"Good Morning America" on Friday featured something that has become rare on morning shows, an actual philosophical debate between a strong conservative and a vocal liberal. Liz Cheney, daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney, engaged in a shoot-out with MSNBC analyst and former Senate Democratic chief of staff Lawrence O'Donnell over the issue of torture, Guantanamo Bay and keeping America safe. (On MSNBC, Thursday, O'Donnell called Dick Cheney's speech an "abomination.") [Audio available for download here.]
Cuomo did offer this softball to O'Donnell in relation to Barack Obama and the former Vice President's dueling speeches on Thursday: "Enhanced interrogation. Is that just another word for torture and is that the game America should be in?" He then asked O'Donnell, "Is this just another term for torture? Is that what you think is going on here?" But, Cuomo mostly conducted a fair interview, playing traffic cop as the two guests argued their points. He pointedly queried O'Donnell, "Mr. O'Donnell, is the President's instinct to play nice putting us at risk?"
Cheney seemed to enjoy inciting the MSNBC analyst. Towards the end of the segment, as Cuomo was trying to rein in the two, the former State Department official reminded viewers of a rather odd argument O'Donnell had made earlier in piece. He asserted that if waterboarding worked, why didn't the Bush administration use it on all the terrorists at Guantanamo, instead of only a select few? (As if all the detainees had high value information.)
Cheney taunted, "And it should be noted that Lawrence thinks we should have waterboarded 500 people at Guantanamo." This set O'Donnell off. He retorted, "I did not say that, Liz! I asked why your father didn't waterboard more people to make America safe...If waterboarding keeps America say, why didn't they do it to more people?" Cuomo, clearly trying to get out of the interview, pleaded, "You're both getting me yelled at now."
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:03am, follows:
CHRIS CUOMO: Couldn't have a more important question, really. So, let's continue this debate. We're joined by Liz Cheney, former State Department official and, of course, daughter of former Vice President Cheney and Lawrence O'Donnell, former Senate Democratic chief of staff, live from Los Angeles. Thank you to you both for being here.
LIZ CHENEY: Great to be here. Thank you, Chris.
CUOMO: So, let's get to the big question. Liz, I'll start with you. Why are we as Americans less safe right now because of President Obama's philosophy?
CHENEY: Well, I think it's in part because of his actions. I think taking the step of releasing the legal memos that laid out in great detail exactly what techniques we used in our enhanced interrogation program gave, as my dad said yesterday, the terrorists a new insert for their training manual. We know former Director of National Intelligence Mike Hayden has explained, we know that terrorists train to these techniques, so it's one thing to say we're not going to do them anymore, which as a policy is the President's right to do. But, then to take the step and say we're releasing all this information, you know, I think very clearly makes us less safe. It takes a tool out of the toolbox for every former president or future president.
CUOMO: Mr. O'Donnell, is the President's instinct to play nice putting us at risk?
LAWRENCE O'DONNELL (Fmr. Senate Democratic chief of staff): Well, you know, the interesting thing about Liz and her dad's position is that a releasing of a memo has made the country less safe and so the Cheney family suggestion is now to release more of it. So, you know, you can't have it both ways. You can't say that if we release classified information it makes us less safe and now let's release more of it. That's their position and the funny thing is that Dick Cheney's argument and Liz's argument with the Obama administration is really an argument that began in the Bush administration when Dick Cheney started to lose the fights in house. Nothing has changed. Nothing has changed in practices under the Obama administration.
CHENEY: You know- It's absolutely- That's actually not true, Lawrence. No. Well, Lawrence-
O'DONNELL: It was George W. Bush. It was George W. Bush who stopped waterboarding. Liz, you know who stopped waterboarding. You know who banned it. It was the Bush White House that stopped it. That's who stopped it. That's who said we're not-
CHENEY: Lawrence- Would you like to hear what I do know? 'Cause I'm happy to tell you what I do know. What I do know, actually, is that there's a big difference, as I'm sure you probably know too, I don't know if when you were in the Senate you had access to classified information. But there's a big difference between information that really does, in fact, compromise sources and methods, which is the information that was in the legal memos that were released, which is why you had four former CIA directors and the current CIA director ask the President, please don't release this information. The point that my dad has made is now that that information is out there, now that we have said to the terrorists, here's how we're going to interrogate, here's how we used to interrogate, we won't be able to do it anymore, the American people-
O'DONNELL: All-
CHENEY: Lawrence, let me finish my point.
CUOMO: Hold on, Lawrence. Let Liz finish.
O'DONNELL: Liz, you didn't let me finish so we'll play it your way. Go ahead.
CHENEY: Let me finish my point. Thank you. All we're asking is that the American people themselves have the opportunity now to decide. The American people should be able to see, because this whole debate is about whether or not enhanced interrogation kept the country safer. There are documents that show the intelligence we gained from that program and the American people ought to be able to judge for themselves. That's the main point. I think you know, it's fundamentally, you know, disingenuous for the White House and its supporters to say, well, the President can't declassify these memos or he can exercise his right to classify some but not others. I just think the American people deserve better than that.
CUOMO: Let's get past the vocabulary a little bit here, both of you, also. Enhanced interrogation. Is that just another word for torture and is that the game America should be in? That's something that seems to be danced around here in both speeches, needs to be addressed. Let me start with you, Lawrence, because you were waiting on that one. Is this just another term for torture? Is that what you think is going on here?
O'DONNELL: It is torture. This government has prosecuted people in the past for doing exactly this. But Dick Cheney believes that it's not torture and that is essential to his position. He can never acknowledge what waterboarding actually was, as practiced by the Bush administration, because it was torture. Every definition of torture is included in that. And, you know, what's really silly about it is the Cheney notion it was a very effective program, that waterboarding in these kind of torture methods were effective. If it was effective, why did they use it on only three people? If it was effective, why didn't they use it on the 500 people, 500 people that Bush/Cheney administration released from Guantanamo? 75 of whom we know, we know, we now know have gone back into the terrorism business. That was a failure of the Bush/Cheney administration to keep America safe by processing people correctly at Guantanamo. It let go a minimum of 75 people who have gone back into the terrorism.
CUOMO: Is that accurate? I mean, you hear what he's saying, have you been releasing them back?
CHENEY: No, of course, absolutely it's not accurate.
O'DONNELL: Your father said it yesterday! Liz, your father said yesterday that 14 percent of them went back into terrorism.
CHENEY: Lawrence, let me start at the beginning and go through the points that you made. Lawrence, that's true.
CUOMO: Let's get the response.
CHENEY: I'm not denying that. I'm not denying that, Lawrence, but now let me go through all of the inaccuracies in what you just said. First of all, the question of whether or not enhanced interrogation is torture has been answered. And it's been answered legally. And it's not that Cheney or President Bush or anyone else believed it to be torture. The Justice Department-
O'DONNELL: Are you afraid of calling it waterboarding? Are you afraid of the term waterboarding? Oh, okay. Great.
CHENEY: Lawrence, are you going to let me answer here? Waterboarding is not torture. And you ought- I would refer to you Attorney General Holder's testimony-
O'DONNELL: Why has this country prosecuted people for waterboarding? Why did we do that?
CHENEY: Lawrence- Because they did a number of other things in addition to waterboarding. But, let me go through the points you made. First of all, Attorney General Holder had a hard time explaining exactly what the legal definition is of waterboarding that would make it torture. We've done it to our own people. Secondly, your argument about why didn't we do it to 500 others proves our point. It was used in three cases when we had terrorists who had information about potential attacks on the United states of America. So, the notion that somehow, you know, we should have waterboarded everybody. I'm surprised that's a position you've taken this morning.
O'DONNELL: I'm not taking it! I don't think we should have waterboarded anyone because it doesn't work and there is zero evidence that it works.
CHENEY: Lawrence. Lawrence, on the issue of the people who were released from Guantanamo.
CUOMO: Hold on. Liz, finish this point. Then we got to wrap this.
CHENEY: You need to let me finish this point. There is zero evidence that we have seen. There is evidence that we haven't seen, the White House won't let us see. 14 percent of the people who released from Guantanamo already have returned to the fight and that's exactly-
O'DONNELL: Released by the Bush/Cheney administration.
CHENEY: And that's why it's so dangerous for the Obama administration to say it'll close Guantanamo and bring those people to the United States.
CUOMO: Liz, Lawrence, thank you very much. I'm cutting you both off so it's fair because we got to wrap this. But it's a great discussion for us to be having, the idea that we're having it all raises security issues. Should we be discussing it in public, having the President and former vice president.
CHENEY: And it should be noted that Lawrence thinks we should have waterboarded 500 people at Guantanamo. I think that-
O'DONNELL: I did not say that, Liz! I asked why your father didn't waterboard more people to make America safe.
CHENEY: And I told you the answer to that.
O'DONNELL: If waterboarding keeps America say, why didn't they do it to more people?
CUOMO: You're both getting me yelled at now.
CHENEY: -limited instances where we had to protect the-
CUOMO: Liz, thank you very much. Lawrence O'Donnell, Liz Cheney, thank you very much to both of you. We'll have you back.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.





CHENEY: Well, I think it's in part because of his actions. I think taking the step of releasing the legal memos that laid out in great detail exactly what techniques we used in our enhanced interrogation program gave, as my dad said yesterday, the terrorists a new insert for their training manual. We know former Director of National Intelligence Mike Hayden has explained, we know that terrorists train to these techniques, so it's one thing to say we're not going to do them anymore, which as a policy is the President's right to do. But, then to take the step and say we're releasing all this information, you know, I think very clearly makes us less safe. It takes a tool out of the toolbox for every former president or future president. 














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I have to find video of
May 22, 2009 - 11:18 ET by Scuba DudeI have to find video of this exchange. I can only imagine O'Donnells face as Liz evicerated him.
We need more Republicans like former VP Cheney and his daughter to start fighting back against the lies and distortions put forth by the Democrats and their MSM lap dogs.
"The wrOng ONE was elected"
video shortly!
May 22, 2009 - 11:21 ET by Scott WhitlockVideo to appear shortly!
As Mr. Burns would say
May 22, 2009 - 11:25 ET by Scuba DudeAs Mr. Burns would say "Excellant".
"The wrOng ONE was elected"
Liz Cheney and L. O'Donnell
May 22, 2009 - 11:29 ET by merlin61I have watched Liz Cheney several times stating
her case, and she is excellent. She doesn't mince
words and is very accurate in what she states.
I hope she continues, and also her dad. We need
someone to state the reality.
This is a word I used in one of my previous...
May 22, 2009 - 12:17 ET by jawebster1comments. I think it was in relation to Mark Levin "eviscerating" O'Donnell on his radio show. I admit that I too, misspelled the word. Jim Webster
Scuba
May 22, 2009 - 15:04 ET by NorthCoasterI'm impressed with both of the Cheneys verbal debate skills lately. Neither of them have to respond to the MSM and Obama stories but they have stepped forward and spoken plainly about the facts. The rest of the Republican Party needs to take notice and act accordingly by putting an end to acting as lap dogs for the MSM and the Dems. All the actions taken by Republicans to meet the Dems in the middle have resulted in getting consistently steamrolled by them all.......Enough of that already!
So true NorthCoaster, I am
May 22, 2009 - 17:26 ET by Scuba DudeSo true NorthCoaster, I am tired of hearing we must meet them in the middle. The Dems/Libs sure as hell have no desire to go visit the middle. I also mentioned many months ago after the hatchet job the MSM did on Gov Palin that no one on the Right should EVER trust doing an interview unless:
A) Bring your own camera so you can show the real interview transpired compared to the edited version the MSM will show.
B) Have a dossier on the reporter and the types of questions they asked of the Dem/Lib candidate versus a Rep/Conservative
C) Be on the offensive, you know they will be asking "gotcha" questions, the MSM is NOT your friend. Take them to task on how they ask the "gotcha" questions to a Rep/Conservative versus softball questions to the Dem/Lib.
Just my 2 cents.
"The wrOng ONE was elected"
Liz cleaned Larrys clock...
May 22, 2009 - 11:23 ET by sam12663... Larry O'Donnell must be angling for a gig at MSNBC. He seems to think he can out crazy Olbermann. What a fool. Have you noticed that whenever a 'democratic strategist' is on a panel with a conservative, the dem is always an angry, condensending, uninformed, talking points spewing yelling fool, while the conservative is reserved and informative, and generally polite. Liz Cheney took O'Donnell to the woodshed, which is something any person armed with common sense and knowledge could do to any liberal, seeing as most Dems are bullies at heart, and have no concern for the truth.
President Obama is nothing more than a lying empty suit; a Hollywood style special effects smoke and mirrors show that has shown itself to be a total fraud.
WAKE UP AMERICA! SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION!
Re A gig at msnbc
May 22, 2009 - 11:52 ET by slickwillie2001Unfortunately, what we see lately in the old media is that bouncing off the walls and experimenting with your medications a la MSNBC is where the money is, vs being an honest journalist or news anchor. Until this changes, we will see no end of Chris Matthews-Olbermann clones.
Is it really where the
May 22, 2009 - 12:04 ET by mattmIs it really where the money is? It seems to me that if conservative punditry and unbiased news were more readily available, they would take over the market.
FOX should have an over-the-air broadcast wing - with a newscast to go opposite ABC, CBS and NBC - shows to counter 60 Minutes and 20/20 etc. - and Sunday programs to counter the Nets.
Other networks should pop up as well. It would also be nice if one of the big nets was bought out by people who want to deliver real news and real debate.
There's a ton of money sitting out there if those in a position to do something would do it.
Music to my ears
May 22, 2009 - 12:46 ET by KC MulvilleI've been wondering the same thing. If Fox is so successful, and the nets are dwindling, why wouldn't someone want to be the "conservative alternative?"
I think the Newsweek makeover is a watershed event in journalism. The mainstream media is admitting that no one believes they cover all perspectives, so Newsweek gave up the pretense and is focusing on its niche. We're all laughing at their clumsy attempts and explanations, but I think that's what's really going on. They've admitted the obvious. They are a niche magazine anyway, so why not embrace it?
Liz Cheney
May 22, 2009 - 16:20 ET by blazermaniacLiz certainly took Lawrence to the cleaners today. I don't think that O'Donnell can out-crazy Bath Tub Boy. And we are once again reminded, California elected a celebrity as governor and look how that is going. The same think can be said for the dummies whom voted for a celebrity for President of the United States. All "Liberals" are empty!
This is Why The Mainstream Media Fails
May 22, 2009 - 11:31 ET by deerjerkydaveThe liberal media fails the public because they never seem to devote more than about 2 minutes to any issue. This is a big debate right now which could put our national security in jeopardy. The only way to get in depth analysis is through talk radio. These can be complex issues and 5 second sound bites at the top of the hour news, or 2 minute debates just isn't enough to create an informed public.
A tale of two daughters.
May 22, 2009 - 11:45 ET by Willis_Leon_JohnsonWhich has more brains?
Liz Cheney?
or
Megan McKainnedy?
http://gjresult.com
Willis
May 22, 2009 - 15:07 ET by NorthCoasterIt's a shame that the question has to be asked.
KUDOS from Rush
May 22, 2009 - 11:50 ET by TexndocI was reading this segment and here is Rush on the radio commending Liz Cheney on being calm, cool, non-defensive and ---- a killer. When it comes to daughters, Dick Cheney got the gold and John McCain got the coal.
Finally!
May 22, 2009 - 12:58 ET by Chris NormanI like the point that Rush made about how Liz Cheney will tell an interviewer that she doesn't accept the premise of their questions (when posed from the liberal point of view). For far too long, too many Republicans have accepted the premise of their loaded questions and always seem to be (weakly) on the defensive. Liz Cheney shuts them down with intelligence, quick wits, and style.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Assumptions
May 22, 2009 - 14:59 ET by KC MulvilleAll questions carry assumptions. All answers, therefore, either accept the assumptions or deny them. Liberals always bring liberal assumptions. These include:
Conservatives must start every answer to liberal media questions by denying the assumptions. That's how we attack liberal media bias.
Meghan McCain
May 22, 2009 - 14:31 ET by okiehawk44Are the IQs of John McCain's other children in the same double-digits as Meghan's?
Re other children
May 22, 2009 - 16:04 ET by slickwillie2001One of them is in the news; President Obama Congratulates John McCain IV at Naval Academy Graduation Ceremony: http://townhall.com
Whatever you think of John III, you have to respect the tradition of service. I'm pretty sure he placed higher in his class than III did. Looks just like the old man did at his age.
Good gravy. Liz is wiping up
May 22, 2009 - 12:04 ET by jistincaseGood gravy. Liz is wiping up the floor with these stupid liberals with their talking points. It would nice to see her shut up the urinator and sissy mathews next. Some one get that woman on the next presidential ticket. She has more guts than anyone besides her father in the republican party taking on these idiots. I would like to see Couric try and take her on, it would be ugly! Hows this for a 2012 ticket. Ryan/Cheney or the other way around Cheney/Ryan.
jistincase
May 22, 2009 - 15:12 ET by NorthCoasterI'm getting really great audios in my head of the pre-election debates. I can see it now, the Teleprompter-in-Chief and Liz Cheney going head to head. My guess is that the puppetmanster behingd the teleprompter won't be able to keep up and we would hear an extrordinate amount of umming and ahhing as well as stories of his life.
It seems that this kind of
May 22, 2009 - 12:56 ET by d1carterIt seems that this kind of high profile rebuttal drives the White House crazy. They are not used to having people tell them that they are wrong and prove it. Liz is doing a great job.
Liz Cheney is a star...
May 22, 2009 - 12:05 ET by jawebster1I haven't felt this way about a Conservative since I first listened to Sarah Palin. She reminds me a lot of her mother. I am so proud of the way she handles herself in these interviews. I could listen to her and her father all day. Am I starting to sound like Chris Matthews praising Obama? One difference: She deserves it! Jim Webster
You are so right. Liz
May 22, 2009 - 12:24 ET by Gat New YorkYou are so right.
Liz Cheney has come out of nowhere is the best spokesperson for the GOP we have had yet. She has the best mix of qualilties of her father and mother.
I only wish
May 22, 2009 - 12:44 ET by Kingfish17Too bad Sarah Palin can't articulate her position as well as Liz Cheney.
"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them." Judge Smails
I think Sarah Palin does a
May 22, 2009 - 12:56 ET by mattmI think Sarah Palin does a fine job - when she's not being sandbagged.
"Oh Danny, this isn't Russia...this isn't Russia, is it?" - Ty Webb
Sandbagging
May 22, 2009 - 13:11 ET by Kingfish17From what I've seen of Liz Cheney, she could handle the sandbagging.
"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them." Judge Smails
Liz Has spent her entire life
May 22, 2009 - 13:47 ET by IamTinmanLiz Cheney has spent her entire life in the Washington swamp and Sarah Palin has spent hers in places with real people who don't live to go political headhunting. I think she got schooled during the last election and won't let that happen again.
Hi Kf... I'm with you and
May 22, 2009 - 13:55 ET by bigtimerHi Kf...
I'm with you and your sentiments...wouldn't you love to see a one on one debate with Obama without his teleprompter or notes.
Talk about delicious.
...and by the way, I don't care where anyone was raised etc...Liz has the sharpest mind I have seen in years and years...she speaks with conviction, doesn't hesitate about any subject or question, very succinct, and never let's the left get ahead of her or the better of her, let alone talk over her...God knows we need that.
Go Liz Go!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
That debate would be sweet.....
May 22, 2009 - 14:12 ET by Kingfish17.........But of course, it will never happen.
Look for less and less of Liz Cheney on the MSM. She will of course be featured in a soon to be torrent of personal vilification. She can't be allowed to get away with any of this.
"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them." Judge Smails
Kf... I don't know, I
May 22, 2009 - 15:15 ET by bigtimerKf...
I don't know, I understand exactly what you mean and where you are going with this....they aren't going to be able to vilify her, or they would have already done so...only think they have left with their fear of this woman is to not have her on the networks, attempting to keep her mem...problem is Fox is Number One...and she will be there, let alone the other venues there are....
Nope....I don't think they are going to be able to defeat this strong conservative woman one iota.
One thing is for sure...time will tell.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
She cleaned his clock with
May 22, 2009 - 13:04 ET by bigtimerShe cleaned his clock with integrity and class...something O'Donnell can never buy.
She cleans everyones clock with such intelligence and ease, it is priceless....I love this gal, she is succinct, she takes no bull from the left on any network or talking head they put against her, she is the best of the best, it would do well for the spineless repubs to take a lesson on how this should be done if you are going to go on these various shows...
Like I've said before...please Liz run for something...Prez is fine with me!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
bt, Amen! You know,
May 23, 2009 - 01:41 ET by Svenbt,
Amen!
You know, Rush made an excellent point (paraphrasing): He said that leaders have a way of rising up from nowhere, and when there leadership is viewed by the electorate, the people naturally get behind this leader.
To be honest, I never really knew of Liz Cheney beyond about three weeks ago. Now I'm watching this LEADER absolutely destroy the premises of these Libs with truth and conviction!
Just as it's been proposed by many here, my wife and I were asking: "Do you think Ms. Cheney would ever run for President?" I think this is exactly what Rush was referring to when he spoke of leaders rising from obscurity! I certainly don't want to be presumptious, but I really hope Liz is considering a bid in 2012!
I believe she'll wipe the floor with our Punk-in-Chief!
Liz Cheney
May 22, 2009 - 13:06 ET by Fred GregoryHeard audio on Rush of Liz ( GMA ) blunting the canard that over 100 detainees have died in US custody. Please get the entire video. That part isn't on the Eyeblast minute and 20
Liz and Dad are a start
May 22, 2009 - 13:08 ET by IgnatzJFahrquarNow lets get Fred and Jeri Thompson out there, too.
As far as Palin ... I've got to wonder if being a state's Gov is keeping her somewhat on the restrained side in regard to why she isn't more in-there-face like Liz.
"You should always tell the truth, because if you tell the truth you make it the other person's problem." Sean Connery
Dems throw themselves on the grenade again...
May 22, 2009 - 13:10 ET by chegu45O'Donnell, as most supporters of 'Bama just lose sight of the issue. Torture, that is, waterboarding is wrong, they exclaim. In the closing of Gitmo, the ExOrder, left open the detentions overseas to continue renditions. Michael Scheuer, the CIA man who designed and installed rendition protocol, states himself that rendition is worse than waterboarding. This tool is to be expanded to safeguard this country, all with the knowledge and acceptance of policy by the One, himself, Bama. To the Dems, it only appears to be torture if it is done on US soil/territory, but is acceptable on foreign turf. As to the failures of these tactics, those failures were based on the utilization of rendition in these foreign locales, where the individuals involved with the rendition, did so without doctors, lawyers or any other safeguards to health or legality of the interrogated. If waterboarding is torture, then Bama is worse for allowing rendition. Check out the LA Times ragsheet for the heads up on this little item on the ExOr. Oh, that is a liberal newsource by the way.
What does it take to have
May 22, 2009 - 13:10 ET by BKeyserWhat does it take to have an honest debate on the subject. Every debate begins with "since we now know that EIT's are torture" which is as disingenuous as the left's entire argument. It's the EXACT same beginning to the global Warming debate: "since we know that CO2 causes global warming..." (No, you see, that's not entirely true and just because you say it over and over, doesn't make it come true. Now go back to your nap...)
It's always followed up with the main points of their argument:
What I really want to know is who suffered? Where are these three young fellows that were so savagely treated? Surely they must be dead, right? If not, then severely derranged (I mean, even more so) and langushing in their own feces somewhere in a padded room and straightjacket?
The argument for closing Gitmo is following the same tack as changing the name of the War on Terror. Hollow, pointless, and totally without merit. Gates confirmed that today by saying that it's one of the words best facilities for the purpose, but has a "taint" (due to the idiotic attacks led by the America-hating ACLU and the billionaire lefties who control Obama.)
They must not be allowed to get away with this. You watch, they are already trying to downplay the whole screwed up mess they created (and would've gotten away with if it were not for the courageuous integrity of Dick Cheney) will get the word out to the media to let it die over the long weekend. This one frustrates me probably more than all the other debacles combined because its a mistake derived for political purposes that will likely get innocent Americans killed; and one that cannot be undone by the awakening of the voting dead in a future election.
Thank you Ms. Cheney, and God-bless your father and his former boss for keeping us safe and making difficult decisons that could not, and will not be made by this administration- even when it matters the most.
Bob
Well stated
May 22, 2009 - 13:20 ET by Kingfish17Very well put.
I've been to other websites where registered participants can give a "thumbs up" or "thumbs down" to posts. I wish we could to that here.
"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them." Judge Smails
the left can't define pornography...
May 22, 2009 - 13:18 ET by Paul Gbut they can define 'torture'....a caterpiller?
Cajones
May 22, 2009 - 13:54 ET by sharinliteIt is shame that it takes the Cheney family to take center stage and push against all the deceitful, hateful, vicous spewing and lying the other side is doing. I have begun to nice a push back by the women of this country in the media...nice to know that Cheney has the same ones her Dad does!! Good for her.
This type of debate clearly shows that you do not bring a knife to a gunfight. O'Donnell and his cohorts had better watch out....you also need a brain, which they lack.
A Regular Aristotle, That O'Donnell
May 22, 2009 - 14:14 ET by easygoerCorrect me if I'm wrong, but does O'Donnell's position boil down to this? If Chaney says that waterboarding kept America safe, why didn't he waterboard everyone?
Not quite the most illogical statement I've ever heard, but he's in there trying all the way. If this is what passes for logic on the left, they are beyond help. Good grief.
O'Donnell
May 22, 2009 - 14:41 ET by okiehawk44That's the best Larry has. That's the best Obama has. That's the best Soros has. That's the best Polosi has. That's it folks!
Feel safe now? Me either.
I think liberal smart aleck
May 22, 2009 - 15:56 ET by Chris NormanI think liberal smart aleck word play is beginning to fail - especially when it's thrown back in their faces by Liz Cheney, leaving a punk like O'Donnell sputtering. The only place it really "works" is on MSNBC, where there is no contrary opinion to point out it's underlying sheer dishonesty.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Bush ended the Waterboarding... Gore supported illegal actions
May 22, 2009 - 14:33 ET by Gary HallBush ended the Waterboarding...Gore supported illegal actions (in his view, they were illegal).
.. in 2003.. so why are we still in the national discussion of fingerpointing and smearing? Answer: The left just hates Republicans.
But, they don't hate Al Gore for this Vice Presidental view (cause the MSM won't put it in the conversation) ?..
Gore believed that [extraordinary renditions - where they were sent abroad to be tortured by other unaccountable countries] to be against the law.. yet he supported doing it.
Bush/Cheney sought legal advice and consent of congress to make sure that what they did was not against the law.
Seems to me that Bush/Cheney has the higher ground here, as they sought to be within the law, while Gore pushed his administration to ignore the law.
Gary
Liz kicks metrosexual butt...
May 22, 2009 - 14:47 ET by wnaegele...with nary an effort.
President Liz Cheney
May 22, 2009 - 14:53 ET by DelsaA chip off the old block!
YEA
Howdy Delsa... I Second that
May 22, 2009 - 15:00 ET by bigtimerHowdy Delsa...
I Second that Motion!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Hey big
May 22, 2009 - 15:09 ET by DelsaI don't know if her father would run? He'd bury his opponent. He is still young. Young enough to do a four year term and I think his love of country is pushing him.
We need to stand up! Republicans should step on the democrat bugs in DC. They would win everywhere if they would be as articulate as the Cheney's!
Delsa.... Well
May 22, 2009 - 15:19 ET by bigtimerDelsa....
Well heck...Cheney/Cheney is music to my ears!
Seriously though, I don't think he will run...but I have always had nothing but admiration, respect and love for this man...so whatever he does is A-OK in my eyes.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Dude looks like a Marxist, everyone sing along----
May 22, 2009 - 14:59 ET by Roscoe MendagoLiz Cheney is impressive and she surely inherited her father's good sense.
That O'Donnell character is one idiotic, mistake prone, leftist ideologue. I Wiki'd the dude and was surprised at the tenor of the material of said search, seemed it was mostly negative. Of course that only applies if you think someone who yells "liar, liar" repeatedly to make his point, or wonders what's so bad about "Killing Dogs", not much different that killing a fish, hummmm.
http://en.wikipedia....
I was thinking Cheney/Cheney too
May 22, 2009 - 15:40 ET by Delsalol
The MSM would go strak raving insane!
I would have gone Cheney over Bush. I was glad Cheney was VP because Bush needed honest, well reasoned arguments for or against the issues of the day.
We shall see. In the mean-time GO LIZ and DICK!
Oh Oh did you hear Fiat is having second thoughts about Chrysler ???
WE LOVE LIZ
May 22, 2009 - 15:42 ET by charlietexasLIZ IS OUR NEW HERO.....WHEN IS SHE RUNNING FOR OFFICE. NICE BACK BONE!!!!!
MOM
O'Donnell is a whimp!
May 22, 2009 - 15:56 ET by BuzzyO'Donnell is such a whimp as are all males on the liberal side. I'd like to see Liz b!tch slap him. O'Donnell would then run to his mommy and cry in her lap.
Liz Rocks!
May 22, 2009 - 16:04 ET by JaneyI watched this on GMA this morning. Liz Cheney was magnificent. It was so good I Tivoed it for my husband.
Liz Cheney used Enhanced
May 22, 2009 - 18:50 ET by Jack BauerLiz Cheney used Enhanced Interrogation Techniques on Lawrence O'Donnel -- and he crumpled like an al-kayda terrorist coward.
There's a lesson here for so-called Republicans.
Also conservatives need to follow Cheney and keep up the calm cool directed attacks on Obama and his dumb ideas.
He can't stand it. One day he is going to really let the mask slip and blow up in public
Ooooooh Jack....that he
May 22, 2009 - 18:55 ET by bigtimerOoooooh Jack....that he is.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
I hope I see it when the
May 22, 2009 - 19:25 ET by Lord ElicaniI hope I see it when the public finally sees who he is.
"And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears
fought are still at issue around the globe – the belief that the rights
of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of
God."
- John F. Kennedy
I think John McCain needs to
May 22, 2009 - 21:47 ET by Radical1979I think John McCain needs to show this to Megan McCain and tell her if she can't speak intelligently like Liz Cheny to shut up, get a job, and give the IRS all her money so Obama can spend it.
DRAFT LIZ CHENEY... To
May 23, 2009 - 04:05 ET by Jack BauerDRAFT LIZ CHENEY...
To PRIMARY John McCain for the Rpublican Senate nomination
for the state of Arizona.