Actual Joan Walsh Salon Headline: 'What’s The Matter With White People?'
Can you imagine the media outrage if a conservative author published a piece entitled "What's the Matter With Black People?"
On Sunday, just days after she told MSNBC's Chris Matthews the GOP is "The party of old white men," Salon's editor-at-large Joan Walsh offered her readers "What's the Matter With White People?":
On the left, white people have been a problem for a while, due to the depth and persistence of white racism. Today it’s hard to ignore the racial resentment that feeds the hysterical anti-Obama movement – the sickening email about the president’s mother sent by a federal judge is just the latest example. Democratic pollsters and strategists have been wringing their hands over losing the white working class to the GOP since the rise of “Reagan Democrats,” but it’s now remarkable the extent to which the Republican Party has become a white party. Where that was an advantage back in [Pat] Buchanan’s day, though, it’s an eroding base in the 21st century. About 52 percent of white voters call themselves Republicans, according to the Pew Research Center, as opposed to 8 percent of blacks and 22 percent of Latinos.
"On the left, white people have been a problem for a while, due to the depth and persistence of white racism."
Maybe Walsh should check her own racist leanings given her hatred of white people:
Just Wednesday, before he began the filthy rant about Sandra Fluke that ought to get him mothballed, Rush Limbaugh railed that Obama “Casts Aside White, Working-Class Families While Setting Up ‘African-Americans For Obama‘;” in December he claimed “the Obama campaign says to white working class families: We’re not interested in your votes; we don’t care.”
The president’s crafty strategy, Limbaugh insists, is meant not only to disrespect whites but to rev up and turn out his non-white base, which presumably thrills to the notion of reparations and race war. Of course it’s Limbaugh and his hard-core listeners who want a race war; the rest of us, of every race, mainly just want to get along.
The rest of us, of every race, mainly just want to get along. That's why Walsh spends so much time complaining about white people:
Of course, whites will remain dominant economically and politically even after they lose demographic dominance, due to the legacy and endurance of racism.
And then she did what white-hating liberals do best - cherry-pick data:
The biggest difference seems to be whether you define that group by income, or whether you define it in terms of people without a college degree. The Democrats’ current political troubles have more to do with white people who lack a college education than those who lack income. In 2008, Obama lost white voters who didn’t go to college by 18 points, but he lost whites who made less than $50,000 by only four points. No wonder Santorum doesn’t want us to go to college. (Intermarriage rates are also highest among the college educated.)
Walsh omitted a key point from the 2008 exit polls: Obama got 63 percent of high school dropouts to McCain's 35 percent. In fact, McCain's numbers did better and better as voters became more educated with the exception of those with post-graduate degrees.
As such, despite Walsh's claims, a more educated electorate favors Republicans.
This became even more apparent in the 2010 midterm elections when House Democrats received 57 percent of the high school dropout vote while Republicans garnered 52 percent of high school graduates, 53 percent of folks with some college, and 58 percent of college grads.
What was that you were saying about "No wonder Santorum doesn’t want us to go to college," Joan?
The fact is Democrats have known for years the key to their success is an uneducated electorate. This is why they favor teachers' unions in public education that basically guarantee low graduation rates and poorly-performing students.
And why they have folks like Walsh out there misinforming the public so the great unwashed will continue to vote for Democrats against their best interests.
Maybe Walsh's next column should be "What's the Matter With Liberal Journalists?" as this is a far greater problem in our society than white people.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Thiis "woman"
Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:17pm.
is fecal matter.......and I'm being nice here
⇒ Not fair fivestring
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:28pm.
As has been pointed out by our trolls here, calling a woman a "slut" is different from referring to her as "slutty". I'm not clear on the nuance, but these trolls feel there is a difference.
So in the interest of placating our liberal trolls, you might say "Joan Walsh acts like she's the product of her own fecal position"
I missed all those discussions...
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:53pm.
Similarly, I went back and looked at the "judge" e-mail joke. The joke was making fun of the mom, who is white, and not blacks. The judge is white. How exactly is that racist on his part? Just asking what people saw in that. And, what was the timing of the joke and WH signing into law the big OK to humans have "relations" with animals (prohibition removed from the military code)? I did not look into that.
EDIT: I just looked this up, and was she not proud of her situation of needing lots of birth control? Look at the end of this definition:
Slut
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Slut or slattern is a term applied to an individual who is considered to have loose sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous. The term is generally pejorative and often applied to women as an insult or offensive term of disparagement, meaning "dirty or slovenly."[1] However some women have demonstrated saying they're proud of being "sluts", and have given it a positive connotation.[2][3]
Rush was describing how she was describing herself, just using a form of this valid English word. The words Maher uses are way over the top worse. No comparison. Rush did not say this out of the blue either, just describing what she had imposed on herself. Palin did nothing to "merit" what Maher does on a regular basis. And, didn't SNL use this word in a popular line? Jane?
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Athousand Pardons
Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:40pm.
how insensitive of me,,,,libtards would have me drawn and quartered
⇒ Yeah, what's the matter?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:23pm.
Why, indeed, would American individuals shirk their responsibility to think alike?
Joan is all too happy to understand the wonderful benefits African Americans enjoy as chattel of the Democrat party. It's her superiority boost.
No, Joan. I prefer not to be owned. I've seen the results of Democrat ownership.
Walsh's own logic is flawed
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 11:17pm.
Is it Walsh who's the racist?
Her issue: Support for Barack Obama. Most white people without college education didn't vote for him.
Her theory: College-educated whites are smart enough to support him. Non college-educated whites are too stupid to vote for him. This, she offers, makes an argument for sending everyone to college.
But using her own points, her theory about college education falls apart.
Her Unspoken Point: African-Americans -- the majority of whom are not college-educated -- voted overwhelmingly for Obama.
Conclusion from her points: Being smart enough to support Obama is not tied to college-education. It must be about race, because millions of black Americans overwhelmingly voted for him. Ipso facto, white people are not as smart as black people, and require a college-education to elevate their wisdom.
Well, as a minority.....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:28pm.
in the Demokratik Republik of Kalifornya, this working white man is tired of having every form of sexual deviancy, political malfeasance, violation of national sovereignty, and tyranny of the minorities being paid for out of my pocket. That's "what's wrong with this white person".
Because of those reasons, my wife and I will be taking our "5% of income-earners who pay 68% of taxes" to TN or GA or AL this summer and KA (CA) can, as Maxine Waters says, "go to hell". They're more than half-way there now.
Come to FL, cowboy.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:41pm.
The weather is better, the women are prettier, (some of the men think they are but you have that problem in CA), and we can use some more conservatives moving here to offset the influx of Northeastern liberals.
PS. We probably have more real cowboys than any state in the union, if that's what you want to be!
He can call himself a cracker, too!
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:30pm.
And not be racist, or be racist, whichever is his wont. :)
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
He can be a cracker, but first ...
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:25pm.
... he has to learn how to actually handle a bullwhip!
I'm very picky on that subject:)
Kind of like being a "conch." You have to get really laid back and sluggish if you truly want to be one. I've almost got that down pat, too. (That is NOT a reference to an old DEMOCRAT joke about Richard Nixon!)
Slugging is an art form, Bubba
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 4:47pm.
One best learned in the tropics, natch. I know. We spent six months slugging in Central America (wow, it's been 2 years ago already).
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Wanna buy a condo....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 5:10pm.
in Wellington?
Texas
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:15pm.
Tons of CA people have been moving Texas. Ironically some vote their CA "values," exactly what brought down the state they fled from.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Yeah, Max.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:27pm.
That's the problem FL has with the Northeasterners who are fleeing their old home states.
I guess once stupid, always stupid.
Well, I won't be one of THEM.
Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 5:17pm.
I've got my conservative bona fides: My family has been in the US since the 1600's migrating from VA to AL (Ft Payne) and Lee County, MS before it was split off from Itawamba County. One branch went to TX but came back to MS to escape the Comanches (the faster, smarter ones). And, I know enough about REAL cowboys to ever claim to be one!
Welcome home then! LOL.
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 11:47am.
Part of family here since 1630. My appreciation of our Country really sunk in when I began reading our family history and all they went through. It takes just one generation for a family to go in the gutter and three generations for a Country to piss on the ideals that made it great. "Ain't going to take it no more!" Media sucks. Like how they are going after Rush and leave "their own" who say far worse alone. Fed up to say the very, very least.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Good morning Max
Submitted by cocodrie on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:05pm.
In 1755 my family was kicked out of Nova scotia (Acadie) and sent to Louisiana. If you read their history it is very much like what the liberals have in store for christians and conservatives of today. It includes the confiscation of guns, the strangling of legitimate commerce and the redistribution of wealth.. I pray that history doesn't repeat itself.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Religious and other persecution is real you bet.
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Wed, 03/07/2012 - 12:40pm.
Part of my family history fled France to Britain since they stood up for the reformation (was a priest). They fled Britain for the US for the same reason. According to research done by another direct relative, Fulk V, King of Jerusalem, 1131-1144, is in our family tree. That set me back just thinking about the crusades and the take over of a vast Christian area by the Muslims. Then I think back how schools and Hollywood teach that defending your own land was bad. I was shocked how many kings were in just one side of the family tree. I think over 40. It gives you a new interest in history and appreciation for those that have come before you. Without anyone of them, we would not be here. I am sure other people's trees are just as interesting. We are all related if you go back far enough!
This is pretty interesting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulk,_King_of_Jerusalem
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
How long your family has been here
Submitted by dzejk113 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:36pm.
doesn't necessarily determine your conservative credentials. My family came to the US in 1911-1912 and in the 1920's, but we're still solid conservatives.
Agree, not saying that.
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Wed, 03/07/2012 - 12:24pm.
Another branch homesteaded in the 1860's in Nebraska in a sod home. Just saying that knowing the history really makes one appreciate that NO one has it "hard" these days. Irritating that government now has people expecting to live the good life without even working... and then COMPLAIN how little their "entitlement" is.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Projecting, Joanie, projecting!
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:28pm.
It's not "what's the matter with white people"? It's "what's the matter with Joanie's white guilt?"
And in case you forgot, Joanie, it is your party that continues to insist that all minorities conform to its directives and vote as they are told. It is your party that tells minorities they are oppressed, require the government to step in to micromanage their lives and to think monolithically. When a minority American does not, your party portrays them as a traitor or worse. Your party's tolerance ends where your own prejudices, bigotry and hypocrisy begins.
Look at the results too. War of enslavement, not war on poverty
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:52pm.
ALL of our social and economic problems ARE due to the abortion of the "traditional" American family. A God loving husband, wife, and kids. Liberal judges, politicians, teachers, administrators, media, Hollyweed, have flushed our founding principals and morals down the drain and are now considered "extreme." With the "war on poverty," single motherhood has been subsidized. You get what you subsidize! PROVEN FACT. As a result, more and more children have been raised as being their own pleasure seeking gods, who could care less about inconvenient morals. Selling or taking drugs: No problem! Rampant sexual activity prior to marriage: No problem! Killing their conceived children: No problem! If it feels good do it! Work hard: Forget it, that is slavery! Stealing: Don't get caught! Lying: Don't get caught! Cheating: Funny stuff Jay Leno! What a first class joke he is!
So just who is the party of individual responsibility? And thus, FREEDOM!
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Q? A: They keep FEELING...
Submitted by Annie Ashe Fields on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:32pm.
... you're opinion matters when other, more evolved of their species - LIKE US - THINK critically and investigate whether or not people like you have a legitimate p.o.v.
Happily human nature is ever optimistic, so it triumphs over experience and we don't give up. We keep checking back in with lesser mortals like you, always hopeful we might find something edifying, but, alas, it is an empty cup.
Don't worry Joan. We'll help you when the collapse comes. That's part of what makes us superior to the more gelatinous among us - like you. We never ever forget that life, however vapid, is precious, and should not be cruelly ignored and left to die...
...you know... like those babies in the soiled linen closet in Chicago.
"Those pesky assed white boys just won't do as they are told!
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:44pm.
"Why, oh why can't they get in line and be good boys like all the darkies? I swear, they act like a bunch of field hands down on my momma's plantation, instead of being good house nigga's like the liberal ones.
"I swear Scarlett, I just don't know what to do!" (attack of the vapors)
"Why, don't worry your pretty lil' head, Joanie. Barack will get them white boys in line jus like he done with them black boys when he was a commie organizer in Chicago. He know how to do it! Give'em just enough to get by on, and not has to work, and they will do everythang you say. Sweetheart, they ain't gone have no choice after a few years. That's when we will REALLY own them.
"Massa Barack knows what he doing. You jes don't worry you pretty little head, Joanie.
"Stick with old Scarlett. Tomorrow's another day!"
"Thank you, Miss Scarlett. I don't know nothin' 'bout birthin' movements. I'm so glad we have Barack to show us the way."
This prune with the puckered
Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:37pm.
This prune with the puckered pie-hole could give 'white' people a bad name, just by lookin' at her and listenin' to her!!!
Jeez, hagface, if you're so embarrassed about your race, go put on some blackface!! Ooooooooooohhh!!! Was that a racist comment??
And speaking of blackface, did you see that the Obama impersonator (Steve Bridges???), just died...........at the age of 48???
And we KNOW that Boy Barry has really thin skin!!!
It's not good to be an Obama critic and be in your 40's,
Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:47pm.
apparently. Nah, that's just paranoia.
Well, it's not paranoia if they really are out to get you.
Isn't racism more prevalent amongst African Americans?
Submitted by Kevin Groenhagen on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:48pm.
If we accept Walsh's argument that voting was based on racism rather than policy differences, can we not conclude that African Americans are, as a group, more racist than Whites? After all, Obama received more than 80% of the African American vote not just in the general election, but in the Democrat Party primaries. Given that there was very little policy differences between Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, and Obama, can we not conclude that African Americans voted for Obama over a white woman and a white man because of his race? What other factor(s) could it have been? Obama's vast experience? His two autobiographies?
Most certainly true, D-Blacks MUCH more racist!
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:06pm.
Listen to their own words! I would say that is true for a significant block of D-voting blacks. It is the pinacle and definition of racism. IMO only a small, very, very small, percentage of whites voted for McLaim because he is white. I have never met one of those whites either. Things are changing and blacks are just starting to switch back to conservative values. Obama has been a gift to awaken those who have been brain washed in our liberal society. Against all odds an American revival is taking shape. Too bad Cain got caned by the (white) media. I donated to Cain and other conservatives.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
you're up against the left
Submitted by TruthMonger on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:23pm.
you're up against the left who thinks literally that blacks are not capable of racism because its all about the whites having more power - so blacks can't be racist until the power evens out...huh?
Congratulations Jimmy Carter!
Even worse, Truth, ...
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:35pm.
... liberals believe that blacks are just plain NOT CAPABLE of anything!
Hell, they count on it. They have been working on engineering stupidity into the black culture since the 60's, and brother, it's taking hold.
They are also at work on all school children to make them as dumb as stumps since the Dept. of Education took hold of the reins.
This is all by design, and we get upset because Rush calls a little ho, a slut?
Come on people. Get pissed off and focused on the real danger here!!!
West v. Klein
Submitted by Kevin Groenhagen on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 2:21pm.
How do liberals such as Walsh explain cases such as Allen West vs. Ron Klein, in which West a Republican who happens to be an African American, defeated Ron Klein, a white Democrat, in 2010? West lost to Klein in 2008. Did whites in that district overcome their racism in two short years?
I don't know
Submitted by nolefan2 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:50pm.
Joan, why don't you look in the mirror and then tell us. You ARE a white person, aren't you? I, for one, would like to have THIS question answered: WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE MSM?
If you're not college educated, you're stupid -- Joan Walsh
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 2:44pm.
WALSH: "The biggest difference seems to be whether you define that group by income, or whether you define it in terms of people without a college degree. The Democrats’ current political troubles have more to do with white people who lack a college education than those who lack income. In 2008, Obama lost white voters who didn’t go to college by 18 points, but he lost whites who made less than $50,000 by only four points. No wonder Santorum doesn’t want us to go to college. (Intermarriage rates are also highest among the college educated.)"
And hence, the President's goal to send everyone to college. It doesn't matter if one wastes money on earning a degree for which there are no jobs in the work force; universal "progressive" indoctrination is the key to winning elections indefinitely.
Inherent in Walsh's rant is her own intolerance (dare we say disdain) for white's lacking a college education. Nothing new here; the white elite on the Left has always looked down on what they dubbed "The Fly-Over States." When they pine for the heroic sacrifices made principally by those Americans serving in our armed forces, it's not out of a sense of respect, but rather from a view of "poor people who have no other choice but to join the military." They look down at them as children vice adults making a good choice.
For further evidence --- Clowns like Rep. Charles Rangel and some white Leftist elites pose a solution: draft rich white people into the military to make it more difficult (according to them) for the President and the Congress to send them to war. They want to stop the exploitation of the perceived victims of no college education.
Incredible
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:02pm.
African-Americans for Obama isn't racist, nor "What's the Matter With White People".
This country has truly gone insane.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I'll drink to that!!!
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:37pm.
Keep saying it, B!
Are these people masochists?
Submitted by JLin on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:05pm.
Really?
Here's what's wrong with white people:
Submitted by KyWriter on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:30pm.
We have too many blithering idiots like Joan Walsh.
The Evil of Censoring Black Crime
Submitted by berlet98 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:11pm.
The Evil of Censoring Black Crime
I have frequently posted articles relating to the bias of the mainstream media when it comes to reporting incidents involving racial violence and hate crimes, which raises the question of whether commenting on black racism constitutes white racism.
I think not, although the MSM would beg to differ and unless propaganda now trumps honesty.
Various members of the MSM have even admitted their censorship of news and defended the practice on the theory that they are preserving social harmony by selectively editing news stories, not publishing the whole truth, or by totally ignoring racist crimes.
In fact, they are instilling a distrust of all media on the part of those aware of the censorship–as well as shirking their journalistic responsibility and subverting journalistic ethics.
Last week, yet another blatant instance of racially-inspired hatred occurred in Kansas City, Missouri although, based on the coverage the story has received, few people will ever hear of it.
A 13 year old, white, eighth-grade boy was heading home from classes at Kansas City’s East High School two blocks away. He almost made it safely.
He was followed by two older, black males who, according to his mother, may have been students at East Hills. They accosted him on his doorstep, poured gasoline on him and set him ablaze.
He managed to extinguish the flames but suffered first degree burns on his face and possible injury to his lungs and eyes and spent hours in a hospital burn unit.
The attack was horrendous enough, the media coverage almost worse.
The boy’s mother told police that one of the assailants said, “This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=15773.)
The biggest problem...
Submitted by CobraMan on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 1:16pm.
Joan, the biggest problem I can see is that you're one of us. Keep your White Guilt to yourself.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Well, find me some "white" people, like this page's background
Submitted by merly1 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 2:13pm.
it is hilarious to see how all the caucasian groups are lumped into one big "white" pool.
Talk about racial clueless-ness!
'Sides, we ain't all "white."
Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:40pm.
I like to think of myself as more of a tall, non-fat latte.
Well, then...
Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 5:19pm.
I'm a short, bald 22% body-fat latte!
Caucasian is a misnomer
Submitted by dzejk113 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 4:15pm.
I'm not from the Caucasus mountains, and neither were my ancestors. I don't think of myself as just "white" either, I think of myself as an American with Polish and German heritage.
Gee, Joan, will you stop
Submitted by ant on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:37pm.
Gee, Joan, will you stop calling me a racist if I give you a list of all the 'white people' I also despise? Guess what? You're on that list too...ya'll have one thing in common...no, not your skin color..your flaming libtard ideology. "The rest of us all just want to get along!!!" Sure, you do. And it goes back to Joe Klein's equally ridiculous blanket condemnation of whites as the 'scared middle-class'. Let's see what might make the 'white middle-class' a little hesitant to embrace multi-cult libtard governance and what might disprove your 'we just want to get along' BS;
- LaRaza reconquistas. (No need to list their hate-mongering and basic declaration of war against the 'gringo system, we are all familiar by now).
- "Kill all the cracker babies" from the Black Panther crew. Again, not an ideology that sane people need or want 'mainstreamed'. Thanks, anyway.
-Everything you have or work for is ours or should go to some less fortunate 'victim' (to be designated at a later time and at the convenience of the 'deciders'). Nah, why would that make the middle-class hesitant to embrace your leftist world-view.
- Muslims are owed any money we can borrow for them, apologies, bowing, punishment of our own and any other suicide we can perform on ourselves to make them happy.
-the anger, hatred, and venom spewed at conservatives on a daily basis by politicians, so-called journalists, and any punk commenting at Daily Kos.
- the sane, rational well-thought out behavior, tactics, and message of the left's baby, Occupoop. I mean..really...who wouldn't want a Nation run by them, right?
-the rampant, out-in-the-open lawbreaking, corruption, favoritism, and petty tyranny of not just Congress and government 'departments' like the EPA, HHS, DOJ, and TSA, but of the President himself. We have eyes, deary, getting angry about officials walking clear from what they should be impeached or in prison for is not 'racism'.
That's just a sample, Joan, so, yeah, you and Klein just keep blaming white-racism on your inability to foist the libtarded agenda into the hearts and minds of the rational, working middle-class American. Good luck, loser.
'SWF looking for NBA star for fun, role-playing.'
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:47pm.
Email MissDaisy@salon.com
That's effin
Submitted by bkeyser on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:57pm.
hilarious!
As for the joke- I heard BOR losing his mind over it last night and I kept thinking, "Yeah, so. Bad joke. Big deal." It wasn't funny. It wasn't pithy. It was just a dumb joke. Or maybe I didn't get it. I don't know. But offensive? I guess. Maybe if you're offended by anything that in any way pokes fun at the president. Maybe if you were the president you'd be offended. But it seemed to me the only person really being made fun of is a Kenyan named Barack Obama. Nothing for BOR to go drama queen about.