'Karl Rove Indictment' Shuster Predicts Same for Scott Walker
David Shuster is predicting the imminent indictment of Karl Rove.
Oops!
That was Shuster as an MSNBC host back in 2006. In his current incarnation on the no-rated Current TV he is predicting the possible indictment of Wisconsin governor Scott Walker. Despite making himself a laughingstock six years ago by projecting visions of Karl Rove being frogwalked across the White House lawn, Shuster now seems intent on delivering an encore performance.
Here is David Shuster himself breathlessly predicting the possible indictment of Karl Rove, uh, I mean Scott Walker:
According to government lawyers familiar with a Milwaukee criminal corruption probe, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is now a "target" of the investigation.
The legal sources, who are not involved in Wisconsin's recall, spoke on condition of anonymity. They said Walker faces "serious legal challenges," including "a possible indictment," regardless of the election results on Tuesday.
And how many other journalists did these "legal sources" leak to? Apparently none since David Shuster is the only one reporting on Rove's, I mean Walker's, "possible indictment." So of all the people to leak this supposed inside info to, these "legal sources" somehow decided to give it to the person who ended up with egg on his face due to Karl Rove's non-indictment.
What is fascinating is that David Shuster delivered both predictions with identical expressions of smug certitude. First you can see the video below of Shuster at about the 2 minute mark delivering his prediction, conveniently timed for just before the recall election, of the possible indictment of Scott Walker:
Now compare the above video with the video below of Shuster six years ago predicting the indictment of Scott Walker, uh, I mean Karl Rove with the remarkably similar expressions of smugness:
Of course, no story about David Shuster's predictions is complete without his infamous money quote so here goes:
I am convinced that Karl Rove will, in fact, be indicted.
Oh, and David, did you use the same "anonymous sources" on your Scott Walker story as you did on the Karl Rove indictment story, namely those two "reliable journalists," William Rivers Pitt and Jason Leopold?
- P.J. Gladnick's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Really, PJ
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 06/05/2012 - 6:17pm.
....would you kindly up Shuster's lithium dose?
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I think it's at max, Blonde.
Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 06/05/2012 - 6:32pm.
He needs valproate badly. It very nicely chills 'em out.
Open mouth, insert card table.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 06/05/2012 - 6:28pm.
I cannot believe this jackass is back on the airwaves. (If Current actually has airwaves).
Ha, I saw this yesterday!
Submitted by Texndoc on Tue, 06/05/2012 - 6:54pm.
And I did a little research, poor guy's marriage fell apart after about a year. Big surprise.
Oh, and he'll be back with news of Indictments against Romney and Rubio this summer.
They
Submitted by grammajane on Tue, 06/05/2012 - 7:41pm.
were referred to as "two pros" Pros in what, may I ask?? Making complete idiots out of themselves. Wish O'Keefe would do an investigation on where shuster gets all his info
I tweeted
Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Tue, 06/05/2012 - 8:15pm.
this doucher just that this past weekend and have yet to get a response
War on terror bias
Submitted by American Delight on Tue, 06/05/2012 - 9:26pm.
OT, but a Bloomberg Businessweek article just called the Seal team that took out Bin Laden "raiders":
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-06-05/drone-strike-that-kills-al-q...
Also, I had the misfortune of watching Gwen Awful's "Washington Week" "web extra" a couple weeks ago. While asking a question to another journalist, she referred to the "murder, or whatever euphemism you want to use" for killing Bin Laden.
Murder?? By "raiders"?
Liberal scum hounded Sarah Palin out of office...
Submitted by OxyCon on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 3:32am.
...then they set their sights on Scott Walker.
If this keeps up Conservatives are going to have to adopt the same tactics of filing frivolous lawsuit after frivolous lawsuit against Democrat governors and make their lives a living hell and chase them out of office.
There's no time for sitting back and watching this nonsense and hope the Liberal scum knock it the hell off. Those bullies won't quit until they get their own noses bloodied.
One good thing about "Current TV". My cable company...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 3:38am.
doesn't carry it, so it is not necessary for me to program my TV to skip over it like what I have done with MSNBC.
It is hard to believe, but this guy Shuster once worked for Fox News. I don't remember ever seeing him on Fox, but I think I read it somewhere.
Can someone be indicted for making stupid and unfounded predictions?
I watched this Maryland Governor guy by the name of...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 3:53am.
O'Malley twice say on TV tonight that the reason Scott Walker won is because he was never charged with any illegalities in office. Then after a pregnant pause, he added the word "yet".
Not exactly a gracious loser are you, Mr. O'Malley?
It seems the common M.O. for Liberal Democrats like Shuster and O'Malley is, if they can't beat you at the ballot box box, then they can always resort to indicting you in a Court of Law, no matter how specious or how "off the wall" the charge may be.
Come on the man is working in
Submitted by John21 on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 8:19am.
Come on the man is working in the media version of "Siberia" at current, he has to say something that might get the liberal propaganda media to remember him and let him return to the fold.
The burden starts with whom?
Submitted by CobraMan on Wed, 06/06/2012 - 11:32am.
"The burden starts with Karl Rove to stop the indictment."
Really, and in what Communist country does that happen? Here in America, it's up to the prosecutors to "start" an incitement, (which is accomplished through a legal filing) and not the yet-to-be-accused defendant to "stop" it.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.