Anyone Wishing to Evaluate John McCain Won't Get Old Media Help

Photo of Tom Blumer.
  • Bookmark and Share

It's not exactly a secret that John McCain is not admired by conservatives for a variety of reasons.

The conventional wisdom is that the Arizona Senator and GOP presidential nominee needs to mend some, uh, fences (warning: profanity at link) with many in his party.

Fair enough, but a word to the wise, and this is relevant regardless of personal ideology: If either McCain himself, or anyone who wishes to give him a fair shake, thinks Old Media is going to help them out, they're sadly mistaken. The candidate is going to have to go around the media types he may still believe are his friends. Voters in general should not be satisfied saying, "Well, I haven't seen or heard anything from him," because Old Media will work to minimize his visibility.

Case in point:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Last Tuesday, McCain clinched the Republican nomination. No matter what you think of the guy right now, it was a historic moment, and from a pure-news perspective, completed a remarkable political comeback. Conventional wisdom had McCain's candidacy dead last summer; the only greater turnaround in my lifetime that I can think of is Richard Nixon's in the 1960s.

McCain's victory was his first opportunity to speak to the American people as a whole. He did that, and gave a pretty good speech -- which got relatively little press coverage on Tuesday night. It was then followed, as NewsBusters' Scott Whitlock noted, by virtually no coverage on the networks' Wednesday morning shows.

Full transcripts of McCain's speech can be found at the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times (link may require registration), All Headline News, the UK Guardian, at JohnMcCain.com (with partial video), and of course at a few forum and blog sites.

As far as I can tell, that's it. I wouldn't have learned of McCain's good speech myself if I hadn't read this post at National Review's The Corner.

Further, as NewsBusters' Brent Baker noted Tuesday, "A new study of positive versus negative campaign coverage found ..... that John McCain's coverage grew more negative as he got closer to winning the GOP presidential nomination." Don't expect it to get any better now that he's the nominee.

Passivity and waiting for McCain to come to you would be justified if we were in a fair and balanced media environment, but anyone who has spent more than a few minutes here knows that isn't the case. McCain owes it to us to try his best, but voters of all ideologies owe it to themselves to be proactive. Perhaps a good start would be reading McCain's Tuesday night speech. Old Media is hoping you aren't interested enough.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Having to vote for him to

Having to vote for him to keep the communist out of the White House makes me have to puke, congratulations old dying media for using the uninformed to chose both candidates, I'm not going out of my way to read some drivel we all know is not in his heart. Back-stabbing RINO.

Was McCain really so naive

Was McCain really so naive that he thought they would still be his friends after he got the nomination? If he was, I guess reality is now hitting him in the face like a wet fish. They may like him best of all the Republicans, but it doesn't hold a candle to their feelings for the Democrats.

The only Republican they like is an "even Republican."

They are laughing up their sleeves now at having had their way.

This whole thing just makes me sick.