The news wing of the Media Research Center, CNSNews.com, yesterday reported that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) refused their request for an interview with Chief Diversity Officer Mark Lloyd about his tremendously disturbing First Amendment and communications policy views.
(Not to mention his affinity and admiration for Venezuelan dictatorial thug Hugo Chavez and his demand that "white people" "step down" "so someone else can have power.")
These are views which certainly deserve additional explanation from the man himself. We have analyzed his record at great length, but all of it from the outside looking in. Some direct questions to - and answers from - Mr. Lloyd would be most helpful.
The FCC told CNSNews that it's their policy not to make staffers available to the media. And that is in fact fine; the FCC said its Commissioners are the front line officials and they themselves speak to the media, not those who work for them.
But Congress - and Congressional oversight - is a different story. And Congressman Greg Walden of Oregon agrees. So too does FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. During a September 17 convening of the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, Congressman Walden - who is on said Subcommittee - asked Genachowski if Lloyd would be made available for questions (video at right).
Lloyd has a long and troubling track record of virulent opposition to the First Amendment, particularly as it pertains to the rights of conservative and Christian talk radio hosts and stations. It is time he discuss his views with someone besides fellow Leftist Fellows at liberal think tanks and on Socialist media "reform" panels.
Chairman Genachowski, it's time to make this hearing happen. Soon.
—Seton Motley is Director of Communications for the Media Research Center and Contributing Editor for NewsBusters.org.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Chairman Genachowski, it's
October 6, 2009 - 13:40 ET by Dan The Man 2Chairman Genachowski, it's time to make this hearing happen. Soon
Probably about the time NYC is under 8 feet of water.
Know how to keep a Troll in suspense? Ill tell ya in the morning.
I thought that the "Czars" worked for the President?
October 6, 2009 - 13:51 ET by c5thenIsn't the definition of a "Czar" a "special advisor the the President on a certain specific issue"? As such that would mean that they work for the Office of the President and not any cabinet Secretary or Agency head (which is part of the problem with Czars).
So...either Chief Diversity Officer Mark Lloyd works directly for President Obama as a special advisor and is then a so-called "Czar" or he works for the FCC Commissioner and therefore is simply a government employee with no special policy powers.
The Obama administration can't have it both ways.
Throw 'da bums out!!!
no incumbent re-elected, with very few exceptions!
www.loyaltoliberty.com
Any friend of Chavez
October 6, 2009 - 14:36 ET by Army Bratis an enemy of America and Americans.
Our Commie in Chief makes me sicker and more fearful of the coming collapse of Capitalism in America.
This is his goal. He has no love for this country...only disdain and contempt.
God will not save this Republic. We the people must do so. God helps those who help themselves and we'd better get busy.
"Rome" is burning and Obama is laughing and fiddling. Why should he care if America goes to hell? It won't affect him in the least.
islam is a lie and Truth is killing it.
"Diversity czar". Hmmm.
October 6, 2009 - 21:38 ET by RR GOP"Diversity czar". Hmmm. Why not just admit this dude is the "reverse racism czar", the "reparations for black folk czar" or the "I hate whitey czar".
Anybody else really fooled by this?
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.