Ann Coulter Takes Matt Lauer and Brian Williams to Task on 'Today'

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.
  • Bookmark and Share

After reports that Ann Coulter had been banned from NBC News, her return to the "Today" show set this Wednesday morning was, as expected, a fiery one with co-host Matt Lauer. The conservative author put Lauer on the defensive on her being bumped for the likes of Rachel Maddow and Perez Hilton, his colleague Brian Williams’ softball questions to Barack Obama, and Lauer’s charges that Coulter’s takes on single motherhood and Obama’s middle name were "outrageous," and "venomous."

First up, Coulter stuck it to Lauer on his, rather lame excuse for her being bumped from yesterday’s "Today" show:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

MATT LAUER: Let me just get to this little controversy. You've been all over the blogs in the last day or so. We cancelled your appearance here on Tuesday. And from what I've been reading you thought you were banned for life from the show. Did, were you behind that report?

ANN COULTER: No, I didn't say that. That was from a reliable news report that, by the way, had never, has never had to retract a report on exploding GM trucks. But I do know that, like NBC. Um, it apparently took-

LAUER: So we're either dead or you weren't banned.

COULTER: It apparently took eight hours for the "Today" show to remember that there was a Wednesday show that I could be invited back to. It took the Drudge Report posting that, for the Wednesday invitation to appear.

LAUER: You, you-

COULTER: But I'm very happy to be here Matt Lauer.

LAUER: You said all kinds of things. That, that one of the reasons you weren't on the show is because the mainstream liberal media hates conservatives. I mean you do know that we-

COULTER: I didn't say that.

LAUER: Yeah you did.

COULTER: Where did you say that?

LAUER: On, I think it was on "Hannity & Colmes" or something like that.

COULTER: That the mainstream media hates conservatives? I didn't say that.

LAUER: Yeah. You, you know that we've had every major conservative-

COULTER: I have much more colorful language. I mean you're capturing the thought, that's just not my language.

LAUER: Do, do, do you think though that much was made of this and maybe you helped fan the fire here a little bit to (holds up book) make a controversy to sell the book?

COULTER: No I don't think I'd be sitting here now if it hadn't been a headline on Drudge. But let's get to the book-

LAUER: Really?

COULTER: -because I do want to talk about the book.

LAUER: But we've had you on so many times in the past. After every book you've always been invited back. Why would you, all of a sudden, be banned?

COULTER: Well I was, well I don't know. I mean that's not for me to answer what your motives are.

LAUER: We made it, we traded you out for Tony Blair yesterday. And I think that's a pretty good switch.

COULTER: Well yeah, more than Tony Blair on for four hours.

LAUER: Yeah right.

COULTER: It's a four hour show.

LAUER: But you were, in your slot where you were supposed to be yesterday morning was Tony Blair.

COULTER: Um, and Rachel Maddow, and various gossip columnists-

LAUER: Afterward.

COULTER: -and a bear.

LAUER: Afterward.

COULTER: The point is I was cancelled twice and it wasn't until the Drudge Report ran a headline, on its own reporting, and the Drudge Report has never had to retract a report-

LAUER: You know-

COULTER: -the way NBC News has.

LAUER: You know, you know what that expression is? Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean you don't have enemies.

Then a little later in the segment, Coulter took the liberal media and specifically, Lauer’s colleague, NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams, to task for giving Obama a free ride during the campaign:

LAUER: We've just come through an election cycle where it seemed to me and maybe I'm completely wrong because apparently, according to you, I'm wrong about most things, but that, that people have decided it's time to address the issues that face this country. The economy clearly one. Unemployment. Things like that. And to maybe concentrate less on what divides us. Did you not get that sense from this? I mean I'm just asking is-

COULTER: No.

LAUER: You didn't get that sense from this election?

COULTER: No, to the contrary and as I detail, at great length in this book, we didn't, I mean to say we want to concentrate on the issues, then why wasn't B. Hussein Obama asked about the issues? He was asked, as I describe over and over in my book, you know the tough "gotcha" questions he'd get from the media were things like, "How did you feel tonight? You must have been thinking about your parents."

LAUER: Do you, do you not get a sense though-

COULTER: That's from Brian Williams.

LAUER: -that people want-

COULTER: Meanwhile Sarah Palin is memorizing the last seven kings of Swaziland.

LAUER: Do you not get a sense that people want a different tone? That they want a different attitude? That they want, maybe, to start to pull together?

COULTER: No I think liberals want conservatives to stop talking so that you can keep telling us how marvelous B. Hussein Obama is. You were not asking him about the issues during the campaign, which is why, well the next four years, I think, are gonna be a surprise for all of us because he can't keep voting, "present."

The following is the complete transcript of Coulter’s segment as it was aired in the 7am half hour of the January 7, "Today" show:

MATT LAUER: Conservative commentator Ann Coulter is a bestselling author and syndicated columnist. Her latest book is Guilty: Liberal Victims and Their Assault On America. Ann, good morning. Nice to have you here.

[On screen headline: "Conservative Queen, Coulter's Assault On Liberal America"]

ANN COULTER: Good morning, it's great to be here.

LAUER: I want to talk about [Roland] Burris in a second, but let, let me just get to this little controversy. You've been all over the blogs in the last day or so. We cancelled your appearance here on Tuesday. And from what I've been reading you thought you were banned for life from the show. Did, were you behind that report?

COULTER: No, I didn't say that. That was from a reliable news report that, by the way, had never, has never had to retract a report on exploding GM trucks. But I do know that, like NBC. Um, it apparently took-

LAUER: So we're either dead or you weren't banned.

COULTER: It apparently took eight hours for the "Today" show to remember that there was a Wednesday show that I could be invited back to. It took the Drudge Report posting that, for the Wednesday invitation to appear.

LAUER: You, you-

COULTER: But I'm very happy to be here Matt Lauer.

LAUER: You said all kinds of things. That, that one of the reasons you weren't on the show is because the mainstream liberal media hates conservatives. I mean you do know that we-

COULTER: I didn't say that.

LAUER: Yeah you did.

COULTER: Where did you say that?

LAUER: On, I think it was on "Hannity & Colmes" or something like that.

COULTER: That the mainstream media hates conservatives? I didn't say that.

LAUER: Yeah. You, you know that we've had every major conservative-

COULTER: I have much more colorful language. I mean you're capturing the thought, that's just not my language.

LAUER: Do, do, do you think though that much was made of this and maybe you helped fan the fire here a little bit to (holds up book) make a controversy to sell the book?

COULTER: No I don't think I'd be sitting here now if it hadn't been a headline on Drudge. But let's get to the book-

LAUER: Really?

COULTER: -because I do want to talk about the book.

LAUER: But we've had you on so many times in the past. After every book you've always been invited back. Why would you, all of a sudden, be banned?

COULTER: Well I was, well I don't know. I mean that's not for me to answer what your motives are.

LAUER: We made it, we traded you out for Tony Blair yesterday. And I think that's a pretty good switch.

COULTER: Well yeah, more than Tony Blair on for four hours.

LAUER: Yeah right.

COULTER: It's a four hour show.

LAUER: But you were, in your slot where you were supposed to be yesterday morning was Tony Blair.

COULTER: Um, and Rachel Maddow, and various gossip columnists-

LAUER: Afterward.

COULTER: -and a bear.

LAUER: Afterward.

COULTER: The point is I was cancelled twice and it wasn't until the Drudge Report ran a headline, on its own reporting, and the Drudge Report has never had to retract a report-

LAUER: You know-

COULTER: -the way NBC News has.

LAUER: You know, you know what that expression is? Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean you don't have enemies. But anyway. Let, let's get to-

COULTER: Let's get to the reason I wanted to be here.

LAUER: Let me get to Roland Burris first. Let me get to Roland Burris first. What's going on here? Has Rod Blagojevich pulled a fast one on the Democratic leadership here?

COULTER: I am like Roland Burris. I was turned away but I'm back.

LAUER: But I mean has he pulled one over on the Democrats here?

COULTER: Look I haven't been following this. I have a brand new book out. I'm very happy about it. All I can say is they're all Democrats so I don't really care what happens. But I do know, I have read the Constitution, and the Senate cannot turn away an appointed senator by a sitting governor. They can't do it.

LAUER: In, in the, in the book you say that liberals play victims all the time, and then they use that victimization to go on the attack.

COULTER: Right.

LAUER: You also say that the liberal media and Democrats are out to accomplish the same thing, they want to destroy America. So I mean, go ahead, why, why do liberals and the media want to destroy America?

COULTER: Oh why? Their motives? Well I'd have to be their confessor or psychologist to understand that. I'm, I'm describing the results. And one beautiful example of this my, my chapter two of the book, is the exultation of single motherhood. It, it's promoted in the New York Times and all the glossy women's magazines and Hollywood movies. And we now know, after 30 years of promoting single motherhood, of the courts destroying the institute of marriage, that children raised without fathers are filling up the prisons, are 70 percent of the teenage runaways, of, of teenage pregnancies, of rapists.

LAUER: Hasn't the mainstream media also done extensive reporting on the problem of the disintegration of the American family?

COULTER: Not so much.

LAUER: And talked about the responsibility that needs to be held by men and fathers and all that sort of thing?

COULTER: No, not so much actually. I mean I think I document that pretty well. You have Barbara Ehrenreich, who used to be a regular reporter for Time magazine and the New York Times, and she is constantly denouncing the nuclear family. National Organization for Women has a bumper sticker, "One Nuclear Family Can Destroy Your Whole Life."

LAUER: But there are a lot of other voices, there are a lot of other voices that say, "Hey we need fathers and mothers to raise children together." The, the point I want to make with this, is you, you say it and I don't have time to read the whole excerpt from the book and if people want to buy it they should go off and do that. But you say it in a fairly outrageous way. The last sentence of which and I need my glasses now. The last sentence of which is, "Countless studies on the subject make clear, look at almost any societal problem and you'll find it is really a problem of single mothers."

COULTER: Yes.

LAUER: And I think Harry Smith, I think did a, tried to raise this point with you yesterday. When you make outrageous comments-

COULTER: That isn't outrageous. That's a fact.

LAUER: When, when you, when you make outrageous comments and you use that kind of venomous tone, in some ways do you cut your own credibility off and take away from the real viable points you make in some of this?

COULTER: Okay, can I answer now?

LAUER: Sure.

COULTER: It'll be more than half a sentence. No, I mean on one hand you just said, "Look the mainstream media we're, we're totally standing up for the, for the nuclear family," and then you turn around and say that, the statement you just quoted, is an outrageous statement to make.

LAUER: No the tone of it.

COULTER: This, that-

LAUER: The tone of it.

COULTER: I said there would be more than one-

LAUER: The tone of it.

COULTER: It would be more than half a sentence. What I just said there is absolutely true. look at any societal problem, it is a problem of single motherhood. I quote Charles Murray saying basically the same thing. That you could solve-

LAUER: Well let me just clear you up, you, you said, "almost any." I mean if you want to say, "any societal problem is a result of single motherhood," that would be crazy. "Any." You said, "almost." Even in your book you say, "almost."

COULTER: Wait! Oh, okay but I'm speaking extemporaneously. You're gonna, take out the "almost."

LAUER: Okay, I'm just saying do think every societal problem-

COULTER: No.

LAUER: Okay.

COULTER: I describe what they are in the book in great detail and with enormous numbers of statistics. I mean it's not a static problem, because new illegitimate babies are being born every year, being raised without fathers. New runaways, teenage runaways, new murders are occurring everyday. So every, you know, it changes. But study after study, for years, have shown that 70 percent of the prison population - children of unwed mothers. 70, 60 to 70 percent of teenage runaways, teenage pregnancies, teenage murderers, teenage rapists. In fact there's a liberal institute, the Progressive Policy Institute, that says if you take out the factor of illegitimacy the difference in black/white crime rates completely disappears.

LAUER: I'm not saying-

COULTER: This is a massive problem. And no, the mainstream media does not discuss it.

LAUER: Let me-

COULTER: In fact your shocked by this line of mine and unfortunately Republicans-

LAUER: No, no I only read one line. The, the section in the book goes on in some other directions that I think are over the line. That's the reason I made the point.

COULTER: Well quote that sentence to me then!

LAUER: Let, let, let me do this. Let me ask you this other thing. In the book, throughout the book, you refer to the President-elect Barack Obama as "B. Hussein Obama."

COULTER: Not throughout the book.

LAUER: Well in a lot of places.

COULTER: I sometimes call him the Angel Obama.

LAUER: In a lot of places.

COULTER: The Sheriff Obama.

LAUER: You don't refer to President Bush as "G. Walker Bush." Why would you, if not for the reason of appealing to the extreme readers of your book who still believe--despite all the information and despite the fact that it's simply untrue--that he's Muslim.

COULTER: It's not untrue that, that's what his middle name is. This is the first time-

LAUER: But why would you refer to him

COULTER: -in history-

LAUER: -in that way, when no one else refers to him in that way?

COULTER: He refers to himself that way!

LAUER: As B. Hussein Obama?

COULTER: We now know that he likes his middle name.

LAUER: But as B. Hussein Obama?

COULTER: He's announced, he's announced that he is going to use his middle name now. So-

LAUER: Well so I think George Walker Bush-

COULTER: You act like this is a hate crime-

LAUER: George Walker Bush enjoys his middle name too-

COULTER: -to use his middle name.

LAUER: -but he doesn't call himself G. Walker Bush. I'm just saying you don't refer to any one else in that way.

COULTER: Okay I think it's insane-

LAUER: But by highlighting Hussein-

COULTER: -to act like using someone's actual middle name is some sort of vicious hate crime - point one. Point two, if Republicans-

LAUER: Why take his first name out of the mix?

COULTER: Because, because we just went, I mean it is funny Matt Lauer. I'm not going to deny that there is something ironic about having just gone to war with an enemy named Hussein and they're running a guy whose middle name is Hussein. This would be like Republicans. I'm going to finish this sentence no matter what you do.

LAUER: Go, go! I didn't say a word.

COULTER: Oh you were getting ready. In 1948 running, running instead of Thomas Dewey, you know if it were, Thomas Hitler Dewey. If that were his middle name I think it would have come out. If we were running candidates named, named, you know-

LAUER: Would we have called him, T. Hitler Dewey?

COULTER: I think it would have been mentioned.

LAUER: We've just come through an election cycle where it seemed to me and maybe I'm completely wrong because apparently, according to you, I'm wrong about most things, but that, that people have decided it's time to address the issues that face this country. The economy clearly one. Unemployment. Things like that. And to maybe concentrate less on what divides us. Did you not get that sense from this? I mean I'm just asking is-

COULTER: No.

LAUER: You didn't get that sense from this election?

COULTER: No, to the contrary and as I detail, at great length in this book, we didn't, I mean to say we want to concentrate on the issues, then why wasn't B. Hussein Obama asked about the issues? He was asked, as I describe over and over in my book, you know the tough "gotcha" questions he'd get from the media were things like, "How did you feel tonight? You must have been thinking about your parents."

LAUER: Do you, do you not get a sense though-

COULTER: That's from Brian Williams.

LAUER: -that people want-

COULTER: Meanwhile Sarah Palin is memorizing the last seven kings of Swaziland.

LAUER: Do you not get a sense that people want a different tone? That they want a different attitude? That they want, maybe, to start to pull together?

COULTER: No I think liberals want conservatives to stop talking so that you can keep telling us how marvelous B. Hussein Obama is. You were not asking him about the issues during the campaign, which is why, well the next four years, I think, are gonna be a surprise for all of us because he can't keep voting, "present."

LAUER: George Bush leaving office in two weeks. What are your thoughts on his departure?

COULTER: Well I'm grateful to him for keeping the nation safe for the last, for the last eight years. We'll see if that continues. We don't really know that much about what, what the President-elect is going to do, because he was being asked so much about how he thinks his parents would feel tonight? "You must have been thinking of them? And how do you think the Republicans will come after you?"

LAUER: The book is called Guilty. Ann Coulter, I'm glad you're back.

COULTER: Oh so am I! Thank you.

LAUER: It's good to be here.

COULTER: Nice to see you again.

LAUER: Alright we are going to, by the way you're not banned for life, obviously. Okay?

COULTER: Thank you, I'm delighted to hear that.

LAUER: Next book comes out I'm sure you'll be sitting right, you'll be sitting right here again.

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

LMAO!

I don't like Coulter but she was spot on with how the media treated Obama & single motherhood.  I might actually consider buying this book and I've never wished to read any of her books before.

Perfect Demotivator for the Obama Administration

http://www.despair.com/government.html

She Grows on You

Ann is one of those people so controversial that you have to actually listen to and/or watch her speak to realize she is the ultimate Reaganite and she is backing down for absolutely nobody.  She is the embodiment of the complaint of whiny liberal feminists that "if you are a strong woman and stand up for yourself, people think of you as a bitch".  Well, Ann seems to know what she thinks, lives it, doesn't care what others think, and, in my eyes is not a bitch.  She is a strong woman.  Period.

Before I ever heard Rush, all I knew about him was what I read in Newsweek or on the liberally slanted talk radio station KMOX that eventually picked him up here.  You should have heard the furor that went on on that station, and in the local newspapers.  Several (almost half, if I remember correctly) of their on air personalities actually quit and moved to other stations over it.  This was about the time of the Hillary care debates.  I would actually turn Rush off whenever I knew he was coming on.  And I had voted for Reagan and was a strong Reagan supporter all through the Iran-Contra hearings, cheering for Ollie and hating that weasel Dean.  That is how clueless the MSM is.  Finally, one day, Rush was speaking when I walked into the room with the radio/cassette tape deck combo.  I went over to put in a cassette so I wouldn't have to listen to "hate" speech, heard something interesting about the health care lunacy, which I was against, kept listening for a while, then a while longer, and before the show was over I was actually amazed that I found myself agreeing with nearly everything Rush said.  Wasn't that fascinating?  Point is, Ann was the same.  Until I got a chance to see and hear her in person, I thought bad things about her too.

About Lauer:  is he clueless or what?  "Do, do, do, do,...".  Translation: "Duh, duh, duh, duh...".  She had him nailed to the wall.  That was so much fun to watch.

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

I've heard her talk before.

     I've seen her many times on H&C, O'Reilly (she doesn't show up there anymore),  Donny Deutsch's lame show, etc.  I definately can't warm up to her.  She is annoying, she crosses the line of tact, and unlike Reagan, she is incapable of conveying her message without using shock tactics.  But she's still right about the MSM and unwed motherhood. 

Perfect Demotivator for the Obama Administration

http://www.despair.com/government.html

OK

Personal taste, I guess.  As for "crossing the line of tact" and using "shock tactics", I guess I have a hard time seeing where she even comes close to someone like Overbite, Madcow, or Franken to name just a few.  She does not lie and she does not back down.  The libs find that extremely offensive, I do not.  They would rather have McLame and his ilk who fall down on their knees to keep from doing or saying anything that might offend the libs.  Then when they inevitably do offend them by crossing the perpetually moving line, they prostrate themselves again trying to make up for it.  OK, lets let 20,000,000 illegal aliens in.  Will that make you happy?  It's the same mindset that absolutely hates Palin.  While she is not as blatantly in your face as Coulter, the results are the same, the difference being that she has the unmitigated audacity to try to run for national office.  What cheek!

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

I agree totally.  Ann is

I agree totally.  Ann is not nearly as bombastic as Olberweenie or Franken.  If she were a liberal, and behaved exactly as she does now, it would be completely acceptable to most of the media.

Mizflame

I have to agree that she can be a little sharp toned and sarcastic, but I like the fact she in un-apologetic. She also doesn't come across well on t.v. most of the time because the cherry-pick a quote from her books, then when she tries to explain, she gets continually interrupted. I have heard her speak in person, what a hoot! And the people in the room were falling all over themselves. I think, though, she comes across best in her books. If you have never read them, she has got to be one of the best referrenced writers I can think of. She has facts to back up everything. I mostly like it when she does these programs because she gets people like Matt's panties in a wad. That's good enough for me.

 

AWESOME!

I need this video.  Anyone?  Anyone?

The thing I like about Ann is that she doesn't let people talk over her / interrupt her, which is a favorite tactic of lib journalists and hosts. 

You can probably get it

You can probably get it on AnnCoulter.com.

Unfortunately, he did talk

Unfortunately, he did talk over her when she was discussing the media's treatment of Obama.  I was furious and wanted him to respond to her comments.  I wish she'd had more time to take him to task and hold him accountable.

 Still a great interview. 

Here's the link at least:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM6euZ4BAyA 

Video

Try this

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

This was an earlier

This was an earlier interview with Matt promoting her book Godless.  Still funny though.  Her body language is an important component that a transcript can't suitably capture.

 

And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall.   -- Edgar Allan Poe

Oh Well.

I didn't see the original, so I thought this was it.  My bad.

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

Matt was almost pleading with her.

"Please stop picking on Obama...Stop it Ann.You'll spoil everything."

It's funny how now at this time he seems to have a problem with people showing disrespect for the Office of the President.It didn't seem to bother him for the last eight years.

Matt Lauer is a total jerk! Haven't watched Today in years

since he came on - he and Katie were absolutely tooooooooo much for a human to take first thing in the morning.

Where or where are today's Dave Garroway and Frank Blair - Ann Currie's breathless presentations that she considers 'news' were disgusting - my head hurt so much that there was NO alternative to turning the channel - which I did!

A PROUD member of the Oogedy Boogedy branch of the GOP!

Matt Lauer vs Giant Bat

Did anybody else see that one, about 8 years ago? They had some animal person on with a bunch of different animals, and a GIANT bat (the largest species) jumped onto Matt's back and crawled up!! Whoever it was, Jack Hanna maybe, didn't remove the bat until you could see one of it's claws coming over the top of that putz's head! Matt was obviously trying not to scream and run in circles. I laughed myself SICK!

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Self-Righteous Progressive

Matt Lauer is one of these liberal-minded fellows who tend to travel in social-justice and political circles, but they are much better at talking about high principles than actually incorporating them into their lives.

These progressive types have an uncanny ability to gloss over their own behavior as they focus on the wrongdoing of others who display the same psychological and emotional warfare. He's the kind of guy that's alluring because it appears that he wants to make the world a better place. Yet, he doesn’t want to afford you the same rights he fights for so vehemently on the political or social scene.

http://politicsofdes...

Matt Lauer...

... smoked, once again, like a cheap liberal cigar.

 If NBC wanted to jump ratings, Coulter should replace him.

"smoked, once again, like a

"smoked, once again, like a cheap liberal cigar"

That usually means 'crushed out after a few puffs'.

Ann kicked his a** all over

Ann kicked his a** all over the studio. I'm sure the sycophants at NBC sucked up to Lauer afterwards telling him how well HE did. And how typical of a member of the liberal media. Matt makes a statement of "fact" that Ann supposedly said mainstream liberal media (like theres any other kind) hates conservatives and when she calls him on it he can't state for certain if she said it, when or where! You'd think he'd be better prepared. If you are going to accuse someone of something...anything...have you facts in order! Day, date, time, location...you know...journalism 101.

 

Facts don't matter to these

Facts don't matter to these clowns; only the higher agenda matters.

I wasn't planning to buy the book..

But now I would.

People hate Ann for the same reasons they hated (and still hate) Sarah Palin: she is a strong conservative woman who is not ashamed of her beliefs!

 

Go Ann!!!!

I'm buying it now too.

I'll bet she did more for his ratings on wednesday than any two democrats have ever done.    His technique is infantile and whiney.   

Amazing

Some of us are on Team Sarah and still think Ann does this for (selling) effect. And I am not ashamed of my beliefs, nor do I agree that single-parent homes are by defnition dysfunctional. Maybe you should say ALL homes are dysfunctional until proven otherwise.

 

How 'bout this....

All single parent homes are at a disadvantage compared to a complete nuclear family.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

cl3x

  nu-cu-lar

  That's how real

 
That's how real conservatives pronounce it.

single brood mares

Does what for 'selling effect'? Tell the truth.

The message is good...

...but let's face it, Ann can really rub people the wrong way; even conservatives.

That said, I would agree with her about the family issues -and many of the issues she talks about in her columns - she mentioned.  Addressing this single issue, imho, would alleviate many ills in our society.

Also, I think Ann likes being the sort of bossy, smart @ss girl of conservatism.

And she's kind a hot :)

http://www.reasonand...
...thought matters

++++++++++++++++


Normally I don't root for the disease. But in your case I am willing to make and exception.

We beg to differ!

  Ann only rubs liberals the wrong way. Conservatives cheer Ann.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

"Meanwhile Sarah Palin is

"Meanwhile Sarah Palin is memorizing the last seven kings of Swaziland."

LOL:  This is why I love Ann Coulter.  She has a biting way of getting to the heart of the matter and is unapologetic about it.

Meanwhile, Lauer tries to play the "people just want to get along now" card.  Whenever libs are in power, that's when "people just want to get along" and do not want partisan politics.  Coulter is right.  The translation is that they just want to be allowed to implement their agenda without criticism.  When Republicans run things, though, all we hear is dissent. 

That was Matt Lauer doing a

That was Matt Lauer doing a pathetic Tom Daschle impression...you know, the "disappointed" look and the whining about how he is just "concerned" about the tone.... yeah, right, Matt. You just want to make Ann see the light, you're just trying to help....

 

Yes

You're exactly right.  All poor, sincere Matt wants is for everyone to get along. *gag*  Ann was as sharp as steel and made Matt look like a whiney fool.

That was Matt Lauer doing a

That was Matt Lauer doing a pathetic Tom Daschle impression...you know, the "disappointed" look and the whining about how he is just "concerned" about the tone.... yeah, right, Matt. You just want to make Ann see the light, you're just trying to help....

And you're right.  When Democrats are in charge, we all have to "get behind" the President and the government; when Republicans are running things, all we hear is how "dissent is the highest form of patriotism." 

 

Yeah, now suddenly we're

Yeah, now suddenly we're supposed to have reverance for the Office of President?   I agree, but where was it the last eight years?

Ahhh, its Ann Coulter vs

Ahhh, its Ann Coulter vs Matt Lauer. Or the smart ass vs the dumbass....

LAUER: Let, let, let me do

LAUER: Let, let, let me do this. Let me ask you this other thing. In the book, throughout the book, you refer to the President-elect Barack Obama as "B. Hussein Obama."

COULTER: Not throughout the book.

LAUER: Well in a lot of places.

COULTER: I sometimes call him the Angel Obama.

This is some fantastic theatre.  In the 60s, it was the liberals who were the agitators and rock-throwers, who thumbed their noses at the status quo.  And now they ARE the status quo, and Coulter is playing the role of Abbie Hoffman.

I'm beginnng to like her. 

I agree...it is great theatre...

Here's more:

 

LAUER: Let me get to Roland Burris first. Let me get to Roland
Burris first. What's going on here? Has Rod Blagojevich pulled a fast
one on the Democratic leadership here?

COULTER: I am like Roland Burris. I was turned away but I'm back.

LAUER: But I mean has he pulled one over on the Democrats here?

 

Another example of how quick she is...and how pwned Lauer is...

..."but I mean has she pulled one over on the Demo...er...MSM here?".....way too funny...and somewhat prescient.

 

Saw the show. Lauer is

Saw the show. Lauer is still wondering what hit him.

You would think that after all this time, the leftist MSM would know better than to try their little tricks on Ann. They lose every time. And by having her on, they boost the sales of her books.

This Lauer guy really is a numbskull, isn't he?

 

Go Ann Go! The Rocky

Go Ann Go!

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

Yup. she makes the MSM

Yup. she makes the MSM Lauers of the world look like complete babblegeeks, and it takes them a week to figure that out.

 

Dubya

"but he doesn't call himself G. Walker Bush. I'm just saying you don't refer to any one else in that way"

No, a lot of people refers to Bush as Dubya (W), which is a play on his middle name, Walker, remember? There's even a BILLBOARD in Hollywood that says:  "W. Still President. Thank you Hollywood!"

Lauer must thing we're all stupid, or VERY forgetful.

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

pro-life? naah - let's use "ANTI-ABORTION"

LAUER: Let, let, let me do this. Let me ask you this other thing. In the book, throughout the book, you refer to the President-elect Barack Obama as "B. Hussein Obama." Why refer to him by a name he doesn't call himself?"

COULTER (I WISH): You guys refer to pro-life people as "abortion opponents" or "anti-abortion." Why refer to them by a name they don't call themselves?"

LAUER'S EAR-PIECE: quickly change the subject dammit! 

LAUER: It's good to be

LAUER: It's good to be here.

I'll bet it is, Matt.  After the pounding he just took, I'm sure they brought out the smelling salts.  This interview just illustrates what an empty suit Matt Lauer is.  He made a direct accusation of Coulter, and when she called him on it, he was left to clutch at straws to find where he got his information (Hannity and Colmes or something, nice).  Then he tried the lame, tortured "doesn't the result of this election illustrate that the people want to come together" tactic, and emerged as pantless as the skiier they profiled.  As the interview wore on, Lauer resorted to changing the subject as soon as Coulter challenged him to clarify his non-specific accusations.  Usually contestants who get flogged as comprehensively as Matt Lauer did know better than to seek a rematch...fortunately for us, Lauer actually believes he won on points. 

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

Is it a problem of single

Is it a problem of single mothers or disfunctional family background? Isn't "single mothers" a little too specific?

Single mothers ARE a

Single mothers ARE a dysfunctional family background. (and I'm talking about women who MAKE the decision to do it that way, lest you try to divert the point using widows)

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

The media employs a rather

The media employs a rather sly tactic in glorifying certain protected classes like single mothers, anti-war veterans and public school teachers whenever it wants to shame conservatives from scrutinizing the merits of their arguments.  The use of a statistic that suggests that single parenthood is not to be encouraged is not an attack on single parents.  Skepticism about the motives of a particular anti-war veteran is not an attack on all veterans.  Challenges to NEA propaganda is not an assault on teachers or children.  But dishonest media create victims out of these protected classes and use them as shields against resistance to their political positions.  There's nothing wrong with pointing out that a high percentage of crimes are committed by children raised in single-parent homes...that's not an indictment of individual single parents (some are heroic, some are portrayed as heroic and some are just deadbeats)...it's a suggestion single parenthood is not an ideal to be pursued. 

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

I'm just saying that as

I'm just saying that as phrased, the blame seems to be heaped on single mothers, not dead-beat dads. The problem is broken families, not single mothers.

If single moms have been "glorified," it's to eliminate the idea that all is lost without a husband if a woman is unfortunate enough to be deserted, or has elected to remove herself from an abusive relationship.

Good evening Bal

The term single mother should be self explanatory. Approval or condemnation by the MSM depends on which side of the political spectrum the mother is on.

Fair enough, but I believe

Fair enough, but I believe that putting all single mothers in a protected class as if to suggest that all single motherhood is an involuntary condition brought upon unwed mothers (in effect that they bear no responsibility when there's a perfectly good deadbeat to heap all the blame on...the all-single-mothers-are-selfless-heroes-not-to-be-scrutinized platitude) is a dishonest tactic.  Single parenthood should be a situation of last resort (but when you have the press glorifying some wealthy celebutard for choosing that path out of convenience, it kind of undercuts the notion that it's not typically the smartest choice), and there are statistics that support that position.  I don't think there's anything wrong with pointing that out.    

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

fitz, I think championing

fitz, I think championing the plight of the single mother does result in some thinking they are above reproach. Obviously that's wrong. But for Ann to say flat out "single mothers are to blame" is ridiculous and intentionally irrational to -- guess what -- get attention.

bal, That sounds

bal,

That sounds reasonable, but without knowing what the actual "objectionable" statement is in context, it's hard to know whether Coulter has really said "single mothers are to blame" or if (as often happens with Coulter) much of the media is framing her argument to have it appear objectionable.

By the way, where have you been? 

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

once again Ann is taken out of context

For the millionth time, Ann's point was not to attack or ridicule women, but to point out the effects that particular situation can have and blame the media for encouraging more and more girls to fall into it.

It's one thing to end up that way because of family issues or death, but it's quite another to choose it for your children and then insist that overwhelming stastitics are all lies.

It amazes me how libs can declare a "consesus" on scientific data and tell us the debate is over when it suits their politics, but when a conservative proffers study findings of their own, suddenly they feel in their heart that statistics aren't always correct. 

 

I'm a typical white person.

→ candance

And when the statistics point to a 70% probability across a spectrum of tens of million observations, libs still look for that missing dynamic.  But of course, that missing piece isn't the anecdotal dad.

Must be sexual repression that causes it.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

I hate to break it to you but...

     All is lost.  Before you have kids you better make sure you find a mate of high regards and with a strong moral compass.  The statistics speak for themselves.  Crime rates, drug addiction, low education, low earning potential are higher among children of single mothers. 

     If you don't buy off on what the statistics say, just look towards nature.  In the animal kingdom the species that have the larger brains, are more complex, and need more time to mature are the ones that are being cared for by 2 parents or in the case of elephants and lions; in groups.  There is a reason for that.  The offsprings will not learn how to survive if they get half-assed care from only 1 parent.  

     If momma is trying to work 2-3 jobs while the kid is left alone to fend for himself or or stuck at the babysitters, do you think that kid will vulnerable to gang violence, drugs, getting some girl pregnant, etc or do you think that kid will have a high chance of becomming an honor student with a high moral compass and some sort of plan for what he wants to do with his life?

Perfect Demotivator for the Obama Administration

http://www.despair.com/government.html

balboa raises valid points

These are valid points.  The problem is broken families, specifically those with cowardly, irresponsible fathers who skip town.  When a father deserts his own children, along with their mother, the ramifications are macroscale.  A woman in this circumstance has few moral choices.  Being a "single mother" is one of them; abortion, while a legal choice, is nevertheless an immoral one.

However, this said, I think Coulter is lamenting the media glamorization of "single mothers," as if this is a good end to be pursued by women on their own accord, with men implicitly cast as superfluous, and I think she is suggesting that the media have contributed greatly to the problem, and that it is misguided at best and sinister at worst.

 

And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall.   -- Edgar Allan Poe

Bal

The choice is made to have a child by an unwed mother and golly gee, the father is never around but we end up supporting the child and the mother. That is what is wrong with single motherhood. The maturity level of the unwed mothers that I see regularly is about 16 which is the age that they stopped going to school to have children. What sort of a future do you think that projects for the children? Most of these mothers start at sixteen and continue to have additional out of wedlock babies for years. Some stop at one child but most continue for at least three or four more kids. This also often means that by 32 years old, they are grandmothers because they have taught their children that it is OK to have this lifestyle.

Balboa

Actually, the book is about media bias, and what she is saying is that the MEDIA glorifies single motherhood, that is the type that is espoused in Hollywood. Not, hey, I had my old man run out on me, kind of single motherhood. I have been a single mother, due to divorce. It sucked, and I was having a horrible time with my kids. So, yeah, I don't think it is an ideal. I think it should be a last option kind of thing. I divorced because my ex was a wife-beater, yet, I stayed for 14 years, because I wanted my kids to have a nuclear family. Even though I didn't get the crap beat out of me anymore, the result was horrible. I was broke and my kids were out of control. I think Ann also was trying to point out that it is also a fact the government has destroyed the black nuclear family.

Do you really think your

Do you really think your kids are better off today because you stayed in that relationship?

Balboa

No!!!I don't think my kids are better off beause I stayed, I was making the point that  things that were not suddenly all sunshine and roses just because I wasn't getting abused, anymore. It was very hard, and that's why I am against glorifying single motherhood like the media and Hollywood does. I don't think it is ever ideal. Yeah, it may be financially easier for those with big $$$,like those in Hwood, but by saying how wonderful it is leads young women to think, hey, this is great! They don't think about the money, how they won't be able to pay for nannies, tutors, and cooks for their kids, no father to help raise the kid, it will all be on them. So, as I said before, Ann is calling out the MEDIA for glorifying this. That's a good thing, in my book. And yes, girls do need to learn to keep their legs shut!!!

broken families

Ann isn't talking about 'broken' families. She is talking about 'never were' families. Mostly welfare brood mares but, also hollywood ditzs.

 

Never try to teach a Liberal to think. It wastes your time and annoys the Liberal!

bal - most of the time the 'single mothers' referenced by Ann

have absolutely no idea who their baby's father is!  The baby is simply a way to receive the first welfare check!  And most of the time the money from that check is not spent on the baby...hence bringing forth the description by Ann of the prisons being full of neglected grown children of single mothers who never gave a damn!

There are MANY single mothers who do not go the welfare route and raise responsible children with loving care. 

Contesting her suppostions is simply the way of liberals to try to pin the tail on the elephant rather than the donkey! 

A PROUD member of the Oogedy Boogedy branch of the GOP!

Yeah, but she didn't say

Yeah, but she didn't say that, did she. She took a swipe at all single mothers because she knew that would get a rise out of people.

→ I disagree with both

What Ann is saying is that single mothers, for the most part, have a harder time raising disciplined kids.

A well-meaning mother, who is single, has a far harder time raising children respectful of the rights of others.

Very nearly all children will be tempted to engage in all manner of wrongdoing, and a very important deterrent is the presence of a father.

Ann is not singling out the Welfare Mother.  She is including the divorced nurse who works nights while the 14 yr old is supposedly doing homework.  To say that child has exactly the same probability of staying out of jail as the kid who comes from the two parent home is a real stretch.

Just wait till your father gets home.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

I don't know what she said - haven't read the book yet.

A PROUD member of the Oogedy Boogedy branch of the GOP!

Will someone in the media

Will someone in the media please tell me what in the hell they mean when they say "people want a different tone" or "they want a different attitude".For eight damn years all I have heard is Bush bashing and not once have I seen President Bush go after demwits or the msm.God I really hate these msm folks.Bet you will never see these idiots out in public on their days off.They know that they will get heckled or more.

Exactly, obxray

I have heard the plea for a 'different this' and 'newer that' when all the while they (the media, of course) are still attacking Governor Palin (and all of her family), President Bush, VP Cheney, and whoever else they feel threatened by.  Toughen-up, Leftists, 'cause it's going to get a lot rougher for you numbskulls.  Remember, when some of our citizens are suffering, that it was YOU who voted Hussein into office.

Yeah, I use Hussein like everyone in the press uses W.  I have no respect for Hussein and there's no reason to show it.  Until, of course, he shows the country his real birth certificate, the passport he used to get into Pakistan, his school records, etc., etc., etc.  He has hidden so much that I have to show the respect due to him - none.

Well, there's my 'Tone' in a nutshell.  I am going to exercise my right of protest for the next 4 years.  Ya know, that thing all the Leftists wore out for the last 8 years.

This is a lot of

This is a lot of excitement over a simple duel between a moron with a pen knife and a woman with a 45.

just a pen

sans the knife.

Then he can scrape himself up off the floor and re-inflate himself by blowing on his thumb like the cartoon character he is. 

"part of what I'm hoping to introduce as the next president is a new ethic of [government enforced] responsibility" - B. Obama

LOL!

LOL!

Coulter vs Lauer

The weenie metrosexual Lauer brings a knife to a gunfight.  It was not even close, a ratings bump for NBC due to Coulter, now back to the bottom of the ratings.  Lauer is a pathetic loser for the MSM.

 

O's last day 1-23-2013

Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter should run for president, maybe we could get the leftist media out of the way. Palin/Coulter '12 sounds good.

Lauer was acting like a

Lauer was acting like a shrill little girl...nay nay nay nay naaaay nay...what a woos...

Ann's got a bigger set than he'll ever have.  Thank you, Ann, and don't stop using Barack's middle name.....because it pisses them off... LOL

As the old saying goes . . . .

Never start a battle of wits when you're out of ammunition.  Matt, you'd be better off behind the lines, getting coffee.

Two days in a row for our Conservative Wonder, Ann.  She does have a way with words.  I want to see her on Olbermann, Letterman, Matthews,  and that newer troll on PMSNBC, whatzername - Madcow.  Would any of them have the guts to go one-on-one with someone that can ''slit them up a treat''?  Letterman might, but he's so old and senile (a crabby-ass) he would just attempt mindless attacks that made sense only to the most mentally deficient.

I'm going out to get her book today.

Ann--

We would have won all the campaign debtes if Ann had been in the running. The other candidates would look so stupid they would withdraw in embarassment.

 

A small but nice win for conservatives.

Sarah and Ann

Wouldn't it be great to see Sarah Palin and Ann Coulter on a ticket? They could play good "cop, bad cop" right into the Whitehouse.

Ann, my conservative Goddess

Heh. I'm willing to bet that Lauer needed some intense hemmorhoid cream after the reaming that Ann gave him.  I applaud her wholeheartedly that she walked into that pit of vipers and fought back.  Thanks for giving the rest of us conservatives a voice, Ann. 

"What you can not enforce, do not command" -Sophocles-

COULTER: No, I didn't say

COULTER: No, I didn't say that. That was from a reliable news report that, by the way, had never, has never had to retract a report on exploding GM trucks."

LOL!!!!!This might be the best line ever in 2009 and it's only January.

Lauer got destroyed like Roland Martin destroys a donut.

Ann's new book

My wife was wonderful enough to pick up her new book for me yesterday.  Having finished the chapter on single mothers, I don't think she's referring to the single mothers who were made single through an act of God such as death, but those whacked out idiots who get knocked up because they can't keep their legs closed and the man who they let knock them up is a drug addict who took off at the first sign of responsibility.  Or the moronic starlets who think that it's ok to go out and get a sperm donation and screw having a real live father present.  I believe she is referring to those families where dad has taken off and refuses to own up to his responsibilities and moms who don't make said garbage accountable.

"What you can not enforce, do not command" -Sophocles-

Messing with little democrat minds....

It probably blows the feminists away that strong minded women like Sarah Palin and Ann Coulter have made the 'choice' to stick to conservative values that still place importance on a nuclear family, religious beliefs and ethical values and personal responsibility.  I especially loved it when Ann started slapping Matt around about how his station and all the other libs gave Hussein Obama a free pass during the election.  You could definitely tell he had orders to keep the interview off THAT subject.

GO ANN!!!!!

"What you can not enforce, do not command" -Sophocles-

This explains why McCain lost.

McCain tried to appease and make nice with the MSM and the left-wing extremist democrats. He managed to alienate conservatives and moderates.

Ann Coulter stands up to one left-wing extremist moron and energizes the whole conservative base.

This is lesson number one for 2010.

Coco

I'm certain that this is the reason why Conservatives have lost ground over the last 8 years. Too many conservatives have tried to play nice and court the middle and the Dems.. They have been too kind to the folks lying and cheating and telling half truths and propaganda by not coming out and exposing the truth. Too much Senatorial attitude by John McCain and too much of a "Kindler Gentler" George Bush Presidency when they were both getting kicked in the teeth by the opposition.

I agree! I'm waiting for McCain's first journey across the

aisle!  What a traitor he is to the principles of the Republican Party - we are CONSERVATIVES, whether he likes it or not!  He should have changed parties if he couldn't stand up for us! 

I voted for George W. Bush and thank him for keeping our country safe during his term in office, however I feel greatly let down by his lack of leadership in conservative fiscal policies as well as his neglect of  the illegal immigration issue. 

One of the worst decisions was his selection of a Democrat for Treasury Secretary and then following his advice!  President Bush should have vetoed that hastily concocted first bailout!  I thank each and every Republican in the House who voted against it.  We need one of them in a position of leadership - it is time for Boehner and McConnell to step aside! 

WE NEED CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP - NOW!  

A PROUD member of the Oogedy Boogedy branch of the GOP!

Agree

Ronald Reagan is not going to be back.  There are an awful lot of people out there talking the talk, McLame included, but they don't walk the walk.  And I see more of them on here than I would like but hey, we can't convince people to adopt conservatism if they don't come on and get immersed.  I am so sick and tired of politicians of all stripes, but especially the ones that espouse conservative values, but then spend their time crossing the aisle trying to please the press and the libs, i.e. McLame and the Govuhnator and countless others.  It amazes me that people don't wake up and vote for more politicians that actually do what they say they are going to do, i.e. Inhoff, Jindall, Palin.  We thought we had a conservative "revolution" in '94, but look where that has gotten us- Gingrich, Boehner, McConnell and others who are now afraid to stand up for what's right. 

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

amazing

We havea duty to throughly vet Sarah Palin to make sure she is up to the challenge!

Let's not as Obama any gotcha questions. It's time for a new tone in politics.

Speaking of gotcha questions, did you hear Sarah Palin flub an answer about what magazines she reads? She's obviously too stupid to hold public office.

But it's not the media's job to portray politicians as stupid. We all need to help Obama be successful.

Once again proving their double standards are all the standards they have. 

 

I'm a typical white person.

Thank you Chris Matthews!

Or was that your imitation of....Hal?

 

→ I ♥ Ann

There, I've said it.

I hope this video is available soon.  I know she was debating a clueless milquetoast, but it must have been awesome theatre, nonetheless.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Video

Here

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

  I haven't even finished

 
I haven't even finished reading it yet, but I have to say this...

"and a bear"

ROFL!

  I haven't even finished

 
I haven't even finished reading it yet, but I have to say this...

"and a bear"

ROFL!

sheryl

Put the mouse down....step away from your keyboard.

 

  It was FUNNY!!!  She was

  It was FUNNY!!!  She was telling him all the "important" things they put in there in her place, and he kept interrupting her as she is making the list, and she said, "And a bear".  I just pictured it and it was funny.  Wasn't it?

sheryl

Of course it was funny.

I was referring to the Sheryl Stutter Syndrome, LOL.

Sorry, couldn't help myself.  :)

 

  I just realized that.

  I just realized that. Haha... only two though... I guess the treatments are working.

LOL!

LOL!

and...

LOL! 2.0

 

Gary

 

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

Well Okay.....

But DON'T make me repeat myself!

I am still laughing about that and all of the silly comments.

 

In defence of Sheryl

I have been having a double comment prob here the last few days, and I see a few others have, too. Why? Of course, Sheryl's New Years day postings were great fun.

server issues

We were just having a bit of fun.

Seriously, though, the server here has been a bit twitchy over the past couple of days, no worries.

 

  I feel honored to hold

  I feel honored to hold the record for multiple posts ever since anyone started counting. (32 thank you for asking)  But the one here was cuz i got distracted when it didn't go and then i forgot if i actually clicked it then i clicked it again. Also, I believe I am automatically pardoned because i am holding a sleeping grandbaby.

The old "I was holding a sleaping baby" defense.

The old "I was holding a sleaping baby" defense.

A likely story...  ;-)

 

"Gov. Palin has been subjected to one of the most massive and dishonest pile-on smear attacks in the history of liberal media."  -- Lowell Ponte

32?

Really?

Wow!  Not only do you hold the record...I don't ever recall a multiple like that...where it kept adding one or two words at a time.  Strangest thing I've seen here.

As for the sleeping grandbaby....lucky you!  A sleeping grandbaby in arms makes everything in the world right.

Post on, sheryl.

 

  Amen to that Blonde.

  Amen to that Blonde. There is nothing better anywhere on earth!

Ooooooh....baby talk

Much better than the porn thread. I'm nursing my 12 week old as I type. I usually am when I'm on here. It forces me to sit down so I might as well be entertained while he's keeping me pinned. :-)

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Uh . . .

TMI

Free

What are you doing on the baby thread? :)
BTW, that is what they are for. Men adore breasts, but it's gross if you feed a baby with them huh?
Sarah does it too Free. :-O

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Amen, cl3x

But don't those husbands love those boobies when you are nursing??? Mine thought the sheer size was a great act of nature.LOL. Have u seen the video on youtube of the chick who nurses her 8 yr old? Now that is a funny clip.

Y'all had a lot of nerve

Y'all had a lot of nerve to criticize the porn thread. This one's better. Would either of you know where I can get a pornograph?

coco,

LOL-Yeah, they get all over me for pointing out the obvious about the hard times that have befallen the porn industry, then come over here and start talking about breasteses.

Dayem, life just ain't fair.  :-^)

-Dave

“Them that’s going get on the wagon. Them that ain’t get out of the way.” -Because enough is enough.

WOW RD

My momma never told me all this. I'm EMBARRASSED.

I'm just getting warmed up

Tell Free to look away.
If you're not careful the baby can nurse on one side more than the other. Which leads to an imbalance. Which leads to taking first AND second place in a wet T-shirt contest!

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

*

*

→ **

( . ) ( . )  You were saying?

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Cool,

LOL-No, I ain't going there.

I'm in enough trouble as it is. :-)

-Dave

“Them that’s going get on the wagon. Them that ain’t get out of the way.” -Because enough is enough.

Cocodrie

Guess this thread just got better, huh coco?!
Check with Free, I'm sure he has 3 or 4 pornographs just lying around.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Hello chose

If these threads keep going we're going to cause global warming and have to change our name to Vicebusters.

Chose.

Don't go slandering me now.

TBDI

I started out a 34 DD so when I have a baby I make Dolly Parton look like a twig! It's actually quite uncomfortable, but considering our little boy has gained 10 lbs and 5.5 inches in 12 weeks I'd say they're doing their job!

(if Free thinks that's gross, I'm gonna tell him what a baby comes OUT OF when it's born! :-O)

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Chose!

OMG! LOL!!

I actually deliverd my two youngest myself, on purpose, at home too! Our family doctor thought it was great. I think mom's are the best!

BTW, your sense of humor rocks!

 

Gary

 

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

Gary

We have three, and the last two were born at home with just my husband there!! (yes, it was deliberate both times)
I read that chili post of yours to my husband this morning and he laughed himself sick! I'm bookmarking that thing.
And thanks, life is too serious to take seriously, if you know what I mean.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

You go girl!

"We have three, and the last two were born at home with just my husband there!!"

That's too cool good lady! Child birth is natural, my experience delivering my two youngest was a great time in my life! What a small world that I would post to you about delivering my two youngest and you did the same!! WOW! Good for you, I'm liking you more and more (I liked you from the start BTW, your wit is excellent!) Congrats on your 3 kids, they have a great mom! Kids are great!! Mine are all grown now and I am very proud of them all. Keep up the great work good lady! Bless you and have a great new year!

 

Gary

 

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

  I can't  believe I

  I can't  believe I missed the whole GOOD thread!  I had two of my babies at home too, and nursed all mine for almost two years (each).  They got tired of it before I did.  Well, I wish I had been here, Newsbusters got really comfortable for a little bit here.

Now, now Chose, Protect

Now, now Chose,

Protect Free!He might not be ready for that adventure yet!! I only have two, (kids, and breasts), but did the 100% natural childbirth. And yeah, I wore a size 1 dress, and had a 34 DD chest. With the blonde hair and southern accent, I did get called Dolly a few times by friends! I am happy for you with the new baby. Glad to hear he is growing so well. That breast-feeding does make those little critters grow fast. My granddaughter will be a year old Feb. 11th and is still on the boobie. I think my daughter is starting to get tired of it, but I hope she continues awhile. As much as she loves babies, she might decide to give me a new grandchild. And I think we have just the right number now.

TBDI

She sounds like a wonderful mom. You do get tired of nursing them once they've got some teeth! I made it to 18 months with the first one and 14 months with the second. (she was a biter!!:-0)

Babies sure are addictive. This is number 3 (and our first boy) and there is simply nothing sweeter than watching our 2 little girls play with each other and their baby brother. And the way the girls run to meet Daddy when he comes home, blond curls bouncing. I gotta stop before I spontaneously concieve.......

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

easy there that's only been

easy there that's only been done once

The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts

cl3x

Spontaneously conceive? That is a definate no-no! But never apologise for loving kids, especially your own. My daughter is a great mother, she is only 20!!! And the kids are dolls. I am proud of her for doing so well. No blond curls in our family though. My 19 y old son had them briefly, now he is dark brown. We just can't keep the blonde, even though my mom is a natural white blonde. I come by my blondeness by the hands of a skillful hairdresser, who removes those grey hairs beautifully. I found the first grey hair on my 22nd b'day. Now at 42, they have multiplied like wild fire.

MATT LAUER

I'M  TRYING  TO  REMEMBER  IF  MATT 

CROSS  EXAMINED  HILLARY  ON   HER

ATTACK  OF  'THE  VAST  RIGHT  WING

CONSPIRACY' IN THE  MANNER  HE  DID

WITH  ANN  COULTER.  I  DOUBT  IT.

"NOBODY PUTS ONE OVER ON FRED C DOBBS"

B.TRAVEN

 

COULTER: Oh you were

COULTER: Oh you were getting ready. In 1948 running, running instead of Thomas Dewey, you know if it were, Thomas Hitler Dewey. If that were his middle name I think it would have come out. If we were running candidates named, named, you know-

LAUER: Would we have called him, T. Hitler Dewey?

Umm, yes Matt.

Like theater of the absurd.

Lauer... once a douche, always a douche.

→ Coulter on O'Reilly Tonight.

Factor's on.  Ann Coulter is to be his guest.

More fun.  Followed by Miller Time.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Cool

Thanks for the heads-up. I am a night person so I will catch it on the repeat. I do love Dennis though. My favorite rant of his ever is the one he did when Fox had the 1/2 hour new proram, and he does the long rant on Harry Reid. I think I have watched it about a dozen times on youtube, and still laugh. Priceless.

I think most conservatives

I think most conservatives are generally happy people who go through life trying to make money to support their families and try to get along with their neighbors. I think when Ann comes along she comes across as abraisive because she doesn't just get along with people who are rude to her.

Most of us take crap off people in our lives because we are raised to be polite. There comes a time though in every persons life where you need to stand up for yourself and Ann hit that point with the media. The media has behaved so poorly as a group that Ann correctly views them as a single entity with whom she is doing battle with defending her country from relentless assault.

Until the rest of us wake up and realize the same we will continue to be beaten up. Our elected members of congress like John McCain appologize on the rare occurance of acting like a conservative so they can "get along" with those in the media and seem "reasonable". Until we elect congressmen with some anger and fight in them, people who won't appologize for being right like Ann, then we lose. Even when Republicans gain a majority, if the majority is the current wimpy class who doesn't know we are fighting bad people, we still lose.

I am very sad to hear so many people wringing their hands about Ann on this post. Its shows how far conservatism still has to go. We behave like a bunch of battered women. Its time to stop being victims and fight.