A Shocking 'One-Child' Statistic in CNN Story From China Earthquake

Photo of Tom Blumer.

You have to wonder how this CNN headline and story about the earthquake in China got out, as it includes a shocking statistic (400 million births "prevented") rarely seen in the West (bold is mine):

Parents' losses compounded by China's one-child policy

Li Yunxia wipes away tears as rescue crews dig through the ruins of a kindergarten class that has buried her only child -- a 5-year-old boy.

Other parents wail as soldiers in blue masks trudge through the mud, hauling bodies from the rubble on stretchers.

"Children were screaming, but I couldn't hear my son's voice," she says, sobbing.

This grim ritual repeated itself Thursday across southwestern China, as thousands of mothers and fathers await news about their sons and daughters.

..... The grief is compounded in many cases by a Chinese policy that limits most couples to one child, a measure meant to control explosive population growth.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

As a result of the one-child policy, the quake -- already responsible for at least 15,000 deaths -- is producing another tragic aftershock:

Not only must thousands of parents suddenly cope with the loss of a child, but many must cope with the loss of their only child.

China's population minister recently praised the one-child rule, which dates to 1979, saying it has prevented 400 million children from being born.

..... That reality has cast parents like Li into an agonizing limbo -- waiting to discover whether their only child is alive or dead.

Joe Stalin, himself responsible for the deaths of countless millions (literally true; the total has been best-guesstimated at between 20 million and 30 million), once said that "One death is a tragedy; a million is a statistic." What does that make 400 million? It would appear that at least 300 million of those "prevented" children were victims of abortion; this Abortion Facts link reports that over 10 million abortions took place in China in just one of the 29 years since the one-child policy took effect.

Though I suppose the point might be made, I'm not going to try to argue that losing "only" one child of several would make parents' grief more manageable. I just find it very interesting, given the relative pass the US media has given Communist China during its government-imposed 29-year "one-child" horror, that this story took the angle that it did -- and that it got past its editors.

It will be very interesting to see how long this Kyung Lah's CNN dispatch remains available. Saving it to the hard drive might be advisable.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The grief is compounded in

The grief is compounded in many cases by a Chinese policy that limits most couples to one child, a measure meant to control explosive population growth

It's also important to note that China has almost no safety net and that the elderly are completely dependent on their children for assistance.

You lose your child, you're in trouble.

Add the fact that it's projected that in about two decades there will be anywhere between 12-20 million young men with no chances of marriage (female babies are aborted), you've got a prescription for major social upheaval in China.

The 21st century will once again be America's century.

If we want it to be. 

 

 

One in a million in China

If you're one in a million in China, there are 1,000 people just like you.

I only hope the Chinese people will rise up against and overthrow their dangerous government before they reach military equality with us. They seem to be catching up in a hurry. But, then, I've waited for the Iranians to overthrow their tyrants too for 30-odd years.

Communist

China is a communist nation. After the 1917 Revolution in Russia, that nation almost collapsed until 1922 when the government let the free market bail them out. As long as this evil philosophy is followed, China will be on a down hill slide. As we expand "liberalism"/socialism/ communism in America, many people, particularly the young, are apathetic and ignorant, believing that the government will bail them out of their "troubles". However, when faced with reality, as many Chinese are now, their attitudes change. Too late for many Chinese. Will it be too late for us?

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Tom Blumer...I saw this

Tom Blumer...I saw this segment...and I could not agree more that with what you wrote...my heart and their wailing with grief went out to all of them, the people involved with this story and the way it was presented was despicable IMHO.

Thank you.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Whoa!

My head is spinning that they're even mentioning it. And that somebody in the MSM can grasp the idea that it's sad for a poor person to end up childless. They seem to think that if you're poor, you don't want, need, or deserve children.

Maybe there is hope after all. 

We also need to consider...

that some of these parents that lost their only living child may have already lost 1, 2, or 3 due to forced abortions - Sorry - "prevented births".