Liberal talk-radio star Ed Schultz has been a Barack Obama guy. In April, he spoke at a Democratic fundraiser in Fargo, and caused Obama to disassociate himself from Schultz’s remark that John McCain is a "warmonger." Sampling the show in the noon hour here in Virginia on Tuesday, Schultz said Obama’s "lay off my wife" comments on ABC were a "little sensitive" and "really short-sighted." Schultz thought it implied to people "And don’t believe her when she's on the stump." Here’s a summary from my quick note-taking:
The consensus E-mail from across America to this program is, if Obama doesn’t want the Republicans to pick on his wife, then let her stay home in the kitchen and not make speeches on the stump.
Then he said listeners also said the media should be "hammering Cindy McCain" for failing to release her tax returns and the media is accepting the "bogus excuse" that she’s protecting the privacy of her kids when she could be making unscrupulous "Sudanese investments."
Then he returned to the spousal point. He said everyone should ideally have their spouse as their best friend and career adviser. He said the Clintons clearly ran as a team in 1992, and that people thought when they elected George W. Bush they would get his dad as an unofficial adviser. He declared:
Family connections count. So I don’t mind the scrutiny. I just don’t think it’s important to have the insults, so I think Barack Obama may be a little bit sensitive in this arena, that his best surrogate so far has been Michelle Obama. And to maybe leave the impression that she’s not going to have an influence on him if he’s President of the United States I think is really short-sighted. Because she will. She’s too intelligent to stand in the kitchen. Okay? No offense, but that’s a fact. She is going to be an advocate for what she believes to be important for America. And that brings her to a level of public scrutiny that it would for anybody else. Now do I agree with the nasty 527 stuff that’s out there? The twisting of the comments, the patriotic – but I really think Barack was a little sensitive when he said "Lay off my wife." That’s a little like saying "And don’t believe her when she’s on the stump." This I think is a very fair approach to all of this. I do believe that criticism of a spouse is fair game, if it’s not dirtball politics. I mean, if it’s a fact, it’s a fact. If it’s not a fact, then obviously maybe that’s what he was talking about.
He added that he thought Laura Bush had "her hands on the Bush administration," and Nancy clearly had Ronnie’s ear. So he insisted that to suggest Michelle Obama won't be important in an Obama White House wouldn't fly.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Notice how all the PC Dems
May 21, 2008 - 06:00 ET by lumpylove it that Barry said to lay off his wife. But then failed to mention the double standard that Hill never told them to lay off her husband?
The PC Dems thinks sexist gallantry is permissable when it comes to female spouses.
The PC lefties on Daily Kos have been beating up on Bill Clinton--but no one dares lay a hand on Michelle.
"Thought" Laura had her
May 21, 2008 - 06:22 ET by tater"Thought" Laura had her hands on the Bush adminsitration...there they go again assuming stuff without facts. Libs like to make a big deal when conservatives assume stuff.
"They need to have a course in college called common sense and everyone should take it. Problem is there isn't too many people that could pass or teach it." -my grandfather
Tater
May 21, 2008 - 16:34 ET by Jerry MackI listened to ES occasionaly before he was removed in favor of an Airhead America, America hating zero. I would not be a good witness to testify that he is capable of independent thought.
If Michelle Obama is going
May 21, 2008 - 06:44 ET by motherbeltIf Michelle Obama is going to make speeches, she needs to be held repsonsible for what she says...just like any adult.
Period.
She does NOT get a pass on whatever she says in public just because her husband is running for President.
What the Obama is really saying is that he doesn't want anyone's opinion of him to be affected by what she says.
I agree
May 21, 2008 - 10:09 ET by docbmotherbelt...but lets make sure it is not taken out of context....
Somebody Gets It
May 21, 2008 - 08:03 ET by MeanderingAt least someone finally gets it. It’s crazy to think that she can say whatever she wants and influence his campaign, but not be held accountable for her words. I suppose that is the liberal way, say what you want, but no one is allowed to question or comment on what you say. Let her speak for herself Obama, or should we call her “Sweetie”?
Itchy Woman
May 21, 2008 - 08:15 ET by VonuO's bigger problem is that his wife is dismissive towards him, calling him an accessory and stating that he is stinky and snory in the morning. This will not go over well.
Michelle the Ball Breaker
May 21, 2008 - 08:43 ET by suzycreamcheeseMichelle the Ball Breaker is capable of taking up for herself. It is laughable that Obama warns people to lay off his wife in a tone he should reserve for reprimanding his daughters. I really can't stand the sanctimonious tone that Obama uses everytime he opens his mouth and speaks.
Whatever Happened to Free Speech
May 21, 2008 - 08:54 ET by GothampcWhen did the Democrats become so thin skinned? Was FDR so hypocritical concerning Eleanor? Because people really said bad things about her.
If Obama can't handle attacks against his wife, then he shouldn't be running for such a high profile job. What's he going to do when Hugo Chavez gets up at the UN and says mean things?
It would be different if they were calling her a nappy headed ho. But these are comments concerning her own words.
Maybe this is like that
May 21, 2008 - 09:05 ET by krendlerMaybe this is like that "national dialog on race" where one side gets to say whatever it wants (e.g., "America is downright mean and oppressive) and any kind of response from the other side isn't necessary and is, more than likely, "racist".
This reminds me of the outcry from Obama and his cronies (Biden) when Bush dared to say the word "appeasement" (w/o ever mentioning Obama or anyone else. Oh the outrage! "Disgraceful", "How dare he", "This is bull&^%*^" etc etc etc.
This after Obama had attacked Bush BY NAME daily for months on end, blaming him for every evil in the world. How dare Bush "respond" (even though Bush wasn't).
Barry
May 21, 2008 - 09:24 ET by iveseenitallBarry H. Obama, in a speech about those "nasty" Republicans, 2008:
"They better be careful"... "or,or, or...I'll just fold my arms and turn my back on them...hrumph!"
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
This after Obama had
May 21, 2008 - 10:34 ET by motherbeltThis after Obama had attacked Bush BY NAME daily for months on end,
blaming him for every evil in the world. How dare Bush "respond" (even
though Bush wasn't).
And even after President Bush's speech, Mr. "New Kind of Politics" said that the only person who had made the world less safe was President Bush.
This is going to get old really quickly. Obama says he wants to have a new kind of campaign, but I guess that means only until he gets criticized. Then his standard goes right out the window.
Re: Warmonger
May 21, 2008 - 11:01 ET by mattmIf it wasn't for the warmongers, the peaceniks would all be dead. If it wasn't for the peaceniks of the 20th century, 50 million lives might not have been lost. “To be prepared for War is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.” - George Washington
Wow Tim. We see so little in the way of..
May 21, 2008 - 16:34 ET by Gary HallWow Tim. We see so little in the way of.. such straight, fair and obviously sane talk from the MSM and the slightly farther to the left folks these days, that this material from Schultz reads just like it was said by a person with a conservative mind. My goodness, he'll have to take a shower. (;~>
She’s too intelligent to
May 21, 2008 - 21:33 ET by bigtimerShe’s too intelligent to stand in the kitchen. Okay? No offense, but that’s a fact.
Hey Schultz... I take offense to that.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Michelle, Bill Ayers,
May 21, 2008 - 21:44 ET by fitzfongMichelle, Bill Ayers, Reverend Wright...it would cost Obama an extra $45 just to take all that baggage on an American Airlines flight.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
"Carry" on, Obama. Carry
May 21, 2008 - 22:56 ET by Scout Finch"Carry" on, Obama. Carry on.