It seems Fluffanopolis and Chrissy Softball should host a debate together...that way there would be no chance of Dims getting tongue tied and therefore possibly looking inept.

I still would like to see Shillary actually answer a question directly....even a softball question.

No I wouldn't.  I never bother to watch his show. 

Liberalism is a convenient lie.

 I got the immigration bit from Lonewacko bt, and linked from Malkins site. I didn't watch the debate fortunately. From what I heard it was just another warm fuzzy love-in.

http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/006955.html

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

BT Said "Illegal Immigration is and will be a deciding factor for the next Prez."

Realistically, nothing is going to be accomplished on immigration any time in the next few administrations. This is largely because the issue is a lose-lose for both sides of the aisle. Any action on immigration will cost BOTH the Dems and the GOP dearly with a major portion of their respective bases. On the Dem side, you're either going to tick-off the unions or the bleeding hearts, on the GOP side, your either going to tick off business or the law & order crowd. This guarantees that there will be plenty of talk and posturing, but no meaningful action in any direction.

The danger, however, is that too many Republicans, Conservatives and Capatalists won't realize that the all too convenient timing of bringing this decades-old issue into the forefront is nothing more than a media stunt that may well succeed in factionalizing the Right, which would be a major benefit for the left. (Think of the robber who throws a steak to the guard dogs, and then sneaks past while the dogs fight over the steak.)

Sure, current immigration policy is screwed up, but it has been that way for 40 years, and until people get realistic and actually get a clue about immigration issues, it's not an issue that's likely to get fixed any time in the next 10-20 years.

There are many bigger problems at hand. Getting control on entitlements, restoring domestic resource production (oil, coal, minerals), saving our infrastructure from total collapse, and stepping up our efforts in the global war on terror until we have taken the will to fight away from the enemy.

Thompson/Giuliani 2008

 Please Blonde, thats cheese eating surrender-monkeys if you will.

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/H/R/french_surrendermonkey.jpg

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

Blonde 

I kind of favor "wimpocrats" and/or "runocrats"

acumen,

Excellent.  I have a similar vid someone sent me of a terr practicing firing a big rifle at an indoor range.  The recoil sends his sorry butt right through the glass door, where he picks himself up and after lots of "Allah  u Akbooms" (as you so humorously put it)....says "Where's the Bossman?. 

I've not visited Pat Dollard's site in a while.  So a second thanks is is in order for that. 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

This is a real flying Imam.

Steph never asked it because it didn't come from a video with a snowman in it, this year's tome of knowledge to the democrats. Kinda shows you how intelligent the left is, don't it? ;)

"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage
morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested,
exiled, or hanged." -Abraham Lincoln

thalpy --

 In a socialist system the electorate is incidental in the scheme of things;

I don't think that's totally true in the Euro-socialism which cloaks itself in the fake veneer of "democracy."

Here's what happens -- and this is what even "conservatives" have gone along with since the end of WW2.

The state expands massively so that more and more people become reliant on the state for their jobs or for their handouts, the dole et al. 

This means that ever decreasing numbers of citizens pay ever increasing amounts of their income in tax.

Eventually a critical mass is reached where those voters who have a vested intersest in welfare stateism outnumber those who do not.

At that point, a built in permanent majority of voters who can never be moved comes into existence.  And at that point, even nominally "conservative" parties become dependent in offering a never ending litany of state handouts.

What happens then is that the inherent internal conradictions and base flaws of "socialism"  play out as they did in the UK during the 1970s.

Then a real conservative called Margaret Thatcher came along, and a landslide as people stared at the abyss of a welfare state addled culture, huge union power, constant strikers, massive inflation, and all the other goodies that inevitably come from BIG GOVERNMENT.

Check out my latest YouTube...but only if you support the troops and their mission: Better Men Than Me/The Battle For Fallujah