Global warming? Case closed. Consensus achieved. There can be no debate about it.
ClimateGate? Never happened. I refuse to even acknowledge its existence.
Must hang on to the global warming belief at all costs even against evidence to to the contrary.
That dogmatic stance pretty much sums up the attitude of Associated Press writer Malcolm Ritter in his story about how global warming skepticism can be ascribed to psychological faults:
The Copenhagen talks on climate change were convened with a sense of urgency that many ordinary folks don't share. Why is that? One big reason: It's hard for people to get excited about a threat that seems far away in space and time, psychologists say.
"It's not in people's faces," said psychologist Robert Gifford of the University of Victoria in British Columbia. "It is in the media, but not in their everyday experience. That's quite a different thing."
Oh, I see. Global warming skepticism has nothing to do with the observable evidence or with the recently discovered falsified data revealed in the ClimateGate emails and East Anglia University CRU computer source code. No. It can all be ascribed to psychology as presented by global warming dogmatist Ritter:
Gifford said people tend to attach less importance to future problems than more immediate concerns. That may be a holdover from early days of human evolution, when "things far away didn't matter, things in the future didn't matter. It was whether the tiger or the enemy was just around the corner," he said.
In fact, scientists say global warming's influence is already visible and it could get worse within decades if no action is taken. The average number of heat-wave deaths in Chicago could more than double by 2050, and killer heat waves in Europe could also increase by that time, experts say. Arctic summers may be almost free of sea ice by 2030 or sooner, they say.
Could..could...may. This is called reality? It sounds more like speculation. And Ritter picked a really poor example when he stated that heat-wave deaths in Chicago could more than double in 2050. In the actual, not could, world Chicago has just experienced an unusually cold summer. However, this won't stop Gifford in his junior league psychological analysis starting with the "13 dragons."
Even among people who accept global warming as a serious issue, there are additional psychological barriers to getting them to take significant action against it. Gifford, who studies pro-environmental behavior, calls them the 13 dragons.
Among them:
_ Environmental numbness: "OK, climate change. I've heard that one before. Been there, done that."
_ A feeling of powerlessness: "Anything I do is just a drop in the bucket."
_ Conflicting goals: "Yes, I should be changing my behavior, but I've got to look for a job, I've got to go to the gym, I have to take my kids to soccer practice, so I'll do it tomorrow."
_ A sense of inequality: "Why should I take the bus when my boss is driving a Cadillac?"
_ Loss of freedom: `It's a free country. I can drive a Hummer if I want to."
_ Tokenism: "I recycle, so thank you very much, I'm finished."
_ Excessive optimism: "It will work out in the end. The scientists will figure it out, so I don't have to do anything."
And then there's just plain habit. It's "a huge but boring force," Gifford said. "We just tend to do today what we did yesterday."
How about a 14th dragon?
Dogmatically clinging to a "scientific" belief without considering any evidence to the contrary by writing off dissenting views as merely due to psychology.
Perhaps Malcolm Ritter should look to himself in the global warming psychological problem department.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Geeee....
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:00 ET by Patriot IIIt couldn't be because its all a big con and lie could it?
The AP is particularly biased on the AGW fraud.
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:14 ET by jazbo"Democrats; Breeding voters like farm animals since 1963"
Morning Joe...
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:24 ET by unkeeafThis was a big topic of conversation on Morning Joe. That idiot actually admits he believes the hoax, as does every guest on the show. They were working hard to put the genie back in the bottle, although Joe did state the other side should be heard.
------------
Merry Christmas from Obama Claus!
http://bit.ly/6Atufc
Deny the Lie
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:54 ET by allanfI say "Deny the Lie". The Global Warming Fantasists should be sent to Church or Synagogue to repent.
especially hard to believe.......
Sat, 12/19/2009 - 12:01 ET by Patriot IIwhen you are freezing your butt off LOL....what idiots!
Don't you feel sorry for this guys kids?
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:12 ET by dboAs Lord Monckton would say, "Robert Gifford-bedwetter and rent seeker".
"Gifford said people tend
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:29 ET by Indiana Joe"Gifford said people tend to attach less importance to future problems than more immediate concerns."
Well, by God, he's right! I know I should put this $600 in my son's college fund, but those evil bankers will throw me out on the street if I don't pay my mortgage! /sarc off
That's called reality, Bozo.
The fact that most people do worry about the future, do have college funds for their kids, or 401k plans for their retirement pretty much puts the lie to this academic pipsqueak's argument.
When did "The University of Victoria in British Columbia" become such a renowned seat of Academia, anyway?
Do they even have a decent football team? ;^)
"Four legs good... two legs better!" - George Orwell
Ohhhhh, I see now...........
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:37 ET by old cro"It's hard for people to get excited about a threat that seems far away in space and time, psychologists say."
That explains why the socialist leadership wants to spend every last cent they can get their hands on without a thought for the future of this country. Gifford can go play over in Copenhagen with his bunch of dragons.
Thinking the exact same thing.
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 13:11 ET by SimJimAfter reading the profile I thought to myself that the pyschologist were describing liberals refusal to recognize the damage being inflicted on future generations as it pertains to government's spending habits. Real and quantifiable, politicians are in the process of destroying the economic foundation of this country, yet they ignore the facts and plow forward thinking only of the next election.
These people are buffoons...fortunately less and less people are being snookered by global warmists and more and more people are beginning to understand the ramifications of all this government spending. I wouldn't expect the fringe media to acknowledge their own hypocrisy.
Not for everyone
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 14:41 ET by viluzionIt's hard for people to get excited about a threat that seems far away in space and time, psychologists say.
Not if they're psychotic. The threat doesn't even have to exist in the real world. Another thing about psychotics: They think they're sane and that people who don't believe them are crazy. I see a pattern here.
The loons at Absurd
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:38 ET by mattmThe loons at Absurd Prevarications are trying to tell us that if we don't believe the sky is falling we're nuts? That's rich!
"Dogmatically clinging to a
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:50 ET by troglodyt"Dogmatically clinging to a "scientific" belief without considering any
evidence to the contrary by writing off dissenting views as merely due
to psychology."
But you wouldn't care to give some examples of scientists clinging to their scientific beliefs, would you?
Malcolm
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 12:07 ET by NorthCoasterYou are projecting your own view of Climate and Nature on the subject of man made global warming.
The Scientific method requires sceptical inquiry into proposed hypotheses. Pay specific attention to the steps, because gathering data to test hypotheses and using gathered data to test said hypotheses, is what the sceptics have done.
From Wikipedia: Scientific method refers to a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.[1] A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.[2]
See the following link for the full explanation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
When you test a hypothesis and find a conditon where the hypothesis is invalid, you have to refine or change the hypothesis and retest. Rising CO2 emissions and recorded temperatures aren't following each other as the AGW hypothesis proposes. In fact the common thread of the "Climatgate E-mails", is how to present a picture of rising temperatures when the recorded temperatures are declining.
So, who's dogmatically clinging to a political position when the science shows otherwise?
For a real test...
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 12:08 ET by TheCynicPoll idea:
In terms of your concern that they could actually bring disaster to the planet in the foreseeable future, rate your feelings of the following in terms of "Very concerned", "Concerned", "Not very concerned", "Not at all concerned".
Large Hadron Collider
Global warming
Meteor impact
Global cooling
Running out of oil
Collapse of the dollar
(insert other ideas here)
If the AP reporter is correct, then anything not immediately threatening us would be rated as low concern, because we are psychologially prone to ignoring long term threats.
Personally, I think he's wrong. I would rate global warming as "not very concerned" but meteor impacts as "concerned". I'm interested in seeing money spent to search for and track asteroids that might hit the planet. I am not very interested in curbing CO2 output. It's not a question of long term versus short term, it's a question of things I'm afraid could actually happen and things I think are overblown.
AP reporting explained by Psychology
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 12:16 ET by ApacheAP reporting explained by Psychology:
Freudian Projection
Right, got it
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 12:24 ET by 10ksnookerClimategate fraudsters are sane, while the people holding to the truth are ... wait that's not right.
I say it's the fraudsters problem to prove their fraud it true.
It must be my demented
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 12:53 ET by celatorIt must be my demented state of mind that found me at my daughter's house last night at midnight helping her unfreeze her water pipes with a blowtorch.
My insane imagination thought it saw -10 F on the outside thermometer at the time. My crazy state of mind heard on the radio that the windchill made it feel like 20 below as I drove out to her place.
My mental instability tricked me into thinking I was shivering down to my boots as I crawled around the ground looking for where the water main entered her house so I could trace the water line from the street.
As the ice in the pipes melted and her water started flowing again, I thought that it must be time for me to get my head examined because Global Warming made it impossible for this to have happend to her water pipes.
Sheesh.
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
Celator
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 13:06 ET by NorthCoasterBeen there, done that. There's nothing like the cold slap of reality when the wind and snow are blowing, while you try to thaw pipes in arctic weather conditions.
"Waiting for Global Warming or Something Like it"
(H/T to Firesign Theatre)
North.... they should give
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 13:36 ET by celatorNorth.... they should give us a big medal for unfreezing pipes in the middle of the night. ;+} Maybe call it The Gore Climate Gate Denier Medal.
I would have rented a polar bear to keep me warm but, apparently, they are all dead. Read that in the Gorewiki book.
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
Moonbat Spin
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 14:11 ET by slickwillie2001Look at the spin here:
Valdez Socked In: http://www.alaskadispatch.com
"All the experts says the effects of climate change will be felt most in Alaska, home of the ex-governor who contends climate change is no big deal. Good thing she wasn't in Valdez this week when the citizenry got buried under a record snowfall."
"By the time the citizens of Alaska's only oil port finally caught a break, the snow was piled 5 feet, 8 inches deep."
Got that? Lots of snow means 'global warming' is happening! Anything you don't like in the weather, –'global warming'. Good weather? Nevermind.
PS Website crushed, Drudge effect.
I'm a climate change/global
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 13:54 ET by misterbee241I'm a climate change/global warming denier. there, I've said it. Come get me Al.
"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."
Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941
Who are the deniers
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 19:58 ET by ReaverWho are the deniers now?
I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me. - Hunter S. Thompson
Tuvalu Scam
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 14:22 ET by slickwillie2001This is hilarious:
"The lead negotiator for the small island nation of Tuvalu, the bow-tie wearing Ian Fry, broke down as he begged delegates to take tough action. 'I woke up this morning crying, and that's not easy for a grown man to admit,' Mr Fry said on Saturday, as his eyes welled with tears. 'The fate of my country rests in your hands,' he concluded, as the audience exploded with wild applause.
But the part-time PhD scholar at the Australian National University actually resides in Queanbeyan, NSW [Australia], where he's not likely to be troubled by rising sea levels because the closest beach at Batemans Bay is a two-hour, 144km drive away. Asked whether he had ever lived in Tuvalu, his wife told The Australian last night she would 'rather not comment'.... "
The Supremacy of Tuvalu: http://www.powerlineblog.com
A bit late to this party
Sun, 12/20/2009 - 23:11 ET by kangarooLOL Queanbeyan is about 2000 ft above sea level, Driving up the mountain from the Bay is murder, Driving down is down right scary. My ma used to live 40 miles south of Batemans Bay.
"When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hang on"--Thomas Jefferson
The Liberal Mind, beat you to it...
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 16:40 ET by upcountrywaterThe Liberal Mind
The Psychological Causes of
Political Madness
By Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., M.D.
Read The Liberal Mind and learn why:
codes--the rules--that properly govern human conduct arise from, and
must be compatible with, the biological, psychological and social
nature of man.
liberal agenda is a transference neurosis of the modern liberal mind,
acted out in the world’s economic, social and political theaters.
The liberal agenda’s basic principles are not only
antithetical to our most cherished liberties; they are also directly
contrary to all that is good and noble in the human enterprise. The Liberal Mind is
the first work to explain why modern liberalism appeals to the
irrational tendencies of the human mind. It is the first work to
explain how liberalism can be defeated.
If you are feeling colder, It's because it is, (graph)
Getting Hot
Sun, 12/20/2009 - 22:50 ET by scottdavene12.00
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
I could be paddling a rowboat down Market Street in San
Francisco after the poles have melted, and there will still be conservative
fanatics who deny that humans
are responsible for Global Warming or that it is even real. I invite
you to my web-pages devoted to raising awareness on this urgent issue: http://pltcldscsn.blogspot.com/2009/12/conservatives-still-deny-global-warming.html
scott how can you know
Sun, 12/20/2009 - 22:57 ET by Radical1979scott how can you know about global warming when the data has obviously been tampered with? Or did you miss that little story?
Hasn't it occured to you that the earth's temperature has constantly been in a state of flux for thousands upon thousands of years? I think it's extremely arrogant to assume man can have affected the earth in the short course of several hundred years.
~Cleanup on aisle 5
Sun, 12/20/2009 - 23:09 ET by choselife3xNot just spam...Chicken Little meets the Wolfman liberal spam....
"my solution is to destroy children"--mamabear's cure for poverty 12/08/09