The Washington Post, which features the motto "An independent newspaper" at the top of its editorial page, endorsed Democratic candidates in 22 of 26 races for the November 3 elections in Virginia. In addition to supporting the Democrats running for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general, the paper on Friday, Saturday and Sunday weighed in on the state’s House of Delegates races and picked 19 Democrats and only four Republicans.
The Post, which for months has been attacking Bob McDonnell, the GOP’s nominee for governor, also relied on very personal, angry attacks against most of the Republicans in the House of Delegates races. On October 23, the paper editorialized that Delegate Bob Marshall is "the author of off-the-wall legislative antics that even members of his own Republican Party regard as clownish." [Emphasis added.]
His opponent, meanwhile, is a "sober, sane Democrat." On October 25, the paper’s editorial page also deemed Chuck Caputo to be a "sober, sane Democrat" and complimented fellow party member Mark L. Keam as a "thoughtful, serious community activist."
Republican Thomas Greason is a "glib businessman who believes you can slash taxes while simultaneously improving schools and roads. A neat trick, but not one that occurs in the real world." Republican Timothy D. Hugo" is one of those peddlers of fiscal flim-flam who rail against tax increases..."
The reoccurring criticism on most of the Republican nominees is that they are opposed to tax increases. In the October 23 editorial, the Post complained, "...Most Republicans have fallen into lockstep with their party's gubernatorial nominee, Robert F. McDonnell, whose fanciful transportation plan would do little to deliver a 21st-century transportation network."
Thomas D. Rust, one of the few Republicans to receive the Post’s blessing, was described as playing a "constructive" role in securing funds "that many in his own party opposed." The unsigned editorial chided the other GOP candidates for being "publicly opposed to raising taxes to deal with [transportation issues]."
Certainly, the editorial page is the place where opinions should be expressed in a newspaper. And the Washington Post’s editors can endorse whomever they like. But, when the paper picks 22 Democrats in 26 races, when it produces 12 stories in 11 days on a thesis that Republican gubernatorial candidate McDonnell wrote 20 years ago, readers can be forgiven for doubting whether this news outlet is really "an independent newspaper."
Additionally, claims, such as the one by Post staff writer Amy Gardner on October 21, that it wasn’t the "goal" of the paper to help Democratic candidates, become less believable.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Lefturd Bias
October 26, 2009 - 11:40 ET by Thinking.ManPrestitutes sell themselves again, whats new?
These organizations should be forced to register as lobbiest.
On a related laughable note ...
October 26, 2009 - 11:55 ET by IgnatzJFahrquarIn yesterday's Cleveland Plain Deceiver this lovely bit on how newspapers endorse "because we care". It's bad enough that the reporting is slanted, but to have the outright butt-kissing for the Dims and their liberal agendas come election-time is a joke.
"You should always tell the truth, because if you tell the truth you make it the other person's problem." Sean Connery
The WaPo will endorse any candidate
October 26, 2009 - 12:16 ET by jazbojust as long as s/he is a Democrat.
"Democrats; Breeding voters like farm animals since 1962"
Expectations
October 26, 2009 - 12:49 ET by John53What else did you expect from the Washington Compost?
The compost has been a DNC propaganda media since the 70's and has become worst since the Obama primary, now they don't even attempt to hide their bias or comtempt for America, just like the DNC>
One thing the Post failed to note about...
October 26, 2009 - 13:33 ET by Prester John...Bob Marshall, "the author of off-the-wall legislative antics that even members of his own Republican Party regard as clownish" was that he single-handedly brought down a regional transportation authority scam passed by the legislature (with Republican support) that allowed unelected officials to set tax rates for transportation purposes in a particular region.
Marshall's objection? A little thing called the Virginia Consitution which says only popularly elected bodies can levy taxes on the people.
Out of a 100-member legislative body Marshall was the ONLY one who said it was unconstitutional and proceeded to win a 7 - 0 decision in his favor from the Virgina Supreme Court.
Funny how one man who will stand by principle and the law can make a difference.
Even if he is a "clown".
Heh.
About those 4 Republican candidates
October 26, 2009 - 13:42 ET by mom_roxJust curious about why WaPo endorsed those 4 Republican candidates.
When the Houston Chronicle endorses a Republican, it's usually because the Republican is a very popular incumbent or there is only a token Democratic alternative. Thus, the Chronicle can claim that it supports both parties.
~~save your tea, dump congress~~
I am outraged!!
October 26, 2009 - 13:45 ET by MightyMouthAnd totally NOT shocked!
"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"
I'm sure that they're
October 26, 2009 - 15:31 ET by TenebrousI'm sure that they're independent, as much as they are unbiased. Then again, their circulation has dropped again this year. Wonder why?
-----
Random-jumbled-thoughts.blogspot.com