To commemorate the Media Research Center’s 20th anniversary this month, we’ve just published a special expanded edition of our ‘Notable Quotables’ newsletter. This issue contains more than100 of the most outrageous, sometimes humorous, quotes we’ve uncovered over the past 20 years.
Over the next few days, I’ll be writing about some of the more obnoxious quotes we’ve uncovered over the years. To read the full issue, and watch any of the 50 video clips that accompany the issue, please visit www.MRC.org.
Today’s installment: The liberal media and communism. Probably the most sickening display of pro-communist propaganda to air on an American network was the seven-hour series ‘Portrait of the Soviet Union,’ produced by (you guessed it) Ted Turner. It aired back in March 1988 on Turner’s TBS, and was narrated by ‘Jaws’ actor Roy Scheider. Here are a few excerpts from the first night’s installment:
Video (0:43): Windows (1.36 MB), plus MP3 audio (213 kB).
“The Soviet Union, draped in history, born of bloody revolution, bound together by a dream that is still being dreamt. It is the dream of a socialist nation marching towards the first communist state. The Soviet Union, a mighty union.”
“Once, the Kremlin was the home of czars. Today, it belongs to the people.”
“Atheist though the state may be, freedom to worship as you please is enshrined in the Soviet constitution.”
Some of the other quotes that show the liberal media’s soft spot for totalitarian dictators:
“A Gulag Breeds Rage, Yes, but Also Serenity”
— New York Times headline over article on last Soviet political prisoners being released, February 12, 1992.“Few tears will be shed over the demise of the East German army, but what about East Germany’s eighty symphony orchestras, bound to lose some subsidies? Or the whole East German system, which covered everyone in a security blanket from day care to health care, from housing to education? Some people are beginning to express, if ever so slightly, nostalgia for that Berlin Wall.”
— CBS’s Bob Simon, March 16, 1990 Evening News.“[Fidel] Castro has delivered the most to those who had the least....Education was once available to the rich and the well-connected. It is now free to all....Medical care was once for the privileged few. Today it is available to every Cuban and it is free....Health and education are the revolution’s great success stories.”
— Peter Jennings, ABC’s World News Tonight, April 3, 1989.“Frankly, to be a poor child in Cuba may in many instances be better than being a poor child in Miami, and I’m not going to condemn their lifestyle so gratuitously.”
— Eleanor Clift on The McLaughlin Group, April 8, 2000.“For Castro, freedom starts with education. And if literacy alone were the yardstick, Cuba would rank as one of the freest nations on Earth. The literacy rate is 96 percent.”
— Barbara Walters on ABC’s 20/20, October 11, 2002.
Tomorrow’s edition: The liberal media vs. Ronald Reagan and the GOP.
—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Wonderful post.
October 22, 2007 - 10:51 ET by buddycWonderful post.
Thanks to all at MRC for
October 22, 2007 - 12:35 ET by Mark FinkelsteinThanks to all at MRC for assembling this. The MSM apologia for communism is absolutely astounding, and we need to be reminded of it.
I loved Walters's line: "if literacy alone were the yardstick, Cuba would rank as one of the freest nations on Earth."
Great point, Barbara. And if frost-free days per year was the yardstick of freedom, Cuba would be unsurpassed!
What is it about Castro that
October 22, 2007 - 12:46 ET by Chris NormanWhat is it about Castro that makes these silly shallow people go all ga-ga over him, enough to make these ridiculous statements? What is it that appeals to them, to make them consider Cuba, a downtrodden mud hole, chic?
It's the beard and the
October 22, 2007 - 21:33 ET by MikeBIt's the beard and the uniform, I tell ya. Well, that and the denunciations of the bourgeoise oppressors of the proletariat who will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes for the running dogs of imperialism. That'll get the commie-libs hot and bothered every time.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
And these people are still
October 22, 2007 - 11:00 ET by candanceAnd these people are still allowed to control our media. Americans really are the stupidest people on earth.
card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
Lambs to slaughter
October 22, 2007 - 11:23 ET by iveseenitallAmericans are lambs going to slaughter. Witacker Chambers wrote in his book, Witness, that the communists have already won. Because of our continued apathy, it is just a matter of time before America becomes a complete socialist/communist state. Lying propagandists rule the media in the name freedom of the press. Socialists rule our public schools, brainwashing our youth with misinformation on a daily basis. All the while, the average American is consumed with American Idol, The Super Bowl, The World Series, and crime,violence and sex on t.v. Scholars like Thomas Sowell are ignored when they give their warnings. Worst of all, it is our children and grandchildren who will live the coming nightmare. Sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
They probably said the same
October 22, 2007 - 11:24 ET by balboaThey probably said the same thing during the Red Scare. Hasn't happened. Won't happen.
History repeating???
October 22, 2007 - 17:32 ET by m4ster chiefThe words in your post were precisely what the vast majority of people in England were saying in the middle and late 1930s, when Winston Churchill was trying desperately to convince them that war with Hitler's Germany was inevitable. They laughed at him, scorned him...and died by the thousands in the Blitz.
Sometimes the doomsayers are right, and history repeats. The big problem here is that if America goes down the tubes, western-style democracy goes down with it; and if democracy is eradicated from the planet, hope for mankind is gone. Then, the few will rule the many for millenia to come.
Having said that, I'm not worried about it because I believe the Holy Bible version of the end of the world as we know it. I know where I'm going to be while the nightmare plays out.
And, of course, Bal is gonna get that knowing looking on his face and call me a brainwashed fool. Right, Bal???
Not so fast, I'd say
October 22, 2007 - 22:52 ET by ConservativeRexNot so fast, I'd say the Neo-Stalinist are in firm control of most media. The red-scare was very real, the Stalinist were embedded in all forms of Government, and some were found out, others not.
Now, the Neo-Stalinist are embedded in all Universities in our country and it will take a dad gummed crow bar to pry their sorry asses out.
My old Daddy had the best saying about Commies I have ever heard..he said "cut their ugly heads off, and throw it at their dead asses"! I agree.
"Americans really are the
October 22, 2007 - 16:19 ET by Sonny Lykos"Americans really are the stupidest people on earth. "
Such an astute observation. I'll drink to that!
And is why Hillary will be our next President.
An Obama Salute?
October 22, 2007 - 11:03 ET by Tim GrahamHmm, I wonder if Barack Obama would put his hand over his heart for this clip...
ROFL card holding member
October 22, 2007 - 11:08 ET by candanceROFL
card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
Tim, I wonder if a parade
October 22, 2007 - 14:50 ET by Chris NormanTim,
I wonder if a parade on Red Square would get Obama going? Tanks rolling, troops goose stepping, anti-capitalist missiles going by?
While in the Army.....
October 22, 2007 - 11:58 ET by Prester John......I was able to go through all the Eastern Europen countries except Albania just before the Wall came down. In the early 90s I was an arms control inspector in the heart of the Soviet Union's military industrial complex. What the Communist system did to those countries, especially the Soviet Union, is one of the great crimes against humanity.
While several of the countries were relatively undestroyed/rebuilt (Poland, the then Czechoslovakia, and Hungary) the remainder were either polluted and still wrecked from WW II (East Germany), full of secret police (Rumania), or just plain run down (Bulgaria and Yugoslavia).
The Soviet Union of course was on a whole different level--polluted, run down, poverty stricken, brutal.
All the people were doing as best the could of course, but the Utopia of the Left was as demeaning, degrading, and oppressive as anything I could imagine. And anyone who says otherwise was either blind, stupid, or bought.
Or maybe all three.
Concur Prestor
October 22, 2007 - 16:49 ET by acumenAs a ten year old living in West Germany when the Berlin wall was built I remember the horrific influence the communist regime in East Germany had on all. And it had nothing to do with supposedly superior education or dandy health care. It was the most intense time of my life.
I vividly remember hearing the anxiety in fearful voices of otherwise strong adults and seeing the genuine concern in their eyes. West German nationals and others living there at the time were confident that the communists would follow-up on their public statements to expand communism. An attack on West Germany was a serious possibility and real preparations were being made to counter such an offensive. The US military was on constant alert continuosly shuffling convoys of tanks, artillery and soldiers to different strategic areas. Nuclear war was expected and prepared for. Nuclear fall-out shelters were being constructed at record pace and civil defense drills were being carried out weekly.
Those living in West Germany were witnessing the horrors played out daily on those wishing to escape East Germany. Many Germans living in Eastern Germany suffered unimaginable repression from the communist system resulting in more than 2 .6 million East Germans escaping to West Berlin or West Germany from 1949 until 1961 when the Berlin wall was completed. Those that escaped brought their personal stories of brutality and horror with them. Even the most rational person considered an invasion of West Germany to be imminent if for no other reason than to silence those outraged by the treatment of their fellow Gemans in communist East Germany.
After the wall was constructed, the East Germans not fortunate enough to have escaped before the wall was finished suffered even more than previously. The East Germans were no longer able to obtain even the simplest of things such as seamless panty hose or toilet paper. With the border sealed, healthcare was non-existant. Education consisted of communist propaganda. Meanwhile, West Germans had now lived for decades in constant escalating fear of their communist controlled neighbor.
For any journalist or media personality to portray communism in any other fashion is to dishonor the memory of the millions that have been brutally murdered by agents of the communist state and those that continue to live in fear of being imprisoned, tortured and/or murdered by their communist government.
Any attempt by the media to depict true communism as anything less than the wholesale dehumanizion of mankind is a lie perpetuated by those that could not possibly have had to endure the daily threat and fear that communism inflicts on the world. If they had they would know better than to endorse communism. To promote communism as anything remotely beneficial is to endorse and consent to the ongoing suffering of millions of innocent people.
Notice who praises Communism
October 22, 2007 - 12:17 ET by mattmRich liberals.
Here's a quote for you:
"Communism is a way for the ruthless few to tyrannize the masses while pretending to be their benefactors." - Publius
Communism is dumb. The
October 22, 2007 - 13:41 ET by wiwfCommunism is dumb.
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
I'm not sure they're all that bad...
October 22, 2007 - 16:41 ET by DaveSEleanor Clift and Peter Jennings have some pretty stupid comments on there, but I don't see how some of them are all that horrible... at least, not without context.
Like the Barbara Walters one. How do we know that it isn't immediately followed by "But it's not the only yardstick.... yada yada". We don't.
In other words, it would be a bit silly to jump to conclusions and pummel the media over some of these quotes, because the most of the quotes as presented aren't really evidence of any bias. (Some are, but not most.)
“For Castro, freedom
October 22, 2007 - 17:16 ET by rimsky“For Castro, freedom starts with education. And if literacy alone were the yardstick, Cuba would rank as one of the freest nations on Earth. The literacy rate is 96 percent.”
— Barbara Walters on ABC’s 20/20, October 11, 2002.
That's right DaveS, Barbara was totally taken out of context.. the entire context was:
"There are those closet commies among us in the States who would have you believe the lie that, For Castro, freedom starts with education, and those same people go even further in saying that the education system in Cuba is so good that if literacy alone were the yardstick, Cuba would rank as one of the freest nations on Earth.. and then they acutally try to make us believe that the literacy rate is 96 percent. We all know that is very unlikely."
Yeah, she must really hate being taken out of context.
Just how great is a high
October 22, 2007 - 17:28 ET by Chris NormanJust how great is a high literacy rate, if they aren't free to choose what they can read?
Heh... you know what I
October 23, 2007 - 00:37 ET by DaveSHeh... you know what I mean. We have seen so many instances of the left taking our guys out of context and making them look bad, I just don't want to be like them. If the damning context isn't in the quote, I don't cite it as a damning quote.
Period.
They're nostalgic for oppressing societies
October 22, 2007 - 17:45 ET by GalvanicYou give them far too much credit, DaveS. I actually heard several of those comments, and they aren't lacking context.
Now that the Soviet Union and the east bloc are history, correspondents who were never subjected to their brutality and their suppression of freedom and hope, cherry-pick appealing aspects of Communist society and hold them before us as examples of the progress being made in places like Cuba and China, even while their fellow journalists in those countries rot in jail for speaking out.
If they're upset with Bush for not pushing for universal health care, they'll praise Castro or the PRC for having it. That's just the way they are.
Mussolini was praised for making the trains run on time
October 22, 2007 - 18:10 ET by RoverBefore WW II, Mussolini was praised by the intelligencia here and in England for finally getting the trains to run on time. How short-sited.
Rover
It is difficult to gauge
October 22, 2007 - 18:59 ET by JerIt is difficult to gauge the level of obnoxiousness without access to complete transcripts. Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and Coulter have all recently and vigorously complained about the omission of clarifying and contextualizing words, as well as the misinterpretation of their published words. I hope such is not the case here.
With respect to the one full article [NYT on the "Gulag"] I have thus far uncovered, that concern may be well-founded. The Times archives contain literally scores of articles and essays highly critical of the Soviet Gulag, and the one cited in the NewsBusters post is clearly not a complimentary one. The "rage" and "serentiy" referred to in the title relates to the manner in which some of the last prisoners to be released were emotionally reacting to, and dealing with, the totality of the experience--incarceration and freedom. It was no puff piece on the Soviet gulag system.
I found nothing obnoxious about the report.
Jer