Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun
  • New Liberal Study 'Lends Credence to Conservative Charges' of Bias; Dramatic Media Tilt Toward 'Gay Marriage'

MSNBC’s Savannah Guthrie on Possible Dem Loss: ‘This Is Bad’

By Scott Whitlock | January 15, 2010 | 13:04

A  A
Scott Whitlock's picture

Perhaps providing a window into the mind of journalists, MSNBC’s Savannah Guthrie on Friday appeared shocked that a Democrat might lose in next week’s Massachusetts Senate election. "This is bad," fretted the Daily Rundown co-host. [Audio available here.]

She prefaced that comment by ominously observing, "With just four days to go in the race for Teddy Kennedy's Senate seat, a new poll is terrible news for Democrats." Discussing the numbers with co-host Chuck Todd and NBC political director Mark Murray, Guthrie marveled, "Chuck, I'm interested now. NBCs deputy political director, Mark Murray, joins us now. This is bad." [UPDATE: Guthrie responds. See below.]

Todd described Republican Scott Brown’s four point lead over Martha Coakley in more neutral terms: "It is big. This is big." So, were Guthrie’s words meant to indicate that things are "bad" for the Democrats? Or is this another Freudian slip by a liberal journalist?

It should also be pointed out that Guthrie used the preferred liberal term for the race, “Teddy Kennedy's Senate seat.” The MSNBC also graphic screamed, “Poll Shocker: Special Election for Kennedy Seat.”

UPDATE: 2010-01-15 12:38:39

The MRC’s Ken Shepherd Tweeted Guthrie for comment. She replied, “yes, I meant bad for democrats. Thought that was obvious; I should have been clearer. Thanks."

A transcript of the January 15 segment, which aired at 9:10am EST, follows:

MSNBC GRAPHIC: Poll Shocker: Special Election for Kennedy Seat

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: Moving now to campaign politics. It is a nail biter in Massachusetts. With just four days to go in the race for Teddy Kennedy's Senate seat, a new poll is terrible news for Democrats. The 60th vote in the Senate, maybe health care, hanging in the balance. Chuck, I'm interested now. NBCs deputy political director, Mark Murray joins us now. This is bad.

CHUCK TODD: It is big. This is big. What's going on?

MARK MURRAY: It is humongous. Right. Savannah mentioned there’s a brand-new poll from Suffolk University that shows the Republican in the race, Scott Brown, ahead by four points. There was another poll that was out for a Democrat-leaning group showing the Democrat in the race, Martha Coakley, up by eight. But no matter what, this race is a toss-up. The two big political handicappers in Washington, Charlie Cook and Stu Rothenberg have the race as a toss-up. There's a flurry of activity and there really is the perception that the Republican could end up winning this race, which is a humongous turn of events from last month after the Democratic primary when everyone thought the Democrat was going to win.

TODD: Very quickly, turnout is why some of these poll numbers- everybody's got a different model. High turnout, does it benefit the Democrat in this case, or maybe not?

MURRAY: Well, the conventional wisdom, as we pointed out in First Read today, says that a nationalized election, more people turning out benefits the Democrat in this Democratic-leaning state. But, if you really think about independents and independents are really breaking towards Scott Brown, the Republican in this race, the more independents, the bigger turnout might turn that conventional wisdom on its head and actually end up benefitting Brown.

About the Author

Scott Whitlock is the senior news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Scott Whitlock on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2010 Congressional
  • Chuck Todd
  • Savannah Guthrie
  • Daily Rundown
  • MSNBC
  • Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • National Media Skip Over Charges U.S. Ambassador Abused 'Minor Children'
  • Rand Paul: ‘I Want to Go From 5% of the African-American Vote to At Least 20-25%’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use