Is it just me, or is the Associated Press's Jeannine Aversa doing an end-zone dance because she thinks that the recession Old Media has been pining for has finally arrived?
Someone needs to remind her that one negative quarter, if it even occurs, does not a recession make.
In an early-Saturday story on the economy, Aversa treated the recession as a lock in her first paragraph, even though the fifth paragraph betrayed uncertainty (bolds are mine):
It's no longer a question of recession or not. Now it's how deep and how long. Workers' pink slips stacked ever higher in March as jittery employers slashed 80,000 jobs, the most in five years, and the national unemployment rate climbed to 5.1 percent. Job losses are nearing the staggering level of a quarter-million this year in just three months.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓For the third month in a row total U.S. employment rolls shrank—often a telltale sign that the economy has jolted dangerously into reverse.
At the same time, the jobless rate rose three-tenths of a percentage point, a sharp increase usually associated with times of deep economic stress.
The grim picture described by the Labor Department on Friday provided stark evidence of just how much the jobs market has buckled under the weight of the housing, credit and financial crises. Businesses and jobseekers alike are feeling the pain.
"It is now very clear that the fat lady has sung for the economic expansion. The country has slipped into a recession," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group. Indeed, there is widening agreement that the first recession since 2001 has arrived.
"Widening agreement" is a far cry from "It's a question of how deep and how long," ma'am.
Throughout her report, Aversa makes the same mistake -- mistaking seasonally-adjusted total employment losses for actual job losses -- that she did in an earlier report Friday (covered in more detail by me yesterday at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog).
The economy lost 80,000 jobs in March and 232,000 jobs during the first quarter of 2008 on a seasonally-adjusted basis. But, no matter how much Ms. Aversa may wish that it were so, that does not translate to the "blood on the streets" verbiage she used -- language that was mimicked by most of the rest of Old Media yesterday:
Job losses were widespread last month, hitting workers at factories, construction companies, retailers, banks, real-estate firms and even temporary-help agencies. Also mortgage brokers, hotels, computer design shops, accounting firms, architecture and engineering companies, legal services, airlines and other transportation as well as telecommunications companies.
Those cuts swamped employment gains elsewhere, including at hospitals and other heath-care sites, educational services, child day-care providers, bars and restaurants, insurance companies, museums, zoos and parks.
The fact of the matter is that the economy added 574,000 jobs in February, after having added another 529,000 in January (data can be retrieved from this BLS page; select the very first "not seasonally adjusted" table):

It sadly is the case that the number of jobs added in January and February of this year is significantly lower than the number added during the same two months in 2007 and 2006. This largely explains why total employment, when adjusted for seasonality, has shrunk. There is also no denying that the slower level of job additions so far this year in comparison to previous years is cause for concern about whether a recession has begun.
But none of this changes that fact that the negative core of Aversa's employment narrative ("pink slips stacked higher," and "job losses were widespread last month") is demonstrably false. Pink slips did NOT stack higher, and there were job GAINS (though less than one would have hoped for).
There is no indication in her AP story that Aversa's reporting is entirely based on seasonally adjusted data. It makes me wonder if she, or AP, even realize it.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
A recession is never good
April 5, 2008 - 12:13 ET by ThisnThatA recession is never good news for the country. However, if offered a choice of a booming economy with the current crop of MSM idiots, or a deep recession if every one of them were fired, I'd say -- bring on the recession.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
And your point being?
April 5, 2008 - 12:22 ET by HumblepieThis is just another wonderful angle that dims can use to enforce their logic that conservatives cannot run the country. That being said, its only a matter of time before they state that a vast portion of said lost jobs were to ethnics, thereby giving Rev. White validation for giving his "keeping the black man down" sermons.
I guess the news industry does not hire seasonal staff or temp to fill in during high peak times. Also, a decline in sales of said news does not relate to individual being laid off. Cause and effect is a very bitter pill. So sorry dims, Monica is not here to help you swallow this one.
Screw the
April 5, 2008 - 12:31 ET by Clear thinkerScrew the Democrats...
Wanna mess with Dems? Start a nationwide campaign as Democrats (undercover of course) to toss out all the illegals in the country so Americans can turn a 5% unemployment rate down to about 2.5%.
Just think of the ramifications!!!
"Abstain from McCain"
Unemployment rate during the
April 5, 2008 - 12:48 ET by BlazerUnemployment rate during the Clinton admin. 5.4% + MSM= Economy sizzling.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
Tom - would you like to comment on:
April 5, 2008 - 13:55 ET by Gary HallTom - would you like to comment on: The LA Times, in today's headline version (moved the almost daily McCain hit pieces down a notch again) of the never ending, "oh my God - it's all over" economy, they offer up this little chart: seasonal adjusted U.S. employment rate.
As we enter this current cycle, how does the steepness of the rise in unemployment this time so far compare to the steepness of the rise following the collapse of the Clinton economy in 2000? Perhaps evidence of a soft landing - compared to last time - is in the works. Thanks, gary (;`>
Gary
April 6, 2008 - 09:33 ET by Tom BlumerIf there is even a need for a soft landing (because that assumes a recession, I don't see a spike like the one in the graph.
The non-adjuststed (i.e., actual) unemployment rate shot up from 4.7% to 6.3% from Sept. 2001 to Jan. 2002. Barring another 9-11, I don't see a steep climb like that again. (Crossing fingers) I don't see it going above 5.5%.
In raw terms, the thing to look at in the next three months is whether raw employment increases by more or less than it did in the past 4 years (April avg - 1,012; May - 868; June - 530). If it gets reasonably close to those averages in each of those three months, I would say the worst is over. It will take a while for the seasonally adjusted numbers to catch up with that, so even if it does happen, the media can still have fun in make-believe land for a while.
Deniers
April 5, 2008 - 15:16 ET by forestRecession Denial!
There's a recession because the media says so! If there isn't one now, they'll keep saying so until they scare people enough to cause one.
"It is now very clear that
April 5, 2008 - 15:28 ET by WhoIsJohnGalt"It is now very clear that the fat lady has sung for the economic expansion."
Oh, so NOW they admit the economic expansion was actually good news for the last five or six years?! How come the MSM would never admit it until now?
Consensus!
April 5, 2008 - 17:11 ET by heldmywThat's right folks, the MSM has a consensus making recession, if not full-blown depression a fact! (With cannibalism rapidly becoming a part of the school-lunch program.)
The fact that the banking and investment firms who were hardest hit in the subprime debacle have taken their lumps and are shaking it off now... well, that's just a 'distraction'.
The earth is burning up and
April 5, 2008 - 17:15 ET by BlazerThe earth is burning up and everyone is going to turn into human flesh eating cannibal's. Sweet, I've alway's wanted to be in a real life zombie apocolypse. -sarc
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
Global Warming approach to economics
April 5, 2008 - 22:37 ET by nkviking75It's the same tactic that works so well for the Global Warming loonies. Declare the recession as fact despite the fact that the official criteria has not yet been met and claim a consensus of the experts.
I doubt any serious person would claim the economy is perfect, and maybe when the facts come in they'll show we are in a recession. To meet the standard of the official definition, we need two straight quarters of downturn, and we don't have the numbers to show that one quarter has happened yet.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.