Palin to Walters: The Media Made People Think I'm Scary, Polarizing and Uninformed
As NewsBusters reported Thursday, Barbara Walters during an interview to be aired hours later claimed the public find the thought of Sarah Palin as president "scary" because she's "uninformed."
When the full segment aired later that evening, Palin fired back saying, "I think it's because the media has shaped that persona and allowed that to be out there as a misconception and a misperception about my, what my values are and what the positions are that I support" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
BARBARA WALTERS, HOST: Well, you know, Governor, many people find the thought of you as president a little scary. You hear, "Oh, she's very charming, but she's uninformed.” What are they afraid of?
SARAH PALIN: You know, I hear the, the, the comment out there that's made often that I'm polarizing, and, so I'm surprised that you didn't use that, that word.
WALTERS: Okay, I'll use it: you're polarizing. Okay.
PALIN: Why is that? I think it's because the media has shaped that persona and allowed that to be out there as a misconception and a misperception about my, what my values are and what the positions are that I support.
WALTERS: What about the accusation that you're uninformed?
PALIN: That, too, I think is something that's been pretty much ginned up by the press.
Indeed it has.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
Yeah Sarah Barracuda, if
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:16am.
Yeah Sarah Barracuda, if McCain would have let the Barracuda out of the cage then she would have been VP.
Yeah... but then McCain would
Submitted by Bruzilla on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 8:12am.
Yeah... but then McCain would have been the P, and Palin and every other Conservative would have been spending the last two years fighting against our own President.
Indeed, McCain's handling of
Submitted by Ruths husband Ben on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:36am.
Indeed, McCain's handling of Palin (or mishandling) resulted in this perfect storm we are in right now where the Democrat Party could cease to exist as a political power in a few years. The term Epic Fail would be redefined as Obama's presidency. I pray that the two party system survives with Libertarian vs. Republican. That would be sweet, would it not?
~The only thing worse
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:56am.
Than an Obama presidency is a McCain presidency. He would have RINO'd conservatism to death, and the whining about American racism would be even worse than it is now. Not to mention, Palin would have been forever tarnished by working with McCain, kinda like Hillary is now. How's that SoS gig working out for ya, Shrillary?
Sometimes you have to go all the way to the bottom before things get bad enough to make you come to your senses. America had to wake up, hung-over, lying in the gutter robbed of everything but the clothes on her back before it dawned on her that maybe playing footsies with socialism wasn't such a good idea.
I think being VP would have
Submitted by Bruzilla on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:02am.
I think being VP would have been a disaster for Palin. I talked to a Congressman who went on a trip to Iraq with McCain, and he said McCain just came unglued when he dared to step into a conversation McCain was having with a general and ask how he could help. McCain has one of those egos that doesn't like sharing the spotlight with anyone, and Palin definately would have been taking the spotlight away from him.
~And being upstaged..
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:08am.
By a girl, no less!
A friend of mine has a theory that McCain picked Palin in an attempt to destroy her, politically. McCain is a charter member of the Good Ol' Boys club, and Palin crippled their Alaskan arm.
R, Funny, I have the exact same theory
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:16am.
But mine involves more than just that donkey in an elephant suit from Arizona, but the entire RINO leadership given how little support her TEA Party candidates received from the so-called GOP "leadership."
It's not just the wussified left that fears her, as she scares the hell out of the wussified squishy middle country club repubs, too.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
~I think their dastardly plan
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:33am.
Backfired. Like a '79 Chevy El Camino.
That sounds like a good idea,
Submitted by Bruzilla on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:59am.
That sounds like a good idea, but how long would it be before the Progressives took over the Republican party?
you mean
Submitted by theduck6 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:22am.
a moistened bit lobbing scimatars is no basis either?
love the reference.
"See the violence inheirent in the system"
"See the violence inheirent in the system" !!
What insolent and insulting
Submitted by Chris Norman on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:30am.
What insolent and insulting questions. Why doesn't Walters ask Obama questions about his confirming many peoples suspicions that he was clearly unqualified for the Presidency and is totally out of his depth? If honest, the answer would be: that his qualifications and capabilities were ginned up by the media.
Not even Obama; ask JOE BIDEN
Submitted by TheHistorian on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 9:33am.
why the public thinks he's dumber than a doorknob and couldn't find the correct side of an issue if his life depended on it. Obama is the COL Klink of modern days; if you don't know which is the right side of an issue to be on, just listen to him and take the other side.
Barbara Walters is SO sold into the Obama/Biden clap-trap that she doesn't dare expose him, because it will then show how stupid she really is. One of the problems when your idol has clay feet is that you have to then prop it up even harder.
Dennis Prager
I find the media's paranoia
Submitted by Captain Repus on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:36am.
I find the media's paranoia and fear of Palin to be very fascinating. Who would have thought this woman could completely capture the entire pollitical and media arena for 2 solid years, grow stronger by the day and will completely dominate them for the next 2 years.
I don't have a clue if Palin would be a good, or even mildly competent President, but it would sure be a ball to watch it happen. And who knows, she might actually be a good one. Certainly couldn't be any worse than the empty suit puppet ruining the nation now.
Its precisely because of her
Submitted by 4rcane on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 4:07am.
Its precisely because of her history that I love her. It got nothing to do with her personality or that she's likeable. She is what you call a Reformer
I don't have a clue if Palin
Submitted by Newsbusterbrown on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:06am.
I don't have a clue if Palin would be a good, or even mildly competent President,
Compared to other GOP alternatives, you have a point. Compared to any Dem alternative? Palin's performance would kick all of their butts.
“There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Let's see. Who would be better the President, an...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 3:58am.
incompetent that the media adores or a skilled person the media hates? I vote Sarah Palin over Barack Hussein Obama.
We don't like Obama because
Submitted by 4rcane on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 4:01am.
We don't like Obama because HE IS polorizing, uninformed and scary and its not by his words but by his deeds
It must be coincidence that I can't stand the people who...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 4:01am.
don't like Sarah Palin and I like the people that do. How does that happen?
Palin is a joke
Submitted by goldwaterfan on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 5:18am.
She is uninformed and ignorant. Most Americans can't stand her. I wish she would just go away.
Amanda Carrington
Somewhere....
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 5:24am.
there is a bridge missing a troll. Get back to work.
Obviously,
Submitted by Massage_Master07 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 5:43am.
you know absolutely nothing about our current CiC. Thusly you are inferring, which liberals do by nature and habit, your feelings about yourself onto her and conservatives in general.
Prove me wrong
Submitted by goldwaterfan on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 5:47am.
I just stated the facts.
Amanda Carrington
Then source it
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 5:52am.
If they are indeed FACTS, you should be able to provide some kind of objective source. You are a basement dwelling, middle aged loser who has never accomplished anything in life and resorts to attacking successful people who you blame for your pathetic existence.........prove me wrong. Oh and if you could get a spouse, you would beat he/she/he-she....prove me wrong.
Or---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 6:34am.
goldwaterfan is an unemployed, finger-nail chewing, incompetent.
A malcontent.
An acne-scarred, bed-wetting, tree-hugging whiner except for when he turns on his computer and becomes "Super Stud".
Then he casts aspersions at Palin that he knows are out and out lies.
The fool calls her ignorant when it has been manifestly shown that she is not.
He calls her names because he is a sissy, and the very thought of her frowning at his existence causes him to wet himself in a most embarassing way.
Palin is a decent person, who has never harmed anyone, but goldwaterfan is actually physically afraid of the woman and so he acts out by lying about her.
Whether Palin runs for the highest office in the land or not, I will be eternally grateful for the stark fear she engenders in these pantywaists who insult her at a far remove.
goldwaterfan is of the psittacine order; he eats, squawks, and craps.
QED
MD
Agreed MD
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 6:38am.
After looking up many of the words you used, I agree. Lets go with yours.
Ok, sentry---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 6:46am.
But you still get a good solid A for your post.
MD
Well what is there to dislike
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 6:13am.
Well what is there to dislike about Palin? Could it be the fact she drummed out corruption in her own party? How about the fact she ran Alaska in a fiscally responsible manner, returning excess funds to it's residents? Perhaps she is disliked for the fact she earned an 80% approval rating from the Citizens of Alaska?
Her support of TARP and the
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 9:53am.
Her support of TARP and the bailouts as well as putting party over principle by throwing her support behind McCain before the Arizona primary. Big turnoffs.
Don't be ignorant. She never
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:44am.
Don't be ignorant. She never supported the bailout. The closest she came to "supporting" it was her remark that "...we need to do something, not necessarily this ...". Of course, funny how a liberal press never followed up on what "something else" might be, such as spending and tax cuts..
As far as her support for McCain... I didn't like it one bit, but I do understand it. It was personal loyalty to someone she considers a friend.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Obama is a joke
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 9:59am.
He is uninformed and ignorant. Most Americans can't stand him. I wish he would just go away.
There, fixed it for you.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
the joke is on you...
Submitted by texasborngranny on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:15pm.
[goldwaterfan] is uninformed and ignorant.Okay
Submitted by panzerakc on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 5:34pm.
Walters has a co-host on "The View" who is unaware that slavery was abolished by an amendment to the Constitution, and yet it's Sarah Palin who's uninformed???
No, you stated no facts. You merely parroted a popular opinion.
I find it
Submitted by Massage_Master07 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 5:37am.
very amusing that the people that are "sick and tired" of hearing about Sarah Palin, are the same ones shoving a camera in her face. heheheee
Love/Hate Relationship
Submitted by beauxdog on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 7:33am.
I think Sarah Palin would make an excellent president if the media was fair and gave her the respect the office demands. She has a Davy Crockett/Daniel Boone type of frontier personality. She is a doer in all aspects of life. She is a proven reformer (per another poster) and anti-corruption... which makes her the enemy of 98% of elected Federal officials. She is "We the People".
Amanda calls her ignorant and uniformed because thats all she sees and hears from her sources whom she trusts. I believe we are all guilty, to a certain extent, of trusting our preferred sources. Most of us don't have time to do our own research. Amanda is still wrong, but she is being honest in what she believes.
I believe that as president, Sarah would disappoint a lot of us because we have such high expectations of her. We, as conservatives, are focused on our world view and she would be ruling a country with disparate world views. Rome wasn't built in a day and she won't be able to "give our country back" overnight... or even in eight years. I believe she has the wisdom to put in place the mechanisms to bring us back from the edge... they just might not be as fast as some of us would like.
Now the hate... I can't stand her voice. I prefer to read her words than listen to them.
Beauxdog
goldwaterfan---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 7:42am.
or Amanda Carrington, either persona, is the one showing ignorance, irrespective of said "trusted sources".
Liberal BS talking points from a liberal BS'er.
MD
No, Sarah
Submitted by bsny on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 8:32am.
You did that all on your own.
HOW did she do that herself, you stupid jackwagon?
Submitted by TheHistorian on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 9:38am.
Sarah has NOT done that herself, any more than you bunch of BSers from NY expanded on Obama's 57 states comment. It has been taking short comments out of long interviews and blowing them up that has been done. It really has been done by the liberal liar sites like Huffington, Moveon, Media Matters, but the media has carried the liars' water.
In short, if you gave her HALF the chance that you repeatedly gave Obama and Hillary then this stuff would have melted away. YOU did it, and you libs should be proud of your lying selves.
Dennis Prager
Funny how
Submitted by bsny on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 9:57am.
you always bring Obama into the equation - I did not mention him. Yes, he's equally scary and uninformed, but the topic was this dingbat.
Real Comedy
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:11am.
It's more funny that you libs come to a site dedicated to media bias and wonder why we would use Obama as a measuring stick to demonstrate that bias.
How about those Sox Spew York?
Submitted by Tomorama on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:38am.
Thanks for making the point asshat.
The media has and DID create the aura of Barack Obama that he was a uniter, smart and was the "one" we have been waiting for and the rest of us were hmmmmm, what about Rezco, Chi-town, Ayers, Wright, voting present etc, etc and the media cabal on the left were dragged kicking and screaming on reporting ANY negativity on a junior Senator who had NO exaecutive experience to speak of.
They BUILT the beast and got him selected, elected and totally protected.
They sent a battalion of reporters to Alaska, but not one "jowhornalist" could stick a microphone near Ayers, Rezco, Wright etc, etc who all live and breathe in that far away mecca called Chi-town?
That's why bringing up his name is relevent.
We could also use Biden as a par VP candidate, good ol' Uncle Joe, he's funny, stupid, but sooooo harmless, right?
You protest too much, BS
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:00pm.
Ah, the Barry Sotero sock puppet checks in.
Palin obviously scares you witless, as your posts here demonstrate.
Some things in this life are just plain sweet, and the reaction Palin creates in you liberals is one of them, pure enjoyment for us conservatives.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Yeah tell us*
Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:40pm.
How's that vjayjay thing working out for you and Obama BSny?
really like Sarah too
Submitted by theduck6 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 9:21am.
as a reminder of our values and ethic and she might even make a fair President. Certainly couldn't be any worse than the one we ended up with.
I do wish she had rethought her "reality show" " Sarah Palin's Alaska". You can oversaturate yourself, just ask Barry. I have seen 2 episodes and came away thinking she wasn't quite the bear wrestling, frontier woman she portrayed herself as. Don't get me wrong, she is a lot more grounded and back-to-basics than most pols, especially liberals but she whined during a fairly short rock climbing episode and had her dad jacking rounds into her rifle during a caribou hunting expedition. Admittedly the hunt was very remote and adventureous (jealous I suppose) but she did help clean, pack and freeze the meat with no hesitation or queasiness. Dear God, Kate Goslin is bringing her octet up for a camping trip on a future episode. I think I will refrain from watching that one.
Still....GO SARAH!!! Love to see her up there hunting with Pelosi, wouldn't you?
Now, now, don't even think that!!!
Look, the media, while
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:10am.
Look, the media, while certainly doing everything it could to delegitimize her, is not responsible for her not being able to name a single SCOTUS decision she disagreed with. The media is not responsible for her supporting TARP and the bailouts. Palin is actually insulting people by blaming the media, because the implication is that people are not independent thinkers and that they can't find their information elsewhere.
As much as she wants to paint herself as an outsider, she is as much establishment Republican as the Washington insiders. She threw her support behind McCain before the Ariz. primary, putting party over principle, and she told tea partiers to pick a party while falsely stating that we have a two-party system.
Actually
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:15am.
She named Roe v Wade that she disagreed with and Couric proded her for more.
Actually, Couric began by
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:02am.
Actually, Couric began by asking Biden about Roe v. Wade. Couric is the one who supplied Roe v. Wade as a topic, not Palin:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/10/sarah_palin_joe_biden_talk_to.html
Yes, she prodded Palin for more, just as she had asked Biden to name some decisions he disagreed with.
So?
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:30pm.
Sarah Palin was prodded. At least she never tried to say the United States does not have a 2 party system. Only someone as Stupid as Satchmo forwards that lie.
Prodded is a poor choice of
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:00pm.
Prodded is a poor choice of words. It's an interview, after all, and both VP candidates were asked the same question. Asking both candidates to name a decision or decisions they disagreed with is a legitimate question.
And in case you weren't aware, there are more than two parties, many of whose members hold office. While two parties are dominant and try to control debates, processes, etc., it is foolish to say we have a two-party system. We have no such thing.
Satchmo the Stupid troll doubles down.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:17pm.
Tell us Satchmo, tell us all how we don't have a 2 party system. Come on. Shine on your Stupid.
Beat me to the punch..........
Submitted by Tomorama on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:45am.
Sentry beat me too it about the SCOTUS myth you are lying about.
One answer was not enough for Catty, Palin needed to give thousands and nothing less.
As for McCain, if she didn't support him she would have been hammered for that as well, you can pick out any name, she would have been called it for NOT supporting the person who gave her the VP nod.
Sorry that doesn't register.
Doesn't mean I support everything McCain has ever done or Palin either, she was in a lose-lose situation and she did the right thing and 99 percent of the politicians would have done the same.
It's not a myth, nor is it a
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:10am.
It's not a myth, nor is it a lie. Here's the transcript: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/10/sarah_palin_joe_biden_talk_to.html
Couric supplied Roe v. Wade as a discussion point, asking both Biden and Palin why they agreed or disagreed with it. She then asked both to name SCOTUS decisions they disagreed with, and she didn't ask for thousands. Palin was unable to name any.
Standing by your principles is not a lose-lose situation. She put party over principle, but maybe McCain's principles are hers as well. Either way, not a good signal to conservatives.
And?
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:28pm.
Putting party over principle does not prove you are stupid. Saying the United States does not have a 2 party system. That is Satchmo Stupid.
Which one did Biden name?
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:57pm.
He babbled on about some law he wrote that was rejected by the SCOTUS. Maybe Palin just needs more experience writing bad laws huh? In the end, he didn't NAME one.
He named it by the bill's
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:23pm.
He named it by the bill's name. In case you weren't aware, SCOTUS is an appeals court that hears arguments about written law. That's their job. Biden named the law, not the multiple cases before the court that the court's ruling covered. The court struck down the law after it had been in effect for six years. Biden disagreed with the ruling. This isn't about playing getcha with Biden or Palin. The question was asked of both candidates. Biden was able to answer it, Palin wasn't. It's ok to admit that.
~While Biden was picking his nose
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:24pm.
in the Senate, Palin was reforming her state's political system and brokering the largest domestic energy deal, like, ever. And that, you little pervert, is a big effin deal.
Why are you trying to change
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 3:51pm.
Why are you trying to change the subject?
~Who died and made you Thread God?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 5:43pm.
Take your thumb out of your posterior and pay attention.
Biden is a D.C Sewer Rat who's eaten, drunk, and breathed politics for decades. Palin had been busy cleaning up/running a state. Which one of them is more likely to spout political trivia off the top of his/her head?
Let us not forget that this mental giant you're lauding thought that FDR went on television in...1929.
"Incest A-OK among consenting adults"
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:28pm.
But please, continue to educate us.
Not about getcha?
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 3:25pm.
REALLY? Now I know you are a dishonest lib. Oh hey....can you name any SCOTUS decisions that upheld the illegality of incest?
Satchmo, for all your typing,
Submitted by bassndude on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:55am.
Satchmo, for all your typing, you sure do get alot wrong. Or is it just lies? She did not support TARP. She named Roe vs. Wade on SCOTUS.
Your not real high in the food chain are you?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
McCain voted for TARP and
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:44am.
McCain voted for TARP and Palin defended it on the campaign trail; she supported it.
As for Roe v. Wade, I've shown above that it was Couric who raised it to both VP candidates, not Palin.
And?
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:26pm.
When was she ever stupid enough to claim the United States does not have a 2 party system? ONLY Sactchmo IS THAT STUPID.
Satchmo lies again.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:07pm.
...while falsely stating that we have a two-party system.
One of the prominent features of the American political system is the presence of a competitive two-party system.
The United States is the classic example of a nation with a two-party system.
For more than two centuries the two-party system has endured in the United States.
With the two-party system of government in its founding stages in the United States...
One of the prominent features of the American political system is the presence of a competitive two-party system. Parties were formed in the U.S. polity while the founding fathers...
The political systems of several nations are dominated by two parties, most notably the governments of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Since the administration of George Washington two political parties have dominated the United States political system, but they have not always been the same two parties.
Satchmo is a liar or stupid, probably both. Hey Freakshow sock puppet. WHY DON'T YOU HARASS ME SOME MORE.
YOU ARE A LIAR.
If we have a two-party
Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:09pm.
If we have a two-party system, then how is it there were NP (no party), L (libertarian), C (consitution) candidates, among others, on my ballot? In fact, I voted for one of them in 2008. How would that be possible if we had a two-party system? Which party was it that Jesse Ventura was with when he was elected governor? Which party was it that Lieberman ran with recently?
The United States is not and never has been a two-party system. This is basic civics. There are a number of office holders all over the country who belong to parties that aren't the Dems or Repubs. That would not and could not happen in a two-party system.
And harrass you? I have no idea what you're talking about. You responded to me, not the other way around. As if responding to someone on a discussion board is harrassment anyway. Seriously, man, get some help.
Good job Stupid.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:20pm.
Stick to your stupid in the face of OVERWHELMING evidence. A guy post 50 LINKS proving he is right. You just chug right along maintaining your Stupid.
Most excellent work from the Stupid that will maintain his Stupid at all costs.
You are mental.
Submitted by Satchmo on Sat, 12/11/2010 - 12:52am.
You are mental.
And?
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 12/11/2010 - 1:09am.
Stupid sez what again?
Tell us more Stupid. Tell us more about how we do not have a 2 party system. Go on. The floor is yours.
How about you try to act like
Submitted by Satchmo on Sat, 12/11/2010 - 1:22am.
How about you try to act like an adult? From what I see, you are the troll. The first post I made to this site you immediately responded with insults and namecalling. Every single response since then has been the same: insults and namecalling. That is not someone interested in having a discussion; that is someone with the intent on causing disruption.
Awww. Does trollie has a hurties?
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 12/11/2010 - 1:26am.
Is trollie butt hurt now?
Hey, I ain't the one claiming we do not have a 2 party system in the face of 15 Links from a guy that PROVED we do.
Not my fault you are a butt hurt Stupid troll.
Whine on trollie.
Um, Scratch, the freak
Submitted by Rukus on Sat, 12/11/2010 - 1:38am.
I suggest you don't mess with the Vet, bad move dumbass. He will pick your azz apart, and use your own words against you, stupid. It would be best if you shut up now as the Vet will show your stupid, over, and over, and over, etc... Give it it up stupid, you don't have a chance against the Vet, just a helping word.... dumbass.
SatchelMouth---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 12/11/2010 - 3:21am.
You have no problem with sex between a father and his daughter so long as it is supposedly consensual, but you call the Vet out as being mental?
Strange individual, you are.
I mean, I can understand someone taking offense if they feel they have been insulted, but when that same person, who initially painted a big ass bullseye on his own forehead with one of the more idiotic statements ever seen on a thread at NewsBusters, begins judging others for taking shots, the action of becoming judgemental turns rapidly into an exercise in farce of the highest degree.
Even were the Vet to tire of dealing with you, there are others at NBs who will be happy to dish out the ridicule you have brought down on your own head.
MD
I think it's funny that all these lefties are so afraid of a...
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:56am.
...girl.
ROFL! What a bunch of wussies.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
~Well you see..
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 10:59am.
She's a conservative woman, which means she went off the reservation. To add insult to injury, she only comes back to hunt on it.
Good one Bru*
Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 2:47pm.
Two sentences and you have just described the current political scene and media ignorance. Bravo! Need ammo?
~Still got a few clips
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 3:00pm.
Blonde is field-dressing Satchmo on the incest thread; I'm popping some corn while I watch. Want some?
All Sarah needs to do to
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:07am.
All Sarah needs to do to quiet the critics is climb up her family tree and find some American Eskimo out there on one of those limbs.
She would then be treated with kid gloves just like the Ass Clown is today......right?
Well he's also retarded on top of being a minority, but Sarah does have a special needs child which should more than level the playing field.
Her great looks and millionaire statis also may have something to do with it for some folks hating her.
I would bet Hillary has decided to not run because of Sarah's huge success since leaving public service. She will attempt to duplicate Sarah's wild ride, but will not be successful. You need to not only be the real deal, you've first need to be real. Hilly fails on both levels.
Anyone that speaks of Sarah Palin possibly seeking the office of president of the United States of America in a disparaging way while the Ass Clown is still fully ensconced in our White House is either a complete partisan, jackass or both.
I do not believe she is what the country needs right now as our leader, but to dismiss her out of hand because you say she's dumb or polarizing while the most polarizing D-bag of the past 100 years sits in that seat is pure unadulterated bullshit.
Barack_Must_Go.....
"Anyone that speaks of Sarah
Submitted by Smartypants on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:51pm.
"Anyone that speaks of Sarah Palin possibly seeking the office of president of the United States of America in a disparaging way while the Ass Clown is still fully ensconced in our White House is either a complete partisan, jackass or both."
Amen.
I watched the whole interview
Submitted by shawn. on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:17am.
Walters was fair and gave Palin a chance to clarify her positions to her critics. There are many times Sarah is treated unfairly from the media, but this is not one of them.The View
Submitted by PrimalElements on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 11:36am.
How informed are those gals and they voted for a Marxist who is practising Fascism.
Walters is a joke..............the other women.
The ol' "some people" game.
Submitted by tomchris on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:07pm.
You may remember that when Rush Limbaugh was interviewed by Barbara Walters two years ago she chastised Limbaugh's like of Palin saying she was "uniformed." Clearly Barbara's "some people" was actually Walters asserting her own opinion of Palin- the lamest of the lamestream media's tactics.
I, too, am all in for Sarah and eagerly await the left totally implode if and when she decides to run.
Not quite "all in"...
Submitted by jimbo297 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:42pm.
...for Sarah, although she has been communicating the TEA Party message most effectively. I hope we take a good look at the prospective GOP candidates and choose the one who can get the job done. I do think she'd be alot more electable than Huckster or Mitt, not that they're not strong candidates, but because she'd bring alot more energy to the game. I really want to see what this new crop of GOP/TEA congress critters amounts to-if they can pave the road smooth enough by promoting growth through lower taxes and defund Obamacare, then just about any Republican will be able to drive down it.
For what it's worth, I have never heard Sarah say that she is going to run. She has said that she will run if no one else is going to step up, so I get the impression that, like me, she's waiting to see what green shoots grow out of our grassroots victory in November.
Frankly, I don't want her to be distracted in 2012 with her own campaign cuz there's still a whole bunch of Dems and RINOs that need to be shown the exit, and she played no small part in last month's victory.
Still holding out hope that she'll come moose hunting in Vermont next year-just to see all these le#bos and d%kes get their panties in a wad!
I love how members of the
Submitted by Smartypants on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 12:56pm.
I love how members of the media, including WaWa, throw around the "uninformed" accusation of Palin, when most of these media minions could not explain economics 101 to any of us. Their version of being "informed" is as they define it, and a prominent conservative will never measure up to it. Palin may be the current incarnation of the devil to these people, but they treated Reagan, HW Bush, GW Bush, you name it, in similar fashion. Nobody with an "R" after his/her name is smart enough, informed enough or caring enough for their taste--until that person abandons the R party in some way.
Well, she has said some real
Submitted by wiwf on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 1:02pm.
Well, she has said some real boneheaded statements via twitter...like what?
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 1:03pm.
I'd love to see them.
Oh wiwf
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 1:12pm.
One more thing. After looking at your profile
44-0 The sheep SUCK (you know what I'm talking about)
Are you referring to her
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 1:29pm.
Are you referring to her "Party Like its 1773" tweet? The one Markos (Daily Kos) Mouslitas said proved she was stupid? Except that was the year of the Boston Tea Party . . . Another Liberal FAIL/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
"Why is that?"
Submitted by Tom1969ca on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 1:10pm.
I do wish that when Sarah asked (rhetorically, as it turned out), "Why is that?" that instead of answering her own question she had instead smiled and sat quietly ... waiting for an answer from Babs!
It would've been fun to see her try to spin her way out of that one!
I'm reminded of a quote I saw attributed to Mark Twain: "If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you *do* read the newspaper, you're mis-informed!"