"Good Morning America" co-host Robin Roberts interviewed Bill Clinton for nine minutes over two segments on Monday and somehow managed to avoid discussing the disgraced Eliot Spitzer and controversial Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Instead, GMA again featured another positive look at the Clinton Global initiative and its plan to fight poverty and get young people involved. Roberts gushed, "It's got to warm your heart 'cause this is something that's very-- has always been very dear to you about getting them involved."
Roberts found no time to ask the ex-president, who was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice in relation to a sex scandal, for his thoughts on former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer's entanglement with a prostitution ring and his eventual resignation. The segment, which was highly edited, featured the ABC journalist making only a glancing reference to Wright, Senator Barack Obama's incendiary former preacher and the man responsible for racially charged statements. She mildly added, "...Geraldine Ferraro, Reverend Wright. I mean, both sides-- things that are being said by surrogates." Roberts then shifted the conversation back to a much older topic, Clinton's South Carolina comments linking Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama.
Now, in the first segment, which aired in the 7am hour, Roberts did occasionally press Clinton on whether the battle between his wife and Obama could harm the Democratic Party. And GMA co-host Diane Sawyer did highlight the Spitzer scandal in the 7:30 hour. But, it's odd that Roberts glossed over the Wright controversy and skipped any questions about the former New York governor.
GMA has repeatedly raved over Bill Clinton's charity work. On July 20, 2007, Diane Sawyer touted the ex-president's AIDS initiative as "his work to save a continent." Four days later, on July 24, reporter Kate Snow appeared equally enthused. She rhapsodized, "In Africa, they seem to be on a first-name basis with the former president, shouting ‘Bill! Bill!’" Now, of course the organization's work should be applauded. But there are many fine charities and high profile individuals behind them that don't receive anywhere near as much coverage.
A transcript of the second segment, which aired at 8:17am on March 17, follows:
ROBIN ROBERTS: And now the race for '08 and more of my conversation that I had with-- in New Orleans this weekend with former President Bill Clinton about his Global Initiative. It began in 2005, bringing together 1,000 world leaders to tackle the world's most pressing challenges and now President Clinton is trying to mobilize the youth of the world to do the same. Football games, finals and frat parties. For many, it's the image of college life these days, but that could be about to change if President Clinton gets his wish. Today he's inviting students from around the globe to join him in a bold, new effort. President Clinton, looking at the young people, all look different, sizes, shapes, colors, ages.
FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON: Yep.
ROBERTS: It's got to warm your heart 'cause this is something that's very-- has always been very dear to you about getting them involved.
CLINTON: We have to keep looking for ways to do big things together. And that's what these kids are doing. They're so excited.
ROBERTS: In 2005, he launched the Clinton Global Initiative to bring world leaders together with nonprofit organizations and businesses all to address global issues. But now he's taking it a step further, reaching out to those who bear a great responsibility in the years to come, students and universities.
CLINTON: I'm trying in a general sense to get more college students involved in the kind of work that we do at the Global Initiative every year, to get more campuses to brand themselves by the service they give as well as by their athletic teams and academic programs.
ROBERTS: It's called the Clinton Global Initiative University and it begins in New Orleans, two years after Hurricane Katrina destroyed much of the city, leaving nearly a million Americans homeless.
CLINTON: By coming to New Orleans, I wanted to highlight how much the students here in these colleges have done and are doing to try to rebuild the city and how much still needs to be done and to emphasize that people from outside New Orleans can make a contribution to this.
ROBERTS: He is bringing together students already serving in the Global Initiative together with movers and shakers like Brad Pitt to brainstorm.
CLINTON: There are two students here from Sudan working in New Orleans, and they like it. They're glad to be part of this and, of course, all these kids from all over America, enormous number of them asked me to do this again next year and do it here. They said they want to see the houses come up. They want to work.
ROBERTS: Yes.
CLINTON: It's really fascinating.
ROBERTS: For Samuel Anai and Benjamin Ako, two students President Clinton brought to the U.S. from Sudan, it's been an opportunity to learn and give back.
SAMUEL ANAI (Sudanese student): What is affecting America will affect us too so it's good that for that us to come and share whatever kind of situation that there are people in New Orleans are in.
BENJAMIN AKO: The big part of our life was to help with America and now it teaches that we have to find a way to help others as a payback.
ROBERTS: And for these two students a call for service offers hope for progress locally and globally.
BOB ACKFIROOZBAKHT (student volunteer): We're setting a precedent for the rest of the world when we have natural disasters like this we can go on and, you know, the past is past.
REBECCA OTTEN: (student, Tulane University): You know it's slow going but as long as people keep putting attention on it and keep coming down here and helping out and working on it, we can, we can make it work.
ROBERTS: A simple notion that appears to be contagious.
CLINTON: Well, I think we're poised to make a lot of progress in a hurry now, so I think if we come back in a year from now, you'll see big physical changes.
ROBERTS: And the students really want to come back a year from now and see some changes 'cause a lot of locals were coming up during this and saying it's great the attention that it's receiving but still wanting to see the fruits of that and seeing housing. Make It Right, that's Brad Pitt's campaign and so they've brought the two together and they were out there working very hard yesterday. But I thought it was interesting what president Clinton was saying in how universities, could you imagine how they're known for their academic excellence and their football teams and athletic teams. What if a university is known for their community service, the college students that do the work, branding them that way?
SAWYER: Right. Put it on the cover of some magazines. The best universities in community service. Not a bad accolade.
ROBERTS: That's the goal. Nope, not at all.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Geraldine Ferraro, Reverend
March 17, 2008 - 16:24 ET by motherbeltGeraldine Ferraro, Reverend Wright. I mean, both sides-- things that are being said by surrogates
Roberts is equating one remark by Geraldine Ferraro with the rantings of Jeremiah Wright?????
What a clueless wonder.
Well, at least she has more class than Olbermann....she didn't hand Clinton a check, on camera, with the remark..here, for another school in Africa.
Keeping Bill Clinton in in perspective - let 'em die
March 17, 2008 - 16:42 ET by Gary HallLet's keep Bill Clinton in perspective here. While the MSM loves to look to the far left in preperation for their non-ending assult on President Bush, they seem to skip how the far left often sized up Bill Clinton on these issues.
Let's look no further than "The Nation's," David Corn (Washington editor). In Too little, too late - How many times is Bill Clinton going to apologize to Africa?, we can find the material for how the questions should be presented to this bloated ego-centrist ex-President:
Corn starts out with the quesiton that every single reporter should be dying to hit him with:
Corn's article, in it's analysis of how the Clinton White House operated, adds the following subject lines for the proper impact context:
What else can I say?
And how about the slaughter
March 17, 2008 - 16:58 ET by motherbeltAnd how about the slaughter in Rwanda, when after deciding not to intervene he said in his apology:
all over the world there were people like me sitting in offices, day after day after day, who did not fully appreciate the depth and the speed with which you were being engulfed by this unimaginable terror. (emphasis added)
Nice of you, Bill to apologize for the whole world!!
Even then he had to whine that well, no one else did anything either!
motherbelt..
March 17, 2008 - 17:37 ET by Gary Hallexactly -- imagine Bill Clinton actually getting the hard nose blaming questions from the MSM like Bush is hounded with. They gave Clinton a pass on Somalia, Rwanda, the DR Congo, the takeover in Afghanistan, Sierra Leone, his lies over Kosovo, the Ivory Coast and on his failure of leadership on the global HIV/Aids issue -- all of which are issues dear to the liberal media's soul, or so they portray. A good read on Rwanda, if you have never read it, is "Bystanders to Genocide," by Obama's so recently fired foreign advisor, Samatha Power. gary
Great comment as we saw recently how Pres Bush received in Afric
March 17, 2008 - 22:34 ET by PawpawNGreat comment as we saw recently how Pres Bush received in Africa. His administration has done 100 times more to assist these African nations did the BJC bunch ever did. That's why they rolled out the red carpet for DUBYA and they sang and danced. Geez, even BONO has admitted to GWB's greatness in this!
-let 'em die.
March 17, 2008 - 22:46 ET by R D HelmGary,
I recall Wee Willy having that same attitude during the Chicago Heat Wave of '95.
Many black Americans died in this, but no Bill, no outrage, no FEMA, and not so much as a peep out of the MSM.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
What exactly did you want
March 17, 2008 - 22:55 ET by balboaWhat exactly did you want Bill to do?
Bal, that is exactly my point.
March 17, 2008 - 23:17 ET by R D HelmHonestly? There really wasn't anything he could do about it. In fact, there wasn't really anything anyone could do about it.
However, If George Bush I had won re-election in '92 and was POTUS during that time, the MSM would have given him a ration of hell over it. Nothing was said by the MSM about Clinton.
Just like they did to George Bush II over Katrina.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
Bill Clinton...I want to
March 17, 2008 - 16:44 ET by bigtimerBill Clinton...I want to see your tax records...lets just see how charitable you and your partner in crime really are....worldwide Clinton, World wide...then we would like to see your Library records/donations from others, worldwide Billy world wide...throw in the WH records/itinerary from your partner Bill, release those too.
Inquiring minds want to know.
In some interview, Clinton
March 17, 2008 - 17:10 ET by motherbeltIn some interview, Clinton said that he actually [reaches down to get his own horn to blow] gave a lot to institutions and such that were not tax-deductible, because he didn't believe that you should get a benefit from your charitable giving.
Isn't he just the greatest thing ever???? (If you're not sure, wait a minute; he'll tell you!)
Hey Bill, didn't anyone ever tell you that you don't have to claim any of your charitable contributions as deductions???
You said it all mb... I
March 17, 2008 - 17:16 ET by bigtimerYou said it all mb...
I want to see those records of his for the speeches he gave and the $$$ he got for them from different spots ...world-wide.
It should be very interesting.
You don't even have to see
March 17, 2008 - 17:56 ET by motherbeltYou don't even have to see them. He and his wife both mention, at every opportunity, that they are among "the wealthiest Americans" who "don't need a tax cut."
Are there any true journalists in the media?
March 17, 2008 - 16:49 ET by Daniel BakerA journalist that will only accept interviews where they are not understood agreements that talk will be limited to a celebrities latest charity.
I think it's probably around
March 17, 2008 - 16:57 ET by mattmI think it's probably around 10 percent.
Journalism
March 17, 2008 - 18:12 ET by iveseenitallJournalism, like so many other things in our beloved nation, is broken almost beyond repair. Lies from the media? Once so rare are now daily fare. Bias? There is absolutely no attempt cover it. Quality of presentation?- poorly written, poorly spoken, illogical, sensational. Thoroughness?---stories barely skim the surface. Accuracy---mistakes abound. Priorities? Important stories take a back seat to those which push a "liberal" agenda. Freedom of the Press? When honesty and responsiblity went out the door, so did true freedom of thought. The press is no longer free and that is perhaps the most dangerous thing of all for our country and the world. Sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a"liberal"
Daniel - What a great question?
March 17, 2008 - 17:06 ET by Gary HallDaniel - What a great question? Let's suggest that as a topic for discussion. To keep the partisan out of it, perhaps the question might be, "Are there any true journalists in the mainstream media?"
Over the years I've noted a handful, one being Lisa Myers of NBC - did this one on Gov. Blanco over Katrina. The rest of the MSM yawned, "We only want to blame Bush - keep the players on the ground, most responsible, off the table."
And she interviewed John Kerry's commander, Admiral William Schachte 'No Ememy Fire," in a rather frank interview -- that the rest of the MSM would make believe never happened. Their ethics - Don't talk about it and it will go away. It must have been a good story, as the MSM never challenged it. (;~> gary
DB, my contention is that
March 17, 2008 - 17:11 ET by FastEdthere are very few journalists, at all - mattm's 10% might be right, though I'd go with less. The msm(Lsm)'s view is what they "write", hence, the drop in paper readership as well as the drop in viewership for the tv version of what they call news readers. There is NO investigation, and their single claim-to-fame is to re-write what is given to them, then spinning that, to prove their agenda. The saving grace to this has been the blogs, such as NB, and the writers who visit and contribute here, people who are NOT afraid to put name to what they believe and publish, unlike the lurkers and cowards who are overpayed and won't/can't put name to their agenda.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Just Curious: Why would
March 17, 2008 - 17:07 ET by LeonJust Curious:
Why would Clinton care about Wright or Spitzer?
What do either of them have to do with Bill Clinton?
As for his charity work, are you claiming it's not commendable? GMA was wrong to compliment him on it? Why?
Can even begin to validate your claim that other high profile individuals don't get nearly as much coverage? Bill Gates gets a ton of charity coverage. As does Bono and a laundry list of other celebrites. Furthermore, if it is even true that he gets more coverage, it shouldn't surprise anyone that an ex-PRESIDENT might get more attention in America. He was one of only 43 presidents ever. Kind of a big deal.
All I see here is another example of a severe (and increasingly pathetic) Bill Clinton obsession.
Please provide a link to the
March 17, 2008 - 17:15 ET by motherbeltPlease provide a link to the most recent news stories about Bill Gates' charitable work.
mb,
March 17, 2008 - 17:26 ET by R D HelmLOL-Bill Gate's wife isn't running for POTUS, either.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
Hey, it should be easy for
March 17, 2008 - 18:33 ET by motherbeltHey, it should be easy for him, if, as he says, Gates has gotten "a ton" of coverage.
motherbelt,
March 17, 2008 - 20:53 ET by R D HelmCorrect me if I am wrong (not like that would be a first or anything) but is there not a passage in the Bible that covers charitable giving, in which we are not supposed to let the right hand know what the left hand is doing?
As in, don't go around bragging about it?
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
Bill knows that wasn't
March 17, 2008 - 22:22 ET by motherbeltBill knows that wasn't meant for people like him...he uses it as a "teaching" experience.
If I were the interviewer when he said that tripe about non-deductible contributions, I would have asked him what I said above: then why claim any deductions for your gifts?
Maybe because
March 17, 2008 - 17:17 ET by FastEdas head of the demo party he might want to make a statement or campare notes?? But the other side of the coin, if we are as bad as he and the dem candidates have said, why isn't he helping the poor folks in this country, and prove that the pubs are demons?
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Impeached President
March 17, 2008 - 17:18 ET by bigtimerImpeached President Leon.
Impeached.
Don't forget that word.
ABC
March 17, 2008 - 17:24 ET by R D HelmAt ABC, it's All 'Bout Clinton.
This is just a further attempt by Clinton's MSM fans to try and create a viable legacy for the man, as he was wholly unable to do it himself.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
Taking deductions in the shorts
March 17, 2008 - 18:13 ET by nkviking75"In some interview, Clinton said that he actually [reaches down to get his own horn to blow] gave a lot to institutions and such that were not tax-deductible, because he didn't believe that you should get a benefit from your charitable giving."
Well, that has a lot of credibility coming from a guy who used to donate his used underwear and take tax deductions from them.
I suppose he'd get big money from Clinton worshippers for his used tighty whities these days.
Eww!
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
I had forgotten about
March 17, 2008 - 18:29 ET by motherbeltI had forgotten about that...and $4 a pair too! LOL
Today on Seinfeld they had the "muffin stumps" episode, where the soup kitchen lady said the homeless were insulted at being expected eat muffins without the tops..can you imagine that bunch if they were given used underwear????
ROFL!
Interview
March 17, 2008 - 18:16 ET by WR JonasScott , the second paragraph is gold. Very well done.
As to the disgraced ex- President: he is doing what he has always done. Which is undermining the foundation and institutions of American democracy through the legal process. He is an abominable individual .He cloaks himself with pseudo respectable causes to give himself Stature. He is a phony and a self glorifying snake.
Wow! It's THE bill
March 17, 2008 - 20:30 ET by MidAmericaWow! It's THE bill clinton? I thought hillary sent him so far off the beaten path no one could find him. Although he did look a little rough when they first found him.....
You know ...
March 17, 2008 - 21:57 ET by drillanwrIf you stare at Bill Clinton in that picture the GMA Exclusive logo in the top left corner of the picture looks like a McDonald's sign out the corner of your eye ...
When you men get home and face an anti-war protestor, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy… ~ Attributed to General Tommy Franks
Is it just me or does
March 17, 2008 - 23:32 ET by jdhawkIs it just me or does clintoon need a bra? And, what is he looking down at - checking to see there is no sploge on his pants?
Clintoon - the joke that was president - sad to say . . .
h/t Seinfeld.....
March 18, 2008 - 07:19 ET by motherbeltNot a bra....a "bro".....LOL
jd -- manboob alert! Well
March 18, 2008 - 08:06 ET by Jack Bauerjd -- manboob alert! Well spotted.
I hear liberal women still swoon over this fine specimen of boobhood.