From ABC: A Comprehensive History Lesson in 'Name That Party'

Photo of Tom Blumer.

NewsBusters posters have already given Old Media deserved grief about its reluctance to pin the Democratic Party label on Eliot Spitzer, who, as of this moment, is still governor of New York (Brent Baker on evening news show coverage; Ken Shepherd on the BBC; Shepherd on the AP).

But, as blogger Ace noted last night (warning: some profanity at Ace's link), ABC has outdone the other outlets one better.

ABC's "Political Sex Scandals Redux" popup slideshow has a series of 13 slides relating to current and past politicians. If Republicans are or were involved, the network, with one rare and minor exception, consistently applies the "R" label almost immediately. With Democrats, with one very old exception, the party label isn't there.

Here are the specifics:

Summary:

  • Six Republicans immediately identified; one relatively obscure GOP member not ID'd.
  • Four Democratic affiliations not noted; one, involving a matter dating back a quarter-century, immediately identified.
  • One party affiliation not clear, and apparently not known.

Ace's key comments:

This is all in our minds, huh, MSM?

It's all accidental, right?

Then why does it keep happening, and why do you stubbornly refuse to make a simple style guide change -- requiring the party ID of any and all politicians caught in scandals upon first mention, in the first paragraph?

It's because you want to preserve your freedom to continue doing this. Only Republican scandals are, in fact, Republican scandals. Democratic scandals are never identified as such, and instead are, in your "nuanced" telling, either scandals of a particular man alone or of "The System" generally.

Exactly.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Addendum

A the Corner, Mark Hemingway notes that ABC "somehow" missed former Democratic Congressman Mel Reynolds.

I wonder if readers here can come up with any other obvious oversights?

I thought of Mel Reynolds right away also - him and Barny Frank

 I'm sure there are othes they have left off.

Perhaps the most blatant

Perhaps the most blatant and obvious example of this phenomenon I've seen to day.  Shocking, but unfortunately, not unbelievable.

It's like they aren't even trying anymore to foster the illusion that they are reporting in an impartial manner.

*****

"People only insist that a debate stop when they are afraid of what might be learned if it continues." - George Will 

Let them play their little

Let them play their little games, since we all know that no party affiliation mentioned means that they are Democrats. If they think they are fooling anybody, then they should think again.

As for Spitzer: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!*

* No laughter for what his family has to be going through, however.

If he asked his wife to show support for him yesterday, then he's even more despicable than he appears to be already. 

 

Today's Washington Post...

...actually identified Spitzer as a Dem in para 2 on the front page.

Must have been a mistake.

no surprise here

GMA talked about the story for several minutes this morning and not once did they identify his party.

Wilbur Mills was a Democrat

Wilbur Mills was a Democrat with a lot of power

Sex Scandal Song

Check out this sex scandal song on myspace.

www.myspace.com/herbertfarmer

Hey, at least they managed

Hey, at least they managed to find some Democrats to say bad things about. Usually, the MSM has collective amnesia concerning Dem scandals.

Following the list is interesting too. Especially if you consider that most people never make it all the way through such things.

#1 Spitzer (as appropriate, but party un-named)
#2 Republican
#3 Republican
#4 Republican
#5 Republican

This is obviously painted as another symbol of the Republican "culture of corruption".

Defensible

.... from a recency standpoint (except then why is Craig #8?).

Not that Fox News...

...would ever stoop that low-

http://www.crooksand...

Syrius

 

"...the dire consequences to society when people begin to believe that by
renaming someone to erase their humanity opens the door to the
devaluation of everyone's life..."-dscott

 

Syrius - that has absolutley no relavence to this blog

Whether Fox made a mistake or someone was making a joke, who knows but it's not a consistent normal thing like what is going on here.

You might have a point if McCain was involved in some kind of scandal and they labeled him as a dem, but just incorrectly labeling someone is no big thing