Violence and chaos are terms that are pretty well defined in society. A person tends to conceptualize events tied to such words by visualizing bombs exploding, bullets flying and all commonly associated images from the ravages of war and crime.
But violence is not limited to the media driven coverage that most often captures the readily available public examples of violence. There are plenty of examples of violence that occurs relatively unnoticed to the public eye. Violence such as the quietly executed political and religious persecution that happens in the middle of the night and well away from western cameras. Violence such as the forced recognition of Islamic law by dhimmi slaves and non-religious infidels. These examples, which have plenty of evidence to back them up, are sadly considered non-chaotic because they happen either quietly or with the acceptance of many.
Which makes the BBC characterization of the Islamic takeover of Somalia all that more appalling. Such willingness to ignore the quiet forms of violence and perpetuate the myth that there is a lack of chaos simply because certain crimes against humanity are perpetrated away from the media's selective eye is an affront to journalistic integrity.
The Beeb exemplifies such dishonest characterizations in its coverage of pirates who hijacked a United Nation ship off the Somali Coast.
A US warship is heading towards the Somali coast where a United Nations-chartered cargo ship was hijacked by pirates, say aid officials.
UN staff say the hijacked ship, the MV Rozen, is at anchor after delivering food aid in north-eastern Somalia.
There have been no reports of demands from the pirates who boarded the ship armed with AK-47s. It is not known if any of the 12 crew have been injured.
Piracy was rampant in Somalia, but stopped during recent Islamist rule.
Since the overthrow of the Union of Islamic Courts at the turn of the year, Somalia has been descending back into the violence and chaos seen in the previous 16 years, and this latest incident raises fears of a resumption of lawlessness on the seas as well.
The contention here is that Somalia was relatively peaceful under the Sharia law that was imposed on the country when Islamic rebels took over the nation by force; defying international law and the Somali government that has been struggling to quell violence for almost 2 decades. This contention disregards the religious persecution of non-Muslims and others who lived under the threat of public execution for crimes such as being gay, dishonoring Islam in any number of ways and not praying 5 times a day as dictated under Sharia law.
Even worse and more intellectually dishonest is the fact that many recorded incidents of violence off the coast of Somalia at the hands of pirates were committed by guess who, radical Islamists!! How much do you want to bet that this is the case once again? If so then it is no surprise that the BBC report carries no word of the nationality or religious affiliation of the pirates. That would all but invalidate the premise of the report.
Do you imagine that we will see an update or retraction by the BBC if in these pirates turn out to be the same al-Qaeda backed Islamists that were run out of Somalia? I highly doubt it; that would fly in the face of drive by journalistic standards - or lack thereof.
This kind of bias in the media has become a recurring theme. We have seen this previously in the acceptance of Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez as a democratically elected leader and Saddam Hussein’s Baath party as stabilizing force in Iraq. Chavez is ushering a new era of state sponsored socialism complete with universal health care so he is given a pass in many circles on the left despite the rampant crime in its capital and claims of political oppression by many. Saddam Hussein perpetuated some of the most vicious crimes on his own people as well as that of his middle eastern neighbors but all was forgiven when the United States decided that his influence and support of terrorism was where we were going to draw the line.
Ignoring one set of crimes as a means to further an anti-U.S. and anti-Christian agenda does a great disservice to the people of the world who suffer quietly while the mainstream media chugs along its merry propagandistic way. I can't think of a greater disservice to the world and the journalistic community.
Update: I wanted to provide the following link for completeness and correct an invalid URL: But I Thought That The Somali Islamists Were The Peaceful Type!
Terry Trippany is the editor at Webloggin.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Somalia Was Just As Unsafe Under Islamists
February 26, 2007 - 10:51 ET by emjem24When will these panderers such as BBC (Biased and Bombastic Crap) stop being apologists and propagandists for these terrorist thugs. I wonder how the media qualified the Taliban when they ruled Afghanistan before we kicked their a#$es out of the country? I'd be interested to see a comparison.
There are lot of unsafe and chaotic places (and countries) in Africa. Some are run by dictatos who think they can "cure" AIDS by putting some kind of paste on a person. In other places like Sudan's Darfur, the Islamic government is killing thousands of innocent Christians in the name of their "reconquista" so to speak. Why is this issue so underreported? Gosh, if George Clooney wants the US military to police the area he can't be wrong, right? Where is the UN when you need them?
Africa will always be turbulent and chaotic under any government, whether it be Democratic or Islamist. Until Africa, as a continent, addresses its lack of leadership in these countries, it will always be susceptible to takeover by Islamists and dictators. There is nothing "democratic" about these Islamofascists but since the BBC has trouble accepting democracy and would rather see a socialist, nanny welfare state, there is no doubt they could never report such a story honestly.
When the BBC stops giving Socialist dictators like Chavez, Ahmadinnastupid, et. all a pass, I'll start believing the UN is a benificent and worthy institution for my hard-earned tax dollars.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
The Nazis were a stabilizing
February 26, 2007 - 11:27 ET by GalvanicThe Nazis were a stabilizing force in pre-WW2 Germany, and for the same reason.
...And the Commies were a sta
February 26, 2007 - 11:46 ET by mattm...And the Commies were a stabilizing force behind the Iron Curtain...
If you want stability, support totalitarians.
If you want Liberty, support libertarians.
This is where the "peace" crowd goes wrong all the time: without Liberty, peace (or stability) is meaningless...will they never learn?
Gee, Stalin stabalized Siberia, eh wot?
February 26, 2007 - 12:00 ET by acaiguanaGee, Stalin stabalized Siberia, eh wot?
Using the phrase, 'stablizing force' and referencing Somalia in the same sentence is a bit hard to read through.
In all my years of chasing alphabets across pages; this is the most silly collection of letters juxtaposed that I have come across. (well maybe not the most silly, but close)
So, my question would be, as inquiring minds would have it, do these 'wordsmiths' have day jobs?
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
Peaceful....yes. The peace
February 26, 2007 - 12:09 ET by Tim the EnchanterPeaceful....yes. The peace of the grave.
Piracy was rampant in Somalia
February 26, 2007 - 12:28 ET by taznarOne is left wondering what kind of hold/connection the Islamic rulers had/have with piracy.
Genocide works!
February 26, 2007 - 13:25 ET by upcountrywaterGenocide works!
Genocide works indeed. In f
February 26, 2007 - 13:28 ET by sarcasmoGenocide works indeed. In fact, that's sarcasmo's "third law of chess," the first 2 being "gain control of the center of the board" & "don't waste any pawns."
JMR
When in doubt attack
February 26, 2007 - 16:29 ET by upcountrywaterWhen in doubt attack
First rule of chess is to mov
February 26, 2007 - 16:48 ET by BDFirst rule of chess is to move ALL of your pieces simultaneously at a central point. The game is over in one move.
simple....
On chess strategy
February 27, 2007 - 07:13 ET by UnsaneWhile I agree with the strategy of taking over the center, pawns are cannon fodder.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Reading is fundamental. I s
February 27, 2007 - 07:20 ET by sarcasmoReading is fundamental. I said "waste."
JMR
Great Minds (Again)
February 26, 2007 - 14:08 ET by PSPCplWhen I read this post the first thing I thought of was how the fascists stabilized their countries. This was immediately followed by how totalitarianism in any form is a "stabilizing" force. I am sure their are plenty of folks still alive today who can vouch as witnesses for the "stabilizing" nature of fascism and communism. The problem is that there are too many silent witnesses in too many unmarked graves (mass and otherwise) who can't bear speak about it..
Shame on the BBC (especially given the punishment born by its home country) for printing this tripe.
Folks, face facts. The Left
February 26, 2007 - 14:47 ET by Chicago RepublicanFolks, face facts. The Leftists of the World will never take tyranny seriously, unless they can some how blame the US for it. We might as well just do like Terry's doing here - expose thier apathy toward it and move on.
**************
Support the Spread of Open Society and Capitalism around the World. Do it for the Children.