As Brent Baker noted, NBC’s Matt Lauer claimed the "liberal bloggers" were going to have a field day with Alan Greenspan’s new memoir – especially the remarks critical of Bush. But before the bloggers jumped, the whole Bush-bashing publicity cycle began with the Dinosaur Media. Their field day began with the newspapers, in particular, Bob Woodward at the Washington Post (noted here on NB by Matthew Sheffield), and continued in the usual network television bashing cycle, starting with "60 Minutes" on CBS. NBC's "Today" demonstrated its routine appetite to inflict another bad-news bruising on the GOP.
Lauer also no doubt disappointed Greenspan at the end by Lauer getting excessively chummy and personal about his marriage to NBC reporter Andrea Mitchell, asking him about his claim that he gets his best ideas in the bathtub. "Trying to set aside that image, mental image, for a second, what, what, what is, what is the best idea you ever had in the bathtub?" Greenspan: "Ask my wife to marry me." Lauer cracked: "Was she in the bathtub at the time?"
Matt Lauer began Monday’s edition of Today with this blurb: "Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan rattles with Washington with his new memoir taking direct aim at the, the President and the Republican Party. This morning, he's here for a live interview." In a profile of Greenspan, Maria Bartiromo added: "Greenspan is a self-described, lifelong libertarian Republican, which is why his critical words about the GOP in his new memoir are so powerful. Greenspan writes that Republicans have 'swapped principle for power,' and 'deserved to lose,' the 2006 elections."
In those words, Greenspan sounds like many conservatives who believe the Bush team made a weak effort to restrain federal spending. But Lauer and his colleagues never make the mental leap to consider that the spending bills are sent by Congress, and the biggest, most ambitious spenders in Congress are the Democrats. (They certainly don’t include in the spending equation that the siren-blaring first responders to the proposal of any social spending restraint are the media, spotlighting potential victims who will be allegedly eating dog food or going without health care or other assorted hardships due to heartless spending "slashers.") In fact, on Monday, Lauer didn’t quote the liberal bloggers against Greenspan, but the liberal columnists of the dinosaur media, in this case, Paul Krugman of the New York Times:
LAUER: Alright let, let me read you a little bit more about your criticism of the fiscal policies of the Bush administration. You write, "To my mind, Bush's collaborate-don't confront approach was a major mistake. It cost the nation a check-and-balance mechanism essential to fiscal discipline." You go on to say, quote, "My biggest frustration remained the President's unwillingness to wield his veto against out-of-control spending." Paul Krugman in this morning's New York Times, takes you to task. He says this, 'Mr. Greenspan has just published a book in which he castigates the Bush administration for its fiscal irresponsibility. Well I'm sorry but that criticism comes six years late and trillion dollars short. Mr. Greenspan now says he didn't mean to give the Bush tax cut a green light and he was surprised at the political reaction to his remarks."
GREENSPAN: That was, if I may say so, a bit of a distortion. If you read the testimonies I gave in that period it's perfectly clear what position I was taking with respect to the tax cut. I thought the structure of the tax cut was fine but it had to be paid for. And there's where my criticism is. It's not on the tax cut, it's on the fact that spending is not being funded.
LAUER: I guess though, people listen to a book, they read a book that comes out after your term as, as chairman of the Federal Reserve, and they say it sounds like you're being much more vocal in your criticism now. Did you hold your tongue, to some degree, while you were chairman of the Federal Reserve. Did you have to?
GREENSPAN: No, actually on the issue of fiscal policy people just weren't listening to what I was saying. I'm not saying anything different from what I said back then. Indeed I went through testimony after testimony, with glassy-eyed Congressmen and Senators out there, as I said, we're running into a fiscal train wreck. Did they respond? No.
LAUER: And yet, as you heard in, in Maria's set-up piece there, there are some claim, who claim that you did not see a fiscal train-wreck coming in the housing bubble and in the credit crunch. And they say because you kept mortgage rates so low, for those years, back in the early part, just four or five years ago that we now face the issues that we face today. Blame? Do you accept some of it?
GREENSPAN: Nope.
LAUER: None?
GREENSPAN: No.
LAUER: Should you have seen it coming?
GREENSPAN: No. Here's the issue. Look, the United States is, got a housing bubble. So has probably 20 to 30 other countries around the world, all caused by the same thing - this global, sharp decline in long term interest rates, specifically mortgage rates. Everybody's got the same problem. In Britain and Australia. And the point here, is that we tried actually to get mortgage rates up. We failed, and the reason we failed is that the global forces are overwhelming.
It could not be said that Lauer provided an interview full of softballs. Instead, Lauer came at Greenspan from the left, suggesting that he should have been a more full-throated advocate against the Bush administration. The end of the interview was also a little harsh on the old central banker, mocking his bathing habits:
LAUER: And finally, in this book, you wrote, quote, 'To this day the bathtub is where I get many of my best ideas. Trying to set aside that image, mental image, for a second, what, what, what is, what is the best idea you ever had in the bathtub?
GREENSPAN: Ask my wife to marry me.
LAUER: Was she in the bathtub at the time? [Laughter] Trying also to keep that mental image out of things. Alan Greenspan. Doctor, thanks. Nice to have you here.
But Greenspan’s ties to NBC also made for cozy publicity arrangements. Lauer announced that CNBC would run an hour-long special on Greenspan and his new book on Monday night in prime time.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Bash Bush - Sell a Book
September 18, 2007 - 06:37 ET by allanfThe way to sell a book today is to bash Bush. Will 60 minutes or Today publicize a book which is complimentary of George Bush? Not even Mrs. Greenspan would talk about that kind of book.
I don't think this is a case of Greenspan being misquoted. It is part of the publicity for the book.
We could had stayed in
September 18, 2007 - 07:04 ET by USA4freedomWe could had stayed in Kuwait..but we left ..
(that action is what proves that we did not go in “just for
oil”)
I think they get us confused with the Japanese, they took
over the Philippines, Burma, Thailand, French Indo-China, British Malaya,
Netherlands East Indies, Manchuria Korea, with all its resources, we (with the
help of the allies) kicked them out. THEN LEFT.
Or maybe the Germans, we (with the help of the allies) kicked
them out of Italy France, Algeria, Poland, Holland, Russia, Czechoslovakia, Ukraine,
Belorussia, etc.
Gave them 12 Billion (in 1948 dollars) to rebuild,
THEN LEFT.
Let us not forget Viet Nam. We are still getting oil
revenues from that country.
I put a few gallons of that Korea gas in my car just the
other day.
To say: its just about oil is belittling to the greatness
and honor of our troops, AND.. the greatness and honor of our country.
I think I can speak for many Americans and troops when I say.... SCREW YOU MSM..
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Oil was a factor
September 18, 2007 - 08:37 ET by JimboAgreed. But let me play devil’s advocate for a second.
Suppose part of the reason for the Iraq wars was based on oil? Our national security depends on it, and if a country is going to try to jeopardize our national security by doing so, isn’t that a reason two wield our military might?
I’m not afraid to say oil was just one of many motivating factors in both Iraq wars. $5 or $10 at the pump being the alternative would drive this country into the ground.
That being said, we need to ensure future security by alternate fuel sources and more secure methods of oil supplies.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Bash Bush
September 18, 2007 - 15:00 ET by PAPA LA PROUD AMERICAN
If I'm not mistaken Greenspan was another holdover of Clinton admin. Like all the hold overs that Bush didn't replace when he took office turned on him and are still waving the Clinton banner. Just take a look at all the leaks out of the intelligance dept. But instead I guess he looked into their eyes and could see their what ever it was that he thinks he saw. All that said I shudder to think if Gore won or Kerry, GOD save America for these politations.
Hmph...Weak would be an improvement!
September 18, 2007 - 07:02 ET by sarcasmoTim, saying "In those words, Greenspan sounds like many conservatives who believe
the Bush team made a weak effort to restrain federal spending" implies an effort was made at all. I sure don't see much evidence of that...
JMR -- still out west & on-vacation, PM a URL for a guaranteed response from me, though.
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
I agree, no one cared.
September 18, 2007 - 07:10 ET by USA4freedomI agree, no one cared. except us..
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day