CNN Anchor Claims Christine O’Donnell is ‘Arrogant’ For Praying Over Campaign
Conservative Delaware Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell (R), a popular target of the mainstream media, was questioned on CNN’s “American Morning” for her statements about faith and prayer in her interview with Christian Broadcasting Network White House Correspondent David Brody. The Christian candidate cited prayer as playing a central role in her campaign, and her comments drew raised eyebrows over at CNN.
“For some people, they think this seems so arrogant, to pray to win a senate race, um, but how is it viewed in the evangelical community?” anchor Kiran Chetry asked Brody. Brody quickly responded by saying that O’Donnell isn’t praying for a victory, but rather, “God’s protection, and for, you know, people within her staff and the eyes of the voters to be open, so to speak.” Brody quickly pointed out to Chetry that the power of prayer is a mainstream concept among average Americans and that O’Donnell is being singled out because she is a political candidate. [Video after page break]
“Look, if you line up ten people up on the street and you say, ‘the power of prayer is important to people in their lives,’ they would say ‘absolutely it is’ and they directly link prayer to events in their life,” Brody said. “So this is really a lot of much ado about nothing, but when a political candidate talks about it, obviously it gets more headlines.”
Chetry also claimed, citing no evidence, that O’Donnell is somewhat of a political “lightweight, not necessarily coming with substance to the issues.” Chetry said that “… as long as people are still talking about her religious beliefs and or her social conservative beliefs, she’s not winning over the independents that she’s going to need.” The irony is that Chetry is the one talking about O’Donnell’s beliefs, and not the substantive “issues.”
To her credit, Chetry did recall Brody’s comment that he believes Christine O’Donnell’s faith is real. “And what you noted in your interview is that you believe this is a very authentic feeling, you know, this isn’t to drum up conservative support – this is how she truly, authentically feels,” Chetry stated.
This isn’t the first time CNN has gone after Delaware Republican senatorial candidate Christine O’Donnell. The Culture and Media Institute noted that in September, John Avlon, a CNN contributor called O’Donnell the “new queen of the wing nuts” and a “crackpot of the first order.”
- Erin R. Brown's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
What exactly did O'Donnell
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:24pm.
What exactly did O'Donnell say about prayer and faith?
Why??
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:33pm.
Does it matter what she said about prayer and faith???...If so----why????
You two apparently haven't met
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:36pm.
Sit back and enjoy.
Read enough to know
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:41pm.
Oh, I've read enough of the moron's blather to know what I'm getting into. I know it will be like herding cats, but there's only 7 days left.......
In 9 weeks and 3 days with no
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:59pm.
In 9 weeks and 3 days with no tracking function?
How's it going, Blonde?
Yeah but we not only look
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:00pm.
Yeah but we not only look like elephants we have the memory also.
What the hell are you babbling about?
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 6:59pm.
Try English.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I guess Blonde is ADK's own
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:01pm.
I guess Blonde is ADK's own personal Palin.
She did not even comment in this thread and Teddy has to drag her in. And we know that Palin drives the libturds nuts as Blonde does to ADK.
It was sooooo extreme and offensive...
Submitted by c5then on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:35pm.
She thanked all of her supporters for praying for her and said that she can see that it is working.
In Christian circles (not apparently requented by CNN staffers) it is unheard of to go about any major undertaking without praying about it and while in the middle of it.
The only people this "surprizes" are the atheists.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
This is no surprise, coming
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:38pm.
This is no surprise, coming from an atheist. While others may need to look outside for strength, an atheist looks from within.
Turns out great much of the time.
Within??
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:46pm.
An atheist looks to within, and finds an empty vessel. Pathetic loser.......
~Wow, Joe
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:10pm.
Way to show the Christian love. I think he's convinced, spread it a little thicker and you'll snare him.
Yeah he should have left off
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:12am.
Yeah he should have left off pathetic loser. Otherwise its dead on.
~Yeah
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 12:26pm.
The name-calling while claiming moral high ground part is what I was referring to.
God has asked believers to
Submitted by maxvolt on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:48pm.
God has asked believers to trust in Him.
Your approach tells God to go scr*w himself, you dont need him.
Sadly, I want you to remember this on judgement day...God has offered you life beyond this little blue marble, all you had to do was trust God...there it was, sitting right there on the table in front of you, for you to grab, and you rejected it. You made that decision. You raised yourself up higher than your creator...Your ego is astounding oh little man.
I hope at least you can reason, that if there is a God, you have done enough to p*ss him off with your promulgating this rubbish.
The ancient textx teach us there is ONLY ONE UNFORGIVEABLE SIN...ONLY ONE. Its not murder, rape, robbery, or stupidity.
According to The Bible, the ONE UNFORGIVEABLE SIN is the SIN OF UNBELIEF.
REPENT SINNER, TURN TO YOUR CREATOR, ACCEPT HIS FREE GIFT OF ETERNAL LIFE IN HIS KINGDOM, ACCEPT HIS SON JESUS CHRIST WHO PAID THE PRICE FOR YOUR SIN, WITH HIS LIFES BLOOD ON CALVARY'S TREE> HOW GREAT IS THE SIN OF THE MAN OR WOMAN WHO TELLS GOD, HIS SONS BLOOD WAS NOT ENOUGH!...REPENT
WHO ARE YOU OH MAN TO TELL GOD ANYTHING?
Thanks for the sermon.
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:21pm.
Thanks for the sermon.
Because I like to have all of
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:34pm.
Because I like to have all of the facts prior to making judgement.
B.S.
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:38pm.
That's a bunch of Bull S*it, and you know it. You already know that as a woman of faith, she believes in the power of prayer. Are you concerned one iota of Mr. Coons "faith" or lack thereof?? Like most libs, you are intellectually dishonest.
I know. I've heard this
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:41pm.
I know. I've heard this before too - you know, conservatives being the more intellectually honest of the 2 groups.
How is that working out for you?
Personally, I'd like to keep faith and the supernatural out of it, and stick to the issues.
Right
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:45pm.
Right. And you would try to tell me that the media is focussed on the "issues" regarding Ms. O'Donnell?? Your lunacy is quite amusing.
Is there a reason you're
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:52pm.
Is there a reason you're getting so personal?
Or are you just a retread with a bone to pick?
Personal?
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:56pm.
Just calling you out for the loon that you are. I've read so much of your garbage that I could hold back no longer. Gonna call me a bigot or racist now??
Yeah, but it seems that whole
Submitted by ML Stovall on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:00pm.
Yeah, but it seems that whole 'stick to the issues' business only applies to conservatives. Right, DK?
Uh oh, not the dreaded
Submitted by ML Stovall on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:56pm.
Uh oh, not the dreaded 'intellectually dishonest' label for Dead Kennedy again. You're gonna have to provide a definition for him, Joe. He thinks you're calling him stupid and a liar.
Oh, I've read enough of the
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:03pm.
Oh, I've read enough of the moron's blather
Pathetic loser.......
Just calling you out for the loon that you are.
Gee, ya think?
Look at the time stamps, ace.
Submitted by ML Stovall on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:09pm.
Look at the time stamps, ace. He replied before I posted that.
Stupid & Liar
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:11pm.
Yes DK, I think....Do you??...It doesn't appear as though you do. I guess I WILL throw in "stupid" and "liar" in my opinions of you. In fact, all of the adjectives I have used in describing you fit quite nicely with most of your ilk. You know, progressive, liberal, democRAT, loons.......I have no use for any of you....Your kind is responsible for the attempted destruction of the greatest nation in the history of the world, and I have absolutely nothing but contempt for you, pal.....
I hope you don't bite too, J.
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:15pm.
I hope you don't bite too, J.
No Worry
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:19pm.
Oh, I wouldn't worry, were I you, Sparky. I wouldn't touch you with a 10 foot pole. Never know what I may catch.....
The least you could do is
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:22pm.
The least you could do is have the integrity to come after me with your real identity, J.
Why??
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:57pm.
Why?? You want to come beat me up or something?? That IS the liberal way, is it not? And is "Dead Kennedy" YOUR real identity?? At least I'm using my real first name, Scooby....
Oh, and for a liberal atheist to speak of integrity is comical....
I wouldn't worry too much
Submitted by ML Stovall on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:30pm.
I wouldn't worry too much about DK beating you up, Joe - he is a flaming liberal after all. He would probably just apologize for being insensitive toward you and then give you something of mine to try to make you like him in hopes that you won't beat him up, a la Barack Obama...
No, only Rand Paul supporters
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:24pm.
No, only Rand Paul supporters believe in the whole "might makes right" philosophy.
ONE Rand Paul supporter was
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:17pm.
ONE Rand Paul supporter was physically abusive to the woman at the rally. He was in the wrong and I don't think anyone will excuse his behavior.
The woman in question was heading toward Paul in what was probably considered a threatening manner and Paul's supporter's stopped her before she could get to him and possibly harm him.
And, the SEIU
Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:53pm.
doesn't live that philosophy? Come on, Ted, I thought I knew you better than that.
DK
Submitted by well99 on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:15pm.
You might want to adjust that.So using your methods then all libs bite the fingers off of those that oppose their view?Gives a whole new meaning to finger steaks.
Whoa deddy*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:13pm.
Just a suggestion but you should delete that 15:22 post for your own protection.
cajun2
Submitted by MrShy on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 5:17pm.
I don't think ACL is all that nervous about walking a tight-rope around here....
- Shy Wing
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
Naughty Shy. What have we
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 5:20pm.
Naughty Shy. What have we learned about piggy-backing?
ACL
Submitted by MrShy on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 5:40pm.
We've only learned that you're a fiesty little libturd gnat that never stops buzzing around here at NB.
Now back to work, you bean counter (or whatever it is you do.)
- Shy Spicy Rum
EDIT: Scratch that. You never seem to work. I could swear you're on Soros' payroll...
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
So...nothing. You learned
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 5:55pm.
So...nothing. You learned nothing.
We've been in pre-production for the past month, but this is our first shoot week. Things will be getting busier next week, but I've been given an additional assistant for this show...so I might end up with even less work and more time.
Keep your fingers crossed.
Cajun
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:09pm.
Dead Ted is projecting his own troll tactic here.
Notice way on up the post, he responds to Joe and then asks me (!) a question.
Then his continued inference is that I am using another user name.....like he does, and has admitted in the past. Kinda cute, doncha think? And entirely predictable, I might add.
So all of his vitriol is aimed at me, even though Joe is apparently a new user whose read Deddy's blather long enough to know exactly who and what he is.
For the record, I did have another log on here, it was called "Blonde Test" and was set up for me by none other than Matthew Sheffield about eighteen months ago when I volunteered to write FAQ's for the site. I have no idea whether it's still active or not, as once I finished the project I abandoned it.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
You, Blonde, have admitted
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:13pm.
You, Blonde, have admitted using multiple logins as well.
It's completely obvious you have posted attacks against me using an array of logins, and Joe W is no different. I've been around long enough to recognize a fake, especially one who is as obvious as Joe W.
Next time try using an account that's been active more than a few weeks.
Really?
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:20pm.
Tell you what, Teddy.
I will challenge you, right here and now. You must agree to leave when you fail in your proof.
So prove away, baby. If you can prove that I had multiple log ons and have "admitted it" here (other than right now, with my Blonde Test log on that was given me by the head man here)...I'll leave.
BTW, my original SN was "JustaBlonde", which has been in my profile since I got my original account almost give years ago...back when we could change our own Screen Names. So that doesn't count.
GAME ON, LIAR.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
You posted that knowledge
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:25pm.
You posted that knowledge publicly on either the Liberals or Conservatives forums - you know the ones.
As it were, those pages are lost. Turns out it's your lucky day.
Nope. Man Up, Teddy
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:31pm.
No weasling Ted. Man up.
I didn't post it because I've only ever had the log-on I'm using right now, plus the "Blonde Test" one that Matthew gave to me.
I know I'm telling the truth, whereas you are pathetically lying.
This time it's going to cost you.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
You're lying and you know it.
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:39pm.
You're lying and you know it. It's just your luck that it's on a deleted thread.
But nice work derailing another thread.
Man up, Teddy
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:41pm.
.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Man up?
Submitted by jdlybrand on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:46pm.
Would that not require a pair of testicles?
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
ADK you were the one who
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:42pm.
ADK you were the one who derailed the thread by bringing Blonde into it. You can't blame her for what you did.
ADK, The.only. one
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:51pm.
ADK,
The.only. one .that.is.lying. is.you. Blonde.has.no.need.for.multiple.accounts. You.on.the.other.hand.have.been.found.to.have.numerous.accounts.
You.should.have.had.the.plug.yanked.long.ago.
Somehow.you.liberals.cannot.abide.by.the.rules.
Hopefully.we.wil.not.be.hearing.from.you.again.until.you.reactivate.one.of.your.dormant.accounts.
Buh.bye.Teddy
I admitted so much as having
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:59pm.
I admitted so much as having previous accounts banned, but I've been using this one and only one account for as long as it's been active.
Surely you have reason to doubt?
And seriously, is Blonde just going through my buddy list to have everyone turn on me? Must be election season.
Another lie
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:03pm.
Very nice, Teddy.
You won't even attempt to prove the first one, now you're compounding the lies.
The only one who has turned anyone against you here, is *gasp* you.
Man up, Ted.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Do you think questioning my
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:07pm.
Do you think questioning my manhood is going to get a rise out of me?
And what's with the constant personal attacks? I've never made it personal with you.
Really?
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:13pm.
You.just.posted.the.most.outrageous.lies.about.me.
I'm.telling.you.to."man-up".to.call.you.out.on.your.lilly-livered.little.chicken-****.lie.
You.do.know.what."man-up".means?
So......you have a choice.
PROVE IT OR LEAVE.
I've called your bluff.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I made a similar request to
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:32pm.
I made a similar request to JWF recently. His response:
ADZ: Find one negative thing I've said about Christianity on these boards.
He/She/It knows all comments are gone since they changed over to the new NB servers.
Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2010/10/19/christine-odonnell-separation-church-and-state-not-constitution-msnb#comment-1361899#ixzz13VyKBp43
So it worked for him, but not for me. Good to know you're strongly behind the double standard here.
Blonde
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 9:42pm.
It seems I have mistaken you for another member.
Please accept my humblest apology.
Not Good Enough, Ted
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 10:01pm.
45.Hours.To.Find.Proof.Of.Your.Lies.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Blonde---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 10:05pm.
Good for you.
MD
If you're not going to accept
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 10:09pm.
If you're not going to accept my apology when I publicly admit I was wrong, I have nothing more to say.
Anchor-like apologies not desired, Ted
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 10:16pm.
You apologized for something that doesn't bother me, Teddy....I know Joe isn't me. Apologizing for THAT is beyond trollish. Being obtuse in this instance isn't going to help your cause.
You LIED about me, slandered me, if you will. Not once, but several times.
I love how you make your slanderous accusations in PUBLIC, then run over to the chat room to try to hash it out in private. Would you like me to post that for all of the world to see? I can, you know. I have lots of server capacity.
Tick. Tock.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
You're right. I made several
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:18pm.
You're right. I made several accusations, all of which were false. I regret making such statements, and I once again offer my humblest apology.
ever-watch-a-troll-crap-his-pants?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 9:43am.
Diaper change, please.
Scoob...
Submitted by bkeyser on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:04pm.
broke the column width! Come on- let us in on how you did it. Drill? Sledge? Begged the owners? Out with it Scoob! We all want to know!
BK, breaking the width barrier
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:08pm.
I.suspect.it.was.adding.the.periods.in.between.each.word.
Testing.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Ah J
Submitted by bkeyser on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:11pm.
OneWordWithNoSpacesCan'tBeBrokenSoItEndsUpRunningOutsideTheNormalColumnWidth.
Hmmmm.
On my screen
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:20pm.
IcanReadTheTextOutsideOfThePage..AlthoughIt'sReallyHardToTypeThisWay.
Hopefully they'll get it fixed, else we'll look like lunatics.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I'mAffraid-ItMayBE2Late4Meeee
Submitted by bkeyser on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:31pm.
I'mAffraid-ItMayBE2Late4Meeeeeeeeee
48 Hours Teddy
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:23pm.
Tell you what, why don't you contact Lachlan, let him "hold the bet".
Start a Forum in the Woodshed.
Let's make this official.
Back up your big lying words, Ted.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
enough deddy*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:02pm.
You lose again. Blonde has never chosen another "persona" for NB for a very simple reason. She blast trolls all over with this one so why change it. You on the other hand have admitted to having as many as 6 accts at NB. You have several "persona", one a black, one a woman with children and now this big hollywood dude.All ot them easily recognized because they have a commonality. Pointless, insulting, simplistic and intended to draw attention to a starving ego.
Those who live in glass houses...memory like an elephant...cant find their a** in the dark....pot calling kettle....all cliche's deddy but very apt descriptions. Just remember, I did try to warn you earlier today.You now will get your fondest wish...a target on your forehead..
Yes, that was great
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:05pm.
Yes, that was great advice.
I'm still pondering it.
No Fake Here
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 10:06pm.
Hey, Sparky, there is not a thing "fake" about me. I have been a member of this site for many months, have used only one screen name, and do not post very often, but I read the site several times a day. I know exactly who and what you are. You are what we call "vermon maggots" over at the Fox Nation, where I usually post. For my money, you can take your atheism and your liberalism and shove them straight up your gay as*, you pathetic little twit!!!.......
~WTH?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 10:31pm.
You can leave the attitude at Fox Nation. We don't use accusations of homosexuality to score cheap points here. You're over the line.
Oh, and..you can't spell for sh!t.
Up Yours as Well
Submitted by Joe W. on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:03pm.
No accusation. DK is what he is. And I'll say what I wish, pal, thank you.....
~Pal?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:08pm.
Who do you think you're talking to?
Joe W.
Submitted by Denny Crane on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:44am.
The elipses fairy said quit misusing the period button.
Calling someone gay is an accusation, and it makes you look stupid.
"Lib.free.or.die"
We Are The 53%
~Joe W. looks stupid...
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:46pm.
I'm afraid I can't agree with you, Toney. Joe W. doesn't look stupid, he passed stupid at Warp 4 and picked up speed. At this point, he's so far beyond stupid he wouldn't be able to make it back unless we put him in cryogenic storage and programmed the coordinates into the ship's computer for him.
Frankly, I can't be bothered to go to that much trouble for someone so galactically ugly.
WHOA There Buddy!!! We need
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 10:39pm.
WHOA There Buddy!!!
We need not sink to the liberal level to tell a person they are full of it and that their mother was a hamster and their father smelt of elderberries.
Only libturds will call people names and other foul things. We conservatives are more articulate.
So please dial it back a couple of notches.
Agreed, Scoobs---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 10:55pm.
Therefore, I hereby vow to count one notch, two notches, three notches, before unloading on a lib troll.
Maybe. :^)
House libs get a pass, though.
Perhaps. ;^)
Why, just the other day I stuck up for liberals, cuz when someone said liberals stink, I said, "Like sh*t they do!"
MD
MD Just.keep,doing,what,you
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:01pm.
MD
Just.keep,doing,what,you.are.doing.
I.do.not.think.I.have.ever.seen.you.go.over.the.line.
And.I,agree.with.you.about.the.odor.of.liberal.
Maybe.that.is.the.great.unwashed.these.elitist.keep.talking.about.
You.know.hippies.shy.away.from.the.soap. :-)
Well, then...I'll defer to
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:11pm.
Well, then...I'll defer to your expertise. When the subject is "sh!t", I've often remarked that Matthew Dean is the "go to" guy.
Jer
Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:41pm.
Good one.
I must explain, though, that my doctorate (MD) in scatology, is not in "the biologically oriented study of excrement (as for taxonomic purposes or for the determination of diet)", as you surmise, but is in the field of "interest in or treatment of obscene matters - especially in literature - "
Which, of course, covers all materials written by liberals.
MD
greetings JoeW*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:53pm.
You say that you post at FoxNation. The members at NB are not so crasse as you have shown tonight. Look at the exchange between Jer and MathewDean.
Two long time members who agree on nothing and yet they can dig at and insult each other and do so with finesse and even humor(well its funny to some of us).
Your vitriol and vulgarity may be your "style" at FoxNation but it lacks substance and even intellect and not acceptable to NB members. Well, at least to this NB member, it is offensive.
JMO
Cajun~
Submitted by GG_NB on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 12:09am.
I concur. You can't be right when you're acting wrong. You lose all credibility.
With that, I'm signing off. I'm exhausted from a long day, and I also can't see all of this blog (lots of computer problems tonight) -- but I have caught a glimpse of some of it -- certainly enough to know that tonight has NOT been a good night! Oh m' gosh...I will try to read through this all tomorrow, if my computer is cooperating.
Bye, to friends of mine on here~~
"If not us, who? If not now, when?"
~Ronald Reagan
Does she have a mouse in her pocket?
Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:35pm.
Wild Cherry, who are "these people" that think it is arrogant to actually pray for protection, guidance or whatever they are praying for?
I prayed that NO Red Sox would get hurt this year, was I arrogant accoding to some people "honey"?
Political lightweight, you must be looking in the mirror as is your usual as you don't have the job for your brain matter "honey".
I-C through " Some people "
Submitted by TerryWest on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 2:54pm.
When ever I hear the words " some people" I hear a coward using invisable props to voice and give faulse weight to their own opinions.
Liberals are rightly afraid of God.
Submitted by maxvolt on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:33pm.
Liberals, who join this nabob of criticism, especially so called "christian liberals", expose the satanic in the liberal ideology. Here liberal elitists try to tell citizens that praying to God on behalf of a campaign is out of bounds. I would ask these same liberals, did they ask God if that is correct? See it seems to me God has already declared that we are to pray to him "for all things, and at all times"...so are liberals revealing to the public that they are unaware of what God has asked us to do? or are they actually against God and trying to use God to fallaciously reach a select group of "religious" people who claim to be Democrats? You be the judge. No matter which you choose, it is obviously an anti-God position...otherwise known as Satanic.
They should fear the God of
Submitted by ricklail on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:54pm.
They should fear the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob. Whether they believe it or not they will stand before him and be judged. He takes no excuses. They can't blame their behavior on anyone but themselves. It was Bush's fault or I listened to the wrong people does not flush with the Almighty
I have got up ever morning since Obama was elected and offered a prayer for the nation. It looks like those prayers are going to be answered next week. I feel that God has held back the forces of evil that the Dems could have unleashed. What they did was bad enough but it could have been worst.
I happen to strenuously
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:13pm.
I happen to strenuously disagree with the criticisms of O'Donnell. But, fortunately, maxvolt, God will be the ultimate and only Judge of all of us, conservative or liberal, and not you in accordance with your arrogantly bigoted and offensively sanctimonious pronouncements.
Jer
Actually Volt is dead on as
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 5:27pm.
Actually Volt is dead on as teh Bible tells us to pray for everything, unceasingly. Most libs,apparently yourself included, dont understand this. God also told us to be a witness to the world and we cant do that while silent about our faith.
You take up the cause of the Godless and defend them, defending the indefensable. Sometimes I wonder if you would defend Satan himself.
Maxvolt sees the world as black and white, right and wrong; and you see it as a shade of grey. In God's view there is no grey only black and white. So Maxvolt is right, Biblically and the Bible is the first and last word.
Let's see...I strenuously
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 6:07pm.
Let's see...I strenuously disagree with the criticisms of O'Donnell [about praying for her campaign], and you somehow torque that into a defense of the Godless.
Such pathetic illogic is a big reason your opinions are not taken more seriously around here, Dan.
Jer
But, fortunately, maxvolt,
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:31am.
But, fortunately, maxvolt, God will be the ultimate and only Judge of all of us, conservative or liberal, and not you in accordance with your arrogantly bigoted and offensively sanctimonious pronouncements. And you are full of it Jer. First you say maxvolt for spouting off is bigoted and offensive and that was what i commented about. MV was posting about the Godless liberals not understanding as Christians we are commanded to pray unceasingly and you seem to be rebuking MV for telling the truth. So you were defending them? Funny thing too as you are condemning MV for using teh word of God to discern who is the Godless. The Bible also tells us to discern and make judgements about the world. You like most liberals dont understand we are to make judgements about the world we live in. Most likely teh reason you are liberal is that you cannot or are unwilling to accept teh idea you do make judgements; jsut as you have judged MaxVolt. I say kill em all and let God sort em out.Some people
Submitted by ripper58 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:38pm.
some say, I hear tell yada yada yada.... SOS different talking head. You libs are REALLY SCARED and it ain't even Halloween..........BOO
Isn't it strange that the MBM
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:49pm.
Isn't it strange that the MBM keeps attacking O'Donnell, yet she's supposed to be a nutcase who is behind in the polls. Could it be she's doing much better than polling suggests? Scared much MBM ?/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Yeah, for such a moron and an
Submitted by ML Stovall on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:03pm.
Yeah, for such a 'moron' and an afterthought of a candidate, the MSM campaign wing sure spends a lot of precious air time on running O' Donnell down the gutter. They could be using that time shilling for their other dimocrat candidates that aren't polling as well as they keep telling us that rat-Coons is. Strange huh...?
Just NUTS thank you....
Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 3:54pm.
This is the same way the pussy David Gregory asks ALL Conservatives tough questions while appearing impartial to the folks....
"Some people say that your love for chocolate chip cookies WITH CASHEWS makes you on the extreme end of cookie lovers, how do you respond to that"?
Meaning. cowardly liberal that he is, he can't bring himself to name names, LIKE HIS OWN.
ADK, how you been bud?
Make some new friends above?????????
Never been better - and yup,
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 7:47pm.
Never been better - and yup, always making new friends.
DK
Submitted by well99 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:23pm.
Please post links to always making new friends.Damn it just the facts here.Dont make me send over the SEIU to visit you.They are hell on lawns.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEsdxakaBIo
Mission accomplished: Attention-starved troll gums up thread.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:04pm.
Next.
One of my favorites is the
Submitted by ML Stovall on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:10pm.
One of my favorites is the old tried and true "There's a been lot of people calling for wholesale changes to your foreign chocolate chip policy. How do you respond to these people?" "These people" meaning "we in the liberal media", of course.
What about players?
Submitted by octavioj on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 4:36pm.
So when players pray before going into the field of play, is that also arrogant? When soldiers pray before going into battle, is that arrogant? When some of us pay before going to work, is that arrogant? How much more can religious people take?
Silly Christine
Submitted by ckc1227 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 6:29pm.
Doesn't she know the Constitution says you can't pray about winning a campaign?
It's incredible just how secular liberals are so out of...
Submitted by stage9 on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:02pm.
touch with religion in general.
Chetry said that “… as long as people are still talking about her religious beliefs and or her social conservative beliefs, she’s not winning over the independents that she’s going to need.”
This is how arrogant liberals truly are. They truly believe they can stand against God. They are so heathen that they foolishly believe that God is subordinate to them.
Who do you think God would bless? The one that rejects God, ignores His Word and mocks His people, or the one who recognizes their own frailty in light of God's sovereignty, and seeks His providence in their lives?
Better yet, which would more closely fit the character of our Founding Fathers?
"In times of impending calamity and distress; when the liberties of America are imminently endangered by the secret machinations and open assaults of an insidious and vindictive administration, it becomes the indispensable duty of these hitherto free and happy colonies, with true penitence of heart, and the most reverent devotion, publickly to acknowledge the over ruling providence of God; to confess and deplore our offences against him; and to supplicate his interposition for averting the threatened danger, and prospering our strenuous efforts in the cause of freedom, virtue, and posterity."
This was the opening paragraph exerpted from text for a national fast declared by the Continental Congress on March 16, 1776.
Big city liberals lock themselves away in their elitist ivory towers and they have no idea what average Americans even believe.
To them it's unconscionable that 1) there actually is a God, and 2) that anyone would pray to Him for direction.
Such is the mind of the secularist.
"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
And should Christine win,
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 8:37pm.
And should Christine win, what would the LSM say about her praying?
"Oh yeah. Our guy would have won if Jesus hadn't been involved."
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
~Over here, Joe
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:37pm.
You want to play cyber-bully with me? Give it your best shot. Please.
I'm waiting.
I'm still waiting, Joe W.. Here, kitty kitty.
Dead Kennedy
Submitted by BishopT on Tue, 10/26/2010 - 11:40pm.
Hey, I have a few questions for DK:
1) Is it true that you have logged on in various ways?
2) If that's true, why did you do that? That sounds weird.
signed:
Trimelda, who is always American African, a grandmother and a Christian bishop who is Conservative Republican and supports the Tea Party.
Exactly. Why would I post
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:08pm.
Exactly. Why would I post under various accounts?
Because you're a troll?
Submitted by NewtypeConservative on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:07pm.
Seriously, what kind of question is that? Why? Because you're a troll. Its a common tactic, post under multiple account names just to back your self up/over-represent your opinion on the site. I mean, your whole spiel on this thread pretty much proved you're a massive troll.
Plus the Vet's whole three post thing down there proves that you're a troll who slipped through the net.
Who's backing up my
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:12pm.
Who's backing up my arguments? Which liberals exactly? If you're going to make accusations you need to back them up.
You just asked why.
Submitted by NewtypeConservative on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:33pm.
Your question was "why would I?" not "when did I?", so I really don't feel obligated to get into a slap fight with a half-witted troll. Plus it seems that JWF did all my work for me.
Really, if you're going to troll though, could you try to be of a slightly higher quality? I mean, this thread has literally consisted of you getting your ass kicked because you threw out baseless accusations (kind of like the POTUS!), and then you ask a question, I answer, and you throw a "PROVE IT!!!11!111" tantrum.
I'm thinking of a word. It begins with an "h".
Really?
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:22pm.
You really just posted this?
If you're going to make accusations you need to back them up. After your massive brain fart yesterday, throwing around lies and accusations without one shred of evidence....when called on it all you did was continue to lie and twist and obfuscate. You dare to demand someone else back something up, a statement which is common knowledge, I might add....yet you continue to troll around these threads? Your behaviour is pathetic. Totally, truly pathetic.Sorry everyone, Text Editor is really messed up here. I can't fix it. The second sentence, above, is a direct quote of Deddy being Deddy dumb. The rest is me.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Blonde, Knowing I was
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:28pm.
Blonde,
Knowing I was guttermouth, why did you cover for me for the past year and a half?
Cover for you?
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:39pm.
Didn't rat you out, more like. Common knowledge you are Guttermouth. And many others.
I would remind you that YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS IN VIOLATION OF THE TERMS OF USE. Admittedly so, too.
Now. Back to the topic at hand. Defend the indefensible (you) DEMANDING others back up something, when you won't back up your lies about me. Using my own posts, not something sarcastic someone else wrote to you that contains the word "Blonde".
Tick tock, Teddy.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Right, and suggesting I beat
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:49pm.
Right, and suggesting I beat my wife isn't in violation of terms of use? Yeah, right.
There's always been a different set of rules here for people like you and people like me.
You know Lachlan disabled my account because I called someone stinky, and you're the one who gave me suggestions as to getting my account back online. You covered for me, plain and simple. So don't try to pretend we weren't friends, because I shared a hell of a lot of personal things with you.
None of which have ever appeared here
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:58pm.
Not one. So that dog won't hunt.
And since you are so obviously so confused, let me enlighten you.
The "when have you stopped beating your wife" was posted as an object lesson when you continued to insist others prove your negative. It can't be proven.
Which of course you know, it's merely the last staw you have left at which to grasp, here.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
No, you were trying to be
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 3:03pm.
No, you were trying to be obnoxious and funny in an attempt to make me look bad.
So once again, why is okay for others, including you, to slander me, but when I mistook you for another it's the end of the world?
~
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 3:52pm.
I can think of three conservatives off the top of my head who have signed up for a new account after having an old one banned. They're all still posting even after that fact was made public knowledge on the boards. Multiple accounts are apparently not viewed by the admins as the equivalent of breaking all the Ten at once.
Those of us who knew who you were all along never "covered for you" in the sense of misleading anyone, Ted. We just didn't broadcast it. You stopped posting under mulitple accounts and made an effort to be a member of the community, so we stopped busting your chops.
I know you know that; I'm saying all this for the benefit of those reading the thread who don't know the history. If I see a bunch of noobs following you around yelping hysterically I'm going to break out the garden hose. In the meantime, please refrain from grooming yourself 6 inches beyond the reach of their chains. >.<
Chose, signing up for a new account after being banned
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:03pm.
is significantly different from maintaining multiple accounts...simultaneously.
Just sayin'.
There isn't a shred of proof
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:05pm.
There isn't a shred of proof that I am using multiple accounts, aside from JWF's paranoia.
But since you're jumping on the bandwagon, go ahead and prove it.
Depends what the meaning of "am" is, I guess, right Zip?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:18pm.
Spare us, you're been nailed three ways to Sunday. (More like 20, but who's counting?)
Now you may continue with the hunt for the real murderers of Nicole and Ron.
Still mad I turned you in for
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:21pm.
Still mad I turned you in for calling me an A-Hole repeatedly?
Again, link or slink.
Once is not repeatedly, Little Rock
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:45pm.
Oooooh, I got a polite PM from a mod asking me to not call you an a-hole after you went a-whining.
But unlike you, I don't make PMs public. Although it would provide a good laugh. But it shows how little it takes to get you off that you have to repeatedly bring it up. But continue with your fantasy that I am obsessed with you. It's quite entertaining.
On the bright side, everyone here (whoever is still around) is getting to witness an actual spark-spewing meltdown of a longtime troll... in slooooow motion. You start a sh*tfight for no reason with B? How stupid are you? Don't answer that. We all know now.
Now you may apologize to everyone here, or proceed with the Big Hollywood Shark Jump.
You haven't a clue what this
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:51pm.
You haven't a clue what this is about.
Sure, I'll take your word for it
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:57pm.
/s
~I know
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:16pm.
He tried it once and I busted them all. LOL
Commenting with multiple ID's at once isn't what I was referring to, I should have been more specific. I happen to know that Ted has not maintained multiple accounts since the spring of '09. After the last set was banned he stuck to the Kennedy one and got a lot more polite. I got off his case at that point.
As far as I'm concerned, I like having a liberal around to argue with. Trolls are worthless for anything but squashing, and I like a debate now and then. I wish JasonC would come around more often, we're down to Ted and Jer. And mamabear. Ugh.
Yeah, well, what good is having heels if you can't use them?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:29pm.
Whatever politeness there may have been seems to have dropped into the abyss, though.
~I think
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:55pm.
He may be feeling just a tad defensive right now. Dunno why, it's not like he's being told to shove something up his "gay as*" by a total noob from Fox Nation while simultaneously being ripped to shreds by the regulars. *cough*
Look, I'm not his big sister (He's older than I am, actually. Yes Ted, I did have to rub that in ;) I just hate to see the pitchforks and torches being broken out over someone who isn't even a hard-core progressive. Syrius now, that little abomination deserves this kind of treatment. Unfortunately (for my troll-smashing fun), he gave up trying to comment after the ninth ID I busted.
PSA: Ted and arkansaszippers are not the same person.
How come Another Dead Zippers never post the whole thing?
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 1:32am.
#31 Another Dead Zippers is partying like it is 2009.Submitted by The Vet FKA JWF on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 00:25.
ADZ: Find one negative thing I've said about Christianity on these boards.
He/She/It knows all comments are gone since they changed over to the new NB servers.
Hey Another Dead Zippers.
Then tell us how you are not STILL using sock puppet accounts.
Then demand we find one thing you said prior to a week ago on these boards knowing full well all old comments are gone.
++++++++++
Add one more -
Constantly brings up another user's name or makes accusations about another user and then claims the thread is getting derailed when people respond.
Does cursing count? Or how about conservatives?
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 12:00am.
ADZ: Find one negative thing I've said about Christianity on these boards.
If a liar brings it up, I get to respond ---
okay then++++
Wed, 02/04/2009 - 19:30 ET by guttermouth
Another person who thinks it's okay to joke about child molesting. Effing conservatards!@!@A#$%@$#
+++++
Oh it has to be christians.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 12:03am.
UmWed, 02/04/2009 - 16:10 ET by guttermouth
I was kinda hoping you'd just quote some scripture, but this will do. Thanks. I feel better now. I've seen the light. No, wait. That's just the sun.
++++
Huh?Wed, 02/04/2009 - 15:50 ET by guttermouth
1) I am not afraid of getting my A$$ kicked in front of god, as there is no god. I know all of your arguments, so you can save it for someone looking to debate religion.
2) You've been assuming this whole time that I am a guy, presumably so you can feel more comfortable threatening violence against me. Did the bible teach you that? Silly bird.
Why don't you tell us how
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:12pm.
Why don't you tell us how Blonde told you I had sex with a donkey in a live nativity scene?
Tick Tock, Teddy
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:17pm.
The clock has been restarted after yet another lie from you about me.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Do I look like a liferaft? I would not be grabbing at me.
Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 10/28/2010 - 12:39am.
You made an accusation. You failed to back that up just like all there rest.
Dead Zippers: Come on, BLONDE, why did you turn on me??? Why'd you tell JWF that I was guttermouth? Couldn't keep that little secret to yourself anymore?
The Vet: Yeah, that is how I keep digging out you retread trolls. By relying on others. They also give me all those links when I fact check trolls like you. JWF, big faker at large.Yeah, it had nothing to do with how you openly admitted to being a retread troll anytime someone mentions it huh? Or how you openly admitted to naming 75% of your monikers with punk rockers or punk rock bands. Yeah, cocodrie did not point that one out did he? Sniff. Sniff. Blonde turned on me. Sniff. Sniff. If it weren't for Blonde, everyone here would be nothing but a bunch of redneck conservative christian hicks just like I always sez they are. Sniff. Sniff. Blinde is a turner. Snivel. Sniff. Sniff.
No reply to that.
Then ADZ whines again in another blog about how stupid I am when it comes to sniffing out trolls.
The Vet: Blonde told all. Remember? So shut up Another Dead Zippers. She also told me about your arrest in 1978 for buggering a minature donkey in a live nativity scene. That is why you show such a visceral obsession for all things christian. You are an atheist yet you are obsessed with christians after being turned in by one on Christmas Eve 1978.
Let's see. Someone lies about me. I respond with a sarcastic jokey lie about them. Oh, that is a slam on JWF now. Bzzzzt troll, try again.
Fail. Troll tries to make it look like I was maliciously lied for no good reason.
Wait. I think I misread the whole thing. The troll is actually upset that Blonde narc'd on him. Not that his 1978 arrest was made public. Or that cloven hoofed beasts of burden get suddenly skittish in his presence.*
*That is called sarcasm troll. Much like when we tell people you visit the junkyards in the midnight hours and suck farts out of old car seats and save them in bottles in your basement next the the polaroids of you and the cloven hoofed beasts of burden.
http://www.newsbusters.org/bl
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:25pm.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2010/10/19/christine-odo...
Blonde told all. Remember? So shut up Another Dead Zippers. She also told me about your arrest in 1978 for buggering a minature donkey in a live nativity scene.
Can I ask why you told JWF this? Or was he making up lies about you?
And I was involved in this convo how, exactly?
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:32pm.
Shame on you.
Don't even try that tactic with me, Teddy. I am not the media, I won't call out someone for something so obviously sarcasm. Just because you are trying to twist it, doesn't mean I have to help.
I told you before, cease and desist with the lies about me.
You are now a couple of apologies behind.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
So you're okay with others
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 2:39pm.
So you're okay with others slandering me while using your name? Was it funny when JWF said that? Where's my apology?
Why did you ask if I still beat my wife? Repeatedly? What exactly were you implying? Were you trying to be funny?
And for the record, I have made multiple apologies. I accused pahuber of being you. I was wrong. You made your point. You embarrassed me publicly, as did I. No forgiveness around here apparently.
Still desperately looking for a liferaft.
Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 10/28/2010 - 12:36am.
Let's review.
ADZ makes up a lie about me and Blonde colluding to put the hurts on all the trolls. I respond. Nastiez! Whar iz apologiez!
Blonde uses the most classic plurium interrogationum - the beat your wife loaded question. Naztiez. U sez suntin about trollie wifeyz. You is aplogiezez nah!!!@!
The troll slurs and slanders his way through several days. Then thinks he can apologize, and since he apologized, he is free to slander more and DEMAND apologies from others. U trun udder cheek. U christian. Doo Christian thing. Trun udder cheek for trollie to slap tooo!!
Oh Dead Zippers. You lied about me too.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 11:44pm.
Not a big one but dead wrong nevertheless.
Dead Zippers: I made a similar request to JWF recently. His response:
Wrong. You made the request to someone else. I just cold commented on it.
That's not a lie. I
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Thu, 10/28/2010 - 5:06pm.
That's not a lie. I misremembered. But what the hell - I'm sorry, Mr Vet for confusing your response with another's post.
Anyone else need an apology today? I've got hundreds tucked away in my man purse.