Over a span of three days, "Good Morning America" has devoted almost 19 minutes of air time to promoting "Lions For Lambs," the left-wing, anti-war drama starring and directed by Robert Redford. The promotional push continued on Thursday's show as one of the film's other stars, Meryl Streep, attacked Bill O'Reilly for what she apparently saw as questioning the patriotism of liberals. After co-host Diane Sawyer played a clip of O'Reilly wondering if Democrats really want to win in Iraq, the actress sarcastically stated, "It was my favorite thing that I ever saw Bill O'Reilly do. And so I lifted it out of his show and put it in the movie."
Streep derided O'Reilly's comments as the "wife beating question" and, in an annoyed tone, asked, "Are you still beating your wife? There's no way to answer it." Sawyer's interview came after a segment on Wednesday with the actress, director Redford and fellow star Tom Cruise. That followed yet another piece on Tuesday solely with Redford. On Thursday, Sawyer continued to laud what she saw as a brave film. The co-host gushed that "Lions For Lambs" wonders how "you strengthen the muscles of your convictions?" She fawned over the film, which involves a journalist lobbying other reporters to oppose the government's plans for war, by describing Streep's character as "a middle-aged reporter, facing the question of her job or her convictions. What does it take to be brave?"
It should be pointed out that "Good Morning America" has stood alone in its excessive push for this film. While GMA devoted 18 minutes and 45 seconds to the movie, CBS's "Early Show" and NBC's "Today" have, thus far, featured no interviews with the film's stars. In addition to the massive amount of coverage ABC has given and the gushing tone of Sawyer's questions, the morning show has also featured a generous amount of clips from the movie. Over three days, "Good Morning America" has played two minutes and 33 seconds worth of the film. In contrast, the "Lions For Lambs" trailer is only two minutes and 30 seconds long.
Sawyer's appearance on Thursday featured some bizarre suggestions. There was this "good idea" that the actress appropriated from her mother:
MERYL STREEP: [Mother] had a lot of good ideas. One of her ideas was that everybody should have to vote. You have to vote. And if you don't, you're fined. And after three times that you're fined, then you don't get to be a citizen anymore. You can still stay here, you just have to go line up at the INS. And get your green card renewed and stand in that line. And then the great 62 percent would don't vote who are eligible to vote would motivate themselves. I think it's a really good idea.
Streep also asserted that most Americans aren't sacrificing. She lectured, "I think we'll do things if we think our children are in danger. And for 99 percent of us, our children are not." Even if you buy the argument, wouldn't the global threat of radical Islam mean that, at some point, all of "our children" would be in danger?
Finally, as noted by Sawyer, the actress believes that "just blogging to your friends is not enough" if you want to express your opinions. Streep complained that the problem with blogging is "it just sort of goes out and corroborates with all the other people who agree with you and then you're done." So, blogs don't work because they are only read by like-minded people? As opposed to a more diverse environment like Hollywood?
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 8:16am on November 8, follows:
DIANE SAWYER: And now, a chance this morning to have coffee with Meryl Streep. She is one of the stars of the new movie "Lions for Lambs" with Robert Redford and Tom Cruise. It is a movie about a professor, a student, a senator and a journalist and the question, how do you strengthen the muscles of your convictions? Streep and Cruise.
[Clip from "Lions For Lambs"]
TOM CRUISE'S CHARACTER: You've already sold the war, now I'm asking you to help sell the solution.
[Clip ends]
SAWYER: A dialogue, a duel, ripped from the headlines and the air waves.
BILL O'REILLY: Do you Democrats really want to win the war in Iraq? We'll take a look at it as we continue.
STREEP: It was my favorite thing that I ever saw Bill O'Reilly do. And so I lifted it out of his show and put it in the movie.
[Clip from "Lions For Lambs"]
CRUISE'S CHARACTER: Do you want to win the war on terror? Yes or no?
STREEP'S CHARACTER: It's a broad --
CRUISE: Okay, you see this? This is the quintessential yes or no question of our time.
[Clip ends]
STREEP: The question completely [sic] without an answer. I mean, it's the wife beating question. Are you still beating your wife? There's no way to answer it.
SAWYER: Streep, a middle-aged reporter, facing the question of her job or her convictions. What does it take to be brave?
[Clip from "Lions For Lambs"]
STREEP: You can't leave me hanging out here by myself. You just can't do that.
UNIDENTIFIED CHARACTER: Wrong. I just can't do this. You turn in some loony, speculative, what-if story based on what, a woman's intuition?
STREEP: If we don't do this, Howard, who's going to do it? This is the job. These politicians, these journalists, everybody that says, "Oh, well, if we'd known then what we know now." It was all right there. We knew it. If we had bothered to connect the dots. But we didn't, did we? We just rolled over.
[Clip ends]
STREEP: What are you willing to give? I think we'll do things if we think our children are in danger. And for 99 percent of us, our children are not.
SAWYER: Streep says just blogging to your friends is not enough.
STREEP: If you feel like your voice isn't heard, then you damn well get out and make it heard. But now we have so many outlets for venting. People blog and they go to sites and you feel like you've done something by sending out, tapping out this thing and it just sort of goes out and corroborates with all the other people who agree with you and then you're done.
7:19am
SAWYER: Her mother is here in these home movies.
STREEP: Yeah, I miss her a lot. She had a lot of good ideas. One of her ideas was that everybody should have to vote. You have to vote. And if you don't, you're fined. And after three times that you're fined, then you don't get to be a citizen anymore. You can still stay here, you just have to go line up at the INS. And get your green card renewed and stand in that line. And then the great 62 percent would don't vote who are eligible to vote would motivate themselves. I think it's a really good idea.
SAWYER: You can also see in the home movies a young Meryl who seems to be testing their [sic] acting chops, not to mention singing. You did take singing lessons?
STREEP: Oh, I love to sing, but I'm not that good. I'm humble, believe it or not, I know the limits. But I do love it. I really do love it.
SAWYER: In that case, let's pull out from 1981 Alice at the palace.
[CLIP OF STREEP SINGING]
STREEP: She means crazy not angry.
SAWYER: And the woman who put the devil in Prada surprised us by confessing something about the pressure of the red carpet. What's the most frustrating thing about being you right now?
STREEP: Fashion. You know? For people-- And I'm always in a dilemma. Do I take the free dress or do I buy the dress? I feel better in myself if I buy the dress. Then I think, "My god, these clothes are expensive." And they're sickening. And you can't wear them twice. No one will let you wear a dress twice.
SAWYER: No, no, no, or you'll be up there.
STREEP: Oh, and I'm going to start doing it, by the way. That's my pledge to you today.
SAWYER: To wear your dresses twice?
STREEP: To wear these dresses, like, to everything.
SAWYER: I think you have made -- I think you've made a very courageous decision for that.
STREEP: Thank you.
SAWYER: And lastly, what's the best thing about being you right now in the world?
STREEP: Well, there's a lot of things. And Kinohora (sp?) We don't talk about them.
SAWYER: Kinohora, of course an old Yiddish saying that means may the evil eye stay away. A lesson in Yiddish from Meryl Streep who is in "Lions for Lambs" opening in theaters tomorrow.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
"Are you still beating your
November 8, 2007 - 13:42 ET by bassndude"Are you still beating your wife?" My reply? Only when she starts to talk like you, Ms. Streep.
And she thanks me for it.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
What is Amazing...
November 8, 2007 - 15:18 ET by aerovelo...Is that conservative leaders ever get elected in a country where nearly every media outlet is a liberal propaganda machine.
So how is this possible? I believe this is because despite the media's non-stop campaign to indocrinate viewers and readers to their way of thinking, people just dont fall for it in the numbers they need. So, like inflation, they need to continually ratchet up the rhetoric every year, every month, every day. Just to maintain the same number of converts. They know as soon as they let up the tide will turn hard against them.
So, its fun to watch the machine operate...but I'm afraid as the election heats up, it will be ever harder for them to keep all 4 corners of the blanket covering their band of impressionable propaganda consumers...people just become jaded. It means less and less everytime it's repeated and so another propaganda campaign needs to be concieved, produced and pushed out to the masses.
I just dont think that in the end it will work to get a liberal democrat president elected. Obviously there are plenty of people NOT under the spell of Hollywood or the MSM and It certainly doesnt help that France and Germany are now under more conservative, America friendly management.
8^)
Ask yourself: Do I want a good paying job, or do I want a government hand out. Its that simple!
Sure, force everyone to
November 8, 2007 - 13:51 ET by WhoIsJohnGaltSure, force everyone to vote. That's a brilliant idea, Mrs. Streep. How long does one have to ponder that gem before coming up with at least half a dozen reason why it's a hare-brained idea. Let's see:
1) Forcing people to vote who have no desire to will produce uneducated, totally random results.
2) You need to change the Constitution to make it happen.
3) Dictators and despots force people to vote. Good company you'd be in!
4) There's no provision in the Constitution for removing citizenship for not exercising a freedom.
5) That means that we force Americans to register for a green card, but make no effort to chase down real illegal immigrants.
6) How do you prove someone actually voted without knowing what their vote was?
7) Do I have to vote for every office on the ballot? How do you verify that? What if I determine that I don't know enough about the candidates to make an informed decision? Oops...too much like point #1.
Anyone else...?
OK, lemme get this straight...
November 8, 2007 - 13:59 ET by lotrThe theme and/or moral (both quaint terms in the age of relativism) of this movie is that reporters, the MSM, all need to rise up and fight the power (i.e., the U.S. government and military)? I knew this movie would have a liberal agenda before I even knew what it was about -- most all dramas out of Hollywood these days conform to this, especially when they star well-known "activist actors."
I know what I want to see..
November 8, 2007 - 21:03 ET by UndercoverConservativeso she says this is a movie where a reporter has to choose between "her job and her convictions". So when will we ever see one where they don't choose their ratings (a.k.a. their jobs) and instead choose something that responds to their beliefs.
Or, they choose their *real* job-reporting the TRUTH, or where there are actually "convictions"-for fraud, for treason, for electioneering, or for slander/libel.
Movie I will miss
November 8, 2007 - 13:55 ET by well99Lying for the Left.Just say no to propaganda!That is all this movie is about.Streeps intelligence real shows on this. "STREEP: The question completely without an answer. I mean, it's the wife beating question. Are you still beating your wife? There's no way to answer it." Actually that is pretty easy.I dont beat my wife.What a idiot.I really hope this bombs.The communist in Hollywierd really think they have to indoctrinate people.They have no understanding of real people.They can FOAD in a hard way.
What I've found interesting
November 8, 2007 - 13:57 ET by BruzillaWhat I've found interesting is how the marketing of this movie has changed. The initial commercial spots made the movie out to be anti-war, with heavy emphasis on Redford. Then when the movie came out and was tanking badly, the commercials changed to make the film seem more like a war/action drama. So now the film is in the toilet, and Streep and Redford are being tossed out to try to score style points with Liberals. How lame.
I just feel sorry for Tom Cruise. This film was Redford's doing, but it's the first movie that Cruise's new studio produced. Now he's taking heat from the Libs for not getting the movie enough exposure, even though commercials for it have run more often than any other movie in years. So now he has to go out and get daddied by Redford or look like he's not down with the struggle. Cruise needs to be more Maverick and less horse whisperer.
Um, the movie hasn't been
November 8, 2007 - 14:12 ET by balboaUm, the movie hasn't been released yet. This weekend is when it opens.
Movie Critics
November 8, 2007 - 18:58 ET by well99I know you can hit some critics reviews and people have been to a special viewing.All movies do that I guess.I know I have seen some of the reveiws.
Excellent point
November 8, 2007 - 14:13 ET by Scott WhitlockBruzilla,
That's a really excellent point. If you see the trailers or TV ads, you might think this is some thriller or action film. It's a real attempt on the studio's part to make "Lions For Lambs" out to be something that it's not. I think Hollywood is starting to understand that these preachy, liberal films don't sell. But don't expect them to stop making them. However, I think we'll see more stealth marketing like this in the future.
You are right. They
November 8, 2007 - 15:47 ET by buddycYou are right. They tried to brainwash you into believing it was a quality movie. That didn't work. They tried to sell it as entertainment and not liberal propaganda. That didn't work. Now they are trying to create a liberal backlash where those idiots will go 5-6 times to prevent it from being a failure and to make the gross look good.
I recognize Redford's contribution to entertainment but I would never go see any movie involving Redford. NEVER. Streep is really a poor actress and has done nothing of significance. Regardless of her political acitivism I wouldn't see anything she was in.
How could Tom Cruise be so stupid as to get involved with Redford and Streep. Redford is the Leni Riefenstahl of the 2000's? Soros is his banker. Cruise is dedeciated to entertainment. Redford is dedicated to brainwashing. This is an important career event for Cruise. It was a big mistake to hook up with these 2.
the movie isn't out yet.
November 8, 2007 - 18:47 ET by balboathe movie isn't out yet. How could all these thing not work before the movie is even released?
"...There's no way to
November 8, 2007 - 14:10 ET by Chris Norman"...There's no way to answer it."
No, because if you answered it honestly, you'd look as bad as you really are.
Scratch a liberal and find a statist
November 8, 2007 - 15:06 ET by greenfairieOne of her ideas was that everybody should have to vote. You have to vote. And if you don't, you're fined. And after three times that you're fined, then you don't get to be a citizen anymore. You can still stay here, you just have to go line up at the INS. And get your green card renewed and stand in that line. And then the great 62 percent would don't vote who are eligible to vote would motivate themselves. I think it's a really good idea.
Oh really, Fuhrer Streep? Does it matter this is a free country where you can be as engaged or disengaged as you like? That's right, you Hollywood people like dictatorships.
In any case, Kommissar Streep buys into the liberal fallacy that if things don't go their way politically it must be because the public is apathetic, "asleep," "afraid to speak out," etc.. On Planet Streep, the U.S. of A. would be a Swedish-style socialist country if only everybody voted.
It would be nice if more people took their right to vote more seriously but only if those who vote are INFORMED. An uninformed vote is just as worthless and a lot more dangerous than just sitting it out.
Well said,
November 8, 2007 - 15:21 ET by jdhawkWell said, greenfairie!
By the way, my wife dragged me to the movie, "The Hours," a while back. It was so terrible, that we walked out after about 15 minutes. It starred, among others, Streep. Yet, it won an Academy Award and numerous nominations.
Streep is a dull witted boring actress. I refuse to see anything with her in it.
I disagree; Streep was a superb actress....
November 8, 2007 - 16:32 ET by lotrin the movie Death Becomes Her.
lotr, she wasent acting in
November 8, 2007 - 16:43 ET by bassndudelotr, she wasent acting in that movie.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
I think this
November 8, 2007 - 15:26 ET by Free ThinkerI think this out-of-touch-Hollywood-moment is best emphasized at the end of the interview with Sawyer telling Streep how courageous she is to wear a dress twice. Wow, thats hard hitting journalism. I don't think Bill O'Reilly who is mocked in the movie clip has ever praised someone for such courage.
Sawyer=liberal Streep=libe
November 8, 2007 - 15:38 ET by buddycSawyer=liberal
Streep=liberal
Redford=liberal
Movie=liberal viewpoint
CBS=liberal network
Where is the intellectual challenge for these people? They live in an echo chamber and all have rotator cuff problems from patting themselves on the back.
Go to Redford's Sundance and look around at the dead vegatation, the smog, the roads and especially the traffic. Consider the new freeway he got the state to construct to Sundance destroying a beautiful canyon and its river, animals, views and plant life. Ask him to account for his private jet travel and his over consumption and use of energy.
Redford is the ultimate example of a liberal. He wants to brainwash you to do things he won't do. He wants to be able to be the only one able to brainwash you. He wants to limit your campaign contributions so his contributions have more importance. He wants rules to apply to you but not him. He won't debate his point of view with anyone who disagrees with him. Redford is a gutless ahole.
Great Post Buddyc
November 9, 2007 - 00:01 ET by GoodieWhat else does Sawyer,Streep,Redford,CBS and all of Hollywood=? COURAGE! Just like Dan said....
"Streep derided O'Reilly's
November 8, 2007 - 18:41 ET by ckc1227"Streep derided O'Reilly's comments as the "wife beating question" and,
in an annoyed tone, asked, "Are you still beating your wife? There's no
way to answer it."
There's no way for YOU to answer it, Ms. Streep, perhaps because the Hollywood writers are on strike. Or maybe it's because the answer you want to give would shock clear-thinking Americans.
No need for you to answer though. The fact that you find the question "Do you want America to win" so difficult to answer tells us all we need to know.