All three network morning shows on Friday skipped a Washington Post report revealing that powerful congressional Democrats such as John Murtha, James Moran and others on a defense panel are the subject of an ethics investigation for a relationship with a lobbying firm. The Democrats, and some Republicans, are under intense scrutiny for steering over $200 million in earmarks to clients of a company called PMA.
However, ABC’s Good Morning America, NBC’s Today show and CBS’s Early Show somehow managed to ignore this potentially damaging problem for the Democratic majority. Instead, NBC’s hosts found time to dress up as Star Wars characters. (Ann Curry appeared as Darth Vader.) Early Show co-anchor Harry Smith went drag and impersonated Julia Child for a cooking segment (See video and blog here.) Even though it’s October, GMA promoted a new version of A Christmas Carol.
It seems unlikely that these news outlets would ignore a similar story that involved possible allegations about a group of mostly Republican lawmakers who are in charge of earmarking federal funds. Washington Post staff writer Carol D. Leonnig explained:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Nearly half the members of a powerful House subcommittee in control of Pentagon spending are under scrutiny by ethics investigators in Congress, who have trained their lens on the relationships between seven panel members and an influential lobbying firm founded by a former Capitol Hill aide.
The investigations by two separate ethics offices include an examination of the chairman of the Appropriations subcommittee on defense, John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), as well as others who helped steer federal funds to clients of the PMA Group. The lawmakers received campaign contributions from the firm and its clients. A document obtained by The Washington Post shows that the subcommittee members under scrutiny also include Peter J. Visclosky (D-Ind.), James P. Moran Jr. (D-Va.), Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) , C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.) and Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.).
...
Together, the seven legislators have personally steered more than $200 million in earmarks to clients of the PMA Group in the past two years, and received more than $6.2 million in campaign contributions from PMA and its clients in the past decade, according to an analysis by Congressional Quarterly and Taxpayers for Common Sense.
A second Post article by Ellen Nakashima and Paul Kane revealed that a broader investigation is also looking into activities by Democrat Charles Rangel:
-- Ethics committee staff members have interviewed House Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) about one element of the complex investigation of his personal finances, as well as the lawmaker's top aide and his son. Rangel said he spoke with ethics committee staff members regarding a conference that he and four other members of the Congressional Black Caucus attended last November in St. Martin. The trip initially was said to be sponsored by a nonprofit foundation run by a newspaper. But the three-day event, at a luxury resort, was underwritten by major corporations such as Citigroup, Pfizer and AT&T. Rules passed in 2007, shortly after Democrats reclaimed the majority following a wave of corruption cases against Republicans, bar private companies from paying for congressional travel.
The MRC’s Tim Graham and Rich Noyes wrote about media silence on this story, which has been developing for months, back in July:
Rep. John Murtha (D-PA), Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-IN) and Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA): Three top Democrats are linked to the scandal surrounding the PMA Group, a lobbying group that closed its doors earlier this year after being raided by the FBI in February. The New York Times reported then that top lobbyist Paul Magliocchetti was suspected of funneling "bogus" campaign contributions to Murtha, Visclosky and Moran, in exchange for directing more than $100 million to PMA clients. Rep. Visclosky had admitted being subpoenaed in May by a federal grand jury, and temporarily stepped down as Chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee on energy and water development.
Hopefully, once the morning show hosts are done celebrating Halloween and dressing up as women, they’ll find time to look into this investigation by the Washington Post.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
It was leaked out that
October 30, 2009 - 14:41 ET by ricklailIt was leaked out that Maxine Waters is under investigation for her dealings on the banking committee and her husband having stock in the bank in question. Could we so lucky as to get her and Murtha at the same time?
Semper suprene nitens
OBAMACARE: If it ain't good enough for my Congressman then it ain't good enough for me.
AWWWW
October 30, 2009 - 14:48 ET by jacktheripperlighten up, can't you see it's Halloween @ the MSM ? No time for N E W S !!
"The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can
bribe the people with their own money." – Alexis de Tocqueville
Exactly, jack, Halloween is
October 30, 2009 - 16:10 ET by ForeverOnTheRightExactly, jack, Halloween is FAR more important. These morning shows are for entertainment, with a little superficial biased news sprinkled in, just to keep them from being too much fluff.
All three morning shows?
October 30, 2009 - 15:02 ET by locomotivebreath1901I believe those network programs are no more than "opinion journalism masquerading as news."
Wake me when corrupt-o-crat Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is in prison....
http://locomotivebre...
Biding time for realy important stories
October 30, 2009 - 15:05 ET by Kingfish17I'm sure they have their ace reporters investigating really important stories similar to:
Valerie Plame outings
Ma-Kakka utterings
Republican Senators toe tapping under bathroom stalls
Cindy Sheehan types leading ten people protests
Adding new meaning to "Mischief Night."
October 30, 2009 - 15:40 ET by KC MulvilleIt's Friday ... politicians' trash day. This is when they don't want the media to notice. And the media goes along willingly.
Nothing to see here. Move along. Nothing to see here.
Since Senator Dodd was exonerated by the Senate...
October 30, 2009 - 16:21 ET by ThalpySince Senator Dodd was exonerated by the Senate Ethics Committee, it's doubtful that the Ethics Committee for the House can be more objective than Committee members Schumer, Byrd, Feinstein, Durbin, and Nelson-right.
Watch and see Obama give
October 30, 2009 - 16:30 ET by celatorWatch and see Obama give Dodd and Frank the Presidential Medal of Freedom next year for keeping their mouths shut about the Congressional corruption they've participated in.
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
I see Oscar potential for
October 30, 2009 - 17:08 ET by BuffNBoneI see Oscar potential for "Silence of the Dummies."
"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"
Ethics?
October 30, 2009 - 18:22 ET by jdlybrandDoes anyone in Washington even know the meaning of the word????
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
Dims playing dressup?
October 31, 2009 - 10:18 ET by Patriot IIThey are not fooling anyone....! They have been playing dressup for years....dressed up like politicians...but we know better don't we LOL
They should have dressed up as
October 31, 2009 - 11:30 ET by BO STINKSthe three monkeys (hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil). How long can these poor nincompoops keep their heads in the sand? Apparently until their networks go bankrupt.
I hope he is impeached, soon.
MSM Ignoring Ethics report
October 31, 2009 - 12:27 ET by Patrick MichaelI am shocked, shocked I say that the Main Street Media would ignore a story like this! Well, actually I am not shocked at all. The Main Street Media could not figure out a way to spin the ethics report to make the Obama administration look good, so why bother reporting on it?
I am surprised we know this much about it.
October 31, 2009 - 13:21 ET by spmcintyreIt had better not be like when Rangel got put on timeout for half a second. If they used only half of the energy they use to lambast a repub that is under investigation, these demoncretins would already be out on the street.
When it comes to government, its not whether the glass is half full or empty, its that the glass is just to big.
spmcintyre
October 31, 2009 - 13:26 ET by MrShy"If they used only half of the energy they use to lambast a repub that is under investigation, these demoncretins would already be out on the street."
Sad, but oh so true. And yeah, I'm scanning all the major sites and still this is a buried item.
They Are Democrats
October 31, 2009 - 15:02 ET by devan95It's really very simple. The left stream media ignores bad news about Democrats because THEY are Democrats, their bosses are Democrats, the camera crew, programmers, technicians, makeup "artists, etc are all Democrats AND union members. And not only do they ignore and spike bad news about Dems, they try every way possi ble to block good news about Republicans and/or their message. People who get upset at Republicans because they "don't get their message out," need to remember the Democrats control the message machine. Most TV and radio employees belong to AFTRA - the tv and radio union. Go to aftra.com and check out just how radical they are......