You would think the man left a woman to drown in the back seat of his car. 

Limited Disclosure:  I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.

How much time did the conviction, yesterday, did the wife, Monica Conyers, of Judiciary Chairman Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., pleads guilty to federal bribery charge, receive on the networks?

..not to mention the gross number of ongong trials, investigations, and pending indictments of Democratic politicians all around our country.

(;~/ gary

 "They thump the Bible. They condemn everyone else..."

Pardon my acronym, but WTF is he talking about?  "They thump the Bible"?????

Who?  John McCain?  Sarah Palin?  Mitt Romney (does he "thump the Book of Mormon")??  Fred Thomson??  Rudy???  Sean Hannity???  BOR???  I have yet to hear anyone of them even mention the Bible, but funny how I've heard several prominent Democrats quoteth the Scriptures.

Could it be that the pop-liberal programmed talking head let slip a bigoted caricature of "them thar' Republicans" that is condescendingly shared in his elite social circles?

Look, I think most of us agree -- Sanford, I mean, what the hell was he thinking?  But Sammy boy is way out of line and out of his league, and is the pot calling the kettle black if he wants to talk hypocrisy.  He should retire.

"Let's wrap him up, alright?" -- Keith Olbermann

In their major role as shills for the Democrat party, the MSM will be forever trying to stick it to conservatives or Republicans. Teddy Kennedy has been trying to get into women's pants since was five years old, but there is no press criticism of the "lion of the Senate," nor will there ever be. Members of MSM just don't like Republicans (can't blame them, really). They don't like them because Democrats and the press belong to a different tribe. Truth is always murky for them; there are no rights and wrongs--sort of a social justice thing for everyone with its diversity, affirmative action, inclusion, fairness, and equality.

The morning shows did hype the Mark Sanford story, but what were we expecting?

When the msm say "This is a scandal that will not go away," they mean "This is a scandal that (WE) will not (LET) go away.

should have announced a change to the democratic party during the news conference and all would be well.

Did Scott Whitlock forget to mention McGreevy's party affiliation or did someone edit it out? It wasn't there with the first mention of McGreevy.

I've noted that NB has a tendency to leave out party affiliations when complaining about other sources leaving it out.

I don't particularly care about which party someone belongs to. If what they did is wrong it is wrong. It is the act of the individual and the individual bears responsibility. Their actions in no way apply to me or the party's goals or standards. It would be nice if someone would mention that every once in a while.

I can't imagine that any party (well some of the activist ones might) has as part of their platform "let's go out and violate the law (this is the one that some parties may actually have as part of their platform), morals or ethics and then lie about it." The ones that violate the first three as a matter of policy aren't going to lie about it, they're going to hold a press conference to take credit for their actions. The individual that did the violation may try to avoid and/or evade prosecution. But the party will certainly hope to further their cause by taking credit.

Hypocracy doesn't make the underlying laws, values and ethics invalid. Laws, morals and ethics are difficult to keep. Even the simplest ones such as "treat others as you want them to treat you" are difficult to keep. I can't imagine that the Democrats and MSM want us to treat them the way they treat Republicans.

My desire is that NB and other outlets be consistent. Report it or not, but remember it is the individual(s) and generally not the party that is responsible.

I guess mud is easier to sling than truth.

The networks went right off the deep end on the Sandford affair, but here's something you're missing and deserves equal condemnation.  Fox News cancelled Special Report, in it's entirety, on Thursday night to cover the Jackson story, as it evolved.  On the contrary, the major networks chose to treat it as a 'story' and dedicated appropriate time with other more material news stories.  This is standard operating procedure for Fox, and their attitude is we hope you watch but tough cookies, we do what we think will attract the most audience.  Fair is fair; the major networks deserve bashing on a regular basis for their biases; but sometimes, so does Fox.

I think poeple will eventually catch on.  House passed global warming bill.  Democrats and Obama seem hellbent on piledriving the economy into the pavement.

By the end of 2010, we'll probably have energy prices through the roof, record unemployment, and a ton of democrats under indictment.

Humpy dumpy is going to have a great fall and all the king's media and all the king's propaganda won't be able to put him back together again. 

Sanford will be an old story in 2010.  Nice to have this done with.  Any other Republican with an affair just come forward now or cancel the affair.  2010 will be WAR.

 GOP has a good chance.  Democrats may sabotage themselves sooo bad that Republicans could eat babies on camera and still win seats.

The adultery scandal wouldn't have been so big if Mr. Sanford had accepted the "stimulus" money.  But because he dared to stand up to Ears, Ears found his favorite method of destroying enemies...the sex scandal.