Obama Rejects Ed Schultz Event Outburst: McCain a 'Warmonger'

Photo of Tim Graham.
By Tim Graham | April 6, 2008 - 12:43 ET

Remember the brouhaha the liberal media made out of Cincinnati radio host Bill Cunningham mocking "Barack Hussein Obama" at a McCain fundraiser, which McCain quickly rejected? Now the same thing (only bigger) has happened on the left. Radio Equalizer reports that at a Democratic Party fundraiser in Fargo on Friday that Obama later addressed, nationally syndicated liberal talk show host Ed Schultz slammed John McCain as a "warmonger." On Saturday, the Obama campaign repudiated the comment. But will the same networks that played up the Cunningham remarks (say, CNN) have the same fervor for the Obama-punts-Schultz story?

The Equalizer expects flying fur on the left: "While Obama is clearly looking to the general election and what will be expected of him, this is likely to go over about as well with the left as the suspension of Randi Rhodes by Air America. Don't expect Schultz to let this go without a fight."

It will make Monday's Schultz show worth sampling. From AP, which had the decency to employ the L word to describe Ed:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrat Barack Obama's presidential campaign on Saturday repudiated a liberal talk show host's description of Sen. John McCain as a warmonger, a comment made to an audience that Obama later addressed.

Ed Schultz, host of a nationally syndicated radio program that is based in Fargo, N.D., was warming up the crowd Friday at a $100-a-person fundraiser for the North Dakota Democratic party in Grand Forks when he tagged the Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting as a "warmonger," Schultz acknowledged in a telephone interview Saturday.

He said he has used the term many times on the air to refer to McCain because of his support for the war in Iraq.

"He voted for this war. He's a perpetrator of the war. He's an advocate of the war," Schultz said. "In my personal definition, that's a warmonger."

Obama was not in the room when Schultz spoke. The candidate spoke after a series of introductions by the state's three Democrats in Congress.

Obama thanked Schultz and called him "the voice of progressive radio."

The Equalizer wrote that The Wall Street Journal's Washington Wire reported that McCain was quick to demand apologies:

Sen. John McCain called on potential fall rival Sen. Barack Obama to condemn comments made in a Democratic party fundraiser in North Dakota on Friday night where liberal radio talk show host, Ed Schultz, called Mr. McCain a “warmonger.”

After he was introduced, Mr. Obama thanked Mr. Schultz and called him the voice of progressive radio.

“It’s a free country and we have freedom of speech in America and Mr. Schultz is entitled to his views. I would hope that in keeping with his commitment that … Sen. Obama would condemn such language since it was part of his campaign,” Mr. McCain told reporters in Prescott, Ariz. “That kind of thing I don’t think is necessary at all in this campaign. I’ve made very clear how I feel about war and my experiences with it.”

Left unsaid was that, unlike Mr. Obama, Mr. McCain does not allow reporters into his fundraisers so the press does not know what supporters may be saying to the crowds there.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

McCain should simply have

McCain should simply have said...


"Sorry... I rarely read Peanuts... and that doesn't sound like one of his funnier strips. Besides, isn't Schultz dead?"

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

Understand the enemy

So, I went down the Randi Rhodes link you provided, read some of the quotes and articles, and came upon this: "AAR is gonig to have to understand progressives, liberals, and socialists do not want to hear Democratic party cheerleading. This is why they are failing".

We keep talking about the Dims, and relating them to the MSM. What's really scary is the fringe, as indicated by this quote. The so-called Progressives, Liberals, and Socialists crowd is really out to destroy America. And I believe Clinton and Obama are leaning in that direction.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Many times

No one objected when he said it on the air because he was talking to the choir.

Whose turn is it to be "I'm

Whose turn is it to be "I'm sorry" now?

Geesh this get's old...

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

MORRIS SUGGESTIONS TO McCAIN (and mine)

 

MORRIS SUGGESTIONS TO McCAIN (and mine)

According to (democrat) political guru Dick Morris:
What should be McCain’s message? Populism. Many will urge that he
fortify his base. But with Republican Party identification at an all
time low, there isn’t enough base out there to win. He needs to attract
swing voters. Not by going to the left of the Democrats, but by
transcending their liberalism by attacking the forces of privilege thei
r party is bent on protecting.
Here are a few choice targets:
• McCain should go after those who have caused the subprime crisis and
demand justice. He should press for recapture of the fees and
commissions they made by making loans they knew were no good. He should
demand that their licenses be ended, their institutions closed, and
their ill gotten gains confiscated.
• He should attack credit card companies for their abuse of consumers
through usurious interest rates, high penalty fees imposed at the drop
of a hat, and interchange fees that add to the cost of everything we
buy.
• McCain should take up the case against Congressional perks, building
on his efforts to curtail earmarks, cracking down on Congressional
ethics, and taking aim at the day to day practices (as opposed to the
speeches) of his two fellow senators who are running for office.
• He should go after regulators who don’t regulate, beginning with
those who let unsafe toys into the U.S. He should condemn the FAA for
its weaknesses. He should go after the Fed and other regulators for
their laxity in the face of the emerging credit crisis.
• McCain should blast China for its abuse of Tibet. While governments
are cowed into silence, McCain should speak out for human liberty and
against the repressive tactics of Beijing even as China wants us to
celebrate their Olympic games.
Strong, vigorous, populist advocacy can bring the spotlight back to
McCain, draw attention to the integrity and strength which has always
made him a unique public figure.
CRAWFISH NOTE: Forget attacking business, the liberals cannot be outdone on that…its what class warfare private industry bashing socialists do.
Perks? (wasted tax dollars formerly termed pork) Perks
are a solid topic because the democrat candidates are traditionally
feloniously wasteful. You dig? I meant “big dig”.
Unsafe toys? Compare that junior high nanny state
subject with enforcing immigration law and reforming the dreadful
income tax system. Which do you think normal voters will want to hear?
Regulators? Well, where has congress been for decades?
It seems the point could be made the Senate has been part of the
problem. (Actually part of many many problems)
Why is endangered Social Security not mentioned? Energy independence? Reforming the dumb McCain-Feingold law?
Looks like a C- list geared to out-moderating moderates (whatever a
moderate is)… how about some backbone on the festering issues for a
change? How about some real differences on EVERY possible issue? How
about a 7 point CONTRACT WITH AMERICA???
China bash over Tibet is a winner BUT expect both parties to do that…so where is the difference? Why overdo it?

Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)

Amazing Find; Networks covered that McCain story endlessly

THIS is blantant bias if they don't do the same for this.

McCain the Warmonger

People said the same thing about Winston Churchill.

If it wasn't for the old warmonger Churchill and his persuasive abilities with the USA, the West would probably be speaking the German language, and those in the East would be speaking Japanese. Italy (middle man) would have been cut out completely. Like the idiom, two's company, three's a crowd.