On Eve of Fall of Berlin Wall, Recalling the Liberal Media’s Take on Communism

Photo of Rich Noyes.
  • Bookmark and Share

As readers of Cal Thomas’s latest syndicated column already know, the Media Research Center is releasing a new report today on the media’s coverage of communism, timed to coincide with the 20 anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall on Monday. Sad to say, but before, during and after those momentous events two decades ago, many in the liberal media continuously whitewashed the true nature of communism, or suggested free-market capitalism was somehow worse.

For our report, Better Off Red?, Scott Whitlock and I combed through the MRC’s archives; the quotes (and 19 audio/video clips) we pulled together show some liberal journalists utterly failed to accurately depict communism as one of the worst evils of the 20th century, and often aimed their fire at those who were fighting communism rather than those who were perpetuating it. The full report has more than 70 quotes; here's a sample from the Executive Summary:

■ Before it collapsed, these journalists insisted those enslaved by communism actually feared capitalism more. "Despite what many Americans think, most Soviets do not yearn for capitalism or Western-style democracy," CBS anchor Dan Rather asserted in 1987.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

■ As the Soviet system began to totter, a few journalists claimed it as proof that the threat of totalitarian communism had never existed. "Gorbachev is helping the West by showing that the Soviet threat isn’t what it used to be, and what’s more, that it never was," Time’s Strobe Talbott argued in a January 1, 1990 piece.

■ After Eastern Europe was liberated, these leftist journalists attacked capitalism for "exploiting" the newly-freed workers. A Los Angeles Times reporter touted "communism’s ‘good old days,’ when the hand of the state crushed personal freedom but ensured that people were housed, employed and had enough to eat."

■ Some journalists refused to connect the economic misery caused by communism with communism itself. As the Soviet coup unraveled in 1991, NBC’s John Chancellor lectured how "the problem isn’t communism; nobody even talked about communism this week. The problem is shortages."

■ Viewers heard perverse arguments that the end of communism was a setback for human rights. "Yes, somehow, Soviet citizens are freer these days — freer to kill one another, freer to hate Jews," CBS’s Harry Smith deplored in 1990: "Doing away with totalitarianism and adding a dash of democracy seems an unlikely cure for all that ails the Soviet system."

■ The Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev was treated with more respect than the dissidents and freedom fighters who had opposed communism all along. CNN founder Ted Turner said Gorbachev was "moving faster than Jesus Christ did," while Time magazine fawningly described him as both "the communist Pope and the Soviet Martin Luther."

■ Even after communism’s failure in Europe, liberal journalists continued to shower Cuba’s communist dictatorship with good press. "For all its flaws, life in Cuba has its comforts," the Associated Press insisted in 2006: "Many Cubans take pride in their free education system, high literacy rates and top-notch doctors. Ardent Castro supporters say life in the United States, in contrast, seems selfish, superficial, and — despite its riches — ultimately unsatisfying."

■ Few in the media offered the same praise for the lunatic regime in North Korea, but in 2005 Ted Turner went on CNN to lamely defend dictator Kim Jong-il’s treatment of his citizens. "I saw a lot of people over there. They were thin and they were riding bicycles instead of driving in cars," Turner obtusely related. Anchor Wolf Blitzer informed him: "A lot of those people are starving," but Turner insisted: "I didn’t see any brutality."

■ The one-party dictatorship that still rules China seems to bother many reporters less than the regime’s move away from a communist economic system. "Workers’ Rights Suffering as China Goes Capitalist," claimed a 2001 New York Times headline. In 2009, Times columnist Thomas Friedman admitted that "one-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages."

As the anniversary of the toppling of the Berlin Wall approaches, it’s worth recalling how the liberal media failed to accurately portray the evils of communism, with coverage that often tipped in favor of the oppressors, not the oppressed. At the very least, journalists should take this opportunity to investigate the human rights abuses and oppression that still exists in the world’s last totally communist states, Cuba and North Korea. The gauzy, romantic coverage of the communist regime in Cuba should end — unless the media once again wish to be on the wrong side of history when that dictatorship is also finally swept away.

—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You gotta love it.Workers'

You gotta love it.Workers' rights to be imprisoned in slave labor camps are imperiled, enlightened one-party rule has advantages, starving North Koreans have bicycles, etc. (I could go on, but there is no reason for any of you to know more.)

Where and when did we go wrong? Fortunately, the current administration and Congress are doing their very best to bring us into the comfort that the people behind the Iron Curtain enjoyed. I know that I'm starting to feel better already. 

How come you never see Ted

How come you never see Ted Turner riding a bicycle? 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

Why Ted doesn't ride a bicycle

The reason Ted doesn't ride a bicycle is because he leans very left and therefore just would ride around in tiny circles.

"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."


G. W. F. Hegel

Obama?

I believe that the Halfrican-in-Chief's refusal to visit Germany for the anniversary is because he and the American left see the failure of communism as a tragedy, and not to be celebrated.

You have to let Rather off

You have to let Rather off the hook.  He has a memo in his possession, dated November 22nd 1935, in which an underground leader in the USSR writes about his fear of freedom.  It was published in Pravda, so Dan knows it's true.

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

Rather, not!

And the question was:  What did Carnack the Magnificant say when asked if he wanted to watch CBS News, back then? 

See below. Modification to my signature block

 

"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments (and the media) never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."


G. W. F. Hegel

I've asked some younger

I've asked some younger people in their 30's and 20's if they know why the Berlin Wall was built, and most have no idea that there ever was a Berlin Wall.

Here is a quote from dictator Erich Honecker the leader of East Germany.

“The Wall will be standing in 50 and even in 100 years, if the reasons for it are not removed. “


Erich Honecker

He wanted to use the same tactics the Chinese used on demonstrators in Tinanmen Square.  From the link below.

"The Politburo's tentative first step toward a softening of its policies was already more than many had anticipated. Just two days earlier, President Erich Honecker, 77, had all but threatened a Tiananmen Square-style crackdown to halt the demonstrations that were spreading like a virus from city to city"

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,958817,00.html#ixzz0W0OPkYV9

Then when the Berlin Wall came down people wanted to try Honecker for crimes against humanity, but he was "too unhealthy" to stand trial.  That excuse didn't work for the Nazis, but it seemed to work for Honecker.  Here's a link about him and crimes against humanity.

 

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n6_v45/ai_13580858/

 

Then a person put in a Stasi prison compared it to a Nazi movie.  This link from "Der Speigel" mentions 250,000 political prisoners from East Germany, but you have to remember the only political prisoners that matter to people who wear Che shirts, are any political prisoner they think is important.  Communists mistreating political prisoners is ok, because those people don't recite praises to Che.

From  the link below.

“Like many of the 250,000 political prisoners held in East German jails during the 41-year communist regime,”

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,623008,00.html

 

 

"The Chancellor-the late chancellor-was only part correct.  He was obsolete.  But so was the State, the entity he worshiped. Any state, any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of man, that state is obsolete.  A case to be filed under 'M' for Mankind in the Twilight Zone."  Rod Serling 

Carl

People who have not read history and ,moreover, have not lived its evils do not fear its evils. I have often suggested reading Witness by Whittaker Chambers --the man who left Communism and outed Algier Hiss in the 1950's. In this lengthly autobiography he explains the incidious nature of Communism (which is also fascism). He warns that it will not go away and by its very nature is an often unseen evil. He says that it is " inherent in every collectivist form, and that it can be fought only by the force of an intelligence, a faith, a courage, a self-sacrifice" -- the very qualities lacking in so many of our young today because they have not experienced the evils of communism and have been sheltered from the knowledge of them by our public institutions, our public officials, and our media. Our young do not read or hear the words of Marx directly  as he says " it is necessary to change the world" but, as Chambers writes,  what ties the communists( facists, collectivists ) together is their "defiance of religion,morality, truth, law, honor, and the weaknesses of the body and the irresolutions of the mind". He goes on:

             

                     Few men are so dull that they do not know that the

                     crises exists and that it threatens their lives at every

                     point. It is popular to call it a social crises. It is in

                     fact a total crises--religious, moral, intellectual, social

                     political, economic. It is popular to call it a crises of  

                      the Western world. It is in fact a crises of the

                      whole world.

            

And, as we look at laws such as the new health-care legislation, we should think about some more of Chambers' words:

            " Communism, which claims to be a solution of the crises, is itself a symtom and an irritant of the crises"

Many people laughed off (as well as threatened) Chambers in the 1950's, as many are laughing off ( and threatening) those who know what is happening today (eg. Glenn Beck). But Chambers was proved right about Algier Hiss and his henchmen as late as 1995 in the Russian Verona Papers.

Communism, collectivism, relativism, etc. --all godless ideologies --are still with us and are once again rearing their ugly heads in public. We had better wake up.

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal" 

   

Hey Carl -- they probably

Hey Carl -- they probably think the Berlin Wall has something to do with Pink Floyd!

By the way -- I'm sure you... remember remember the fifth of November: Gunpowder, treason and plot.

Obama thinks winning 52.7% of the vote gave him a mandate to turn America into a Euro-trash socialist state.  

Let's stop tiptoeing around the truth about the far left

These people are essentially communists at heart (or at least communist sympathizers-as if there were a difference), yet few of them will ever actually admit it.

Communism was not invented in order to help elevate the "little guy," but was instead cooked up as a means to put a very small number of people in ultimate power and keep them there.

The intellectuals residing in communist countries have always known this, which is why they are always among the very first people the commie tyrants would go after once in power.

Sadly, our media is full of these people, which is why so many of them pretty much turn a blind eye to the millions of people communism directly or indirectly killed in the last century.

I think its time we who love freedom and liberty, which all communists reflexively hate, stopped being polite, or even civil to these people.

After all, their ultimate goal is to destory every principle this nation was founded upon, along with every freedom we hold dear.

If you doubt this, just look at what they have been doing to our country for the last hundred years, and particularly the last 10+ months.

-Dave

Our elected representatives have failed us.  

Another Obama - another "Red voice" for Pres. Obama?

Rich and Scott - can't wait to read the full report (later).

Meantime the LA Times today, in "Obama sibling steps forward with a book," is perhaps introducing us with a future look into yet another "insider" - this time a half-brother of the President - who may be looking to share with the President (and soon) his vision of why Red is better.  The brother, Mark Okoth Obama Ndesandjo, moved to China in 2002, and is expected to meet with Pres. Obama when he travels to China next month.

According to the Times staff writer, Barbara Demick, "He also expressed a willingness to pass on some advice gleaned from seven years in China." She concludes the piece with this quote:

"I would encourage not only my brother President Obama, but also American people, [to understand] that China is about family. Family is always a recurrent theme here," he said.

China be good - Red is better. I suspect that President Obama has already come to this understanding.

Will Glenn Beck pick up on this  story?

(;~/ gary

Mona Charen

Mona Charen wrote a great book a few years back "Useful Idiots" "How liberals got it wrong in the Cold War and still blame America first."  It gives numerious examples of the media and dimocrats defending communism.  

The fundamental problem

The fundamental problem with communism and socialism is they both require capital to function and both systems are capital greedy and capital destroyers.  The end result is bankruptcy and universal misery.  Look at Cuba: rampant poverty.  Look at North Korea: they're starving to death.  The Soviets had shortages of everything.

Capitalism does not provide equality of blessings.  But it is a system which can last indefinitely.  Long term prosperity translates into new and affordable innovations and technologies which ultimately bless even those at the bottom of society.

It still amazes me that

It still amazes me that people who feel our country to be such a poor model still choose to live well and profit in it instead of moving to those they laud.

Amazing indeed---

Perfect example of those who will "talk the talk", but would never, ever, "walk the walk".

Bullsh*t artists, in other words.

MD

"There is no distinctly American criminal class - except Congress."

Mark Twain (1835-1910) 

Obama's Morning Joe Checklist....

According to The Communist Manifesto, Communism has ten essential planks:

    * Abolition of Private Property. - Working on it
    * Heavy Progressive Income Tax. - Check
    * Abolition of Rights of Inheritance. - Do heavy taxes count?
    * Confiscation of Property Rights. - Check
    * Central Bank. - Working on it.
    * Government Ownership of Communication and Transportation. - Working on it
    * Government Ownership of Factories and Agriculture. - Working on it
    * Government Control of Labor. - Working on it
    * Corporate Farms and Regional Planning. - Working on it
   * Government Control of Education. - Check

Fundamentally, The Communist Manifesto was a rebellion against the extreme poverty of the lower class.

Communism - Atheism and Amorality
Communism doesn't end with economic and political reform. By definition, it further demands the abolition of both Religion and the Absolute Morality founded upon Religion.

The irony is that Communism supposedly attempts to enhance civility within society, but removes all notions of Absolute Morality, the very cornerstone of civility.

How do you arrive at anything "moral" from an amoral system? Unless of course you smuggle it in from somewhere else.......like say Judeo/Christianity?

 

"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will
be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for
pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner."

— Malcolm Muggeridge

I have had many an argument

I have had many an argument with a fellow from Estonia, former USSR sattelite, and he is young in his early 20's.  He doesnt see any problem with Russia and communsim, in fact he said it might be preferable.  Afetr teh Georian invasion I said to him he might get his wish.