Stephanopoulos Attacks Media Bias Against Hillary

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
By Scott Whitlock | February 27, 2008 - 13:37 ET

"Good Morning America" host Diane Sawyer and ABC's George Stephanopoulos, a former top aide to Bill Clinton, discussed media bias on Wednesday's show. The topic, however, wasn't liberal spin. Instead, Sawyer wondered if "the media is, in general, easier on Barack Obama than they are on [Hillary Clinton]?"

After playing a clip of a February 23 "Saturday Night Live" sketch that mocked reporters for gushing over Senator Obama, Stephanopoulos came to the aid of the wife of his former boss, "I do think, though, Senator Clinton has a point. She's being treated like the front-runner, even though she's... the underdog in this race right now." Of course, while Sawyer and Stephanopoulos worried about unfairness to the former first lady, it should be pointed out, this is the same program that in early 2007 described the Clinton/Obama race as one between "hot factor" and "fluid poetry."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The "This Week" host ignored a key point in his analysis. Hillary Clinton has lost 11 straight primaries. What would have been the media's reaction if Obama had done the same thing? Would they still be seriously discussing his candidacy or would the race be dismissed as over? One could argue that journalists have kept Clinton in the race.

On another subject, Stephanopoulos went on to deride Republican presidential candidate John McCain for having a speaker introduce him who mentioned that Barack Obama's middle name is Hussein. Even though the Arizona senator apologized for radio talk show host Bill Cunningham's comments, which occurred at a rally in Cincinnati, Ohio on Tuesday, Stephanopoulos chided, "The McCain campaign, I think, did make a mistake, did fall down on the job by not vetting that introductory speaker before hand."

In a contrast, although "Good Morning America" found time to lecture McCain about his supporters, the program never mentioned the controversy, covered in NewsBusters, of a paid Obama staffer whose Texas office featured a Cuban flag superimposed with the image of murderous communist leader Che Guevara. Stephanopoulos, apparently, had nothing to say on the vetting of that particular employee.

A transcript of the February 27 segment, which aired at 7:05am, follows:

DIANE SAWYER: Let's see what George Stephanopoulos has to say. It's time for the bottom line. He's, of course, as you know, host of "This Week." And, George, good morning to you.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Hey, Diane.

SAWYER: I just want to first point out what a difference 20 debates and ten months can make. 'Cause I want to look at the very first debate and the numbers going in. At that time, ten months ago, Senator Clinton led Senator Obama, 49 to 17. As of last night, it had flipped and as of last night [sic], Senator Obama led Senator Clinton, 54 to 38. Did anything happen last night that started her closing that again?

STEPHANOPOULOS: I don't think so, Diane. When you're behind by as much as Senator Clinton is right now, when you're up against an opponent who has all the momentum, you have to strike a knockout blow. And she didn't. I think she was, as Jake pointed out, forceful last night. She pressed Barack Obama on several points. But he parried them very well. He's become a much better debater over the course of these 20 debates. And I think the impression by the end of the debate is, actually, on many issues, these candidates agree. They both agree that we should be pulling out of Iraq. They both would renegotiate the North American Free Trade agreement. Even on health care, they both say they're committed to universal care and the differences often just seem like just details.

SAWYER: Let's talk a little bit about something she raised last night. And, in fact, it was a joke skit on "Saturday Night Live," the whole question of fairness by the media and whether the media is, in general, easier on Barack Obama than they are on her? I'm going to play a little of "Saturday Night Live" and then what she said last night again.

SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON: Well, can I just point out, that in the last several debates, I seem to get the first question all the time. And I don't mind. You know, I'll be happy to field them. But I do find it curious, and if anybody saw "Saturday Night Live," you know, maybe we should ask Barack if he's comfortable and needs another pillow.

["Saturday Night Live" clip]

SNL ACTOR: Senator Obama. Are you comfortable? Is there anything we can get to you?

SNL "BARACK OBAMA:" No, thank you. I'm fine.

SAWYER: So what about this, George? In all seriousness.

STEPHANOPOULOS: It wasn't quite "Saturday Night Live" last night. I do think, though, Senator Clinton has a point. She's being treated like the front-runner, even though she's still is, as Jake pointed out, she's the underdog in this race right now. Now, that doesn't mean it makes sense to complain about it. You never get helped in a debate by complaining about the referee, but I do think she has a point.

SAWYER: All right, I want to turn now, if I can, before we leave you, to the Republicans and Senator John McCain and his carefully, cleverly-crafted detente with the conservatives, seemed to have been hit by a land mine yesterday. As we know, Bill Cunningham, who is a conservative talk show host, introduced him and didn't say things that McCain agreed with. McCain ended up apologizing. There was an eruption. Let's just hear Cunningham and McCain.

BILL CUNNINGHAM (Host, "The Big Show with Bill Cunningham"): Well, my fellow Americans, now we have a hack-Chicago-style Daley politician who is picturing himself as change. When he gets done with you, all you'll have in your pocket is change. It's going to be Barack Hussein Obama's wonderful life, a year from today. It's about February the 26, 2009. Barack Obama is in the White House.

SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN: I will take responsibility and any offense that was inflicted, I apologize for --

STEPHANOPOULOS: This is only the beginning, Diane. We're going to see, I think, a lot more of this. The McCain campaign, I think, did make a mistake, did fall down on the job by not vetting that introductory speaker before hand. That kind of stuff though is going to go on behind the scenes all year long. We've already seen these e-mails all year long talking about Barack Hussein Obama. And I would expect actually that you're going to see a lot of people picking up on the moment in the debate last night. Barack Obama finally denounced and rejected that support from Louis Farrakhan. But I think you'll see more dialogue in the coming days in the general election about Louis Farrakhan, about Barack Obama's minister and he'll have to beat that back.

SAWYER: Okay, thanks to you, George. And, of course we'll also be watching to see if there was an irreparable breach with what happened when McCain apologized for the words of the conservative talk show host.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm surprised it has taken this long

for stephie to get in the tank with hillbilly - is there a backroom deal being brokered for another job in the clinton inc. admin??

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Stephy and Bias

Isn't it amusing that the MSM is heatedly talking about bias regarding two DEMOCRAT candidates, but when we stand up and point out their blatant bias towards republicans, we're crazy and just imagining it. Funny that.

 

Very true

"not vetting that introductory speaker before hand."

Why does Bill Clinton come to mind here? Bias? What bias?

 

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

Who knew?

Is George in competiton with Socks to be the Clintons favorite pet?Like Ya George the media is bias.Most msm journalist cant spell integrity let alone have it.So your eating your own.Cool keep up the good work.Just remember to practice your gushing for Dem candidates.

For 16 years, these people

For 16 years, these people have been the benefactors of shamelessly biased MSM coverage, in their favor of course.

They have been gleeful at the outright and blatant mistreatment and biased coverage dished out against President Bush and all Conservatives, for that matter.

Now, at long last, they are recieving JUST and EVEN coverage and they construe it to be blatantly unfair. In a sense of relativity, I suppose they would be correct.

How does it feel YAAAAAAALLLLL? Goodness, how I love it.

Now, everyone is concerned that in the general election, McCain will get the same treatment as the Clintons have being up against the MSM idol, Obama. Good Lord, for the Republican to get the same treatment as the Clintons have would be a drastic improvement. We're used to it.

"I feel your pain."

For once I think Clinton is beginning to feel my pain.

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

No Liberal Bias

Scott, you nailed it right at the begining of your piece: 

"Good Morning America" host Diane Sawyer and ABC's George Stephanopoulos, a former top aide to Bill Clinton, discussed media bias on Wednesday's show. The topic, however, wasn't liberal spin.

Once again, what can we expect from these two Billery groupies.

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.” Benjamin Franklin

 

Bayshoreman

Thanks. It is hard to hear George Stephanopoulos talk about media bias against his former bosses and not snicker a little bit. So, this is what it takes for bias to be brought up on GMA? Accusations by the Hillary that the press is working against her?  

Bias

OK, George, so you as a member of the media are vocalizing upset about a bias in the media. But, by defending one candidate against the bias for another, aren't you actually expressing bias for the candidate you're defending? I'm not sure which candidate has the bias. All I know is that the media is biased. Thanks for educating us about your corrupt profession.

I do think, though, Senator

I do think, though, Senator Clinton has a point. She's being treated like the front-runner, even though she's still is, as Jake pointed out, she's the underdog in this race right now.

Simply delusional, Stephie.  If she's being treated like the front runner, it's only because she's acting like she's entitled to be the front runner.  She is routinely getting her a** handed to her in primaries, caucuses and debates, her campaign is self-destructing and they're being exposed not just for being nasty and dishonest, but also for being incompetent.  A non-complicit media would not have indulged any other campaign in this state of disrepair. You would think that the Clintonoids would learn not to repeatedly hang themselves with the endless supply of rope the media has provided them.  Unfortunately for them, they're simply not that smart.  McCain's only hope is if this Clintonoid circus somehow manages to steal the nomination in Denver...she's damaged goods.

Would they still be seriously discussing his candidacy or would the race be dismissed as over? One could argue that journalists have kept Clinton in the race.

Interesting point, Scott.  And you're not the only one who's brought that notion up...MoDo dangled the same theory out there in her column today. 

 

Awwwwww.  Georgie boy is

Awwwwww.  Georgie boy is whining that Clinton is not getting top billing or a free pass anymore from the MSM.  Awwwwww.  So what you are really saying is Obama is finally getting an equal amount of press?  Of course all the Repub candidates are just peachy with air time that cummulatively adds up to just one of the Dem candidates.  <sarcasm> 

If ABC had any ethical standards at all, they would bench Georgie boy for the duration.  How does it look for a bureau chief to be advocating for one Dem candidate over another Dem candidate?  It looks like taking sides to me, so much for neutrality or unbiased journalism.   Guess who's side Georgie boy is going to be on after the Dem nominating convention????  Yeah, right.

Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008  Long Live the Empire!  Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.

Painful

It must be searing pain for George to refer to one of his idols as the under dog. 

I'd be careful using the term

dog - when talking about the clintons, and especially "under dog".    ;)

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Fast... ROFLMAO!

Fast...

ROFLMAO!

SAWYER: Okay, thanks to

SAWYER: Okay, thanks to you, George. And, of course we'll also be watching to see if there was an irreparable breach with what happened when McCain apologized for the words of the conservative talk show host.

   Oh she wishes there's an irreparable breach because of the Cunningham speech.  Actually it worked out very well.  It was just like a typical drive-by hit piece.  Put out the inflammatory speech on the front page and then later disavow it.  McCain should get lots of people to say what needs to be said and then McCain can go ahead and oppologize.  After all, McCain is going to be treated this way by the media (i.e. the recent NYT hit piece) till the election.