For six weeks, while virtually every mainstream media outlet ignored "green jobs czar" Van Jones, Fox News's Glenn Beck exposed the radical background of President Obama's environment adviser.
On Saturday, Jones resigned, and most of the same news outlets that ignored the shocking nature of this White House representative are coming to his defense predictably claiming that he was the victim of a right-wing smear campaign.
One so-called journalist is even asking his viewers to dig up dirt on Beck.
Somewhat bucking this disgraceful trend was Politico in its Monday article "Glenn Beck Up, Left Down and Jones Defiant":
"If Jones left under pressure from the Obama administration then we are in for a very long and painful four years,” said Melissa Harris Lacewell, a political science professor at Princeton University. “I would hate to think that Glenn Beck can simply shout down any member of the administration he chooses to target.”
They were referring to the Fox News host who has rocketed to a status as de facto leader of the opposition since joining the network from the relative obscurity of talk radio and CNN Headline News. Beck's attacks on Jones intensified after an advocacy group Jones helped found, Color of Change, lead a campaign to drive advertisers away from Beck’s show.
But as soon as the ensuing controversy began to bleed over onto the websites of ABC News, POLITICO, and other quarters of the mainstream media, the administration appeared to stop defending Jones. After passing on a statement Thursday from Jones indicating that he would hold fast, Gibbs declined to indicate Friday that he had Obama’s confidence, and the resignation – apparently timed for maximum obscurity in the early hours of a holiday weekend Sunday – began to seem preordained.
The resignation, in turn, confirmed Beck’s stature as the administration’s most potent foe. Along with the talk radio host Rush Limbaugh and the Drudge Report’s Matt Drudge, Beck helped drive a summer of protest against health care reform that turned the legislation into a referendum on change and government.
Is Beck the administration's most potent foe, or is Politico badly missing the point?
After all, the obviously larger issue is that only Fox News, talk radio, and conservative bloggers are at all willing to vett members of the Obama administration, and the mainstream outlets, after spending last year cheerleading the junior senator from Illinois straight into the White House, have now taken to defending and protecting him and his staff.
Isn't this just another example of so-called journalists abdicating their solemn responsibility to uncover the truth and report it to a nation that so craves it?
When did it become the role of news outlets to defend our political leaders and shelter them from scrutiny?
In the previous week, videos surfaced of Jones calling Republicans a**holes, suggesting that President Bush smokes crack, and that white people are intentionally polluting black communities, not to mention the finding that he signed a document claiming the government might have been involved in the 9/11 attacks.
Despite the controversial nature of such revelations, none of it seemed at all newsworthy to media members who three years ago spent almost three solid months obsessing over a word likely no American had ever heard before or vaguely knew the meaning of -- "macaca."
Maybe best symbolizing the absurdity of the current press position was MSNBC's Keith Olbermann on Sunday asking Daily Kos readers to "Find everything [they] can about Glenn Beck, Stu Burguiere, and Roger Ailes."
This was in response to Beck tweeting the following on Friday:

(For those unfamiliar with these names -- shame on you! -- Cass Sunstein is the nominee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Mark Lloyd is the Associate General Counsel and Chief Diversity Officer of the FCC, and Carol Browner is the Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change as well as the former administrator of the EPA under President Clinton.)
So let me get this straight: the host of a popular cable news program asks his viewers to find out information about members of the White House, and another host responds by asking his viewers to dig up dirt on the other host?
Granted, MSNBC was the leading cheerleader for the Obama campaign last year with one of its top personalities claiming after the election that it was his job to make sure the new president was successful:
So, is it now MSNBC's responsibility to dig up dirt on media members that have the nerve to investigate and report the background of Obama administration officials?
And is it the press's job to deflect White House criticism by depicting all negative reports about the current President and his staff as part of what Hillary Clinton called a vast right-wing conspiracy?
Is this really the future of media and politics: Fox News, conservative talkers and bloggers will uncover and report the misdeeds of the White House, and so-called journalists will shoot the messengers?
If so, I guess the left's new mantra is "Defend Authority From All Who Question It!"
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Beck has something on Olbie
September 7, 2009 - 11:22 ET by kch50428Ratings that Olbie can only get all wee-weed up over in total envy.
Beck's new target (easy) should be Valerie Jarrett
September 7, 2009 - 11:35 ET by PaulJameshttp://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2008/nov/obama-advisor-valerie-jarrett-linked-real-estate-scandals
The Tony Rezko Connection to the Chicago Thug White house
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has obtained documents linking Valerie Jarrett, an advisor to Barack Obama and the co-chairman of the President-Elect's transition team, to a series of real estate scandals, including several housing projects operated by convicted felon and Obama fundraiser/friend Antoin "Tony" Rezko.
According to the documents obtained by Judicial Watch from the Illinois Secretary of State, Valerie Jarrett served as a board member for several organizations that provided funding and support for Chicago housing projects operated by real estate developers and Obama financial backers Rezko and Allison Davis. (Davis is also Obama's former boss.) Jarrett was a member of the Board of Directors for the Woodlawn Preservation and Investment Corporation along with several Davis and Rezko associates, as well as the Fund for Community Redevelopment and Revitalization, an organization that worked with Rezko and Davis.
(According to press reports, housing projects operated by Davis and Rezko have been substandard and beset with code violations. The Chicago Sun Times reported that one Rezko-managed housing project was "riddled with problems -- including squalid living conditions...lack of heat, squatters and drug dealers.")
As Chief Executive Officer of the Habitat Company Jarrett also managed a controversial housing project located in Obama's former state senate district called Grove Parc Plaza. According to the Boston Globe the housing complex was considered "uninhabitable by unfixed problems, such as collapsed roofs and fire damage...In 2006, federal inspectors graded the condition of the complex an 11 on a 100-point scale -- a score so bad the buildings now face demolition." Ms. Jarrett refused to comment to the Globe on the conditions of the complex.
"Like Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett is a product of the corrupt Chicago political machine. And it is no stretch to say that she was a slumlord," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "We have real concerns about Jarrett's ethics. Washington already has plenty of corruption. We don't need to import more of it from Chicago."
Now is the time for all to come to the aid of their country and vote Republican.
Kudos
September 7, 2009 - 11:34 ET by flyingmonkeyWell written article Noel. Every question asked and every base covered. You the man!!!
Glenn Googled
September 7, 2009 - 11:35 ET by nicksmith112Glenn Googled Jones.
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
LMAO
September 7, 2009 - 12:56 ET by mbuelNo kidding. If "smear" means putting on display the man's beliefs and statements, I guess I'll take part in that "smear" campaign as well.
and just because Van Jones resigned doesn't mean we got rid of those fundamentally dangerous ideas. Look at this Time Magazine article:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1920883,00.html
His green ideas like this:
http://www.youtube.c...
That white communities POISONED minority communities?
I also love the spin the time article puts on statements and positions that Van Jones made/had.
He wasn't an avowed communist. He was an avowed "anti-capitalist". In the same sentence the author ADMITS that this should've disqualified him from public service. Funny how those ideas didn't disqualify Obama:
http://www.youtube.c...
hmm...
The free market works, Government controls always fail.
If in fact Jones was this
September 7, 2009 - 13:37 ET by nicksmith112If in fact Jones was this amazing guy being railroaded by the evil right, wouldn't the logical thing to do is fight back by putting all the facts out about Jones and let the people decide??
Likewise with Obama-care? Lay it out liberals, line by line. How could the masses not be all-in on Obama-care.(sarcasm)
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
→ Not really, Nick
September 7, 2009 - 13:52 ET by Cool ArrowThey are taking exactly the right approach.
Come tomorrow, when the real news cycle begins, and the MSM still hasn't outed Jones for the radical racist he is, word on the MSM waves will be that racist Republicans hounded him out.
Matthews and Olbermann will be in rare "racial victimhood" mode.
And those who suck liberally from the MSM pap will be none the wiser.
We will Barry you! - Russian prophecy
So Chrissy and Krazy Keith
September 7, 2009 - 13:56 ET by nicksmith112So Chrissy and Krazy Keith have penned a letter to themselves stating what they can do to help King Obama? ;)
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
→ Ed Zackly
September 7, 2009 - 14:18 ET by Cool ArrowOf course, Chris will be softly admonished by the teacher that "not that there's nothing wrong with it", he might want to mention there are other things he could do for the President.
We will Barry you! - Russian prophecy
I've seen Krazy Keith's
September 7, 2009 - 14:51 ET by nicksmith112I've seen Krazy Keith's letter to himself.
He apologized to King Obama about that giant check he presented Bill Clinton a couple of years ago. Keith also claimed that because both he and Hilary have cankles....yada yada yada.
Keith also pledged to crush the non-believers...
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
that would be logical
September 7, 2009 - 15:37 ET by mbuelWhen logic fails the liberal (aka marxist) dogma comes in to the rescue.
There ARE no facts to back up Jones, that's why Obama is getting rid of him on Sunday morning of a 3 day weekend. The spin-meisters of the MSM, will call it a "scalping" by the right wingers, calling it "smear" campaign, etc.
Instead of challenging the facts, they'll just lash out with ad hominem. typical liberal dogma.
The free market works, Government controls always fail.
Megan Kelly interviewed
September 7, 2009 - 11:41 ET by Chris NormanMegan Kelly interviewed Julian Epstein - another "Democratic Consultant", I've never heard of, outside of his interviews as a "Democratic Consultant". The theme of the interview was why the MSM didn't cover the story until Jones resigned - why they interviewed a Democratic Consultant about the media covering up the story, I do not know - maybe no one else wearing a coat and tie was available on a Labor Day morning. Anyway, he hauled out the usual excuses and diversionary tactics - "John McCain's associations with a controversial minister - that Fox doesn't cover Republican scandals as muuch as Democratic ones - but it was all for naught. Despite Mr. Epstein's bland blah-blahings, he never could answer the basic question or justify it. In the mean time, he managed to look like exactly what he is, a spin master who had nothing serious to say. Megan Kelly, instead of thanking him at the end, should have finished by saying. "Okay, Julius. We've heard all we've needed to hear...".
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
I watched that interview too and when I saw who was...
September 7, 2009 - 18:45 ET by jawebster1being interviewed, I knew Meghan was dealing with a left wing hack and against my better judgement, I waited around to see just how he was going to spin Van Jones. He was too smart to defend the indefensible (Van Jones), but he was not smart enough to avoid pulling that old chestnut from the fire, "Well, the Republicans have people that do it too" and then he threw out a name or two nobody ever heard of. The all too predictable Democrats can always be counted on to do the predictable. Jim Webster
The obscure news provider
September 7, 2009 - 11:44 ET by acumen....is Politico badly missing the point?
No, I think Politico nailed this one:
"....the relative obscurity of.....CNN Headline News."
What's the blogging shortcut sign for partial sarcasm?
%SARC
September 7, 2009 - 14:43 ET by Teamcheeser%sarc
Yo, Keith
September 7, 2009 - 11:49 ET by StarAZFriday is M&M day on Beck. Do you know what M&M day is?
"When did it become the
September 7, 2009 - 12:02 ET by Chris Norman"When did it become the role of news outlets to defend our political leaders and shelter them from scrutiny?"
What the MSM's saying is that honestly covering the news and background of the Obama Administration which formerly would be considered an admirable duty, is now considered as standing in the way of the public good. Wow, that's scary.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
And not just any administration, mind you
September 7, 2009 - 12:19 ET by lsudolemitebut the self-proclaimed most transparent administration in U.S. history. Only now the MSM wants to selectively turn their backs on that two-way mirror.
Stuff Dug Up on Beck
September 7, 2009 - 12:03 ET by GottafangAll the stuff the Kossaks dig up on Beck for Olbermann will be delivered to him in a big wooden crate marked ACME.
LOL
September 7, 2009 - 12:17 ET by StarAZGood one!
quiet time
September 7, 2009 - 12:21 ET by MaratIt will be a quiet show for Bathtub Boy tomorrow!!
The ACME Crate
September 7, 2009 - 12:33 ET by THBarbTHBarb
LOL, ROFLOL
I loved the Road Runner anology, it's perfect. I envisioned a new cartoon with a Lapdog (named Keith?) and a Fox (we shall call Glenn).
Wile E. Olbermann?
September 7, 2009 - 12:40 ET by Chris NormanWile E. Olbermann? :)
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
"The problem with
September 7, 2009 - 18:48 ET by QueenMum"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people's money."
—Margaret Thatcher
Missing the point
September 7, 2009 - 13:02 ET by mbuelThere is a huge difference between Beck, Obama and Van Jones.
Glenn is a private citizen that is exercising his first ammendment right to publicly speak about (and question) the government.
Obama is a publicly elected official, and chose to put in a Czar that bypasses the constitution in charge of an illegal green office.
One of these things is not like the other, and should be subject to scrutiny. But in the same way the MSM missed the point when the crucified Joe "The Plumber" vs Obama, they once again are missing the point with the "Glenn vs. Van Jones" debate.
If a citizen can't question his leaders without being dragged through the mud, then we have lost a fundamental freedom.
The free market works, Government controls always fail.
"Culture of Corruption"
September 7, 2009 - 12:10 ET by SlyrrRemember 2006? The Demorats and their leftist media puppets, stinging from their defeat in 04 when they thought it was a wrap, engaged in a wilful campaign to smear the Republical party as 'the culture of corruption', and they sent out thier sleaze merchants to dig up every example of Republican misbehavior that they could. They used it as a cudgel to paint the entire party with the mis-deeds of every individual they saw doing anything shady, from page emails to airport bathroom footsie. And they snidely hinted that if the party of values was so corrupt, well then they, the Demorats, must be better.
And it sort of worked. Republican officials certainly didn't help, with some of them indeed doing stuff that was embarrassing. And Bush didn't help either, with his steadfast refusal to speak out in defense of his own party, coupled with his bizarre refusal to use the bully pulpit to extol the good things they'd accomplished.
But if the left is going to try and hide behind the 'corrupt people shouldn't be in office' mantra, then they're totally being skewered by Alinsky's own rules for radicals. I understand one of those 'rules' is to hold your enemies up to their own hype.
And so far, the left's hype has proved nothing but verbal diarrhea. Culture of corruption? I defy the media to take a good long look at their party (the Demorats) and NOT see corruption in each and every blasted one of them. Tax cheats running the IRS. A corrupt takeover of the auto industry and banks. Corrupt 'czars' being appointed left and right. Sexual and racial bigots being appointed to the Supreme Court. Obama supporters attacking protesters, stealing their property, biting off the fingers of senior citizens, vandalizing their own HQs and accusing their enemies of doing it. Instance after instance of nearly every one of Obama's friends, and Obama himself, being caught red-handed in doings that are worse than anything the Republicans have ever done. Liars, swindlers, crooks, cheats, theives, perverts, racists - any number of horrible and perfectly true names can be applied to Obama and his friends.
If the RNC has any guts at all, they have a treasure trove of audio, video and documentary evidence to prove, from now until Obama is cast out, which party is the REAL 'culture of corruption'.
Nah, the Repubs will
September 7, 2009 - 12:58 ET by RowaneNah, the Repubs will continue to nominate more McCain clones who have lost the balls to fight.
******************************************************************************
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)
God forbid... If McCain
September 7, 2009 - 14:09 ET by SlyrrGod forbid...
If McCain can't see now that he was, and is, and always will be a failed candidate, then he needs to be put out to pasture. He was a loser in 2000, a traitor to conservative principles to 2007, and a Democrat-lite in 2008.
The only reason anyone on the Right voted for this loser was because we knew Obama was ten times worse. Everyone had to hold their nose to block out the foul stench while pulling the lever for McCain. He was an embarrassment. The only thing he did right was to have Sarah Palin on the ticket with him.
If the GOP puts forth another pile of refuse like McCain in 2012, then we deserve what we get. Just like we're paying the price now for many of us staying home in 2008 because we were disgusted by BOTH candidates....
MSM monopoly is over
September 7, 2009 - 12:13 ET by sevenThe people want to know why certain news gets ignored by the media cartel.
Just think, if this was
September 7, 2009 - 13:09 ET by Chris NormanJust think, if this was twenty five years ago, before Fox News, Talk Radio, and Internet blogs, the Obama Administration and the Mainstream Media would've gotten away with their attempted black out and cover up of Jones' background - we would have know nothing about him and he would've stayed on to do his dirty work.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Thoughts: (and a new Flickr upload)
September 7, 2009 - 12:27 ET by BKeyser1. "The resignation, in turn, confirmed Beck’s stature as the
administration’s most potent foe. Along with the talk radio host Rush
Limbaugh and the Drudge Report’s Matt Drudge, Beck helped drive a
summer of protest against health care reform that turned the
legislation into a referendum on change and government."
2. Isn't this just another example of so-called journalists abdicating
their solemn responsibility to uncover the truth and report it to a
nation that so craves it? (NS)
and 3. I plan on issing a new "release" for each of the soon-to-be fallen in this adolescent clique known as the Obama Administration. But I begin with the departure of the legendary Van Jones.
I'll apologize in advance for those who might think this a tad
September 7, 2009 - 12:33 ET by R D Helm...simplistic, but I make absolutely no distinction between an actual "communist," and a "communist supporter." I see them as two sides of the same coin.
As far as I am concerned, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, and all of the rest of the members of the SCM who defended, lied for, or covered up for Van Jones are all communists themselves.
Every last stinking one of them.
And I am beginning to believe that last November, 65 million of my fellow citizens may very well have put one in the Oval Office.
Sue me.
No, these people will NEVER admit what form of government they actually support, but their duplicity in attempting to give this stinking low-life commie a pass was to me nothing short of contemptible in the extreme.
Communism is the most opressive, tyrannical, and murderous form of government yet created by man. In the last century, it was either directly or indirectly responsible for the deaths of between 100 and 200 million people, depending on whose numbers you believe.
I consider anyone who supports this hideous form of government in any way to be mentally ill, and a mortal enemy of freedom and liberty, two concepts that are wholly incompatible with communism.
Chairman Obama's most potent foe is not Glenn Beck. It is the millions upon millions of REAL Americans who still cherish their freedoms, liberties, and their unique way of life, and who are not about to sit idly by and allow this administration, or this government, to take them away.
I hope Van Jones is the first of many in this farce of an administration that will be exposed for what they truly are, as the near-term future of our now fragile republic may very well depend on it.
-Dave
Even when the government tries to kiss you, it is just a prelude to a good screwing. -Neal Boortz
There is an official term Mr. Dave. Dupes. Pinks.
September 7, 2009 - 13:08 ET by JWFFrom wikipedia entry -
K. Now I feel guilty. I add the Chris Matthews. Wikipedia keeps takin' it out. But it should read that way! I will keep trying just for my friend Mr. Dave.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
→ Upton Sinclair
September 7, 2009 - 12:33 ET by Cool Arrow"The Jungle" an expose' on the Chicago meatpacking industry, was commissioned by a socialist group. The end result of its publishing was the formation of the FDA.
Point is, there's always been somebody shining a light on corruption. What the Liberals can't stand is that their corruption is so olfactorily unpleasant that normally complacent Americans turn away in disgust.
Rangel needs to be next. Only a card-carrying fool would agree Rangel carries himself with any modicum of dignity.
This has gone beyond President Bush's famous quote. What we're seeing now is the blatant "bigotry of low expectations".
That is a disgustingly racist belief among liberals that needs to change.
We will Barry you! - Russian prophecy
It's a good thing MSNBC has
September 7, 2009 - 12:39 ET by ConservativeRexIt's a good thing MSNBC has such a tiny audience or this may get serious. I figure they will throw a dadgummed hissy fit when the rest of these tsars are uncovered and exposed for what they really are. Then we'll get to see how quick Obama really will crawfish.
Huffington Post Invaded
September 7, 2009 - 12:42 ET by ConScottThe story appears to have put HuffPo back on their heels.
Up until this morning the forum was mostly open, very little censorship, and wow, many right-thinking folks jumped in yesterday and challenged the average Huffer w/serious logic. Comments were up to nearly 17,000, but unfortunately, as of this morning the censors have stepped in, cutting out past comments (dropped over 600 in the last hour) and making sure that few new anti-Jones comments get through. Attacks on Beck & FOX are now up and mostly unchallenged.
Guess that a call came in from the WH sometime late last evening :)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/06/glenn-beck-gets-first-sca_n_278281.html
Obama foes? Their name is LEGION
September 7, 2009 - 12:54 ET by Jack BauerNo -- that would probably be Mark Levin.
As far as I can see, he has dragged a demoralized conservative movement (NOT Republican) and made the most cogent, brilliant intellectual case for conservatism in the past 30 years.
However, that's not even the point, and Politico does miss it. The most potent foes of Obama are now LEGION.
They are the people armed with facts who are now organizing THEIR conservative communities.
And the Obama lovin' elites LOATH it.
Yup. The Obama
September 7, 2009 - 13:07 ET by QueenMumYup. The Obama administration is having to take at least one backward step on a weekly basis. Seems like their the ones getting all "wee-wee'd up". Power to the people.
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people's money."
—Margaret Thatcher
Hanging Themselves
September 7, 2009 - 13:04 ET by rammingspeedIt's been pointed out that the MSM's failure to report anything on this story actually hurt Obama and the whole Democratic party. I agree. This is perhaps the greatest single example of the double standard of the left wing media we've seen thus far. It's one more step backward for the MSM, and a letdown for Obama that his lapdogs in the media did what they thought was protecting him.
msm
September 7, 2009 - 14:23 ET by cajun2Great article Noel, as usual. I would like to see you follow the MSM coverage of Obieones speech today in Ohio.(I would do it myself but I would barf) He said," his goal is to establish a new foundation for prosperity in America". Now, I interpret that to mean socialism rather than capitalist system but then thats just me. (right wing nutjob) But I am curious as to how the idiots will spin it. Then maybe we can see the connections with Jones, Lloyd, Sunstein, etc in a very transparent way, in the msm's own words. Please Noel? You are my sheppard.
Today Show
September 7, 2009 - 14:25 ET by ricklailI stumbled on an investigative report this morning on Today about people being scammed by magazine sells persons. It took sometime to put that together. Yet they couldn't spend 15 minutes online investigating Van Jones.
Semper suprene nitens
OBAMACARE: If it ain't good enough for my Congressman then it ain't good enough for me.
→ Hey rick
September 7, 2009 - 14:34 ET by Cool ArrowI don't guess they reported on the three entrepreneurial inner-city individuals who shot a homowner and beat another in the name of Obama Care.
I know, I know, wrong template.
But they sure exposed those magazine scammers. Probably saved dozens of people from the petty ripoff the liberal reporter, doubtless, fell for.
We will Barry you! - Russian prophecy
CORRECTION:
September 7, 2009 - 14:36 ET by TeamcheeserNOTE TO READERS:
"The resignation, in turn, confirmed Beck’s stature as the administration’s most potent foe."
Should read:
"The resignation, in turn, confirmed the Obama administration’s stature as this country’s most potent foe."
[don't] Question Authority
September 7, 2009 - 16:08 ET by MadRatI want to get a "Question Authority" bumper sticker and change it to "don't Question ^ the democrats Authority".