Meryl Streep Argues Stern Nun Role Similar To War on Terror Absolutists

Photo of Scott Whitlock.

Actress Meryl Streep, who plays an authoritarian nun battling a "passionate liberal priest" (according to Newsweek) in the new film "Doubt," told the Boston Herald on Sunday that the film is actually a metaphor for those who think the war on terror can be won with force. She argued, "It's about someone who thinks you can control evildoers with force and a firm hand and an unrelenting, 'We will not negotiate (with terrorists).'"

The liberal actress also added, "Or there's another approach, one with all these layers of humanity who think you have to have innocence so it doesn't go bad and get corrupted." Philip Seymour Hoffman, who co-stars in the film as a priest suspected of sex abuse, appeared on Monday's "Good Morning America" as part of a three day promotion that the ABC network is providing for the film. In the interview with news anchor Chris Cuomo, Hoffman somewhat cryptically said of the film, "...Certainty is usually connected to something positive. And doubt is usually connected to something negative. And what if you switch that and what would happen? And the film kind of is looking at those issues." (Reviews of the film suggest it comes down on the side of doubting.)

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Cuomo responded, "And for people who believe, that is huge." In addition to Hoffman, Streep will appear on Tuesday's program to talk about the movie. Another co-star, Amy Adams, will stop by on Wednesday. This promotional push could be reminiscent of the three days and 19 minutes that GMA gave to the left-wing anti-war film "Lions For Lambs," which also featured Ms. Streep.

A transcript of the December 8 segment, which aired at 8:35am, follows:

CHRIS CUOMO: From his Oscar-winning turn in the movie "Capote," to his high flying villain in "Mission Impossible III," it seems Mr. Philip Seymour Hoffman can do just about anything he likes and he'll have the critics raving all along the way. His latest film is called "Doubt." And there's here's no doubt you'll be hearing a lot about this film come Oscar time. Very good to have you on the show.

PHILIP SEYMOUR HOFFMAN: Thanks. Thanks for having me. .

CUOMO: This is a big, complicated film. There's a lot going on in this. From an actor's perspective, what drew you to this, "Doubt?"

HOFFMAN: Um, the debate, the underlying debate in the film. I mean, when people see it they'll know what I mean. The debate between certainty and doubt. And I think someone talked about it a couple days ago- I was overhearing it- that certainty is usually connected to something positive. And doubt is usually connected to something negative. And what if you switch that and what would happen? And the film kind of is looking at those issues.

CUOMO: There's a brilliant line early in the film, that doubt can be as strong a bond as anything else.

HOFFMAN: As certainty.

CUOMO: And for people who believe, that is huge. Now, obviously, there's a second layer to this, which is that your character plays a priest. There are allegations of wrongdoing vis-a-vis a child. No surprise that we've heard that line before. And there's the interplay between you, the character of Meryl Streep, who plays the principal, and Amy Adams, a younger nun. Let's play a clip. Take a look and listen.

["Doubt" clip]

MERYL STREEP: So what do you think, Father, is there something new we can do?

HOFFMAN: We all love the Christmas hymns but it might be jolly to include a secular song.

STREEP: Secular?

HOFFMAN: Yes, "It's Beginning to Look a Lot Like Christmas." Something like that.

STREEP: What would be the point of a secular song?

HOFFMAN: It's fun.

AMY ADAMS: "Frosty the Snowman."

HOFFMAN: That's a good one. We could have one of boys dance up as a snowman, dance around.

STREEP: Which boy?

["Doubt" clip ends]

CUOMO: Little hint to the early tension. Now, it should be noted this is a Pulitzer Prize winning play.

HOFFMAN: Yeah. Terrific.

CUOMO: The writing is extraordinary. Pick up the theatricality when you see the movie. You had to make a choice about how you wanted to play this priest. Some have played him as someone who is maybe getting a bad rap. Others as maybe someone who is not getting a bad rap. How did you deal with that choice?

HOFFMAN: Well, when it's- I mean- you're playing the guy, you have to fill in the back-story, you know, as specifically, with as much stakes as possible. But it's that decision, or that thought process, is such a private thing. Especially when attending to this story because you want people to go into this film without any knowledge of what my opinion is because that's what the film is about. It's how it affects you in that way- that you should leave. And usually, almost since the play started until now, during the whole two-year run, it's like 60/40, one way or the other, in the audience, almost always. And I like to keep it that way.

CUOMO: Now, you've worked with Meryl Streep before, you know her power as an actor. When I heard her voice in this, I was transported immediately back to grammar school.

HOFFMAN: Yeah. Yeah.

CUOMO: Were you aware? You know, when you heard it, you were like, wow. That's it. That's the voice? That's the character.

HOFFMAN: Yeah, because my character's not from the Bronx.

CUOMO: Right.

HOFFMAN: My character's a drifter. He's somebody who's been to a few different parish along the northeast border. But she's one of the authentic person who's probably born and raised in the Bronx. And maybe Amy's character too, I'm not sure. And, you know, she has to come through that. It's beautifully. It's really authentic.

CUOMO: Now, you did research in churches, right? What was the take-away from that?

HOFFMAN: I have a friend, Father Jim, he, you know, showed me around, pretty much. And I went and saw some of his sermons. I just need to get filled in on what the priest is actually doing. You know, what I mean? So, I could look believable in what he's wearing. The history of the church in the '60s. 'Cause the movie takes place in the '60s. And that's very important.

CUOMO: Sure. Big Vatican II came for the Catholic Church.

HOFFMAN: We left Latin and went to English, all of that stuff happened. And, so, he filled me in on that. So, he filled me in on all that. It was good.

CUOMO: It's a debate that keeps going. The film is timely and as well as historical. It's really interesting. And you do a great job. I'm sure you're going to hear plenty of that.

HOFFMAN: Thank you.

CUOMO: It's great to have you here. Merry Christmas to you, you got two young kids about the same as mine.

HOFFMAN: I actually have three now. I just had a third six weeks ago. I wouldn't expect you guys over here to know that.

CUOMO: Congratulations. Merry Christmas. I was behind in my reporting. Shame me later. Continued good luck to you. And Great, great news about the expanding family. "Doubt" opens in theaters this Friday, December 12th. And tomorrow, we're going to have one of the co-stars here with us. You may have heard of her. Meryl Streep. We were just talking about her just now. Amazing. And then Amy Adams will be here on Wednesday. So, I'm sure you're going to want to see all of them.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Lions for Lambs

I guess "Lions for Lambs" was not a big enough bomb for her.

Let me get this straight

Streep plays a "stern" nun who has concerns about a liberal priest who might or might not be doing something inappropriate...and she's in the wrong?

Look - fact of the matter is, if more orthodox religious, clergy and laity had stood up to theologically liberal clergy and religious running roughshod over seminaries and orders and schools, we wouldn't have had the inappropriate behavior. Or the abuse scandal or the cover up.

But - again - this doesn't surprise me.  With the Catholic Church, the media loves to play the, "Heads I win, tails you lose" game.   Remember what I said in the other post: the Catholic Church will one day soon be punished not for the abuse or cover-up, but because it dared do something about it and punish the offenders.

Aut viam inveniam aut faciam

Force

Meryl's right - I cant think of a single war in the history of mankind that was won with force.

Somebody help me here. 

MB241

I cannot believe you doubt her. Everyone knows, history has proven, beat your swords into plowshares, spread your arms and tell your enemies how much you love them. Invite them into your country and give them all they want. When they are satiated, they are done. You have won, that is the handful of you that are still alive.

It's as plain as the foot on your neck.

Another case where the entertainment world fails

to intersect with the real world.

Let's test Streep's approach.  I challenge her and her like-minded friends to hop on the next flight to Pakistan and start meeting with Al-Queda directly.  Maybe she can report back on her progress after a few days...or more likely Al-Queda will report back on THIER progress.

Do you think Streep has Lost Her Head?

The few liberals who have tried sit-downs with Al-Qaeda did not fair well.

Why didnt Cuomo just lean

Why didnt Cuomo just lean over and plant a big wet one on Hoffman's lips?  I'm sure Hoffman would have enjoyed it.

  Todays Hollywood loves to

  Todays Hollywood loves to do 'films'.  But what we'd really like to have is some entertainment. 

Streep on drugs

I've read "Doubt" about 50 times (our local community theater recently put on a run of the show) and Streep's analysis of the play and trying to link to hardliners in the "war on terror" is utterly and embarrassingly absurd.  The play isn't about "controlling evildoers by force" it is about the literal title---doubt and how do we know what we know.  Only a leftist moron like Streep would stretch the text to the point of incredulity to make that sort of comparison.  No wonder her recent movies have been bombs.  A piece of advice, Meryl, stick to acting which you're great at and quit offering artistic and political analysis, which you know nothing about.

This movie is probably

This movie is probably aptly titled.  I "doubt" it will be big box office.  It's that time of year when the oscar contenders come sneaking in late to garner enough audience to win consideration. 

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."  - Sir Winston Churchill

Dang

Now that's a Headline

Just the thought of Streep

Just the thought of Streep playing the role of a nun makes me bay at the full moon. This must be what hell is like.

 

I'm surprised she never got

I'm surprised she never got struck by lightning while filming.

Obama’s Honeymoon Over?

 

 Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

That looney witch is right.

That looney witch is right. But she should set an example to all of us by inviting Al-Queda into her home. If she prefers, we can release the GTMO terrorists and dump them at her porch. I'm sure that they can all sing cumba-ya and reach peace.

And who's more qualified to

And who's more qualified to lecture the rest of us about the war on terror, Islamic terrorists and world politics than a celebrity, right? Since Bush became President Meryl Streep has gone out of her way to ridicule the nation, the President, and the war. Why she's even spoke derisively about her President in foreign lands.  Meryl may not have had much to do with the heroic stand against Islamic extremism herself and quite frankly, when I listen to her speak I find it hard to believe that she really graduated from an Ivy league college  but heck, she stars in a movie about terrorism ---- so who knows more about terrorism than Meryl Streep. Armed with all of her "knowledge" of terrorism and her lefty talking points, I'd just love to see her get torn apart in a debate with fellow Yalie, John Bolton.

Let's see, first thing I

Let's see, first thing I think of when I see or hear anything from Streep is...please, just go eat another apple....then again, I also think she needs to think about other places of fame where apples are stuffed, on a platter...seems to me I am thinking of something to do with swine.

Go ahead Meryl...love, understand those terrorists...your head on a platter with an apple stuffed in your mouth wouldn't bother them one bit.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Great

Another one of those great movies from Hollywood I just can't wait to not see. Of course, I wouldn't go see it if it was great, I don't watch movies with Meryl or Alec or Tim Robbins, or Sean, or well, actually none of them. I have given up on Hollyweird.

question - answer

Certainty is usually connected to something positive. And doubt is usually connected to something negative. And what if you switch that and what would happen? 

Ummmm. No one watches your crappy movie, that's what would happen.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Entertainer Propaganda

Considering movies of this genre generate low revenue, it appears "entertainers" and all involved in these productions get maximum exposure making the rounds on TV news and entertainment shows, thereby getting their message to the masses with what they consider a legitimate reason for screen and air time by pandering leftist cronies.  If the movie is a write-off, they've still left their mark on who they hope are impressionable viewers / listeners.

I am beginning to believe

I am beginning to believe that these films are simply produced to provide "Street Cred" for actors and production staff in Hollywood so they can attend fashionable parties in the Hollywood Hills where liberalsim is de Rigeur.

I am still waiting for a film to be made of the phenomenal fight on top of Takur Ghar in Afghanistan in 2003 during operation Anaconda.  If done ADEQUATELY it would make MILLIONS in domestic release.  But would of course not provide street cred for the Hollywood types.

So, is she actually

So, is she actually proposing that it is the "moral high road" to negotiate "deals" with terrorists?  Is she really saying that terrorism is a legitimate political tactic that works in achieving the ends being sought?

 

And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall.   -- Edgar Allan Poe