DailyKos Thugs Bully Paper to Pull Netroot Nation Story

  • Bookmark and Share

Just as I finish a piece laughing at DailyKos for claiming that it is conservatives that feel they have to "create their own alternate reality" because of their "rigid ideology," I find a story out of The Austin American-Statesman where the DailyKos forced that paper to pull a story that had a mildly satirical take on last weekend's Netroots Nation conference in Texas. Apparently, the DailyKos folks didn't like The Austin American-Statesman's "reality" so the Kossacks flooded the paper with their insistence on creating a new one.

The original article by the Statesman's Patrick Beach knocked the nutrooters for the so-called "surprise" Gore visit, said it turned into a "faint-in," and that their general feeling was "terribly self-confirming," among other snippy comments... fun, but snippy. The general tone of the piece was that of amusement at how seriously the nutrooters took themselves. And, even more galling to said nutrooters, this story was the front page editorial of Sunday's edition. (Original, Google cached version of Beach's piece.)

This did not sit well with the nutrooters in question.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

So, in the true spirit of "tolerance," respect for "freedom of speech," and an interest in a "free press," the denizens of the DailyKos whipped themselves up into a frenzy of complaints. The din was so loud that the compliant folks at the Austin American-Statesman acquiesced to the demands for retribution. The Statesman pulled the piece from their website and made abject, groveling apologies to the folks at the DailyKos.

Instead of Patrick Beach's mildly amusing editorial, we get this message:

Editor's note: Netroots Nation story

Readers expect front-page stories to speak directly and clearly about events and issues. Eliminating the possibility of misunderstanding from our work is a critical part of our daily newsroom routine. When we communicate in a way that could be misinterpreted, we fail to meet our standards.

Our front-page story Sunday about the Netroots Nation convention included doses of irony and exaggeration. It made assertions (that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi might find herself at home politically in Beijing, for example) and characterizations ("marauding liberals" was one) meant to amuse. For many readers, we failed.

In trying for a humorous take on the Netroots phenomenon without labeling it something other than a straightforward news story, we compromised our standards.

-- Fred Zipp, editor

Oopsie. Looks like the Statesman didn't want their customer base upset? But, kudos to the Statesman for realizing that only far left, extremists patronize their rag and for bowing to their customers' desires, just the same.

But, there is more to the story. Not only were the whirling Dervishes of the DailyKos responsible for quashing the free media, but another member of that media was the one that started the newspaper burning efforts.

Greg Mitchell of Editor & Publisher, billed as "America's oldest journal covering the newspaper industry," decided to launch a nutrooter attack on the Austin American-Statesman.

Well, I thought I would perform a public service and let some of the convention attendees know about all this -- few are fans of dead-tree media -- so I posted a summary on my diary at DailyKos (the popular blog that founded Netroots). The “Kossacks” as they are known could do what they wanted with it, if anything. Within a few minutes, so many people were reading and recommending my post that it shot to near the top of the DailyKos “diaries” for the day. It also got picked up at some other popular blogs.

Many commenters promised to write letters to the editor. Some of them were Austinites who claimed they knew people at the local paper and might actually work their magic on them.

Well, so much for professional courtesy! Anything goes when the hard-left ideological line has been crossed to the right, eh?

But, now, remember, folks. The left is far more "civilized," far more "tolerant," and much nicer than those mean ol' conservatives. Remember?

Here is Beach's full article for posterity because that cached page probably won't stay available forever.

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Name-dropping Al Gore and his call for a switch to clean, renewable energy within 10 years was enough to pull whoops of approval from the 2,000 or 3,000 marauding liberals gathered for Netroots Nation at the Austin Convention Center on Saturday morning.

So when the former vice president and Nobel Prize co-winner made a surprise -- and cleverly scripted -- appearance during U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's talk, it looked like the conference might turn into a faint-in.

Talk that Pelosi (who is arguably so left-leaning that her parenthetical should be D-Beijing) would have a Very Special Guest had been buzzing about the conference of liberal bloggers, pols and media types since it began Thursday (it concludes today). But it wasn't clear to attendees that something was afoot until a schedule change handed out Saturday morning indicated the speaker's talk would last 45 minutes longer than previously indicated.

Not that Gore's appearance was necessary to whip up the troops.

From the beginning, it was clear these people were convinced the electoral map would be repainted with a brush sopping with blue paint come November.

The believers will tell you it's morning, that they smell the napalm. And it smells like, oh, yes, victory.

It didn't seem to matter that the conservative and much smaller Defending the American Dream Summit -- featuring syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin and Libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr -- was going on in Austin at the same time. That was miles from downtown, so there was little chance for a rumble.

With the current administration's low approval rating, a charismatic presumptive Democratic nominee and a Republican opponent some in the GOP have been reluctant to even air-kiss, the energy was palpable and, like the political blogosphere, terribly self-confirming.

They went to panels about how the presidential election would be won house by house, block by block. They staged mock media interviews and critiqued themselves, and showed films ("Crawford") and Internet videos ("Harry Potter and Dark Lord Waldemart"). They attended panels on the war, health care, online social networks, volunteer organizing and expanding the networking power of something called an "Internet."

There was even one panel Friday featuring Princeton economics professor and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman (wearing, as if to galvanize stereotype, what appeared to be Birkenstocks) that was essentially about how the media weren't liberal enough.

As they say, only in Austin.

Filmmaker Paul Stekler, who teaches film production and politics at the University of Texas, said:"As you have greater democratization (through the use of technology to distribute one's message), you also have a greater degree of what's called confirmation bias. We live in a very different and weird world in terms of dissemination of information right now."

Indeed, you couldn't find anybody who disagreed that President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were "two ignoramuses," a label hurled by Parag Mehta, the Democratic National Committee's director of training.

Big names? Got 'em. There was Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, founder of the Daily Kos political blog, who hatched the idea a few years ago to get his like-minded pals together and who, in a Friday lunchtime keynote with Harold Ford Jr., chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council, seemed amazed at what the notion had unleashed.

"We're going to keep growing; we're going to keep pushing for an unapologetic Democratic Party," Moulitsas said.

Then there was John Dean, the former Nixon White House counsel who has made a second career of railing against what he considers right-wing excesses the way recovering alcoholics preach against strong drink.

"I have deep fear of my former tribe, and what they might do particularly in the law," Dean said, before going on to refer to former Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani as "Richard Nixon on crystal meth."

It's plinking bass in a barrel to paint liberals as overly intellectual types incapable of having fun unless reading Noam Chomsky counts, and it sure does for them. And there were a handful of colorful characters, including some men from Cedar Creek who looked like bikers and represented the Warrior Wolf Society, which they described as "a group of pagan warriors with wolf totem spirit," and a guy in a Bush mask and clothing with prison stripes.

But for the most part, these were serious-minded people, and decorum prevailed.

When a few people had the temerity to shout at Pelosi and Gore, they got shushed as mercilessly as they would have at a Nanci Griffith concert.

The no fun thing? Maybe it's because, as Democrats, they're not used to having it.

The incredible imploding presidential campaigns of Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis and John Kerry were used as textbook examples of what not to do. As political ad man John Rowley put it, he's been in the business for 15 years and only the last two have been good in terms of the political tide. Still, he said, "We've got to get ready for the day when we're not swimming downstream."

In other words, what a pendulum does is swing. But technology is power, and the left has been quicker to adopt it. As Gore put it Saturday morning:

"You are at the cutting edge of a new era of history. You will look back many years from now and tell your grandchildren about coming here to Austin, Texas, and about the first two meetings of Netroots Nation, and you will tell them that this was the beginning of an effort that was the start to reclaim the integrity of American democracy."

That is exactly what Joe Trippi had in mind. It was the one-time Howard Dean campaign aide who saw, perhaps a little too early and a little too enthusiastically, the transformative power of the Web. As he walked from one place to another Friday afternoon, he got stopped every 20 feet or so by people who knew him or at least knew of his ideas. And this is what they had wrought; this is what he had predicted.

"It's amazing," Trippi said. "I knew it was going to happen, but I'm still blown away that it happened."

pbeach@statesman.com; 445-3603

**UPDATE**

The Austin American-Statesman has re-posted the Beach article on the Netroots Nation conference. It is now marked as "commentary," which it obviously always was.

(H/T kristinn from FreeRepublic.com)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Its all about tolerance,

Its all about tolerance, isn't it?  If you believe what the nutroots believe you are fine.  If you have an original thought and can read past the Dr. Seuss level then you are not tolerated by the tolerant left.

Nothing Like a Little Mob Action,...

to keep those press folks in line.  Just a preview of what the Nutroots and government will do to talk radio with the "Fairness Doctrine".

Who knows what gets nixed before we ever see it. 

Have the Kossacks adopted a signature color of shirt, yet?  Say a nice shade of light-brown (as an earth-tone, of course).  Are they recruiting hackers and planning some sort of cyber-Kristallnacht against prominent Conservative bloggers and other Conservative media outlets? 

Next thing you know, the New York Times will be refusing to run John McCain's rebuttal to a Barack Obama editorial, unless he rewrites it to fit their "template".  Oh, wait!

Let's hope the Kossacks and other Nutroots will stay front-and-center, so the American mainstream can see them for what they are.

I agree... On the other

I agree...

On the other hand, McCain could have the bully pulpit if he wants it...

I'm waiting...

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

This made me laugh

This is my local paper. When I read the original article on Sunday I actually had to turn back to the front page to make sure I was reading the Statesman! It really took longer than I expected for them to retract this article...two whole days! I laughed this morning when I read the EDITOR'S NOTE apologizing to NetRoots for not covering their convention the way they wanted. It's hilarious that within two days they would be compelled to beg for forgiveness for publishing an article that might slant slightly to the conservative side. They should be very embarrassed!

 

True

Maybe if he realizes that the media that used to "buddy up" to him are showing their true colors in the Obama camp, he will explain himself better.

Unfortunately, that seems to be a common trait among Conservatives and Republicans. We (or they) assume that if we do what is good and logical, the media will report it as such and the public will understand.

President Bush should have used the bully pulpit far more than he has. It is not that the American public is "dense", it is that the MSM will either get it wrong or lie about the "How" and "Why" of policies. Too often, the oft-repeated Big Lie wins.

Always the Same

With these leftwing extremists, it's always a tantrum accompanied by some kind of leader-to-group-sanctioned violence (sometimes via the keyboard, as in this instance) targeting some individual, group, or company for doin' them wrong.  Because they believe they have been wronged.  They've cornered the market on imaginary and blown-out-of-proportion persecution complexes.  Ego problems.  They're probably all "middle children" and "left-handed".

They're behavior is consistently that of badly behaved, very spoiled, undisciplined, and irresponsible children.  Without exception.  They stomp and pout and hold their breath (another reason they're blue) until they get their way.

I'm disappointed The Austin American-Statesman caved to intimidation, willingly giving up their individual voice to a gang of radical hoodlums.  Standing their ground, despite the financial support of their left-leaning customer base, is a matter of integrity.  Gotta eat and pay the bills, too, I know.  Just disappointed.

I'm with the Netrooters on this one

The cached version of the original article is filed in the news section. Evidently this was printed on the first page of the newspaper, not the first page of an opinion section. If the article were presented as a straight news item, I also would have a problem with it.

If the article were presented as an editorial/opinion or in a columnist's space, then it is acceptable (and downright funny). However, I rarely see opinion pieces on the front page of any city newspaper, so I'm with the Netrooters on this one.

I wouldn't demand that the story be scrubbed. I'd just point out that this was inappropriate for the first page. 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

You don't read the Austin paper then!

"If the article were presented as an editorial/opinion or in a columnist's space, then it is acceptable (and downright funny). However, I rarely see opinion pieces on the front page of any city newspaper, so I'm with the Netrooters on this one. "

You don't read the Austin American Statesman then. Because  they never hesitate to put liberal opinion on any page...in such volume that they now can only publish that side. Really sad, they've surrender freedom of the press, plain and simple.

 

mom_rox, i have a question to ask of you........

is george benard shaw some one you look up to other than his literary accomplishments?

the gbs quote

I know nothing of Shaw other than this quote and that he was a playwright. I first saw the quote sometime in the late 1980's in a booklet about wasteful government spending (I can't recall by which group).

As I mentioned in a previous post, I saw this quote "in action" so to speak when I lived in Venezuela and saw Hugo Chavez elected as President. Chavez, who has a very charismatic speaking style (sound familiar?) appealed to the poor by promising to take from the rich (again, sound familiar?).

In response to txco, no I do not live in Austin, which is why I do not know if the article appeared on the front page of the main section (but from other comments believe it did) or the front page of an editorial section. I think that distinction and "how" the article was presented matters.

Many articles here at NB decry the blurring of news anchors and analysts on television - and rightly so. The same should apply to a newspaper.

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

I get it

I understand your point and I agree with the journalistic convention of keeping news and opinion in appropriate sections ...or at least labeling them so no matter where they appear the reader is aware of the type of article.

Problem is, the American Statesman has been so over the top with liberal bias in all sections for years. I knew immediately upon reading the NetRoots article that it was going to cause them problems. Whether satirical or not, this article was going to elicit an attack by their opened minded liberal patrons. It's really a mystery how this  article got published in the first place..I guess someone there thought for a second they could be a true journalist and not just the echo chamber for a certain mind set...

liquid paper

The fact that the paper scrubbed its story from its website tells me all I need to know about the AA-S. Leave the article along with the 'apology'. (Aside from the paper, the bright side is that you live in the Austin area ;)

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

Well stated, mom_

Well stated, mom_

Jer

An Old Story Brought to Life

It seems that Winston Smith will be working overtime. Altering all the news that's fit for The Enlightened Ones.

The Kos kids seem about as tolerant as Muslims are to this "Freedom Of Speech" thing. No coincidence there.

Server Response

Is anyone else experiencing response time problems with NB this morning?

server response - yes (slow)

like a turtle

What if the shoe had been on the other foot?

Mr. Huston is allowing his ideology to get in the way of his assessment of the facts. If a newspaper published an allegedly straight news article about a convention of ardent conservatives that employed terms like "marauding conservatives," I have little doubt that Huston would be protesting as vociferously as the Netroots attendees were over the Austin American-Statesman piece. Editor Fred Zipp was right to observe that in running the article "without labeling it something other than a straightforward news story, we compromised our standards."

Fascist is as fascist

Fascist is as fascist does.

I can hardly wait for arts and crafts classes in the re-education camps.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Shocking scare tactics; terrorism!

As far as I can tell, the "thugs" that "bullied" them did so by writing letters. *Gasp!* A strongly worded letter! What a new and unusual form of thuggery! I'm terrified that any American would ever stoop to such a low level as a LETTER WRITING CAMPAIGN. How dare liberals ask a newspaper to remove a poorly-written conservative-biased opinion piece! It's not as if conservatives don't devote whole websites to such a thing! Conservatives would NEVER do that.

 And it was such a GOOD piece, too. It used the time-tested journalistic techniques of SNARK, SARCASM, and unabashed BIAS. In fact, it demonstrates a conservative specialty: verbal EYE-ROLLING at "newfangled" things. 

And, WTH, it's hypocritical of you to defend this as "journalism." And it's also hypocritical of people on an entire website DEVOTED to complaining about the other side to be upset about a LETTER WRITING campaign requesting an APOLOGY for rudeness. And the newspaper, wanting to maintain its reputation as a journalistic institution, apologized for its misguided attempt at COMEDY.

You want to talk about creating realities - look at all of you acting as if this is new. I LOVE this website. 

...I totally get it....

I sure don't blame those people that organized the letter writing campaign against the NetRoots article. They had to be shocked and insulted because their echo chamber (AAS) didn't write what they wanted to hear.....!

Awwww...Were you offended, Nutroots? Now You Know How We Feel

Awwww...Were you offended, Nutroots?  Now you know just a little bit how conservatives in San Francisco feel when we go to SFGate.com and see links to the foul Mark Morford, who isn't just sarcastic, he's deliberately, maliciously offensive. 

Mr. Zipp's apology should have been strictly limited to regret at any possible misunderstanding about what kind of article it was if there was confusion as to whether it was supposed to be a straight news story.  But to apologize for its content after publishing the piece was ridiculous, and to wipe it off the website as if it was grossly offensive is an act of cowardice. 

You would think a guy who grew up with the name "Zipp" would be a little tougher than that.  He must dread every time Airplane! is shown on TV.

 "Well, I've got nothing against the press...they wouldn't print it if it wasn't true..." -- Joe Jackson, "Sunday Papers"

Apartheid, slavery-these were also "grassroots"-supported ideas

 History has always proven the angry mob is *not* the way to create policy. Especially with grown adults playing dress-up as part of the mob.

 What's next? Policy set by comic-convention cosplayers? Demanding government research into superheroes and laws regarding fitness and spandex wearing?

 Or prison riots making policy that all prisoners should be pardoned because they got together and "spoke with one voice"?

 

Sheesh

 

"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".

"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same"

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.