Toe to toe? You mean toe to antennae.

And ooh-la-la, Fred's a lucky guy. 

that Republican women don't need to cover up hairy elephant legs like femocrats do ..

never look a gift skunk in the tail ..

ALAN LURKS AT HIS DESK EACH EVENING WAITING

FOR HIS PREY TO SLIP UP. THEN HE'LL POUNCE WITH

FORCE OF A JACKAL. MOST TIMES HE IS SWATTED

LIKE A PESKY GNAT AND LAST NIGHT THE VERY

BRIGHT JERI THOMPSON HANDLED HIM ACCORDINGLY.

YOUR HUSBAND MUST BE VERY PROUD OF YOU JERI.

NEXT TIME YOU SEE COLMES, GIVE HIM A BOOT IN

THE BACKSIDE FOR ALL OF US.

"NOBODY PUTS ONE OVER ON FRED C DOBBS"

B.TRAVEN

She is great. I would love to see her go up against other women like the "perky one".

Too bad Fred saw her first. :/

Looks like the media have more to worry about than just Sarah. Can you imagine the team these two could make for some time to come?

Thanks for the article. I'm feeling better already.

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Wow, you go Jeri!

I love how this intelligent woman put that walking talking point, Alan Colmes in his place.   The next time Colmes has an original thought it will be the first time.  She did great when, like many liberals, he tried to change the subject when he realized he was losing the battle.  She would not let him get away with it, reminding him of what his original question was in the first place.  She's hot, too.

You know this comparison of Edwards haircut to Palin's wardrobe is interesting.  As a matter of fact, I do think a $400 haircut for a man is more absurd than a woman, who is in the public eye constantly for a couple of months, spending $150K on clothes.  The woman has to look professional.  She would be ridiculed by the media if she showed up in anything but designer clothing.  (I can hear them calling her a hick or backwards.)  Because she's a woman, her clothing and the designer is definitely going to be noted by the media.  If she dresses down too much, she's a dowdy small-town hick.  If she overdoes it, she's wreckless or an elitist.  If she wears the same outfit more than once, it will be noted in the media.  Designer clothing for women is extremely expensive.   Spending $150K might be somewhat extravagant, but I do not think it is as outrageous as what is being stated and, in the end, it's going to charity.  Heck, a pair of designer shoes can run $600-$700 easy.  Unlike a guy, who can get away with wearing the same pair of shoes, she probably needs a dozen or more pairs to go with each outfit.  That's $5K just on shoes.  I imagine a designer outfit can easily go for a few thousand bucks or more. She might need thirty or forty different outfits. Add purses, accessories, whatever, and it adds up. 

Contrast this with a man's $400 haircut.  What the heck can a barber/stylist do to a man's hair that makes it worth $400?  This is outrageous to me.  Tell me that a $400 haircut is going to look any better than a $75 haircut on a guy; I'm not buying it.  A man spending $400 on a haircut truly is being an elitist.

The bottom line to me is that a woman spending a lot of money on clothes might appreciate nice things and want to look as good as possible in front of the cameras and the public.  A man spending $400 on a haircut, however, is doing so merely because he can; he's not going to look any better than anyone else when all is said and done.  Plus, it is far more unseemly when a man, even one in the public eye, is so taken with his appearance as to spend $400 on a haircut. Also, Democrats are supposed to be the party of the people; they are supposed to abhor this kind of consumption, aren't they? Republicans do not make that claim; they're for free enterprise and freedom to consume. It is interesting how the left calls Republicans hypocrites if they do no live by some pseudo-religious code, but Dems can pretend to care about poor people and drive around in limousines, swilling $500/bottle bubbly and live in posh estates, and this is not viewed as hypocritical.

Finally, Obama is spending $2M on an election night party in Chicago.  Is that considered a waste?  How many starving children could be fed with $2M? 

I've commented on this before. Alan Colmes is a very, very lucky man. He's attached himself to Sean Hannity professionally and is the perfect example of an undeserving lefty, liberal being allowed access to mainstream society. He attacks right minded conservatives without any thought to the damage being done by his democrat party. The guy asks questions that are entirely too long and convoluted. He snaps out his long winded query and demands an answer and before he even gets an answer is accusing questioned of evading the answer. Colmes is the worst interviewer on TV. What Jeri Thompson did to him last night was long overdue, the man should be handed his tuccas on a nightly basis.

I saw that last night.  Nice.  

Incidentally, anyone see Megyn Kelly hand Bill Burton his arse today?

http://goldwatergirl...

God that woman is beautiful!  Fred Thompson must be one helluva man.  We passed up a great opportunity to have him as president :(

Skeletor and the Horde called the left, gets taken down by She-Ra Jeri. HEY SKINNY, WHEN WILL YA LEARN?!

Chuck Baldwin--the candidate under the corporate fascist media's
radar--BUT SHOULDN'T BE!  This election should be a REFERENDUM ON THE
MEDIA FOR NOT HIRING PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN HONESTY LIKE MYSELF!

 killer job jerri.   colmes suffers from pds  . the reason they hate sara is because she is more of a real woman than obama (the messiah) is a man .

I love her!

"I've got a really good idea. How about I get to answer, <I>then</i> you get to respond?"

Why are all the smart, hot women Republicans?