ABC Continues to Grill Romney on Religion; Gushed Over Faith of Dems

Photo of Scott Whitlock.

On Monday’s "Good Morning America," guest host George Stephanopoulos pressed 2008 Republican candidate Mitt Romney over whether he will "do more to address" the issue of his Mormon faith.

This is the same ABC program that has repeatedly raised questions about whether the former Massachusetts governor’s religion could damage his ‘08 chances. In June, reporter Dan Harris speculated on how "uncomfortable questions" about Mormonism could harm the campaign.

In contrast, GMA gushed over a CNN sponsored event in June where Democratic candidates discussed their faith. An onscreen graphic wondered, "Are evangelicals embracing Democrats? New party of God?" For that segment, co-host Robin Roberts marveled, "...Senator Obama out on the campaign trail has, has freely talked about his faith." She also played an extended clip of Hillary Clinton discussing the important role faith played in her life.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Mitt Romney has received no such favorable treatment. Rather, GMA has repeatedly discussed Mormonism in relation to how it might harm his campaign or discourage Republican primary voters from supporting him. On Monday, Stephanopoulos played a clip of Romney defending himself and his church to an Iowa radio host. Diane Sawyer teased that segment by calling it, "Romney unplugged." Then, after being asked yet again about his faith and whether conservative Christians would vote for him, Romney attacked the media’s heavy focus on his faith:

Mitt Romney: "You know, I see the same polls and [sic] say a very large percent are concerned if somebody is over 70 years old or if someone’s been married more than once. And frankly, the other guys don't get asked about those questions every time they go on the air. But there seems to be an interest constantly in my faith and that's fine on the part of the American people, but I think the media has more interest than the people do."

On June 19, GMA reporter Dan Harris narrated a segment on the "uncomfortable questions" that the 2008 Iowa front-runner will face:

Harris: "There are other Mormon beliefs that may provoke uncomfortable questions for Mitt Romney. For example, Mormons believe God was once a human being. Mormons also believe in symbolically baptizing the dead, even if they're members of other religions. And, up until 1978, including a time during which Romney was prominent in the church, black people had second-class status. Mormons used to teach that blacks have dark skin due to a curse from God."

And in April, GMA co-host Robin Roberts grilled Romney about receiving campaign donations from the heavily Mormon state of Utah. Below are a sampling of her questions:

Robin Roberts: "So, where is the money coming from, Governor?"

...

Roberts: "You say the money is coming from all the states. The ‘New York Times’ this morning is reporting that 15 percent of the money raised in your campaign is coming from the state of Utah. Many speculate that it has something to do, of course, with your being a Mormon. Does your, does your religion factor in at all in your campaign and in your fund-raising?"

...

Roberts: "Many are wondering if you will do, take a page from former President Kennedy, who had addressed the nation about his Catholic upbringing. Do you anticipate, anticipate doing the same?"

"Good Morning America" has demonstrated there’s quite a contrast between how the program focuses on a Republican’s faith and that of Democrats.

A partial transcript of Romney’s August 6 exchange with Stephanopoulos follows:

7am tease

Diane Sawyer: "Mitt Romney unplugged."

[Clip from Romney interview with Iowa radio host] Mitt Romney: "I’m not running as a Mormon and I get a little tired of coming on a show like yours and having it all about Mormon. [sic]"

Sawyer: "A fired up new front-runner swinging back at questions about religion, battling fellow Republican candidates and Democrats too during ABC’s debate. Mitt Romney joins us live."

7:12am

Stephanopoulos: "You know, just before the debate this weekend, the cameras caught quite an exchange you had with an Iowa talk show host. It was during a break in his program. But the cameras caught it. He was pressing you on your Mormon faith. Let’s take a look."

Romney: "I mean, I don't like coming on the air and having you go after my church and me and–"

Radio host: "I'm not going after– I agree with your church!"

Romney: "I know. That’s right. But I’m not running as a Mormon and I get a little tired of coming on a show like yours and having it all about Mormon. [sic]"

Radio host: "See, I don’t mind it being about that."

Romney: "Yeah, I do! I do."

Radio host: "I agree with the ethics of your church, for Pete's sake."

Romney: "So do I."

Stephanopoulos: "Governor, I know this is frustrating for you. But our recent poll showed that a third of Republican primary voters are still uncomfortable with the fact that you're a Mormon, almost 40 percent of evangelical Christians. Don't you need to do more to address this?"

Romney: "Oh, possibly. You know, I see the same polls and [sic] say a very large percent are concerned if somebody is over 70 years old or if someone’s been married more than once. And frankly, the other guys don't get asked about those questions every time they go on the air. But there seems to be an interest constantly in my faith and that's fine on the part of the American people, but I think the media has more interest than the people do. And, frankly, over time, my experience has been that people in America are not going to make their choice about who should lead the country based on what church they go to, but ultimately that’s a decision they’ll have to make. As Dr. Richard Land said, he's one of the leaders in the Southern Baptist Convention, he said, ‘Look, Mitt, you're not running for Pastor in Chief.’ And that's absolutely right. I'm running to help lead this country, to make sure that it is strong, that its future is bright. I want to see us have a stronger military, a stronger economy and stronger families. That's what I'm going to fight for."

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I think ABC (and the MSM)

I think ABC (and the MSM) watch HBO's "Big Love" too much.  I wouldn't doubt they (MSM) are digging around looking for Second and Third Wives ... in addition to their children.

"...Senator Obama out on

"...Senator Obama out on the campaign trail has, has freely talked about his faith."

Funny, I've yet to hear Sen. Obama "talk freely" about his black separatist faith. 

Obama's faith

I haven't heard Obama talk about his faith either. I saw an interview with his "pastor" once. The guy was a total nutjob. All he could do was obfuscate when they asked him questions. He would respond with "Have you read the works of (insert black power writer here) ?" and would talk over the interviewer. Very fishy. And Romney has a point too. I haven't heard anyone ask McCain about polls saying they don't want an older candidate or anyone get asked about having been divorced previously.

Fundamental Misunderstanding

Democrats continue to misunderstand people of faith.  Stephanopolous believes he can drive a wedge through the Republican party with these shenanigans. He is wrong.

If Stephanopolous was doing anything other than carrying water for the Democrats, he would ask Barak Obama about is Muslim background also.

The "new party of

The "new party of God?!"

It only takes a few soundbites to impress God - that's for sure:)...

Amazing, Steppy gets to lob

Amazing, Steppy gets to lob grenades at the GOP candidates while the Dems duck Fox for being "biased".

Questions that "won't go away."

That's what's considered "fair" now. 

And those "uncomfortable questions" are the ones the media says "aren't going away." They will see to that.

Exactly mb and X.... I

Exactly mb and X....

I meant to comment earlier on the above post by x and got side-tracked.

The leftist candidates think nobody out here in real america is going to notice that they were scaredy cats go debate on Fox because of their looney leftist bases, and that it will not matter...but when it comes to crunch time it will matter, nor will it be forgotten by some of our candidates who will have a great chance to use it either in political ad's or during a debate or two.

It will be priceless and they will be the one's paying it....

JMO....LOL!

I enjoyed viewing the radio

I enjoyed viewing the radio interview (from hotair.com ), because when a candidate thinks he is off the air is when we see the true candidate. He showed real passion, something that I think he should show more often. Because the one reason I have held back on him for is because he seemed too polished. I don't want a weak knee conservative who says the right stuff to get elected, but when it comes time to do the job they don't have it in them to do the right thing. I think that is one of the reasons why people are drawn to Rudy...he is a fighter.

conversely when Obama

conversely when Obama thought he was off the air he whined about we shouldn't make an issue about his ears.

"FAITH OF THE DEMOCRAPS"

Faith, for the MSM, is now a way to catch the naive.
Does it matter faith in what? No, "faith" itself is now a
politically correct word (who, pray tell, has now sanctified it as
CORRECT?)

Faith in gay rights, faith in abortion, what other faiths are now politically correct?

Oops,
I forgot, faith in euthanasia, faith in mercy killing of the
"comatose". The list goes on and on, and the listing of the ship
of State of the US drifts further and further left.

judahbenheard.com

 

Not
a Democrap or a lip-brawl, mostly a conserve-a-tiff. Famous words of
elderly from movie "Moonstruck: "Somebody tell a joke" .

Boy, you had me convinced

Boy, you had me convinced at "democraps." If there's one thing that convinces me of the credibility of a post, it's the use of such a..."clever" piece of lingo.

bal, your posts often remind me

bal, your posts often remind me of a little boy on a family vacation, who, when presented with an interesting scene, focuses on the little ants at his feet.....

"Democraps"? Come on. That's

"Democraps"? Come on. That's lame. I'm supposed to look past that? We need more interesting insults than that; it's like the guy isn't even trying.

and besides, democrat is

and besides, democrat is insulting enough :)

Exactly!

Exactly! Wait..what?

:-)

I know I'm the minority here, but it would just be nice to not have to read posts with this junk in them. The guy probably has a good point. I wouldn't know, though, because I have a hard time getting past the garbage up front.

Getting scary

Exactly! Wait..what?

bal -

I was this close l<->l to posting the same thing ... heh-heh-heh!

agreed.

agreed.

balboa

"Democraps"? Come on. That's lame. I'm supposed to look past that? We need more interesting insults than that; it's like the guy isn't even trying.

You really don't mean to challenge us to post interesting insults do ya?

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.

 

Nice try, balboa

Following your usual format, in  your response to me you nit-pick and avoid the main points being made.

Just a little boy, looking at the ants......

That's because my post has

That's because my post has NOTHING to do with what the guy said. It's about his lame-o use of "democraps." Like I said, I didn't even read the rest of the post.

If I started every post saying "Typical Re-Puke-icans," you'd think it was lame, too. 

I'll side

I'll side with bal here:)!

Let's see if we can rise above the democraps and libotards with our verbage...

bal's right, it really is beneath us:)

Well, you might have an argument, TM, if...

Well, if "looking at the ants" was an occasional thing for bal, you might have an argument, TM, but as I said below he makes a habit of it.  

And that would make my opinion of you different how?

And that would make my opinion of you different how? (kidding)

Come on, bal you're too intelligent to not know exactly what I'm talking about.  Your style often (not always, but often) regresses to a series of nit-picking non-consequential items and avoiding the main points being made by the posters.   Because of your "nice-guy" facade, you get away with your trollish misdirection, but don't imagine ot's not noticed.  In fact, just  a short time ago, BT called you out for exactly the same thing.

I know what you're talking

I know what you're talking about, and I admit to focusing on the little things sometimes, but then sometimes those are the things that interest me.

And what's wrong with objecting to "democraps"? It's not the point, sure, but that doesn't mean we can't discuss it as well. I don't think the guys "larger" point will get lost.

And what's wrong with me calling you on it?

"And what's wrong with...."

And what's wrong with me calling you on it when you do?  ;^>

As for the larger point not getting lost, it's more usual that a point DOES get "lost" in these asides.  That's a classic reason for threads being derailed.  This is the 15th post since his post, and nothing about his point....

The original point: that

The original point: that the MSM now sees "faith" as a good thing, as long as it's "faith" in what you see as their pet movements.

Of course, I disagree because I don't think there's an underlying secret motive by the MSM. I know, crazy talk. I think the MSM treats faith on the right and left differently, sure. But I don't think it's because they want to subvert Republicans.

Romney has finally had

Romney has finally had enough...

...and ENOUGH is ENOUGH....

I am disgusted by these despicable people that just do not let up with the hypocrisy when it comes to religion depending on the candidate and the party affiliation...it never ends.

Stick a fork in it already!

Amen to that, bt!!

Amen to that, bt!! I am sick of the media ooohing and aaahing when Dems talk about the influence of their faith on their actions, but seeing a theocracy around the corner whenever a conservative does the same.

bt... This brings to

bt...

This brings to mind one of my pet peves.

I want to scream everytime I hear someone say "I'm not religious, but I am very spiritual". Aaaaaargh! 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

I'm with ya on that too

I'm with ya on that too Ct...

It do get old.

Romney finally had his fill...I personally do not know he lasted so long, I also hope he doesn't back down now  because of all the msm critique, this is where I have seen people with an 'R' behind their names make huge mistakes IMO. 

I only wish that the

I only wish that the debators had risen to the opportunity to kick little Steffi repeatedly in the debate.  Or, actually, in any other venue in which they can kick his liberal trollish "SMILE" back to wherever it was he started from.

Rudy did it during the debate (I mistakenly posted earlier that it was against Steffi...but it was against the other lib questioner).

When these little libtards continue to push their smarmy agenda (regardless of the venue)...it's incumbent (great word...yes? for someone who desires to become CIC?) upon all to shove their liberal idiocy back in their faces.

Besides which, what gave Steffi the right to argue with candidates during the debate?  Who the heck does he think he is?

Every time one of these liberal hacks pushes their agenda....our guys need to toss it back in spades....deliver major put downs, with great style, and make these libs look like the wussies they truly are.

Spine.  I'm looking for lots of spine in my candidate.  And stuffing these dem tools back in the holes from which they've crawled is a great starting point.

 

Blonde... I feel strongly

Blonde...

I feel strongly that once Fred get's in the race you will see a conservative push back for a change. I for one cannot wait! 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

Thompson/Hunter 08~

Thompson/Hunter 08~

Hoping so,

Hoping so, Clear.

Although I'm beginning to suspect that Fred believes he's not quite ready for prime time.

Hence the late entry into the race.  I'm also thinking this is a good strategy on his part....not to have to mix it up with nine others.

Time will tell.  But as I stated earlier, after seeing yesterday's debate....I am warm and fuzzy with almost all of these guys.  I'm beginning to think that only Mitt & Rudy have the charisma (of those in it so far...I think Fred has it too) to take it all the way...but I'm really pleased with all of the "second tier" guys.  Any one of them would make a fine V.P. if the "top tier" loser doesn't want to do it.

 

Blonde... For some

Blonde...

For some strange reason I followed Fred's campaign when he ran in TN. Which doesn't make a lot of sense considering I don't live in his state!? Anyway, he ran an incredible campaign, the best I've ever seen.

Everything will get real fun once he throws his hat in the ring. You won't be disappointed!

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

Ct... ...and he will

Ct...

...and he will again.

He knows very well what he is doing waiting after summer vacation and school back in, let alone financial reasoning. ...more attention will be given after labor Day as it used to be in most all political campaigning.

Smart if you ask me.

Clear, That's

Clear,

That's interesting.  From what I've read...his campaign was brilliant.  But, it was in Tennessee after all (no offense to those of you who live there is meant).

By that I mean it's a state where grassroots style campaigning is still the n'est plus ultra way to get elected.  In a big state, like mine (Fla)....it's going to take a big degree of shrewd and a huge amount of media savvy.

I began to suspect Fred's strategy after the 4th of July....and watching the debate yesterday (see my comments on TP's Forum) I've become convinced he's waiting until the most of the second tier drops out.  Fred's running second in most polls without having declared.  And really, what is the point of trying to deconflict his message with nine others in the field?

He's waiting until it's Mitt & Rudy....and maybe Hunter & Tancredo (McCain is well and truly finished, IMO).

My concern is that the media is already gunning for Fred (point...news lately that his wife is running his campaign....so what?  That was her profession after all).  Any press is better than no press at all, yes?

I think by the time we get to South Carolina and the rest of the meat in the election process....we'll have three lions from which to choose....and at this point, I'm rather pleased with Mitt, Rudy, and Fred.  Any combination, I think, is electable. 

What I think we should do, as good conservatives, is work tirelessly to remove the deadwood from the House and the Senate....I know I'm going to spend a bit of green on defeating my RINO senator Mel Martinez.  As well as the space-faring Dem, Nelson.

Anyone who supported the illegal invasion legislation needs to be tossed out without a thank-you-very-much!

Interesting times ahead, if we pay attention.

 

More context on Romney's radio interview

For added context, here's what WHO Radio host Jan Mickelson (pronounced like "Michael-son") has written about his interview with Romney. If you poke around the WHO website, you'll also learn that video cameras are in plain sight, placed there for podcasting, and you can access the raw video direct from the source.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Great links

Great links viking...

That interview is what I was speaking of...others may not of known that now that I think of it.

Like I said...Enough is Enough.

Religious lefties

IMHO, it's not so much that Dems are after the evangelical vote; it's more that they're trying to stir up the religious left to counter evangelicals.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Is Georgie boy going to say

Is Georgie boy going to say the same thing once Clinton and Obama are running in the general election on the same ticket?

Are there going to be a large majority who do not feel comfortable with them. You bet!

Clinton scares me because Obama is just running so that no one else can be in second.

If she wins the nomination, she will call Obama as her running mate and they will be the new "Donny and Marie" on steroids.

Georgie boy is dispicable and is only a democratic political hack!