ABC Honors Bill Clinton with Interview on 'His Work to Save a Continent'

Photo of Tim Graham.

ABC’s Good Morning America interviewed Bill Clinton on Thursday morning, and while he made the news for saying Iraq is hopeless ("There is no military victory here"), the interview was also notable as another opportunity for ABC to honor Clinton as a global statesman and ask him softball questions for almost nine minutes. Co-host Diane Sawyer reported he was in Africa to see Nelson Mandela and do his AIDS work: "And President Bill Clinton weighs in, speaking out on the war, his work to save a continent and Senator Hillary Clinton’s campaign. An exclusive interview."

When the interview began nine minutes into the show, Sawyer lauded his humanitarian foundation work again, saving hundreds of thousands of people: "And we turn now to an exclusive interview with former President Bill Clinton, who is in Johannesburg South Africa this week as part of his life’s work with his foundation which has provided life saving treatment for nearly 800,000 children and adults with AIDS in Africa and also simple solutions like fertilizer to revolutionize agricultural production."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Are these tributes coming from the heart, or are they a condition of getting the exclusive interview? You’d have to guess they’re heartfelt, since even when the former president grants interviews to all the national outlets, the questions are typically soft as the Snuggle bear.

MRC's Scott Whitlock provided the transcript and noted the interview segment lasted eight minutes and 57 seconds. The ABC graphic during the interview was "Bill Clinton One on One: On the War And His Mission." Sawyer’s first question was on Iraq. She included the note that generals Peter Pace and Raymond Odierno are seeing some progress in Iraq as she introduced her taped interview:

Sawyer: "Mr. President, so good to have you with us this morning. Thank you. If you were still president and these were your generals, these were your generals, saying give me more time, would you give them more time?"

Former President Bill Clinton: "I think the problem is, first of all, I think there is some evidence that changes from day to day. But while the violence is going up in many places, where we have more soldiers and where the Iraqis are fighting the outside insurgents like the al Qaeda insurgents in the Sunni areas, we've had some evidence of progress. The point is, that there is no military victory here. And there is no evidence that, whether we have a good or bad day in a particular community or region in Iraq, that we have either the political reconciliation process within the country working or any diplomatic process that's got a chance to help with the neighbors. That, it seems to me, is the larger point."

Sawyer: "So there's nothing General Petraeus could be saying in September that would convince you of anything, but start pulling the troops out?"

Clinton: "Well, I believe that General Petraeus is a very able man. And I don't have any doubt that they'll win some battles. And I hope this works. I think every American hopes this works. But it can't work beyond winning a few battles. It has to, it has to be accompanied by, and he has a few weeks, the Iraqis have a few weeks to do it, it has to be accompanied by progress on the political front. The President has weathered the challenge in the Senate because of the filibuster. As long as he can hold more than 40 senators, he can stop the Senate from voting for a change in course. But in the end, September will come, and it won't be long."

Next, Sawyer turned to the Elizabeth Edwards comments to Salon.com, and to her credit, Sawyer didn’t clip the harsher line about Hillary behaving "as a man" by avoiding "women’s issues." (A Kate Snow story on the ABC web site edited out that line, though.) Sawyer read the line, and then only asked vaguely for a response. It wasn’t designed to ruffle his feathers.

Sawyer: "A very quick question about some political news this morning and then I want to turn to the important work in Africa. As you know, the wife of Senator John Edwards, Elizabeth Edwards, has said of Senator Clinton, ‘I'm not convinced she'd be as good an advocate for women,’ meaning as Senator Edwards would be, and says, ‘Sometimes you feel you have to behave as a man and not talk about women's issues. I'm sympathetic. She wants to be commander in chief.’ Do you have a response to her?"

Clinton: "No. You know, I like Elizabeth Edwards and I admire the struggle she's going through and I admire the fact that she's supporting her husband. She ought to be. But the thing I like about this presidential race is I don't have to be against any of these candidates. I like them all. But if you look at the record on women's issues, I defy you to find anybody who has run for office in recent history whose got a longer history of working for women, for families and children, than Hillary does. I'm proud of Hillary's record and her lifetime commitment and I don't think she's trying to be a man. I don't think it's inconsistent with being a woman that you can also be knowledgeable on military and security affairs and be strong when the occasion demands it. That’s– I don't consider that being manly. I consider that being a leader."

When Sawyer turned to AIDS in Africa, the typical pattern kicked in: Slick Willie get to start a lecture that goes on and on before a follow-up emerged. His first AIDS answer lasted a minute and forty seconds before they hit the edit button.

Sawyer: "All right. I do want to turn to Africa now. You were, I believe, the first American president ever to go to South Africa and I know for the past five years as part of the foundation you've been going every single year. Two million Africans died of AIDS last year. Is there a benchmark you can give Americans for when you think the tide can turn if enough is done?"

Clinton: "Yes. I think, when we have– I think there are two benchmarks. When we have the number of new infections going down, and when we are well over two thirds of all those who need treatment are getting it. And the reason I use two thirds is this: An enormous percentage of Africans who are HIV positive don't know they're HIV positive until they get sick. The more people we treat, the more people are willing to be tested, because they're aware of the disease, they see there is no stigma then. They know they'll live if they turn out to be HIV positive because they'll get treatment. As soon as that happens, you'll see responsible activity going up and the number of new infections going down. We now have, just in my foundation, in Africa, India, China, the Caribbean, the whole Asia, rest of Asia, we have about 750,000 people getting treatment off our contracts. And there are probably two thirds more, that is, that's about a third of those in the world getting treatment and there are about two thirds more getting treatment from the United States program, the global fund on HTB and malaria and other smaller endeavors around the world. So we've really ramped up the number of people getting treatment to about, I suppose there are about 2.2 million people, two and a quarter this year getting treatment, maybe a little more.. But I think, by the end of the year, there will be more than three million people on treatment and more and more children."

Sawyer: "The Bush administration has tied some of its funding to abstinence education. Is that a good thing or not?"

Clinton: "I think it shouldn't be mandatory. I think that abstinence plus is a good strategy and several African countries have used it to good effect. I think abstinence only is a loser in a country where either the culture is against it or where the AIDS infection rate is already so high. But I think– I have no problem. I think abstinence should be a part of the strategy, particularly when you're dealing with younger kids."

Sawyer: "As you know, a lot of Americans still ask a question, and it's a good threshold question, which is why Africa? There's so much work that needs to be done here in America."

Clinton: "I think that it's not an either/or question. I believe that we've learned in Iraq and I think we've learned in Afghanistan and I believe, ironically, we're learning in Africa from the successes. A recent international poll showed that, while opinion of America is down almost everywhere in the world, it's up in all the African countries where we have a heavy presence working on AIDS and malaria and development. It's much cheaper than defense, spending money here, and it builds a world with more partners and fewer enemies, which is important. That doesn't mean we shouldn't be working on poverty and health care and economic inequality and education in the United States. But this is a very tiny percentage of our overall budget, and so it would be good for us to do. It's also the morally right thing to do, to try to help these children grow up and have their lives. But I can tell you that it's a very good investment for America, and it's a tiny percentage of the federal government's overall funding. Americans spend much less on this kind of foreign assistance than most people know and it's much more effective than most people know."

Sawyer: "Again, Mr. President, thanks so much for being with us on this busy morning. Thank you."

Clinton: "Thank you, Diane."

Clinton’s answers – especially his deft touch on trash-talking cancer sufferer Elizabeth Edwards – are smooth. But Clinton’s smoothness has always been much enhanced by liberal interviewers who are extremely hesitant to interrupt and appalled at the notion of throwing him a high fastball. Any major-league pitch can draw one of those Fox News Sunday temper tantrums. Sawyer even concluded on a note that would make Clinton look humble:

Sawyer: "And a small foot note. As the President was leaving, I asked about the much-reported moment of mistaken identity when a couple of women saw him in the July 4th parade, started screaming excitedly and said, ‘It’s Bob Barker.’ Here is what he said."

Clinton: "I heard about that. I don't know if it's true or not. But I'll take it. Whatever it is. As long as they're screaming, that's good. At my age, any scream is a good scream. [Laughs]"

Sawyer: "A footnote from the campaign trail, Robin."

Robin Roberts: "Any scream is a good scream."

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Obama won't like this. It's

Obama won't like this. It's his job to save continents. There's going to be a fight between saviors coming up.  

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Scream, Baby, Scream

Clinton: Any scream is a good scream.

Was Kathleen Willy a good screamer, Billy?

I'm tired of this b*****d getting softball interviews. Why bother? The only thing Billy is doing to prevent aids in Africa is testing condoms on the women there.

"Yep! No defects. This one works. Give me another!"

..or Jaunita Broderick?

..or Jaunita Broderick?

The Clinton Brigade can't

The Clinton Brigade can't go away soon enough for me.

Despciable walking filth...that is all they have ever been to this nation...ever.

Bimbo eruptions

Since Hillary handled the Bimbo Eruptions for Bill, is Bill handling the Bimbo Eruptions for Hillary?

 

Our real problem, then, is not our strength today; it is rather the vital necessity of action today to ensure our strength tomorrow. Dwight Eisenhower

Yeah, yeah, more media

Yeah, yeah, more media apple-polishing for Clinton. They'll always love him, which is why Hillary's spouse will whip Edwards' spouse in any confrontation. AIDS in Africa isn't a laughing matter, least of all to Africans, so I hope Mr. Clinton's foundation is doing even half as much as he says it is.

But I can't pass up the idea of a politician's humanitarian foundation distributing fertilizer. I presume Mr. Clinton has an endless supply.

His left-overs

The fertilizer is his left-overs from his last campaign and speaking tours.

 

Our real problem, then, is not our strength today; it is rather the vital necessity of action today to ensure our strength tomorrow. Dwight Eisenhower

Heres the problem

Here is the sad truth about all of this, as I read in an article about a year or so ago about how 92% of the American People form their opinions from MSM crap like this and is responsible for a lot of the following:

1. About 90% of minorities will always support liberal democrats even if they burned a cross in their yards (as many of them probably did) because of the way the MSM portrays them as something for nothing fairies

2. About 70% of women will continue to support liberal democrats because they are portrayed by the MSM as kinder gentler princes and princesses while they portray Conservatives as non-caring Scrooges.

3. About 90% of poor people will support liberals because........see #1.

4. These wonderful, so-called swing voters will usually swing left because they are to lazy to get hard information and make their own decisions and TV and movies are easy.

5. It is an outright miracle that ANY Conservative can ever be elected to office. 

The saddest part of all is that less than 3% of the public are like us, so-called political junkies and on forums like this, we are preaching to the choir. That is the biggest reason that we should "go to war" if these idiots attempt any moves towards talk radio.   

“The saddest part of all

“The saddest part of all is that less than 3% of the public are like us, so-called political junkies and on forums like this, we are preaching to the choir.”

I disagree cvgbuckeye.

There are three people in my family alone, who have moved their political philosophy from liberal to conservative, including myself. Preach on Brother!

I can't quote them

I can't quote them directly, but Bob Geldof said that George Bush has done more for Africa than any president before him, and Bush has pledged $15 billion (!) to fight AIDS in Africa...wonder which sergeant-majors of the third world will get their hands on that largess, huh?....however, it doesn't matter what Bush does, you won't see the pandering and suck-up interviews by the MSM with him. 

  Bill Clinton: Level III sex offender, life-long woman abuser and user.  Traitor bastard.  "Glorious Leader" to the hypocritical N.O.W. and America-last crowd.  The patronizing is sickening!  Bobblehead Diane~ pog ma thoin!  You are such a joke!

Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar. 

Wow!

It's amazing!  Bill Clinton saves a continent?  How can it be?  He had eight whole years in the White House with Hillary and Gore by his side, and he didn't save anything (except for a few FBI files).

I think the best thing we can do for the world is to keep Clintons out of the WH and let them move directly to save the world!

Jury duty

Could the fawning be anymore obvious? This is the same Dianne Sawyer who was hurt by jurors KNOWING that journalists of full of crap.


Saddam Hussein and terrorism. The rest of the story...

http://www.regimeoft...

 

Flattery : The Jack Daniels of MSM Interviewers

The math on these Diane Sawyer interviews is real simple ...

Proverbs 28:4

They that forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them.

Proverbs 28:23

He that rebuketh a man afterwards shall find more favor than he that flattereth with the tongue.

Psalms 36:2-4

(2) For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful.

(3) The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good.

(4) He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil.

 

They that have forsaken truth and integrity will flatter the wicked - the corrupt.

Gideonmjames - try your prosthelyzing on another site.

We don't really care for it here, in general.  The need to comment using Biblical cites that actually don't reflect anything in your own words is a waste of space, particularly when the quotes are only presented to get some Bible into the discussion.

We've had a lot of people come here with the mistaken idea that your technique is actually commentary.

It isn't.

Thanks in advance.

ACA

...

Quoted from:  'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)

Clinton as President, on the issue...

I lump a few items together here, because the MSM is so passionate about issues in Africa - and the MSM is so passionately politically hypocritical. 

Always missed in the media is the all too easy historical evidence, readily available, with which to start the questioning of Bill Clinton with, on the subject of Africa, and Africa and Aids. Naturally enough, seeing as Clinton is a Democrat - the opportunity is always skipped.One would think that they'd (the MSM) would never forgive him for running interference which cemented inaction from the UN in doing anything to prevent the 90 day genocide of some 800,000 humans in Rwanda.  Lack of Imagination and The Taylor Report offer much insight. Had a Bush or Reagan been the sitting pres., the MSM would have dragged them through the annals of historical glowing red-hot coals.Of course the civil war and genocide in neighboring Congo, while Clinton was the sitting "internationalist President) not only was missed by Clinton and the media as it occurred (estimates say 3.5 million + died in the late 90's), but it is still missed by the media and their intellectual elitists Pulitzer prize winning revisionists, like James Traub of the NY Times:

From 1997 through 2000, the world was largely at peace, none of the horrific civil wars in the Third World rose to genocidal proportions, and the White House was occupied by an internationalist Democrat. Then, in rapid succession, a unilaterally-minded Republican took office, 9/11 shattered the interval of peace..

Oh, make me gag. And then there was Bill Clinton and Hiv/Aids in Africa.. and then there was President Bush and Hiv/Aids in Africa (shh).  Richared Gere noticed, and he called Clinton to task. Clinton, as is usually the case, had a boyish tantrum and trashed Gere, and the media was all too pleased to cover for Clinton. Perhaps no one said it better than

Interestingly enough, often we must go to the far left media - those, unlike the MSM which is looking out only for it's candidates (D's), is committed to their causes and even hold the D's to account .

"By the end of 2000, as Clinton was packing up, 25 million people in sub-Saharan Africa were estimated to be infected with AIDS, and six to seven thousand were dying daily from it. Clinton had raised the U.S. government’s global AIDS budget to $340 million. But the United Nations was then calculating that a program designed to prevent and treat AIDS in Africa would cost $3 billion a year... " A cynical guess at Clinton's motivations: AIDS in Africa, it doesn’t poll well.” From: Too little, too late - How many times is Bill Clinton going to apologize to Africa? 07.22.02. Also published here: Clinton Pardon Me, Africa 

Last I heard, President Bush proposed, got passed and funded and delivered some $15 billion in the effort over the past 5 years, and now has requested that congress double it. This chart is a bit old, but it puts in perspective how addressing the problem in Africa took off after Clinton left the white house.

One has to hope that  Diane Sawyer either does not read or can find some other defense for her ignorance  exhibited here again in her role as a journalist. Or, is she aware, and this is all just bias - simple and plain?  Perhaps this could jog her memory. We all know how the media just loves to use entertainers in their effort to push an agenda - unless, of course, the very same entertainers with wich they share so very much with, speak their mind (my bold):

Bob Geldof [of Live 8 fame]: “ America doesn't have a lack of empathy; they just don't know the issues as well. Actually, today I had to defend the Bush Administration in France again. They refuse to accept, because of their political ideology, that he [Bush] has actually done more than any American President for Africa. But it's empirically so”. Or Geldof’s earlier comments: "Clinton talked the talk and did diddly squat, whereas Bush doesn't talk but does deliver," and, "You'll think I'm off my trolley when I say this, but the Bush administration is the most radical, in a positive sense, in the approach to Africa since Kennedy..."

Why, Ms. Sawyer, do you not start an interview off with that quote on-screen? "How do you respond to all of these claims that you looked the other way, Mr. Clinton?"

And Ms. Sawyer, get off of the tired and run-down complaint that some measly 7% of this massive historic international effort by the Bush administration is being spent on abstinence related efforts in combating HIV/Aids. The 7% is now more than the Clinton administration was spending in total. The governments in Africa are reporting that it is very successful. And even Bill Clinton, after stumbling over Sawyer's leading question, had no problem in it's benefit, saying, "But I think– I have no problem. I think abstinence should be a part of the strategy, particularly when you're dealing with younger kids."

Malaria spending - in Africa? Well, not today, Diane, but I can assure you, if you learn how to read, you might find out that ole GW Bush broke new ground here in funding (Yup - that old $billions number pops up again) efforts to tackle Malaria in Africa. Wonder what Bill Clinton was doing during the 90's?

sorry it's so long Tim  - just gets under my skin. (;~> gary

 Thank Goodness you can

 Thank Goodness you can post cogent, accurate and intellectually stimulating material.  I said my usual 3 paragraph diatribe and obnoxious insults about this same thing a few minutes ago.  Quite the contrast!  Thank you! 

Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar. 

I'm with kath on her post

I'm with kath on her post here Gary...

Heck I couldn't even fill a paragraph....I get too angry with the hypocrisy from these creatures.

Patience is a virtue, when it comes to the two fer one team, throw in the fawning leftist msm... I have absolutely zilch.

Miss Irish

Well, thank you. You should understand, that at first I was so teed that all I could come up with was 4 letter words. Hey, it's Friday - a little splash of brandy in my coffee, and I settled right down. (kidding of course - I reserve that for Sun.) Actually you made the exact point, and correctly. I just added some background info. for you. (;~> gh

Nice post Gary, as usual. I'm confused about Clinton's charity.

Wasn't Clinton's foundation (or whatever it is) not actually putting any money into Africa?

I was under the impression that he ran around taking credit for other people putting money into Africa and that his foundation did not actually spend one cent directly in aid (pun intended).

The guy is so beefed up by the MSM its hard to tell when they are lying or he is lying.

:-)

ACA 

...

Quoted from:  'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)

ACA

I'll have to dig a bit to get specifics there, but I'd be willing to play for the moment with the usual MSM accepted excuse for Clinton on this issue. Background here, is that they all know, in their view (those issues usually more associated with the left's good charitable side), and are troubled by that Clinton dropped the ball during his tenure. Many on the far left, as I noted, were really pissed off at him during his tenure for, in their view, not being a full blown socialist and GW freak.

Note: The MSM is a different animal than the far leftist media. While the far leftist media may have forgotten how much they hated Bill Clinton (they really did - of course, they hate Bush even more) now since Bush is in, they just moved up to a new level of hate. The MSM really never let on that they didn't like that Clinton was not playing enough of the left field. The far left wants something left of Dennis Kucinich and the MSM simply only really cares about keeping Democrats in power - that is the big ticket. 

Besides, it's difficult to imagine that Clinton's charity is not driven by personal self fulfiling greed. "I" is the word.

Now, they all know all of this about Clinton, but prefer to keep it to themselves. It's not about the issues they care about as much as it is in keeping the faith. the faith is nothing more than the Democrat Party.  In the moment - since he left office - Clinton is doing a lot to promote what they care about. President Bush, as President, is doing many times more than what Clinton did as Pres., or since. None of this matters. It's all about the MSM's party, the Democrats.   

 

Couldn't immediately find

Couldn't immediately find an audit of the Clinton Foundation.

However, in October, 2006, the Clinton Foundation was the biggest contributor to Madonna's questionable African charity.  (Questionable because it appears to only be a front for her Kabbalah Center.)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,221971,00.html

And - yes, it's wonderful to plant trees.  Must we do so instead of actually cutting carbon emissions?  In any event, the Clinton Foundation is helping a Scottish billionaire acquire carbon credits and assuage his environmental guilt by planting trees in Africa.

http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=906422007

 

Great work Gary Hall. I

Great work Gary Hall.

I believe that's what they call journalism.  Are we ever going to get to ask questions for a Presidential debate?  I would think we'd be a better selection pool than taking questions fitlered by CNN editors to Chrissy Mathews!?  The stuff is just so bad in quality and so blatently obvious in bias, it's literally stunning, ridiculous, humurous and scary all at the same time...because there are still so many people that digest MSM nuggets daily, it's nearly impossible for us to combat all of the slop being fired.

It's like a war of attrition, and their lies are the combatants.  As long as they can keep supplying them in overwhelming force, a high-percentage will saturate their target. 

 

No military solution

What Clinton said is partly correct, there is no military solution. But the plan has always been for the military to provide security so that a political solution can take root. The military isn't the entire solution, but it's a necessary first step. The political phase can't succeed unless they have enough security to sustain it. The "surge" has always been a two-part strategy: General Petraeus establishes security and Ambassador Crocker facilitates the political negotiation. Neither can succeed without the other.

The political problem is obvious. Warring factions are too busy settling old scores to look to the future. Skeptics will assure us that there's no way we can get them to forget their vedettas. But we have a powerful ace in the hole: they have a fortune in oil. If they hammer out a reasonable working agreement, they can all be rich. The terrorists know that, and that's why they're doing everything possible to distract Iraqis from any agreement. And, in turn, that's why the media needs to stop highlighting violence.

It's a classic case of self-fulfilling prophecies. If you focus on the negative, you'll prevent an agreement from happening. If you focus on the positive, everyone gets rich. Our media focuses on the negative, for the narrow purposes of helping Democrats -- because like Milton's devil, they'd rather rule in hell than serve in heaven.

Quit making sense.  It

Quit making sense.  It really confuses the Libs...

Same Bill Clinton who had over a Million African Dead

Is not this the same Bill Clinton who left various genocide slaughters go on in Africa where over a million Africans were dead?

Couple that with the known chemical weapons Saddam provided the Muslims of Saddam which are still wiping out the Christians in Darfur........well I guess ABC has a short memory.

Sort of like forgetting Clinton's Kosovo War is still going on needing American troops and that little matter of Wes and Bill blowing up babies there.

Bill keeps a million Africans alive so his drug company allies can profit off of the pills, but looses a million Africans to genocide. Guess in communist terms that is all good and it all evens out.

 

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

lame cherry

You noted: "Is not this the same Bill Clinton who left various genocide slaughters go on in Africa where over a million Africans were dead."

The "over a million," is probably actually more like 5-6 million, unless we also add in the millions who were dying in Africa from HIV/Aids during his tenure. 

While the media has ignored and subsequently silently forgiven Clinton for all of his lack of leadership in these areas, seldom do they miss the opportunity to go all the way back to Ronald Reagan and remind us of how much they despise him for not talking publically about Aids during the years in which it was becoming understood.

I quote yet again. May 28, 2003:

"You'll think I'm off my trolley when I say this, but the Bush administration is the most radical - in a positive sense - in its approach to Africa since Kennedy," [Bob] Geldof told the Guardian.

[..]

Former president Bill Clinton had not helped Africa much, despite his high-profile visits and apparent empathy with the downtrodden, the organiser of Live Aid, claimed. "Clinton was a good guy, but he did fuck all."

 

The way the media continues

The way the media continues to fellate Bill is disgusting.

I bet he's shooting for a Nobel and these lackeys are doing all they can to give him exposure.

In the photograph, poor

In the photograph, poor Sawyer looks absolutely orgasmic "interviewing" Boy Clinton.  For some reason, she never appears to be so in love when speaking with Republicans unless she's speaking to "Republicans" like Chuck Hagel (RINO, France) or maybe a "conservative" like Andrew Sullivan.

Bill's face in the picture,

Bill's face in the picture, meanwhile, reminds me of PeeWee Herman - can't you just hear the "HA-ha!"?

Well atleast she didn't

Well atleast she didn't hand him a check like KO...of course she wasn't in the same room so she may have if she was.

Man the MSM isn't even pretending anymore the bias for Dems and against Republicans is so clear a blind man could see it and a deaf man could hear it...if Hill get's elected it's going to be impossible to watch any news and after she get's the "fairness doctrine" invoked again it'll be almost impossible to get any other news that doesn't praise her...it's going to be a rough 4 years folks.

 

*Sheehan-vs-Pelosi*
"This could get ugly"

Clinton Foundation Doing Great Things

Conservatives complain a lot about taxes and govt solutions to problem having to go into their wallet to forciably take money from people to pay for programs. Now here we have a private philanthropic foundation that is funded voluntarily and is tackling major problems in the world. Conservatives and liberals alike should rally behind the Clinton Global Initiative. With successes of private foundations and philantrophy comes less of a need for govt spending and taxes.