Jewish Man Attacked in Brooklyn By Muslims Yelling 'Allahu Akbar,' Media Silent

Photo of Warner Todd Huston.

On March 19th, I found a story on The Jerusalem Post detailing an attack by Muslim youths on a rabbinical assistant that occurred at a Brooklyn, New York subway station. The youths grabbed Uria Ohana's yarmulke off his head then ran off yelling "Allahu Akbar," which is Arabic for "God is great." I have waited four days to report this story myself to see what other news outlets decide to cover the incident and how they would cover it. So far, the only U.S. news outlet that covered it was the New York Post. It has been nearly ignored by the rest of the media.

The dearth of coverage is curious because it seems a natural story for the left to get their "hate crimes" dander worked up over. After all, we have a Muslim gang attacking a lone Jew right in the middle of Brooklyn! Yet, the news gives us zip for coverage.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

And this story is no mere he-said story as an arrest was made of an Arab man who was one of the attackers.

Of course, many in the media are cowed by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) that claims that anti-Muslim hate crimes are on a wild tilt upward. CAIR claimed that the number of reported cases from 2005 to 2006 increased at a rate of 25.1 percent from 1,972 cases to 2,467. CAIR also claimed that true "hate crimes" rose from 153 cases in 2005 to 167 incidents in 2006.

But these claims by CAIR neither comport to the FBI's statistics, nor do they come close to the anti-Jewish statistics in this country.

The FBI, for instance, reports that in 2006 there were 1,750 documented cases of anti-religious hate crimes. Of that number nearly 66 percent was anti-Jewish with only just under 12 percent being anti-Muslim. The FBI's reported numbers do not match CAIR's claims at all.

Anti-Jewish crime is up all across the world these days, yet the media stay silent. Of course, the media is all agog when ABC claimed they "discovered" anti-Muslim sentiment even though they had created it themselves, but where are the MSM stories about this real incident of anti-Jewish sentiment?

So, why has the media ignored this story? Isn't a hate crime a hate crime? Isn't news of a gang of Muslim youths attacking an innocent man in the middle of one of our largest cities the sort of news that people should know?

Can anyone doubt that the media would be all over this story if it had been a Muslim youth attacked on the streets of Brooklyn?

(Illustration above via christiansstandingwithisrael.com)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Read the NY Post's take, folks...

The criminal got nailed by a Volvo, ensuring instant justice in spite of what the legal system eventually does or doesn't do.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

This makes NO SENSE!

Does one-upmanship and a thirst to recapture the White House by Democrats entitle Jewish Americans to IGNORE acts of violence such as this by Muslims against Jews??????

Does political correctness preclude the reporting of hate crimes by Arabs against Jews in this country?????

Has the American press now emboldened Arabs in this country to act with apparent impunity against American citizens without fear of media coverage of these acts????

This world of our's has been turned upside down by this shameful behavior by our very own news outlets......

 

Nowhere to Run....Nowhere To Hide.....

I'm a Jewish conservative

And what people don't understand is that the vast majority of Liberal/Democratic Jews are non-religious.

Virtually every Orthodox Jew under the age of 50 is Republican/conservative.

I , personally hate seeing "Jewish leaders" who act in ways very far from Jewish values. They don't keep the Sabbath, they eat pork, are pro-abortion & anti self defense..all items clearly anti Jewish.

Jews know that G-d expects them to be moal & keep the Law...the only way they can justify their hedonism is by being "Godless" 

 

I ,for one, say, call the MUslims what they are, dump PCsilliness & do the right thing!

yes

yes to all of the above.

Sickening, ain't it?:(

Now only if Jews were 'swarthier" or "black" then we'd have infighting that makes Clinton/Obama look like a civilized debate...

 

"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".

WTH, There are over 7,000

WTH,

There are over 7,000 attacks by white power groups per year in America.

The media remains silent on most of these.

When these stories are covered, it's generally in the local news.

According to???

When you give out these kinds of figures, you KNOW you're gonna get asked for a cite. Why not just pre-empt the asking & provide one? Is whatever source you're using THAT lame??
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Natonal

Natonal Geographic

"American Skinheads"

March 19th, 2008, 9 pm

2005 - 2006:  7,000 racist attacks and incidents according to the FBI

Aha.

So the guys in this story were a "white power group"?? Hint: whites aren't the only humans capable of racist thoughts, as if a certain Reverend hadn't already made this obvious. I'm about as white as a person gets, and I live in the south, but aside from a few websites I have no idea where any actual racists are. Also, if black people had attacked me for being a white guy that year, the incident would show up as a hate crime, which you'd effectively blame on whites, because whites are responsible for 100% of hate crimes, right??
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

No sarc, These stats are

No sarc,

These stats are for white vs. other race crimes.

Black on white crime is of course a hate crime, but not a stat that would be featured in a show documenting white racists.

The show was about American skinheads, get it?

Why so sensitive this morning?  White guilt got ya down?

Warner's numbers seem to contradict you, then...

And this is just the same old me, I'm actually quite pleased due to a beautiful view of the Manatee River featuring roseate spoonbills this morning. Yesterday it was the right that was upset with me. I'm not sure you interpret National Geographic's interpretation of the Fibbies' stats correctly.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

According...

According to the FBI link I provided in the story above:

Racial bias

Among the single-bias hate crime incidents in 2006, there were 5,020 victims of racially motivated hate crime.

* 66.4 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-black bias.
* 21.0 percent were victims of an anti-white bias.
* 4.8 percent were victims of an anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
* 1.5 percent were victims of an anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias.
* 6.4 percent were victims of a bias against a group of individuals in which more than one race was represented (anti-multiple races, group).

But, that isn't very many crimes in a population of 300 million! My story above was contrasting the difference between anti-Jew and anti-Muslim crime, but in neither did I say the actual NUMBER was outrageously high.

So, Leon, you state this big number (at least you act like it is big) but you make no other statistical determination or point using that number.

I'd imagine you THINK you have some sort of point here. Maybe instead of throwing out an unsupported number you could actually try to make a cogent point?

(...as everyone laughs at my request, I know.)

WTH, Your point is that

WTH,

Your point is that the national media is silent on the attack.

My point is that the national media is almost always silent on these attacks.

Hence, the fact that the media was silent on this attack is standard operating procedure.  It's local news.  Not national.

So your whining for lack of coverage makes no sense in light of the lack of coverage for the 7,000 other racist attacks that happen per year.

If it were just local news...

Might a certain local grey lady, among other NY media outlets, be glaringly absent on the job? Looks to me like Warner busted some local (at least!) media bias here...
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Sarc, A story about a

Sarc,

A story about a bunch of hoodlums grabbing a jewish mans hat on a subway platform in Brooklyn is national news?

If that's the level of story that should be covered nationally, our newspapers are going to have to have about 1,000 more pages per day.

It was covered by the New York Post, like every other minor racial incident in New York City such as this.

I fail to see how this is media bias.  While unfortunate, it's a minor, local story.  Why WTH thinks the media should be covering this is beyond me.

No, I'm almost agreeing with you...

But I'm saying that Warner, even under YOUR terms, has apparently busted some local mediabias. Do you seriously argue that the NYT should somehow NOT cover this local criminality?
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Sarc, Yes.  This event

Sarc,

Yes.  This event is unbelievably minor.  Subway harassment happens to everyone in NYC, regardless of race.  It's part of living in the city.

It doesn't make it right, but it does render the story about a bunch of street toughs stealing a guy's hat, NOT newsworthy.

The New York Post was sufficient coverage.

 

Wow. I absolutely disagree.

Even if you took the religious hate component out of it, I'd say it's newsworthy. And while I've only visited and never lived there, I've never experienced or witnessed anything like what's described here. I ride the Subway each time I visit because I'm so cheap. In fact, New Yorkers are incredibly nice and helpful to lost-looking folks in their Subway system, I've found, so maybe I'm just lucky. But I'd love to have a copy of today's NYT handy, so I could regale you with what IS "important."
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

As stated above Sarc, If

As stated above Sarc,

If the NYT is going to be expected to cover every single minor incident of harassment on the NYC subway, they're going to have to add a couple hundred pages to their daily paper.

Don't tempt me to go buy a copy...

And find "important" stories compared to this hate-incident. Let's just leave it as "we disagree."
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

it's not the hat stealing

it's the blatant religious motivation. You know, the same sort of thing that would get a man jailed if he grabbed the hat from some guy and called him f**got or other gay bashing slurs.

In San Francisco, the difference between a hate crime and a normal assault is the victim being a minority and claiming "slurs" were used. The Muslim terrorist cry was made famous to many Americans who'd never heard it until Berg's head was sawn off. It was used for religious intimidation and threat purposes only. Just the same as if they'd popped off a palm-vertical salute and "heil Hitler!" before kicking you in the @rse. 

 

"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".

No,  the story is about a

No,  the story is about a Moslem snatching a yarmulke off the head of a Jew while shouting Allahu al Akbar.

Let's recast this.  Suppose this snatcher of the 'hat', as you called it, was a Nazi brown shirt, with Swastika and all.   Do you sincerely believe that would not have made the National news?

Yes.  As stated above,

Yes. 

As stated above, there are hudreds of much more violent Nazi-related incidents per year in America that aren't covered. 

This is a minor, local story. 

Complete BS.   The FBI

Complete BS.   The FBI doesn't track Hate Crimes by attacker type, just motivation.  i.e., the FBI's statistics, which are the ONLY reliable statistics available, do not distiguish anti-Jewish crimes by attacker preference.  All the KKKers, Neo-Nazis, Islamists and other anti-Semitic bigots are lumped together by victim type: Jews.  YOU don't have a clue what the relative proportions of anti-semitic attacks are by diffrent creeds.  Nobody really knows because the data are not reported.

And if you think the Nazi thug wouldn't make the new, tyhink again.  These people get on the local front page and make the national wire services just by applying fior a parade permit.

to deconstruct Leon

so according to this there are just over 5000 racially motivated crimes. In toto. 

less than 7000 already.

Of those, 66 percent were anti-black bias. so we'll take that 5020 and get  3313. Less than half of Leon's rhetoric.

What this doesn't tell us is what the racist perps "cultural identity" is-because contrary to propaganda, hispanics are rather racially biased against everyone who is not Raza. MS-13 and a few others seem to enjoy making violent racist performance artworks. 

And this is why I posit more racist crime isn't being reported-because it would show yet another side to the ever-uglier and more violent Second Mexican War. 

The real screwball in the mix is, from another FBI report (IIRC the same NatlGeo cited one) is that the vast majority of crimes a black man suffers are from others of his own ethinic group. So much for "brothers" and "roots".(Maybe even the same FBI crime report that showed that leftist gun control programs not only failed to deter crime but also increased it)

Of course, NatlGeo has also completely bought into the GW Consensus BS, failed to report on the return and growth of all the missing glaciers, polar ice, and other "harbingers" they themselves promoted as "proof" of AGW. They do a story on military camp provisioners during the War between the States and headline it as "Haliburton in the Civil War"! Attack articles on the preservation of American Indian sites abound while there is no outright indignation at the declared policy of Iran and others *deliberately* destroying any biblical era artifacts that don't paint Islamic histories in a favorable light. Or chastise Egyptian government officials for forcing families out of houses and off of land at gunpoint, with little or no restitution, because they believe there are "cultural" artifacts to be found. Not to mention having fun with the term "God Particle" recently, even though a) no real physicist ever uses that term (even the article admits that) and b) they'd never dare call it a "Allah Particle". Let's not forget the almost-completely-invisible reference to the Janjaweed Darfur mobs as being Islamic, or how the thugs are blatantly motivated by MSM press coverage of Getmo and 9/11, but talk about all those brave people standing up for themselves. Or take the article of Nigerian tribal-based discrimination of their own people regarding oil profit distribution and poverty, and spin *that* into "America's Fault" as well.

Read Nat'lGeo for the photography and the descriptions of places. Filter their"science" thru a BS strainer and do not read any of their "cultural' exploration pieces without some sort of independently verified balance handy. 

*sigh* were they always this bad and as a child I didn't know the spin and bias and dumbed down trendy science reporting? Or is this a recent phenomenon stirred up by the new generation of Media Warriors who lack the means or the balls to enter in a stand-up fight?

 

"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".

UC, The nature of the

UC,

The nature of the crimes as detailed in your post are entirely irrelevant as to whether or not this story should have been covered by the national news.

But E for effort.

really Leon

Then why were those nooses on a college campus national news for three days? Face it: the media picks and chooses the stories they want to promote based on the details and the amount of drama contained.

And don't forget...

And don't forget the Media also picks the stories that favors their pet causes and groups.

Attacks on Gays= goooood

Attacks on Christians= who cares?

Attacks on Muslims= goooood

Attacks on Jews= What attack?

Attacks on blacks= OUTRAGE

Attacks on whites= borrrrring!

etc., etc.

WTH, The fact is that

WTH,

The fact is that most of these incidents regardless of races involved do not receive national news coverage.

So why should some minor harassment where some punks took a guys hat be covered by the national news?

If a...

... Muslim was the one attacked it would have been broadcast from coast to coast as "evidence" of how eeeevil America is. Everyone here knows that.

WTH, So you're claiming

WTH,

So you're claiming that every racially motivated attack on a Muslim has been covered by the national news?

Furthermore, I love when you prove points using hypotheticals.  Great tactic.  Extremely valid.

Yes, there have been...

.... many all at the behest of CAIR.

Of course, my "tactic" is better than yours... you know, the one where you make statistical claims, then have some vague claim of where you got them and then get proved completely wrong when a REAL source is presented? You know.... THAT one?

WTH, 1)  Yes many is (a)

WTH,

1)  Yes many is (a) 'not all' and (b) not a valid answer

2)  My stat is a direct quote from National Geographic.  Take it up with them. 

3)  In the interest of advancing the debate, let's use your source.  So according to your source there are about 5,000 racist attacks per year.  Based on your argument, every single one of these should receive national news coverage.  That is totally ridiculous and entirely unfeasible, thus rendering your argument worthless.

To rehash:  My ONLY point remains true.  There are thousands of these attacks per year.  A vast majority are only covered by the local news.  To claim that this story not being covered by the national news is bias, is silly when most stories like this aren't covered by the national news.

Admit it.  You had nothing to write about and you needed that sweet $20 pop you get paid per online article.  I hear you.  Tax time.  We all need all we can get this time of year.   Even if that means manufacturing controversy.

Interesting...

More assumptions than truths on that one!

You still provided no real proof that you got your stats from anywhere. I see your claim but that hardly suffices. On the other hand, I actually gave real proof.

Now to beat down your straw man. I never made any such claim that EVERY "racist" attack need be reported, even on a local level.

But, what I do see on this one is that we are in a war with radical Islam, yet we rarely get any reportage on Muslims in America unless THEY are the victims.

As to your claims of knowing what my income is from writing, I did find that stab in the dark very, very amusing. But, like most subjects, you don't know jack!

WTH, Knowing that MRC

WTH,

Knowing that MRC has an $11,000,000 annual operating budget, I'd say my guess was pretty close.  Give or take $10.

Candance, Simple. 1) 

Candance,

Simple.

1)  There were a handful of those incidents all around the same time. 

2)  There was a high profile incident in Philadelphia at the new Comcast building, where a noose was hung at the work site.  This had national implications b/c it opened the door to questioning whether or not a building owner or building contractor could be held liable for third-party employment practices claims that could arise from such an incident. 

3)  Golfweek Magazine editor fired for drawing a noose on the cover

4)  Columbia was one of the schools with a noose.  Just so happened Columbia was all over the news at that time (i.e. Ahmadinejad speech)

So the noose national coverage made sense within the context of many other events that were happening at the same time. 

 

Leon is wrong again (as

Leon is wrong again (as usual). Looking at the statistics ( I know that's difficult for a liberal like you to do Leon), it's pretty obvious that the last race we should be concerned about commiting violent crimes against other races in America is whites.

For example...

In 2002, there were 362,784 violent crimes commited by whites against blacks. That same year, there were 1,916,380 violent crimes commited by blacks against whites. http://www.racismean...

Also, the incarceration rates by race are pretty common knowledge: http://www.prisonpol...

One problem is that when a white person attacks a black it's a defacto hate crime, but that when a black person attacks a white it's only a hate crime if the offender made it explicitly obvious.

The second major problem is shows like the one you cited in your post (I happend to have watched it). White racism and "hate crime" gets a disproportional amount of attention compared to it's actual occurance rates. Hate crime or not, the fact of the matter is that a white person in America is more likely to be attacked by a black or latino than a black or latino is to be attacked by a white.

 

Anclerson, Wow thanks for

Anclerson,

Wow thanks for wasting your time to address points I never made.

Great work!

My point has nothing to do with the proportion of hate crimes and what races are involved. 

My point was ONLY that there are over 7,000 white power related hate crimes per year in America.  A miniscule fraction of those receive national news coverage (AND many of these victims are Jewsish)

The fact of the matter is that these small incidents are not national news.  They are local news.

Thus, why would this story demand national news attention?  B/c the instigators were Muslim?  Is that the only reason?  Subway harassment?  Happens every day.  Can't cover every incident, it's simply not feasible.

So, I'm not quite sure why you argued what you did considering my clear, simple point was that this story shouldn't be covered by the national news b/c it's not national news.  It was covered the same way most of these type of attacks are covered, in the local news.

No bias here, just a slow rant day for Warner.  He had to find something to whine about.  Unfortunately, he chose to make a completely irrational and absurd claim.

That you're the only one

That you're the only one that thinks it "irrational and absurd" pretty much tells it all. Another terror supporter speaks.

You're right Leon (for

You're right Leon (for once). Trying to educate you is an enormous waste of time...

Anclerson, You really think

Anclerson,

You really think your post was in some way a refutation of my only point?

How?

Again, all I claimed is that most of these incidents do not receive national news coverage so why should this one?  I fail to see how anything you said is even remotely related to my contention.

Is there a story in every national newspaper everytime a Swastika is spray painted on a temple in the Midwest?  No.  

It's a simple matter of feasibility.  You can't cover everything.

This is a local story, covered appropriately by the local news.  To call for more makes no sense.

Isn't a hate crime a hate crime?

No.

Only white, Republican, heterosexual males can commit hate crimes.

Of course those derned

Of course those derned Zionists are to blame for being victimized by these devout moon-god worshippers....

I oppose so-called hate crime laws.

I do not see how a crime committed against a person of color is any more or less serious than a crime committed against a white person, or any possible combination thereof.

The story of this unfortunate crime was not reported by the liberal MSM for two reasons:

1) The attackers were Muslim, which is a fact the MSM will go out of their way to conceal at every opportunity. If they don't report the crime, then people aren't going to ask questions about who the attackers were. After all, we certainly don't want to offend those whose religion commands them to kill us, now do we?

2) The victim was Jewish. The liberal MSM is largely anti-semitic. One has only to look at the decidedly lopsided coverage of events in the Middle East, which is nearly always slanted in favor of the Arabs.

Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!

Attacks like this will become more common....

as the Muslim population increases.

The danger that Islam presents to the world is being roundly ignored by a media afflicted with PC.

Multiculturalism, PC, and a blind eye to Koran inspired violence are all, a direct threat to the security of the US.

Damn stupid, aging, liberal hippy douches will kill us all.

Happy Trails...