The Rand Paul 'Chainsaw' Massacre: ABC's Apocalyptic Take on 'Radical,' 'Controversial' Senator
According to Nightline anchors Terry Moran and Bill Weir, new Republican Senator Rand Paul is "radical," "controversial" and longs to take a chainsaw to the Department of Education. Using hyperbolic language, Weir profiled Paul for Wednesday's program.
Co-anchor Moran previewed the segment by attempting to isolate the Kentucky politician: "Up next, even the most conservative Republicans balk at his proposals for slashing government." As a cartoon graphic of a crazed-looking Paul appeared onscreen wielding a chainsaw, Weir hyperventilated, "So, while the President argues for a budget scalpel, Rand Paul would use a chainsaw, shutting down the Departments of Energy and education."
The journalist continued, "He would kill the Consumer Product Safety Commission, shrink the Pentagon and cut off all foreign aid." Dismissing Paul's call for spending restraint, the ABC anchor challenged, "Does the richest nation in the history of nations have a responsibility to take care of its weakest?"
[See video below. MP3 audio here.]
Continuing the apocalyptic tone, Weir warned, "But a government shutdown is not Little League. And the cuts he's proposing have the potential to make those Wisconsin protests look like a church social."
In contrast, on January 20, 2009, Weir enthused about Barack Obama's inauguration: "...From above, even the seagulls must have been awed by the blanket of humanity.”
While co-anchor Moran deemed Paul "radical," he fawned over Barack Obama during a November 06, 2006 Nightline profile: "He inspires the party faithful and many others, like no one else on the scene today...And the question you can sense on everyone’s mind, as they listen so intently to him, is he the one?"
A transcript of the February 23 Nightline, which aired at 11:46pm EST, follows:
11:35pm tease
TERRY MORAN: Senator No Surrender. He's the most controversial newcomer to Capitol Hill with a radical pedigree. But, can Rand Paul's high ideals survive the Senate? We've got the Nightline interview.
11:43 tease
MORAN: Up next, even the most conservative Republicans balk at his proposals for slashing government. We sit down with the newly minted Senator, Rand Paul.
11:46
TERRY MORAN: If Republicans and Democrats can't find a way to compromise on spending, the federal government will shut down on March 4th. But what do you think the chances for compromise would be if Senator Rand Paul, the fiery Tea Party newcomer who wants to abolish the Departments of Education and Energy and lots more, what if he was running the show? Well, tonight, my co-anchor Bill Weir sits down with the senator for the "Nightline" interview.
WEIR: It is lunchtime on Capitol Hill and America's most controversial new senator is on his way to the one place he knows his ideas are always welcome. The office of America's most controversial representative, also known as dad. I was just so curious about how the roommate situation is working out.
REPRESENTATIVE RON PAUL: We're not to talk about that in public.
BILL WEIR: Oh really? It's that bad?
RON PAUL: Actually it's very good.
WEIR: Yes, Rand and Ron Paul are DC roomies these days and they share a lot more than rent.
SENATOR RON PAUL [At CPAC]: I'm glad to see the revolution is continuing.
WEIR: Because the son grew up worshiping his father, as the doctor turned philosopher statesman was mocked and praised for his ideals. He was there when he ran for president, with promises to gut big government, end wars and legalize drugs. And now, the libertarian lion has a blood ally.
BILL WEIR: Did he have any sage advice, first day in the halls of power?
RAND PAUL: Yeah, he said just be real quiet and don't try to stir up any trouble.
WEIR: Right, right.
RON PAUL: No controversial votes.
RAND PAUL: That's right.
RON PAUL: We don't believe in that.
WEIR: That is the epitome of sarcasm, of course. And when it comes to stirring things up, Rand Paul has made poppa proud from the moment he left his ophthalmology office to run for this one.
RAND PAUL: There were times when I'd come home and my wife was crying about the things they were saying about me and we thought, is it worth it?
WEIR: As a Tea Party candidate, Paul had to beat both Kentucky's Democrat and Republican machines while surviving potentially devastating controversies.
RAND PAUL: I abhor racism. I think it's a bad business decision to ever exclude anybody from your restaurant. But at the same time, I do believe in private ownership.
WEIR: One firestorm erupted after he argued in an editorial meeting with "The Louisville Courier Journal" that by ordering restaurants to serve African Americans, the Civil Rights Act gave too much power to government. And then, there was the anonymous former classmate who told "GQ" that during a pot-fueled college escapade, Paul tied her up and made her worship a pagan water god called Aqua Buddha. He denied it and she later clarified it wasn't kidnapping, but a harmless prank. What was the lowest point of the campaign for you?
RAND PAUL: Uh, I think probably being called an idol worshipper. Being accused of-
WEIR: Aqua Buddah.
Rand PAUL: Being accused of kidnapping. You know, now we can look back and my wife and I can laugh at it a little bit.
WEIR: But as he describes in his new book, "The Tea Party Goes to Washington," he shrugged off attacks from the, quote, left wing media and was spurred on by disgust over rampant spending by both parties, especially Republicans like Mitch McConnell. You're wearing your elephant tie today. But I wonder how- what's your relationship with Mitch McConnell now?
RAND PAUL: I think good. I think the entire Republican caucus on the Senate side is for a balanced budget amendment. And I say that's good. That means we are philosophically in tune. But I say, you have to cut spending and-
WEIR: You're miles apart from what they want to cut.
RAND PAUL: Yeah, well that's what I mean.
WEIR: [Graphic of Paul with a chainsaw cutting through the Department of Education.] So, while the President argues for a budget scalpel, Rand Paul would use a chainsaw, shutting down the Departments of Energy and education. He would kill the Consumer Product Safety Commission, shrink the Pentagon and cut off all foreign aid. And while the most fiscally conservative Republicans were proposing $50 billion in cuts, he wanted to slash $500 billion.
RAND PAUL: I'd go to a rally and I'd say, I'm not here to bring you a brand new shiny building. I'm not here to bring you any federal money. There is no money left.
WEIR: Does the richest nation in the history of nations have a responsibility to take care of its weakest?
RAND PAUL: Yes. As a Christian, we are our brother's keeper. And we do have a moral obligation to take care of those. The question you have to ask is, is the federal government equipped to do it?
WEIR: And for proof of his hatred of government regulation, consider the bill making it a federal crime to shine a laser into the cockpit of an aircraft in flight. It passed 96-1. Who was the one?
RAND PAUL: Can you imagine-
WEIR: It was you. Explain that.
PAUL: Well a 14-year-old kid is standing outside the airport and he's shining his laser light at the cockpit. I don't want that. But I think the local sheriff can take care of that. Laws are best done at the local level.
WEIR: But at the federal level, there is the real possibility the government could grind to a halt if both sides can't agree on a budget. What are the chances, you think that this is all going to shut down in March?
PAUL: Um, I hope it doesn't. I hope we can find a compromise. The other side wants the dynamic of blaming Republicans for shutting things down. But this happens at every level of government. For example, in my little town if they don't pass a budget, you know what the first thing they do? They turn the lights off at the Little League park and say no more Little League games because they want everybody up in arms.
WEIR: But a government shutdown is not Little League. And the cuts he's proposing have the potential to make those Wisconsin protests look like a church social. But Rand Paul has promised his Tea Party faithful there will be very little compromise in his tenure. And they'll be watching to see if he becomes senatized [?].
WEIR: Are you a burr under the saddle of Republicans?
RAND PAUL: Sometimes. And I do think I am able to agitate. Everything up here is fixable. But you have to have people who aren't afraid to talk about it. I'm not afraid to talk about it. I'm not afraid not to be elected.
— Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
ABC -- just plain dumb
Submitted by ThisnThat on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 6:56pm.
Does the richest nation in the history of nations have a responsibility to take care of its weakest?
That's easy. NO. Instead, we want to associate with and assist free countries -- countries that we can rely upon; which provide give and take; equals.
What a dumb-ass question.
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
OMO, dumb question indeed.
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:17pm.
It seems to me he would have better phrased it with the old military jargon...."the sick, the lame, and the lazy".
Obviously, there is a role for government to play in taking care of those who cannot care for themselves, but it's most definitely not the role of the federal government! State and local function. This includes Social Security and Medicare, as well as the boon of boondoggles under the Obama Administration (energy applicance tax rebates, Cash for Clunkers, yada yada, I don't have time to type them all).
What idiots.
I said it the other day...Rand Paul is beginning to grow on me. I like the guy....he's got style!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
→ Blonde
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:26pm.
Obamalingering. - A state of being, characterized by waiting to enjoy the fruits of another's labor.
Tres bien, CA
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:36pm.
THat needs to go on Grumpy's Code Word Forum.
Excellent, in fact.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Hey, I'm new to this, but I like it!
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 9:31am.
How about "Obamaligning"....the practice of villifying one's opponents by falsely accusing them of villifying oneself.
And they'll say...oh, and did I mention he's.....black?
And---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 6:44pm.
Obamajestic - cuz he so IS, dontcha know? Obamajority - the best method for sinking a nation. Obamalignancy - his administration.don't forget Obama's
Submitted by dirtydan64 on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 11:55pm.
latest Boondoggle he's proposing to save all those Homeowners who are "under water" on their mortgages where he wants the "Big Bank's" to resurrect these loans and of course pass the cost on to use the responsible ones which essentially is a form of another No Tax Increase imposed by the One & Only Mouse of Men Obama !!! Rand Paul has it right, and what he says most everyone in and arou d Congress don't have the Ball's to so much as to talk about cutting all these over Fu ded non essential departments except him and HO's father Ronny !!!! I'd be willing to stick my neck out and say Rand Paul has what it takes to debate the he'll out of anyone on either side of the isle and he also has the abi.ity to be our next POTUS something his father was unable to accomplish but if Rand were to win, he and his dad would make one he'll of a team as President & Vice-President of the USA !!!!!It WAS the richest nation
Submitted by TheHistorian on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:02pm.
By over-using the "take care of its weakest" argument, this country is bankrupt. Thanks to your President, your former Speaker, and your Senate Majority Leader, you have put is in a debt position that no longer makes us the "richest nation in the world". We are among the largest debtor nations with a national debt exceeding our GDP, and a "social contract" of Social Security and Medicare exceeding 6 times our GDP. Thanks, liberals, for spending it all on the "weakest", like Richard Trumka and his boys, mass transit no one uses, and multi-generational welfare. You all rival Paul Krugman as fiscal geniuses.
Dennis Prager
We are the richest nation in the world?
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:11pm.
Not anymore, we aren't, as are our total [real] national debt is now hovering around $113 TRILLION, which everybody (including most conservatives) is ignoring.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
→ Bravo Rand!
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:08pm.
I'm not afraid not to be elected
They are slaves who dare not to be
In the right with two or three. -- James Russel Lowell
richest nation in history
Submitted by MidAmerica on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:09pm.
I could be the richest person in the world if I could borrow obscene amounts of money and print money day and night.
I see the budget in terms of
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:15pm.
I see the budget in terms of a raging fire. Dems want to throw a cup of water on it. The GOP is ready to throw a bucket on it. Paul wants to pull out the fire hose and douse it once and for all.
→ Radical
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:21pm.
I'm thinking with a 2011 budget proposal of $1.56 Trillion, the Democrats are wanting to throw gasoline on it.
I knew Rand would be great.
Submitted by Free Stinker on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 7:41pm.
I knew Rand would be great. After all, Sarah Palin backed him and even campaigned for him..../// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
The real question.
Submitted by Ashrak on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 8:24pm.
Can the current Senate makeup survive Rand Paul and the support his position has already?
Me thinks the answer to that question is no.
Honest on a tough subject
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 11:26pm.
I just saw Rand Paul on Hannity's show. When asked about Social Security, Paul said we need to gradually raise the retirement age, and eventually index it for life expectancy, and probably institute some sort of means testing. That type of honesty takes political courage.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Chainsaw?
Submitted by Junk Science Skeptic on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 11:32pm.
Chainsaw? Hell, give the man a flame-thrower, or some real serious artillery. Maybe then we can make real progress on the budget.
I was thinking more of a
Submitted by ricklail on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 8:59am.
I was thinking more of a nuclear device then it couldn't ever come back.
If that's the apocalypse,
Submitted by Thoreau on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 12:58am.
If that's the apocalypse, then bring it on. I'll take Hell if it means freedom.
You use a scalpel if there is
Submitted by eaglewingz08 on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 1:26am.
You use a scalpel if there is a small amount of waste, but when you have 1.6 TRILLION deficit, there needs to be a cleaver not a scalpel.
Rand Paul, he's nothing. I
Submitted by jdhawk on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 1:47am.
Rand Paul, he's nothing. I heard about this bubba, white trash really, that was up in our White House whoring around with someone half his age claiming it wasn't sex. Funny though, I didn't see any "media" making cartoons about it or poking fun of it. In fact, they tried to avoid the subject of it at all and all the other bimbo affairs, near rapes and rapes. But, he was in that other party. So, it was OK.jd...
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 2:11am.
May I ask you a serious question? What planet were you visiting throughout the 1990's? It is obvious you did not have access to the American media during Clinton's two terms in office. The coverage of Clinton's extramarital dalliances was pervasive and the joking and ridicule was relentless--and the extensive reporting--as well as criticism--of his conduct was engaged in by ALL of the media, not just the conservative press.
Jer
GREAT THINGS
Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 8:37am.
The media line about your hero in the 1990s typically went like this:
1) ANY criticism of Clinton was just plain mean. People needed to stop picking on him.
2) Clinton did GREAT THINGS. Lots and lots of GREAT THINGS.
3) What kind of GREAT THINGS? Well, he did lots and lots of GREAT THINGS!!!
4) The opposition was to shut up, roll over and DIE and let Clinton do lots and lots of GREAT THINGS.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Unsane...
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 9:15pm.
May I ask you a serious question? What planet were you visiting throughout the 1990's?
Jer
Look in the mirror and not at me
Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 02/28/2011 - 11:31pm.
I think you need to ask the mirror that question, not I.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Is Rand Paul The Lumberjack We Need?
Submitted by Boil It Down on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 3:41am.
There have been so many times I've asked, who do we have in Washington lobbying for the average citizen? Who will make the average citizen the foremost priority? While I don't agree with Rand Paul 100% of the time, I do see him taking up our side of the arguments for the most part.
The Department of Education, for one, is something that has been very controversial for quite some time. You all know the arguments about the continual increases of funding with decreased results. The charter schools and private schools are producing far better results on average than public education with far less funding. So, how is it controversial to make a common sense decision to eliminate the money draining, dysfunctional Department of Education? Isn't sending those responsibilities back to the States where they belong, just the kind of decentralization we've been demanding? The redundant and costly federal entity of the DOE has obviously caused more trouble than it is worth. Wouldn't that be working toward reducing the controversy? So, who is really more controversial?
Generally speaking, Rand Paul is absolutely right to call for drastic cuts to repair a disastrous fiscal crisis. The history of tinkering around with it, the way so many in Washington are advocating, just prolongs the tough times to result in worse times, as usual. Rather than reasoning with the people with solid numbers, they just want to sugar coat everything, call the opposition radical and campaign for their next election. It's much easier than doing the actual work as real leaders would.
Of course, there are those true believers that have had that Keynesian, big government dream for so long that all this really is unthinkable to them despite the volumes of evidence that it cannot ever work.
As for my view, the bigger the chainsaw, the better.
Most controversial? Is he
Submitted by Edhenry on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 4:33am.
Most controversial?
Is he defending ethics charges?/Does he have cash stashed in his freezer?/Any intern problems?/Was he appointed by a suspect governor?/Was he a member of the KKK?/anyone drown in his car while he was driving?
Or is he just trying to strengthen the US balance sheet - which helps keep interest rates low and create jobs, especially for the poor who are hardest hit by this recession and "summer of recovery"?
Or is the BSMedia 100% correct, as usual?
richest nation in the world??????
Submitted by Cyborg 0427 on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 6:46am.
True we have the biggest nicest house on the block. The prettiest yard and the most expensive car in the driveway but the fact is the people living in the house have lost their jobs the interest rate has gone out the roof and the family has made the house payments for the other houses on the block and the bank is about foreclose and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out why. Can these talking heads really be this stupid are they the biggest liers in the history of the world? What is so confusing about 12 trillion. Let me see that would be $12,000,000,000,000.00................................................................................................................................As I have said many times
I dont need a chainsaw
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 12:10pm.
Just a pair of dull scissors to cut the threads that the Fed uses to control the States.
If we are to make a real difference and keep this central governance and control to a minumum, the State must assert there Rights. And when the Fed threatens punitive punishment, the State withhold all contributions, let's see just how threatening they are after that? The States can effectively control even a rampant socialist like Obama and his thugs. But first they must find their spines. Please help them, by lending your voice to encourage your State legislators