilty of being conservative. No questions required.
A plague in identity politicians and media
Submitted by needle on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 11:09pm.
“[I]f folks like O'Donnell really want to see more women in politics, maybe they ought to do a better job of treating women in politics regardless of their ideologies.”
Wouldn’t it be great fun if there were a demographic transformation whereby married women became THE most reliably conservative constituency in America?
It would turn the identity driven politicians and DNC media into pretzels and drive them nuts.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Palin
Submitted by mmilesll on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 11:20pm.
Women in politics, how about Palin. O'Donnell complains and then when Palin was nominated O'Donnell trashed her. She does the same with all conservative women in politics.
We need a network
Submitted by vote24 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 10:14am.
They seem to be striving for hypocrisy now. Sanctimonius self absorption contest. They want us to pretend along with them, that they know freedom.
Norah?
Submitted by DeclinesToState on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 11:24pm.
Be honest, you only want liberal women in politics.... and honestly
you are where you are because you are a woman.
Palin
Submitted by grammajane on Sun, 05/13/2012 - 11:36pm.
wasn't the only woman trashed by odonell and all the other msdnc "females" They proceeded to trash every Conservative woman who speaks about politics. Look at Beher, madcow, rosie, barr walters,etc. They spent hours trashing, probably, because they are all jealous of smart attractive Conservative ladies who have class and style and know what they are talking about. What's odonell crying about? She works for the White House with all her liberal blabber
and badgering teen fans of conservative women
Submitted by mom_rox on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 11:50am.
Remember when Norah O'Donnell confronted a teenage fan of Sarah Palin (not yet old enough to vote)?
Lines please
Submitted by Tomorama on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 9:49am.
THIS would have been a good time TO TELL NOD that Obysmal pays his female WH and campaign staff LESS that the male campaign and WH staff.
But, but, but, but, but.........................
NOD, you are only in yer position...... because you are attractive and way more importantly a devout leftist feminazi liberal.
A shrill shill.
Hack Stream Media
Submitted by vote24 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 10:07am.
I can think of 40,000 questions a show like theirs should be asking. Love seeing Norah Odonnel getting her as kicked though.
Women are nurturers
Submitted by wingnut55 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 12:23pm.
I believe that more women would run for office, but if they have a family they care about their children and won't put them through the meat grinder that the Palin children have to go through. Look at what the Bush twins and the Romney boys have to suffer with. Women care about their children and it goes for many family men who won't run because of the treatment of children by the LSM. Until we see children truly "off limits" will we get a true representative of the people in the country in politics.
Surprised?
Submitted by Lamdog on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 3:05pm.
What a surprise that liberals see consipracy and victims around every corner? Second, this argument will surface again along with why women are underpaid. Women may be earning more Ph'Ds but not in the fields that count. Sorry a PhD's in education and sociology is not the same as one in engineering or the hard sciences.
Lamdog*
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 05/14/2012 - 3:35pm.
Please read your own post and try to see the blatant hypocricy. It doesnt matter what a phd field may be, its what you do with it. If it is one of the "hard sciences" and you manipulate data and lie to spin an agenda of fear mongering the earths destruction due to global warming, I cant see that kind of education "counts".