RANDI KAYE, CNN HOST: Senior political analyst, Bill Schneider, watched it from Los Angeles. He's part of the best political team on television and he joins me now by phone. Bill, what do you make of Rush Limbaugh's tone during that keynote address?
BILL SCHNEIDER: Well, it was an angry tone. He was the hero of 1994. Fifteen years ago when Republicans won a big victory in Congress. And that was the year of the angry white men. When they came to power they honored him as being the prophet who led them to victory. Well, this was a very angry speech. By the way, they're not all white and they're not all men but they are angry conservative voters. They didn't do so well last year but they're still angry. The tone of this speech was mocking, bullying, it was full of contempt, and I thought it was a very harsh speech. One that while it rallied the conservative audience it also angered a lot of Democrats and people who aren't particularly partisan just by the tone of it.
Wow! Angry? Bullying? Harsh? Did Bill Schneider watch the same speech the rest of us did? Perhaps that liberal filter of his altered Rush's speech in a significant way that diverged completely from reality.
RANDI KAYE: And Bill, today he did not apologize for his comments earlier that he would like to see President Barack Obama fail. In fact today he defended those comments. What do you make of that?
SCHNEIDER: Well, he did say he hopes Obama fails. Now that in my view crosses a line. It's one thing to say I disagree with the President, I think he's wrong, I think his policies are wrong. A lot of people feel that way. Republicans voted against them. One can even argue these policies won't work, some economists say that. There's either not enough spending, too much spending, they're not the right answer but to say "I hope he fails." That really crosses a line. He said he thinks Democrats did the same thing in Iraq. Most Democrats that I heard didn't ever say "We hope the United States loses." Some of them said, "We're not winning. We can't win." But to say, "I hope the President fails" and at another point it even got rather sinister because he said there were forces there that were trying to undermine the country from within. Those are very sinister comments and I thought in many ways the speech did cross a line.
So did casting aspersions upon the truthfulness of General David Petraeus also cross a line, Bill? We await your comments on this...if they ever arrive.
CNN also displayed Twitter comments about Rush Limbaugh's speech yesterday. See if you can spot a certain pattern here:
KAYE: All right. We are going to continue this discussion. But for now, we want to let you know, we are getting a huge response to Rush Limbaugh's speech on Twitter. And this is what some of you are saying.
One person wrote in for cjustice2K says "I literally had to stop watching it. I have one word about Rush's speech. Hitler.
PinkissoPretty5 writes "When Rush Limbaugh is clearly the spokesperson for the GOP, the party is in worse shape than I thought."
KLDavis08, "At least in all of his absurdness he's entertaining. Limbaugh 2012?
Rusty Campbell writes, "Rush Limbaugh is describing how mean spirited and small minded his brand of conservatism is.
And WhateverDanny writes, "I hope the voice of the GOP is Romney. It will further help the Democrats."
Another one from Apicasso, "Rush contradicting himself in the same sentence over and over. Nice that the audience doesn't care if what he says is factual."
If you had guessed that all the Twitter comments displayed by CNN were highly critical of Rush Limbaugh you would have been right. Somehow CNN just couldn't seem to find even a single comment favorable to Rush. No one!
UPDATE: YouTube took down the first video I used under "terms of use violation." However, the exact same video was posted by another user so I switched to that one. So why was the first video taken down when this second one was allowed to remain? Was it because a certain someone or organization didn't appreciate seeing the video posted here at NewsBusters? And how long will the second duplicate video remain?
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Angry, Mocking, Bullying, Harsh, and Full of Contempt'
March 1, 2009 - 10:13 ET by God Bless the USAAnd spot on!
Yep
March 1, 2009 - 10:45 ET by 10ksnookerCouldn't said it better about Bill Schneider, I would add, Schneider is a really cruel person as well -- As are most liberals.
"We should stand up and
March 1, 2009 - 11:00 ET by TruthMonger"We should stand up and say, we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration"
even hillary can't stomach Bull Schnitter now:)
Boo Hoo
March 1, 2009 - 11:25 ET by jdlybrandThey can dish it out... But they damn sure can't take it!
Rush Limbaugh and Conservatives ???
March 1, 2009 - 14:30 ET by Miss MellieGuess when we FIGHT socialist policies we are considered angry, etc. When libs do the same thing they are considered defenting their way of life or caring about the poor and down trodden.
AS usual, the whinning is loudest when libs are in power....
HMMMMM
March 1, 2009 - 16:20 ET by God Bless the USAAngry, Mocking, Bullying, Harsh and Full of Contempt ...
Now that I think about it ... sorta sounds like Obama's speeches!
Chuck Schumer said....
March 1, 2009 - 17:25 ET by bpjam....that every 100 deaths in Iraq equaled another seat for the Democrats in Congress. Doesn't that sound like 'rooting for the US to fail'?
Harry Reid called the President a Loser and said that our troops 'had lost in Iraq'. He also called the surge a failure BEFORE it even get started and again called the Iraq war 'lost'. Wasn't Harry rooting for America to fail?
Dick Durbin compared our troops to Nazis, Pol Pot, Soviets running gulags but he wasn't 'rooting for Bush to fail'. I'm sure he was cheering Bush on but just in his own special way.
Patty Murray called Osama Bin Laden a 'freedom fighter' and claimed that he was more popular in Afghanistan because he 'built schools, roads and hospitals'. Patty Murray claimed we were the ones killing Afghani people and not Al Qaeda.
Any time we question the Democrats about their opposition to Bush, we were accused of questioning their 'patriotism'. But anytime we question Obama, we are 'rooting for America to fail' or we are just racists.
Bill Schneider is a tool. He is about as objective as my dogs are about me (and don't expect my dogs to ever say a bad word about me....).
Re Chucky Schumer...
March 1, 2009 - 18:41 ET by slickwillie2001I've noticed poster, that Obammy said during the campaign that US forces were 'air-raiding villages and killing civilians', yet since he took over our strategy in Afghanistan has not changed one iota. When President George W. Bush was our President, any time a UAV airstrike was carried out we heard the inevitable prattle about women and children being killed. Whether that was true or not we will never know because al Qaeda always distorts casualty figures.
But since Obammy because President, UAV strikes continue, but incredibly, our missiles have become more accurate! Just today, a report of a strike in Afghanistan, or maybe it was Pakistan, and the liberal media simply tells us '12 killed'. Is Obammy that much more skilled a commander-in-chief, or is the liberal media now ignoring the al Qaeda after-action reports?
still air raiding villages
March 2, 2009 - 12:23 ET by SickofLibsYeah, but now we using unmanned drones, so it's OK.
Contact Sen. Frankenfeinstein's office for exact GPS coordinates and upcoming mission schedule.
It is thier worldview that was attacked
March 1, 2009 - 10:19 ET by richb313I saw the Speech that Rush gave off the cuff. He only refered a few times to notes on points he wanted to raise. I did not find tone angry. He was upset with Republicans who had abandoned the Principles that allowed them to be elected in the first place. I think the reason that the Leftish MSM and all the other Lemmings who have adopted this failed theology is that it runs counter to thier world view. It really reminds me of working with Delusional or other Mental and Phsycologically damaged people. When you challenge thier delusions with reality they become angry. I am not saying that there is any Mental Illness involved with those in the MSM but it is interesting to see the similar response.
Nobody in the MSM is
March 1, 2009 - 10:23 ET by NL207Nobody in the MSM is mentally ill. They just exhibit symptoms of mental illness. They could not possibly be mentally ill.
Speaking of mental illness, have you noticed how many symptoms of Narcissism Barack Obama exhibits?
yes but,
March 1, 2009 - 10:53 ET by RowaneYes, I've noticed the symptoms of narcissism in Obambi and have been trying to figure out which he lacks. But, then again, you can find this in most DhimmicRATs
It is their world view that was attacked...
March 1, 2009 - 14:54 ET by Miss MellieThat similar response thing is called 'talking points'..no libturd will leave the comfort of his play room without them. They can't think on their own except if they get TOLD what and how to say it.
I do not consider Limbaugh as our leader...but rather as the person who has acces to the "open mike" and the audience to target.
And talk about ANGRY...anyone ever watch a speech given by that pervert Bill Clinton? Anger is his calling card whenever he is challenged...and let's not forget that wagging finger...
By my estimation, the anger is ALL on the side of the libs...who still cannot figure out HOW to lead now that they are truly in charge....I call them the party of PUTZ'S.
Those are very sinister
March 1, 2009 - 10:21 ET by Jack BauerMmmmm, it's now "sinister" to verbally oppose the President. This is the considered opinion of a "journalist" (sic).
Pretty soon it'll be un-American. Then it'll be punishable.
The mediots
March 1, 2009 - 10:56 ET by Rowanewill NEVER put Rush's comment into context, Rush said, in effect, that if Obambi was going to change the country to socialism that he hopes he fails.
Umm, guess what mediots, most of America feels the same way whether they'll admit it or not.
I thought it was
March 1, 2009 - 10:28 ET by rollinghillsI thought it was informative and entertaining, the only hate I see is from the left.
Do I want this administrations policies to fail if they bring about more big government? Hell yes! I want the Country to grow and prosper, how can that happen if all our money (and future genations) is confiscated so the government can become the "be all, end all" solution??
Rush's speech (and Coulter's) actually make me believe all is not entirely lost.
I wish CNN would grow a set.
March 1, 2009 - 10:28 ET by HeavyChevyI watched and enjoyed every bit of it. A matter of fact I enjoyed it so much I watched it again when it was re-aired on C-SPAN after watching it on FOX.
I was wondering what the libby elite was going to say about this and I was on the mark (now if I could just do so well in picking lotto numbers :-(
Twitter comments
March 1, 2009 - 10:33 ET by ChadThey forgot the obligatory "I'm a life long republican and and I disagree with conservatism and most things my party does."
They always find that guy...
~Chad
Cincinnati, OH
betcha
March 1, 2009 - 11:00 ET by RowaneBetcha this guy, and the others they "find" haven't voted Republican in a LOT of years, if ever.
It is the oldest trick
March 1, 2009 - 11:04 ET by richb313Oh, it is the oldest trick in the book. How do we know if any of these so called REPUBLICANS are what they say they are. With the Internet it is possible to be anything you want. We can see this by the comments on various sites by so-called conservatives who trash and attack on a personal level. Is this the result of a VAST LEFT WING CONSIPRACY? I doubt it. It is that a lot of people get thier jollys by stirring the pot. As was said in the Dark Knight "Some people just like to see things burn"
Tricksy Liberals
March 1, 2009 - 11:12 ET by Sergeant ROCKWell of course.. we have some those people posting on this website. I think there should be an organized counter-campaign against liberals in the same fashion.
"I'm a liberal and I don't think the majority of the liberals I know support gun control... abortion... etc."
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
The tone of this speech was
March 1, 2009 - 10:33 ET by MidAmericaThe tone of this speech was mocking, bullying, it was full of contempt, and I thought it was a very harsh speech.
I'm sure Rush's speech fits all those descriptions when viewed from the very feminized world of the liberals. Hopefully barack won't break into tears and run to his room. But from where I live that kind of talk is a challenge. If you are man enough you take it and you fire back.
Well I think we all new this was coming
March 1, 2009 - 10:35 ET by general companyThey didnt listen to the message, their "obsolete ideology" and station managers will not allow the too, only to shoot the messenger. Rush was very good, I didnt find his talk the least bit offensive, I found it being very honest about the state of the party and on current events. But they must had missed Ann, because she skwerd them but good.
As far as the "The tone of this speech was mocking, bullying, it was full of contempt, and I thought it was a very harsh speech." I thought Obamas last few talks were more along these lines then Rush's. But of course that is ok,?
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Ann
March 1, 2009 - 10:39 ET by sherylsims"But they must had missed Ann, because she skwerd them but good."
I think they missed her intentionally. Some of those girley men in the media have been verbally smacked down by her and still hurting. Besides, they are probably reluctant to give her free promotion for her new book. It seems like the more attention they give her, the better her book sales go ~ so maybe they are getting a clue.
Ha, your probably right
March 1, 2009 - 11:00 ET by general companyI also notice that they are reluctant to discuss the specifics of their claims. Just the typical hit and run crap they are getting famous for.
cnn showed it, so I think Rush aquired more listeners.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Waaaaaaaaaaa!
March 1, 2009 - 10:40 ET by Flying_FlynnAll of these reactions prove what Limbaugh has been saying all along. Please note that all of the reactions are based on emotion and not fact.
Flying Flynn
"Stupid TV...be more funny!"
-Homer Simpson
Who is he talking about...?
March 1, 2009 - 10:41 ET by supercon" also angered a lot of Democrats and people who aren't particularly partisan just by the tone of it."
The staff in the CNN newsroom?
That guy is a joke.If you ever want to hear what the DNC wants the public to think then just listen to Bill.He'll tell you what you think.
Because with a name like Obama... you know it has to be good.
First off, I hope he fails
March 1, 2009 - 10:41 ET by WorriedAt least some Obamabots were watching Rush. Maybe, just maybe, they heard what he was saying, not the way he said it. That's the problem with liberals, they only listen to what they want and then reintepret it so they can reassure themselves they're the good guys.
Rush could wish someone
March 1, 2009 - 10:49 ET by sublight68Rush could wish someone good afternoon and the MSM would report that he was bullying them to accept his view of the world.
"Slick Willy"
March 1, 2009 - 11:21 ET by iveseenitallBill Schneider, another "Slick Willy". This guy is one of the most biased hypocrites on CNN. Typical "liberal", butter wouldn't melt in the mouth of this phony. He sees nothing but anger in any point of view which is not his own. ""Alot of people saw anger in this speech", he says. Oh, and you determined this where, Slick?--- among your friends in the media? Illogical and false to the core. He saw the speech that way and then attributed his opinion to others.
And the anchor---stating that Schneider is among the best political team in America. Biased, hypocritical, mendacious, nasty, immature, and ignorant. --- this is the best CNN can do? "Journalism" is dead in America.
BTW, these clowns would be the first to call for a "Fairness Doctrine". Yet no sooner is the speech completed than they rush to give it a biased review, with no review from the other side. "Liberal" hypocrites all.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
I wouldn't call it angry
March 1, 2009 - 10:57 ET by nwahsI wouldn't call it angry or bullying. It was a typical "preaching to the choir" speech, sprinkled with half truths and rivers of unsubstantiated assumptions.
It wasn't angry. It was well controlled.
Beware of a crazy woman throwing a hash pipe.
Witch half truths are you refering to NW
March 1, 2009 - 11:02 ET by general companywhile you are at it lets hear about those rivers of unsubstantiated assumptions.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Right
March 1, 2009 - 11:07 ET by iveseenitallgeneral company:
Right on. You beat me to it. How about some specifics from "nwahs" concerning "half truths" and "assumptions".
NEVER,NEVER, trust a "liberal"
Problem is, now he is force to watch it
March 1, 2009 - 11:16 ET by general companySo he can back up his claim,
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
I've watched it already
March 1, 2009 - 15:05 ET by nwahsYou don't want a discussion. You want agreement. There's 150 people on this site that will agree with everything Rush says. You don't need me.
Beware of a crazy woman throwing a hash pipe.
Translation: I am unable to refute anything Rush said.
March 1, 2009 - 15:08 ET by Free StinkerYou don't want a discussion. You want agreement. There's 150 people on
this site that will agree with everything Rush says. You don't need
me.
Translation: I am unable to refute anything Rush said.
Do me a favor
March 1, 2009 - 15:16 ET by nwahsLink a post of yours that has anything of interest in it that was posted in the last 2 weeks. Other than this, I want to see your reasoning on something - anything else. Indulge me. Link to a post of yours that is not a heckle, or a simple agreement, but elaborates on an idea.
Beware of a crazy woman throwing a hash pipe.
.
March 1, 2009 - 15:24 ET by general company"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Be on your guard general.
March 1, 2009 - 15:40 ET by cocodrieBe on your guard grneral. Carbon Copy's tag line says he is going to throw his hash pipe.
Jesus Loves You
Pitiful
March 1, 2009 - 15:23 ET by general companyEveryone has to do for you, go find what your looking for yourself.
Your lazy and have know use for debate, so why do you post here? Least I made an attempt to debate you, but you do seem to be up to it?
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Typical Liberal
March 1, 2009 - 15:36 ET by Sergeant ROCKAlways looking for hand-outs.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Bizarro Shawn
March 1, 2009 - 15:45 ET by Free StinkerYou don't seem to understand how this works.
I do not need to prove anything to *you*, and in fact, your very reply indicates an admitance that *you* post heckles, simple agreement, but no elaboration. Looks like someone is projecting.
So I guess we will just have to take NW word for it
March 1, 2009 - 15:18 ET by general companyLike heck, geez
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
I didn't watch it.
March 1, 2009 - 15:18 ET by CobraMannawhs,
I didn't watch the speech, so please enlighten me as to which statements you feel were "half truths and rivers of unsubstantiated assumptions." I can then view the speech myself, and apply a critical eye to the content therein.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities
of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
I did that in the actual speech thread
March 1, 2009 - 15:21 ET by nwahsJust look for the posts with 20 -30 personal attacks following them.
Beware of a crazy woman throwing a hash pipe.
Prove your assertions.
March 1, 2009 - 15:29 ET by CobraManYou made assertions in THIS thread that you've yet to substantiate. It's apparent that you are unwilling, or are unable, to substantiate your assertions. You're now avoiding the subject altogether.
Unless you are willing to substantiate those claims, I can only conclude that it is YOU who are offering "half truths and rivers of unsubstantiated assumptions."
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities
of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
Believe what you want, I don't care
March 1, 2009 - 15:31 ET by nwahsHere's an idea, go make a post somewhere.
Beware of a crazy woman throwing a hash pipe.
I'm making it here.
March 1, 2009 - 15:45 ET by CobraManI just read everything you posted in the other thread and you didn't substantiate ANYTHING! You used partial statements, inaccurate quotes, and innuendo in a failed attempt to "prove" your assertions, and people responded to those inaccurate claims. You then started attacking them as a mean to deflect criticism for your false assertions.
Now, here, you're still can not substantiate your claims and are back to using deflection as a means of avoiding debate. It's obvious that your assertions are false and that you can't substantiate them. I's obvious that YOU are acting in the very manner that you accuse Rush of acting. It's obvious that YOU are the "Rush Limbaugh" that you were referring to.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities
of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
en re your tagline
March 1, 2009 - 15:33 ET by botgdo ya really think we need to be warned about your mom?
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts
Oh my
March 1, 2009 - 15:37 ET by general companyBet he didnt throw it back?
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
well GC, that would explain
March 1, 2009 - 15:43 ET by botgthe non-linear, nonsequitorian nature of his postings
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts
He's plagiarizing someone else
March 1, 2009 - 15:57 ET by CobraMannawahs didn't actually watch the speech. He most likely followed a thread on another site, like the Huffington Post, and copied the arguments that someone else posted there, someone who did watch the speech. He then posted those arguments here.
nawah is a poser, a plagiarist. That's why he finds it so difficult to stay focused. He isn't thinking for himself. He's letting someone else do the thinking for him.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities
of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
Nice try. I've engaged
March 1, 2009 - 15:28 ET by fitzfongNice try. I've engaged you constantly. But, unlike most posters(including quite a few liberals here), you don't have the chops to defend your position, so you unleash the usual stereotypes and ad hominems to buy yourself time. You're like the boxer who has to resort to the low blow and the rabbit punch just to get the referee to help you out of the corner.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Yes Nwahs, please list the
March 1, 2009 - 13:05 ET by BDYes Nwahs, please list the "half truths and rivers of unsubstantiated assumptions."
If you cannot, or do not, then we will assume youdidnot actually watch the speech and are simply doing the liberal thing of throwing out ASSUMTIONS about the speech.
Anyone wanna lay odds of Nwahs actually replying with such?
1000 to 1 Odds
March 1, 2009 - 15:43 ET by Sergeant ROCKAnyone wanna lay odds of Nwahs actually replying with such?
Evidently, you have to provide information for both sides of the debate. You know, with him being such a go-getter and all.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Don't waste your time,
March 1, 2009 - 15:09 ET by fitzfongDon't waste your time, general company. It's well established that nwahs doesn't even know why nwahs doesn't like Rush Limbaugh. So he creates these broad generalizations out of nothing, presents them as objective facts, then tries to escape direct challenges to his declarations by playing misdirection games...dropping further meritless blanket statements to change the subject. You should see some of the threads he posts on...Johnnie Cochran would be proud.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Dodge and Parry
March 1, 2009 - 15:15 ET by Sergeant ROCKWell, of course.. noballs is just here to disrupt, divert, dodge and parry.Typical liberal tactics.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Yea I know
March 1, 2009 - 15:42 ET by general companypresents them as objective facts, then tries to escape direct challenges to his declarations by playing misdirection
Sad thing is, he isnt even good at it.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Note to the worthies in here...
March 1, 2009 - 15:25 ET by HelenSI think the prudent course ot follow would be thus: when encountering a freshly deposited, steaming pile of Sterling or Nwahs (pronounced nwaaaaa!) one should carefully step over said pile, move on, and let it lie there and compost.
Stepping in either one will only smear the problem all over your shoe and then the whole room ends up smelling like...sterling.
Me - "The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years - the cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil."
You are right Helen. It's
March 1, 2009 - 15:30 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsYou are right Helen. It's sometimes tough to ignore them. It would be much better if the left could actually engage in logical debate, but I fear that is impossible, judging from the ones who come here.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
It is indeed tough to
March 1, 2009 - 15:40 ET by HelenSIt is indeed tough to ignore them, especially when they splatter. However, I have noticed that it is much more synaptically satisfying to talk about them than to them. :o)
Me - "The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years - the cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil."
Very good Helen
March 1, 2009 - 15:44 ET by general companyHowever, I have noticed that it is much more synaptically satisfying to talk about them than to them. :o)
I make the mistake of doing both?
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Oh no, no mistake. It's
March 1, 2009 - 15:55 ET by HelenSOh no, no mistake. It's only a matter of how much nwaaaaahs, sterling or otherwise, you can take. I seem to have a low tolerance for fools and when I'm not close enough to actually deposit them in a dumpster somewhere, I have to sit in the corner and whimper at the unfairness of it!
Not :o) But they are fun to talk about, aren't they? Like making fun of idiots and fools has always been! In the words of some unknown bumper philosopher: "Too bad ignorance (or stupidity) isn't painful"
Me - "The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years - the cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil."
Folks, I must ask you
March 1, 2009 - 11:00 ET by Svenare these reactions from the Left on par with a party that's in power? I say no!!
First, they DO NOT need the GOP to push this crazy spending agenda! If it will be so successful, why don't the Dems want all the credit for themselves? Fact: They want cover when it fails big time!!
Secondly, these attacks from Schneider and the other leftist media outlets show only one thing: FEAR!!
I wish our Leaders (so called) would understand what the left already does: Conservatism ALWAYS WINS!!
Rush's closing comment must be absorbed into our brains (paraphrasing): We conservatives shouldn't view ourselves as the minority in this fight...
Hey Liberals, we smell your fear!!
Sven.... I haven't
March 1, 2009 - 17:34 ET by bigtimerSven....
I haven't forgot some of his closing comments either you put here...and so true they are...when are the repubs as a whole going to wake up to that fact and act accordingly?
Will libs ever stop whining
March 1, 2009 - 11:03 ET by katiejaneabout people saying things that hurt their "itty-bitty" feelings? It's hard to understand why Democrats would be angry that a speaker at the CPAC would say things they thought harsh - of course these are the same people who railled against Pres Bush and called him a murderer, a liar, a drunk, bah, blah.
Why would someone who thinks Obama's policies are bad for the country wish him success in implementing them? Why shouldn't Rush display contempt for policies that he thinks will destroy the fabric of the nation?
CNN "News Alert" blurbs during speech were also skewed
March 1, 2009 - 11:08 ET by gopcongressI'm in the process of going through the speech that was recorded by TacoJosh (a big thanks for that, by the way!). He used CNN, and I had already found one or two blurbs that were taken out of context. I'll be back with the report in a couple of ours
Moderate... Democrat... Liberal... Progressive... Socialist... Communist.
The progression is clear as day.
Distrusted
March 1, 2009 - 11:06 ET by BW222CNN isn't known as "The Most Distrusted Name in News" for nothing. Lou Dobbs is the only person at CNN that I would ever trust.
BW222
The man behind the jowls.
March 1, 2009 - 11:07 ET by JRJ08Some people here seem far too sensitive about what some talking-head commentator on CNN says, and not sensitive enough about what Rush Limbaugh says. Here's a few factoids about your self-anointed political guru: Limbaugh never studied economics. Never earned an advanced degree in anything. In fact, he never even earned a college degree. He never served in the armed forces, nor has he ever held any public office. In fact, he has never served his country in any way, other than to demonize his fellow Americans, and make millions in the process. This former TV sidekick of Wally George, discovered his malignant niche in life many years ago when he stumbled upon a pulsating aneurysm of conservative rage in this country. The seething anger of various hate groups were coalescing and going mainstream, and Limbaugh endeavored to become their voice. His crowning glory was appearing recently as the honored guest and orator at CPAC. Taking an hour longer than the 20 minutes he had been allotted, Limbaugh made a high school civics error by attributing a famous line from the Declaration of Independence to the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution. And, it is no small irony that most of his fawning audience didn't catch the mistake. I've seen this character before, in several old black and white movies. He's the fat, sweaty guy in the rumpled white suit, surrounded by a few demented followers in a small damp room, screaming that his enemies and their evil ways are going to bring destruction upon the world. Then the roof caves in.
Thank you for your opinion, JRJ
March 1, 2009 - 11:09 ET by gopcongressNow run along.
Moderate... Democrat... Liberal... Progressive... Socialist... Communist.
The progression is clear as day.
Give him a break
March 1, 2009 - 11:22 ET by general companyHis feeling are hurt because he cant make that public school and state college degree work for him. So he beats up on the successful. Funny thing is, Rush talked about this specifically. Obviously he did not bother to watch, but still cant help complaining about him anyway
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Personal attacks
March 1, 2009 - 11:16 ET by iveseenitallJRJO8:
How " mean spirited". And the "liberals" wonder what has brought the personal attacks from the other side. Hate brings hate, JRJO8.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Funny how
March 1, 2009 - 11:26 ET by general companyOnly a lib is complaining that Rush went over his allotment of time. Guess the more he speaks the angrer they get. : ]
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Did it ever occur to you
March 1, 2009 - 11:19 ET by richb313Did it ever occur to you that this mess we are in right now has been brought to us entirely by the College Educated. It has always been the "Smart People" who do the most damage to any society. I am not saying this to have everyone attack the College educated but I am saying this to prove how stupid your argument is. Lincoln never graduated from College, High School, etc. I might be wrong, but I think that Truman did not have a college degree either. What he did have was a love of country, and common sense. I am afraid your argument is plain silly.
College Educated Socialists
March 1, 2009 - 11:26 ET by Sergeant ROCKWhere else do they get their utopian ideas of socialism?
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
One simple rhetorical
March 1, 2009 - 14:32 ET by rockyracoonOne simple rhetorical question sums it up for me, you are right on. Thanks Sgt. Rock!!!
Right On
March 1, 2009 - 11:39 ET by iveseenitallrichb313:
"Common sense is not common", so the saying goes. While I believe an unbiased education is good for anyone, I also do not believe it causes anyone to have "common sense". Some of the most intelligent and trustworthy people I've known in my life had no formal education. And some of the most arrogant, ignorant, untrustworthy people ( "liberals" ) had doctorates. Go figure.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Help me out
March 1, 2009 - 11:24 ET by Kirk HallWhere did you get that information. Do you have the website number?
and I still laugh at that KH
March 1, 2009 - 14:08 ET by HeavyChevyPriceless.
Factually Challenged
March 1, 2009 - 11:27 ET by P.J. GladnickYou appear to be factually challenged. Rush was NEVER a sidekick to Wally George.
JR
March 1, 2009 - 11:35 ET by jdlybrandI never studied economics either; but I'm smart enough to know that if I have five bucks in my pocket, I have five bucks to spend. How freaking hard is that to figure out?
~Wow
March 1, 2009 - 11:36 ET by choselife3xLiberals have incredibly bizarre fantasies.
Hope and Change=
Despair and Socialism
JR, your attack is a
March 1, 2009 - 12:56 ET by SmartypantsJR, your attack is a typical ad hominem one which the left loves to implement. It makes no sense on any level. Your empty insults are more a reflection of your lack of intellect than on Limbaugh. Try to actually argue Limbaugh's point instead of attacking the man personally. Nothing you state in your message counters any of the substance of Limbaugh's arguments--nothing! You've learned your debate skills at the Al Franken school of political philosophy; and, just so you know, that's not a good thing.
"The race is not always to the swift nor the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet."
Here's a few factoids about
March 1, 2009 - 13:26 ET by BDHere's a few factoids about your self-anointed political guru:
The seething anger of various hate groups...
Advanced Degrees
March 1, 2009 - 13:48 ET by nofate"Limbaugh never studied economics. Never earned an advanced degree in anything."
Thanks to the "uneducated" Rush, I have had the motivation to read such authors as Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Friedrich von Hayek, William Buckley. Not saying I understand it all, but those are only a few of the books I've read due to the ignorance of Rush. You're a troll. Not worth the space you take up here.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
Oh, no! Rush Limbaugh
March 1, 2009 - 14:06 ET by fitzfongOh, no! Rush Limbaugh didn't study economics in college? You mean he didn't sit through lectures in economic illiteracy by lightweight pseudo-intellectual parasites like Paul Krugman? You mean instead of sitting through tedious classes taught by a pack of self-important neo-Marxists who couldn't even find their own a**es if they used both hands, he went out and got a job?
You contribute nothing to this site other than being an easy target for ridicule. You have a bizarre pride in and self-righteousness about your own ignorance. But keep 'em coming, dummy. You're a lot of fun to slap around. And by the way, as a resident of Orange County during the heyday of Wally George, I can tell you categorically that Rush Limbaugh probably never even met Wally George...and he certainly never worked with/for him. Peddle your myths to the mouth breathers at Kos or HuffPo.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
WOW, THANK YOU
March 1, 2009 - 14:34 ET by DEVILDOCMOMso much for letting me know that nothing can be learned outside of college....imagine, tho' I do have advanced degrees, I NEVER learned anything other than what was taught to me. Boy, I sure will have to be careful in the future to let the experience I have gained in the last 30+ years not to flow over to my practice.
Rush Limbaugh may never
March 1, 2009 - 15:54 ET by lnthompRush Limbaugh may never have served in the military, but he does understand the military's purpose and respect the members of the military, unlike John ("did you know I served in Viet Nam?") Kerry, or John ("my fellow marines are murderers") Murtha, Bill Clinton, Hilary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, or Barack Obama.
Do you really believe Rush Limbaugh could have lasted 20 years in radio, gathering more listeners every year, if he was what you say he is?
Lee T / USN(ret) / Oregon City, OR
When responsible people make mistakes, responsible people bear the burden. When irresponsible people make mistakes, responsible people bear the burden. -- UserFriendly.org, 2/12/2009
Actually, JR, Rush probably did himself a favor leaving college
March 1, 2009 - 16:16 ET by R D HelmIf he hadn't, he might have turned out like you.
There have been some stories coming out about how more and more American males are opting out of a traditional college "education," particularly white males, and it is not because they don't have the money to attend.
Can't say I blame them, either, as they would have to endure endless hours in the classroom, being blamed for every ill that has befallen humanity since the Big Bang.
It was already getting bad when I went to college, and that was two decades ago. I can't imagine how bad it has gotten since
-Dave
Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.
I will bite my resume
March 2, 2009 - 09:27 ET by seaniepI will bite
my resume includes a BA in International Affairs (histroy, econ, political science), an MS in Information Studies (computers and library science), USMC 0341 (United States Marines Corps, Infantry - Mortarman)
so by that, I would expect that no one, would have any right to tell me what to do?
you know what? I don't like Bono, but he does bring a lot of attention to problems in the world that do need fixing (I don't like his ideas for fixing them) George Clooney may be a bit of a clown, but what is happening in Darfur is real - and I do applaud him for helping to bring international attention to it (much like the world should have done with Rwanda) - the list goes on and on and on - and while they may not be technically "qualified" to speak on a topic since, as an actor, they are actors etc - but that does not mean that they are not allowed to read a book when they feel like it, educate themselves a bit
its America, its Freedom of speech, Jeanne Garafolo has just as much a right as anyone else to sound off, and you can turn a deaf ear if you would like, Rush Limbaugh has the right to say whatever he would like, and again, turn the deaf ear if you want, that is your right
btw - you are an assclown
No wonder...
March 1, 2009 - 11:31 ET by jdlybrandI can see why Elvis shot his television!
It kills me when these
March 1, 2009 - 12:03 ET by Mr. MikeIt kills me when these libtards start talking about mean spirited and angry. Did these turdbots miss Palin's inquisition by anal probe? Geez, the only bullies I see are on the Left and they are trying to forever destroy the Right of this country.
CNN Bias
March 1, 2009 - 12:30 ET by slickwillie2001Same old biased vocabulary; Republicans are angry, democratics are passionate. Republicans have mobs, democratics have demonstrations. Republicans have conspiracies, democratics have grass-roots movements. Republicans have compounds, democratics have family farms. This kind of nonsense gets old fast.
Gets old fast? No. Has been old for a long time. But . . .
March 1, 2009 - 13:14 ET by CKA in Red State USA. . .oh so predictable, right?
Clearly, the advocacy/adversary media's not very creative, in that they continue to push the same old worn-out words and phrases.
Remember during the campaign when someone started using the words "light" and "dark" to describe, respectively, the Democrats, liberals and leftists versus the Republicans, conservatives and anyone else who opposed the DLLs?
But what's missing from their list of evils--and something they cannot replace--is that the DLLs are now the party of death, secularism, anti-America, anti-Americans, anti-Constititution, anti-defense, anti-anything-non-black, anti-natural-born-citizens, anti-education, anti-capitalism, anti-decency.
And they know they cannot compete or find ways to hide these things.
Poor Bill
March 1, 2009 - 12:43 ET by DelsaI think we should all go to our local store, purchase a box of Kleenex, and send it to CNN and Bill so all the SOB's over there can dry their tears.
At least Rush didn't call for SOB ama's death or wish him to die of eating fried food or........
Let's send the Kleenex
Liberals have the uncanny
March 1, 2009 - 12:58 ET by ConservativeRexLiberals have the uncanny ability to live up to their caricature. Liberals do not get angry when they get lied to, they get angry when you tell the truth about them.
Schneider proves this point, time and again. And apparently the idiocracy that e-mailed CNN as well.
The truth needs to be shouted out about these socialists. Get them to the point where they start spitting foam and veins are popping out of their foreheads. Then laugh at them. Works every time it's tried.
Great strategy. Mainly because . . .
March 1, 2009 - 13:09 ET by CKA in Red State USA. . .the truth to them is like sunlight and the Cross of Christ to Dracula.
Indeed, Rush Limbaugh may
March 1, 2009 - 12:59 ET by SmartypantsIndeed, Rush Limbaugh may have been somewhat "angry" in his speech, but what exactly is wrong with that? Are liberals the only ones who ever have the right to be angry? The left has been nothing but angry for eight years; in fact, the left is always angry, even when they are in power.
"The race is not always to the swift nor the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet."
Anger is not a politically correct response unless, of course...
March 1, 2009 - 13:07 ET by CKA in Red State USA. . . you're a crybaby Democrat, liberal and/or leftist.
They're all a bunch of spineless pansies who have no life other than to complain and nitpick at anything anyone outside of their morally and intellectually bankrupt gene pool says or does.
They're also too dumb to understand that what they are doing now is revealing even more of what their true colors are--and that is not red, white and blue, but hammer-and-sickle red.
I'm going to pull a Glen Beck analysis....
March 1, 2009 - 13:10 ET by timotheCNN is most leftist news on television and the web. It is further left than MSNBC, PBS, and the Associated Press.
Here is how I got there.
With the exception of PBS, other news broadcasts and websites have financial reason to give voice to the other side. Even the NBC networks, who are constantly excoriated by the likes of Bill O'Reilly, will throw a bone to the objective viewer on occasion. Reporters like Jake Tapper and Rick Santelli along with hosts Larry Kudlow, Joe Scarborough, and to some extent, Charlie Gibson offer mostly fair assessments of the political landscape.
Conversely, CNN "pretends" to give time to the other side. Other than the unshakable Bill Bennett, who is clearly conservative, no other CNN commentator or reporter plays it straight. All of their high profile hosts lean left and occasional contributors like Schneider, Cafferty, and Gergen are set up as fair analysts, but they are further left than the hosts.
Furthermore, the CNN website simply does not report stories important to conservatives. The latest (of many) examples is their complete lack of reporting about the nationwide Tea Parties protesting the stimulus plan. The way they filter the news on their website is ridiculously partisan.
As such, I have chosen once again to boycott CNN. (The first time I boycotted them was when they showed video of Americans being killed by Iraqi insurgent snipers.) I suggest you do the same.
Damn right I hope Obama fails.
March 1, 2009 - 13:12 ET by ArchConservativeI hope he fails at everything he tries.
I hope Hillary fails.
I hope Pelosi fails.
I hope all (d)emocrats fail.
I even hope that Snow and Specter fail.
These people are destroying this country, our freedoms, and our entire economic infrastructure.
I hope for change on 01.20.2013. But I actually am praying for this weasel-man-child, socialist, terrorist-lover to be impeached.
You support the troops by supporting the mission! If you don't support the mission, have the guts to say you don't support the troops.
Obama: Not my President. Ever.
Journalist NOT
March 1, 2009 - 13:23 ET by nofateSchneider is just proving that he is a sycophant to anyone who is not actually drinking the kool-aid. The only line that great, on fire speech crossed was to not be respectful and subservient to the progressive agenda and the lord Obama. Some supposedly sympathetic ditz on Fox, just following the speech, stated that this speech was "red meat for conservatives". WRONG!!! As I stated in another comment, they don't understand what Rush is about. As Rush is fond of saying, he loves tweaking liberals. (I hate that term for progressives- it is another word they have managed to coopt) What that speech was was a giant dose of the absolute truth that the progressives have done their darndest to hide from the public using the MSM as their sycophants. The whole thing was a giant TWEAK!
Hey progressives- TWEAK, TWEAK, TWEAK!
What is really sad is that many of our beltway and political class so-called "intelligentsia" don't understand what Rush is talking about either and spend the next several days apologizing to "moderate" elements for Rush's "red meat rant". We got a lot of edumacating to do.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
JR
March 1, 2009 - 13:21 ET by DelsaLimbaugh has what your hybrid self will NEVER have no matter how much education you achieve!
And that is COMMON SENSE !!
Stupid media, idiotic twitter comments
March 1, 2009 - 13:28 ET by Lord ErondOnce again, they lie about his "I want Obama to fail line". They also fail to note the compliments paid by Rush to Obama.
The Twitter comments? I've never seen a bigger collection of misguided factually bereft morons in my entire life. Maybe if they get out of their mother's basement and start actually living, they might get it.
"What you can not enforce, do not command" -Sophocles-
'Hope he fails' nonsense
March 1, 2009 - 13:29 ET by slickwillie2001This 'hope he fails' meme is being demagogued up and down the block by the liberals, including posters here. It's disgusting. Let's not forget that millions of democratics in 2001 simply did not accept that President George W. Bush was our President. Gore and many of his acolytes still insist that he won the election of 2000. I see refusal to accept a President as our own as far worse than hoping that his programs fail. Rush and any others have made it clear that when they say they want him to fail, that they mean his political programs and not the entire country. That would be ridiculous and un-conservative.
I have not heard a single Republican or conservative say that they did not accept Obammy's Presidency.
PS Only the far-left wackjobs like Soros have said that they want America to fail.
I saw this yesterday...as
March 1, 2009 - 13:32 ET by bigtimerI saw this yesterday...as usual, poor Bill was just beside himself...
I loved it!
When the left is confronted with the truth...they can't handle it...so they use third grade tactics and do exactly what this poor critter did...but for him, it is par for the course.
I will give CNN credit...they were the only network that at least gave all of this issue regarding Rush and his speech yesterday any decent time....even Fox didn't very much at all after he was done, I was very disappointed.
"....it also angered a lot
March 1, 2009 - 13:34 ET by bacadog"....it also angered a lot of Democrats and people who aren't particularly partisan just by the tone of it."
Pardon my language, but who gives a shit what those people think.
Pfftttbb!!
March 1, 2009 - 13:37 ET by Sergeant ROCKThat's my sentiment exactly.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
"Limbaugh Speech Was
March 1, 2009 - 13:39 ET by HelenS"Limbaugh Speech Was 'Angry, Mocking, Bullying, Harsh, and Full of Contempt' "
...So?
And may I add, the transcript of the speach is available on foxnews.com so I will be reading it at my leisure later today.
Thank you Rush for speaking for so many of us! We love you, man!
Me - "The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years - the cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil."
How do you disagree yet want Obama to succeed?
March 1, 2009 - 13:50 ET by nkviking75SCHNEIDER: Well, he did say he hopes Obama fails. Now that in my view crosses a line. It's one thing to say I disagree with the President, I think he's wrong, I think his policies are wrong. A lot of people feel that way. Republicans voted against them. One can even argue these policies won't work, some economists say that. There's either not enough spending, too much spending, they're not the right answer but to say "I hope he fails."
How do you disagree with Obama's policies and believe them to be wrong and dangerous and still want him to succeed? Obama's idiot economics will undoubtedly make things worse. Limbaugh and the rest of us want Obama to fail because it'll be the best thing for America. My loyalty, and Rush's, is to the country before the man in the Oval Office.
The press spent 8 years actively working to sabotage the Presidency of George W. Bush. That's a lot worse than saying you want Obama to fail.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
180 degrees
March 1, 2009 - 13:51 ET by Sergeant ROCKMy loyalty, and Rush's, is to the country before the man in the Oval Office.
Which is the exact opposite of liberals and liberalism.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
SCHNEIDER needs to listen!!!!
March 1, 2009 - 13:50 ET by Roscoe MendagoWhat speech was this dip-wad listening to? Isn't it the oppositions stated goal to oppose, conservatives verses liberals. Since when do liberals not come across as angry, mocking, harsh, contemptuous, and I'll add one, flipp'n lying sacks of poo.
Rush pointed out in his glorious speech that he's not allowed to oppose Obama's plans, while literally all the Democrat leaders opposed Bush every step of the way, criticizing the surge, and it's commanding general. On the economy, the leftists utilized the time tested strategic weapon of "self fulfilling prophecy". They bad mouthed the economy when it was booming, as if they knew the consequences of the bad mortgage mess that was hard charging it's way to ruining America's economy.
Again, what speech was this piss ant Schneider listening to? Any leftist give a 1hr20min speech and there wouldn't be an audience to hear it.
Someone tell me this isn't really happening....
Vexed I tell you
March 1, 2009 - 13:59 ET by SterlingI do not understand why Mr. Limbaugh gets so much attention? As someone who does not agree with him all the time I am vexed as to why some pundits go after him. It seems that no matter what he does he comes out with a stronger fan base and more publicity. I have learned to live with him, I like to compare him to Oprah- cannot stand either one but both will always be in the public eye pushing their world view.
Well lets think about that
March 1, 2009 - 14:13 ET by general companyIt seems that no matter what he does he comes out with a stronger fan base and more publicity.
Couldn't be the principled message? No that cant be it
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Saint Rush
March 1, 2009 - 14:20 ET by SterlingI know that you are itching for me to attack his personal life but I will not fall into that trap. His listeners are just like Oprah’s. They will follow him around blindly just because of who he is what he has done and what he stands for. It is border-line religious their devotion to him; oh ye Pharisees.
Oprah vs Rush
March 1, 2009 - 14:25 ET by Sergeant ROCKThe most assinine statement of the day: His listeners are just like Oprah’s.
Damn, you're a moron.. lol.. Call it 'Sterling Stupidity'.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Brainwashed
March 1, 2009 - 14:51 ET by SterlingOhhhh… It seems that I with all my vast knowledge of observation have hit upon something that is truthful. The anger that is being exhibited towards my statement only solidifies my keen insight. Rush is an empty suit, he is by far more nuanced than Hannity or O’Reily but so is a potato chip. His listeners will jump off a cliff if he asked them to. Just like Oprah he has a certain segment of America brainwashed. All that I am saying is that I have learned to live with him being in the spotlight, just like Oprah.
Finally, I do not understand why some think that I am a liberal? I am a very right conservative who just happens to love trees and animals.
Pseudo-Conservative
March 1, 2009 - 15:02 ET by Sergeant ROCKBecause you share the same symptoms of mental derangement that liberals do, that's why. Attacking Rush just shows you to be a fraud.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
"Because you share the same
March 1, 2009 - 15:08 ET by Sterling"Because you share the same symptoms of mental derangement that liberals do, that's why. Attacking Rush just shows you to be a fraud. "
Thankyou sir, you have just proved my point.
Sterling Stupidity
March 1, 2009 - 15:11 ET by Sergeant ROCKForget to take your medication today? You have no point to prove. You're just ranting and raving like a liberal. If anything, you proved MY point.
Idiot.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Rush is an empty suit? At
March 1, 2009 - 15:04 ET by BDRush is an empty suit? At least he has positions.
Obama simply is for "Hope and Change." He dared not actually advertise his actual beliefs because they are political cyanide....
Sterling... You're a
March 1, 2009 - 15:09 ET by bigtimerSterling...
You're a right conservative eh?
Best laugh I have heard all day!
Though shalt not criticize The Limbaugh
March 1, 2009 - 15:09 ET by nwahsYou shall be plagued by sheep spitting idiocy. Many, many sheep.
Beware of a crazy woman throwing a hash pipe.
Surprise, surprise.
March 1, 2009 - 15:17 ET by fitzfongSurprise, surprise. Nwahs, the resident victim has crawled out of his hole. Care to dazzle us some more with your uneducated sloganeering?
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Well first, I need to email NewsBusters
March 1, 2009 - 15:44 ET by nwahsI want an "ok", that I can safely respond in kind to personal insults without having my account banned. I've seen numerous people call people obscene names an when someone with an opposing opinion replies in kind, out comes the "You've crossed the line! Your account is going to be banned!" When I get a confirmation that responding to this drivel in kind won't lead to my account being banned, I'll show you how to insult someone. I have a feeling when the noise level from these personal attacks gets too great, dissenting opinions will be the first to go.
Until then, you can read my opinions or not . I really don't care. I know every author is writing to a certain person or type of person when he pens something. Take my word Fritz, in my case its not you or anyone like you. I don't care what you think.
Beware of a crazy woman throwing a hash pipe.
a PM would be easier
March 1, 2009 - 16:07 ET by botgbesides would you address him as Mr. Busters or the more familiar News?
i take it that "sheep spitting idiocy. Many, many sheep" is not an ad hominem on your planet, what color is the sky there btw?
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts
Self-fulfilling Prophesy
March 1, 2009 - 16:29 ET by CobraMannawhas has created a Self-Fulfilling Prophesy. He admits that he wants to see how many ad hominem attacks he can post before he gets banned. He justifies this as attempt to be given "proof" that he wont get banned for responding to ad hominem attacks from others.
Once he DOES get banned (if he gets banned), this will "prove" his mistaken belief that Conservatories don't allow free speech, won't allow debate. I've seen this type of behavior before, many times, in the past.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities
of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
You have that OK
March 1, 2009 - 16:13 ET by CobraManYou have that OK, as long as you don't INITIATE attacks like you did with your previous post.
"You shall be plagued by sheep spitting idiocy. Many, many sheep."
That's an attack. You didn't respond to a personal attack, you issued a general attack on anyone who tries to defend their support for Rush. How does the shoe fit now, Cinderella?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities
of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
Another cop out?
March 1, 2009 - 16:15 ET by general companyI have a feeling when the noise level from these personal attacks
gets too great, dissenting opinions will be the first to go.
How many is that today?
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Nwahs: I have replied to
March 1, 2009 - 16:34 ET by BDNwahs:
I have replied to each of your posts and have not lowered myself to denigrating you. Yet, you do not reply any of my efforts to communicate with you.
Why is that?
I have asked for you to please reference comments that limbaugh made that were not backed by logic, yet you have not replied to that, rather tyou have actually replied to those you accuse of insulting you.
This is not a logical position based on your earlier statements.
Why?
March 2, 2009 - 07:11 ET by Sergeant ROCKEOM
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
End of mission? Has he
March 2, 2009 - 07:35 ET by BDEnd of mission? Has he fled the blog?
End Of Message
March 2, 2009 - 07:41 ET by Sergeant ROCKWhy? You may as well go to Daily Koz or DU and try to reason with those people.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Until then, you can read my
March 1, 2009 - 16:56 ET by fitzfongUntil then, you can read my opinions or not . I really don't care. I know every author is writing to a certain person or type of person when he pens something. Take my word Fritz, in my case its not you or anyone like you. I don't care what you think.
Uh, yes you do. Otherwise, you wouldn't unravel in front of everyone and threaten to go to the meds to get permission to personally attack me.
The record shows that you initiated the attacks on this post and on the previous subject on Friday. In fact, you expected...even invited...what you refer to as "flaming". I challenged you time and time again to produce substantive support for your erroneous blanket statements. But rather than accept the challenge, you engaged in a campaign of evasive tactics...ignoring the questions and shifting to a new set of blanket statements in reply. Then, when you reached the edge of the rhetorical cliff, you turned the argument into a petty, personal character assault...you know, the reading my profile thing. Classy touch.
But why bother seeking the permission of the powers that be to launch this apocalyptic personal attack you're threatening to employ? After all, NewBusters provides a whole host of alternative venues for you to vent your irrational bile. If you want to spare the rubber necks from the ugly scene you've promised, you can always use the PM or the woodshed. You have my permission to flame away. The only problem is that you clearly lack the rhetorical skills to deliver the withering commentary your bluster suggests that you'll produce. But why ask for permission when you can seek forgiveness later on? In for a penny, in for a pound, right? Besides, even if your response is so objectionable that they run you from this site, it's not as if you'll be missed.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
You're the blowhard who
March 2, 2009 - 07:26 ET by Jack BauerYou're the blowhard who called a female Christian poster a MILF -- in your mind that stands for a MOTHER I'D LIKE TO F+++? You're such a classy guy.
~'My vast knowledge' 'My keen insight'
March 1, 2009 - 15:13 ET by choselife3xYou forgot your 'humility' and 'modesty'.
Hope and Change=
Despair and Socialism
Are you sure...?
March 1, 2009 - 14:26 ET by EverettPI that would have been a perfect statement if you were talking about your beloved Obama. At least Rush has some substance...
To prevent you from further
March 1, 2009 - 14:26 ET by fitzfongTo prevent you from further deluding yourself, no one is itching for you breathe, much less attack someone's personal life. Let me boil it down for you this way: we like him because people like you hate him.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
You must be talking about
March 1, 2009 - 14:28 ET by cocodrieYou must be talking about Present Obama the founder of The Church Of Good Fleecing. OH, the blind leading the blind. Careful uou don't fall into the pit.
Jesus Loves You
Sterling...Rush speaks
March 1, 2009 - 14:36 ET by bigtimerSterling...
Rush speaks for us....you may try to listen to him say those exact words now and then, did you listen to the end of his speech yesterday and his gratitude for his listeners....eh?
I follow no one around with blinders on....unlike the lemmings in the msm and on your side of the aisle. O is the perfect example of people diving off the cliff for this man and his team...and you will all be begging for a life-preserver before he is done handing the control back over to the repub party as long as we have a strong leader with values for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which is what congress creatures are sworn in to uphold....
Which the left has never done, they trample all over them...to put it politely.
I am not itching for you to do anything
March 1, 2009 - 14:43 ET by general companyYou will continue your dilutional comments all by yourself, you sure dont need me.
I personaly dont follow anyone, I listen and use what I can, either from you or anyone else. You should try it some time, never know, your brain may start functioning again. Good luck
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Why does he get
March 1, 2009 - 14:17 ET by BDWhy does he get attention? Because he gets under their skin by stating the truth. THey live in a make believe land where people who work hard and are punished by the government seemingly work even harder.......
Limbaugh and the rest of us live in reality....
I am currently paying out 44% of my gross income to taxes of one form or another. Tax me even higher and I have NO incentive to work harder.
Exactly BD
March 1, 2009 - 14:22 ET by Sergeant ROCKI've been telling people that if it gets any worse, I'll have to quit my job because I won't be able to afford working!
I'll just get on the Obama gravy train. I have a kegerator, PlayStation and a big screen TV. It's my Constitutional right to sit on my ass at taxpayer's expense!
Suckers!!
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
"I am currently paying out
March 1, 2009 - 14:22 ET by Sterling"I am currently paying out 44% of my gross income to taxes of one form or another. Tax me even higher and I have NO incentive to work harder."
Looks like those Bush Tax-Cuts really paid off.
As a matter of fact, they
March 1, 2009 - 14:32 ET by fitzfongAs a matter of fact, they did. And another round of tax cuts would really get this economy going in the right direction. But the economic illiterate Marxist empty suit in the White House is more interested in accumulating power than in stimulating the economy...so tax cuts won't happen. By the way, the decline of the economy started when/because the Democrats got control of Congress two years ago.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Your hands are not clean
March 1, 2009 - 15:04 ET by SterlingStill defending Bush. Of course nothing was his fault. TARP, Paulson, an inept SEC, and an overreaction to a recession that paved the way for Obama to spend my grandchildren’s future wages. I pity you so-called republicans who put your party above your country, which is why I do not call myself one. If you ask me I did not leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me.
I pity you so-called
March 1, 2009 - 15:16 ET by NewsbusterbrownI pity you so-called republicans who put your party above your country,
Very fortunate that you typed that instead of saying that in front of me.
I have more contempt for clods like you who would rather blow up the country by helping to get Obama in the White House (yes, you are to blame if you didn't vote or voted for someone like Barr who had 0% chance of being elected) so we can all start from scratch again then Democrats who actually believe in liberalism.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Oh, gee, Sterling. How
March 1, 2009 - 15:53 ET by fitzfongOh, gee, Sterling. How original of you! Steal and contort a line from Ronald Reagan...there's a way to earn credibility.
I agree with you on one thing, though. By allowing Congress to spend, spend, spend, Bush let government growth outpace the increased tax collections that his tax rate cuts caused. He undid all the good that was done by letting spending get out-of-control. Of course, the Democrat "solution" is to make things worse by increasing spending and reducing tax collections by raising marginal income tax rates...then to blame the inevitable failures on the previous administration. How dishonest? How cowardly?
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Yes, it WAS worse when I
March 1, 2009 - 14:56 ET by BDYes, it WAS worse when I was a brand new major and was paying about 50%.
I am elligible to retire at any time now, having gone over 23 years. I will not get any more pay increases (the last one was at 22 years).
If I retire now and stop working, I will be making about 55% of my base salary, but my tax obligation drops precipitously. I will actually be keeping MORE of my pay just to sit on my but in front of the tv on a dollar for dollar basis.
Tell me, why should I continue to work when the majority of my tax dollars are being spent to reward the lazy and indolant pay off mortgages they should never have had?
BD
March 1, 2009 - 15:05 ET by katainkentWe're having similar thoughts on the matter. My husband, having retired 2 years ago is seeing our tax burden growing and we're getting increasingly frustrated. We joke often about how much land we could buy outside this country with his retirement pay and work for ourselves (as we always have), maybe do some farming... rather than work for those who don't. Some days its less of a joke than others.
I know that exact
March 1, 2009 - 17:06 ET by BDI know that exact feeling. We sit on the porch and wonder why...
But I have a five year old who someday might wish to go to college. And unlike the Liberals of the world, I will not push that off on anyone else or the federal government.
That and she needs an example of a family that works and does not simply cash government checks or she might end up a liberal at Princeton or Yale....
"Tell me, why should I
March 1, 2009 - 15:08 ET by misterbill"Tell me, why should I continue to work when the majority of my tax dollars are being spent to reward the lazy and indolant pay off mortgages they should never have had?"
BD--only one answer--because it is who you are and what you are--an American with American values. Like most on this site you will do the right thing--it's what you have done all your life.
Trixed I tell you.
March 1, 2009 - 19:34 ET by JWFI understand why Mr. Limbaugh gets so much attention. It probably has a lot to do with the principles of conservatism. You know all that stuff found in the Declaration of Independence & the Constitution.
Say, didn't he mention that in his speech?
I am trixed as to why liberal whiney crybabies come to a conservative site to whine like a little kid.
Wait. Turns out I am not trixed. Trix is for kids. (and whiney liberals whining about vexing for Rush)
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
we're all dogs
March 1, 2009 - 14:03 ET by katainkentBecause with dogs its all about the tone. Its not what you say, its how you say it. Its about repetition and its about being firm without being aggressive, angry... bullying or harsh.
Yup, we're all a bunch of dumb animals. Too stupid to discern content over tone. Too willing to give over control to those who would promise to treat us well.
"The American idea was thrown out with Social Security. We nailed the coffin shut with group rights. We don't want individual liberty because we don't want individual responsibility. We want somebody else to take care of us. If we had a dictator who did a better job of it than our present system, then as long as he pretended to respect Congress, we'd lick his hands like dogs." - Orson Scott Card "Empire"
who else is disgusted? I sure am.
Um...
March 1, 2009 - 14:24 ET by HelenSI am disgusted. Yes. But respectfully: I am not a dog. I am not so brainless that I have to overcome emotions or tone in order to stumble upon content or message.
I have evolved to the point where I am rendered emotionally diabetic by the continuous drivel and emoting that the left continues to wallow in. I am sick of the whine and the pathetic spinelessness of libs to the point that the gutless whimpering displayed even in commercials makes me nauseated. Having Rush (and Sean and Levin...) to listen to is a medical requirement for one in my condition.
So, no - no dog here. Just a disgusted watcher of the downfall of a once great nation.
Me - "The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years - the cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil."
respectfully
March 1, 2009 - 15:16 ET by katainkentmy comments were all to be construed as if from the point of view of the mainstream media. Though as each year passes it becomes closer to the truth. People need find their passion for this countries founding principles and stir themselves out of the numbness.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke
Ah yes. And my apologies
March 1, 2009 - 16:00 ET by HelenSAh yes. And my apologies for taking you seriously. :o)
Should you be concerned that you did a scarily good job of impersonating the MSM?!
Me - "The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years - the cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil."
No doubt Bill Schneider
March 1, 2009 - 14:20 ET by fitzfongNo doubt Bill Schneider took his usual poll, sampling Brentwood, Detroit, the Upper West Side, Austin, the Castro, Santa Monica, Georgetown, Berkeley and a handful of communes (you know, the whole spectrum of political thought) to arrive at this declaration.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
CBS Also describe Rush and his audiance as "angry."
March 1, 2009 - 14:22 ET by CobraManCBS News was pulling this crap yesterday. They, too, were calling Rush and his listeners"angry." It's as if they are all reading from the same talking points.
It seem to me that the only "angry" ones are the liberals who HATE the fact that Rush isn't a liberal.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities
of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
Hi Cobra... I know where
March 1, 2009 - 14:26 ET by bigtimerHi Cobra...
I know where you are coming from with the spin from the msm...but one thing about it....
...WE ARE ANGRY!... and we aren't gonna' take it anymore!
Thank God for Rush and millions of us like him!
You bet your life ...
March 1, 2009 - 15:14 ET by metaphorsbwithuI must say I find television very educational. Every time someone switches it on I go into another room and read a good book. - Groucho Marx
metaphorsbwithu
Bill Schneider on Rush's Speech at CPAC
March 1, 2009 - 15:51 ET by DerRickSo here's Bill: Limbaugh was 'angry, mocking, bullying, harsh, and full of contempt'. Maybe. But note that Bill didn't say Rush was wrong. Rush said, among other things, that the real home of rascism and hypocrisy was the Democrat party. Bill can't assail Rush on those facts. It's too blatantly true.
Bo Hoo Boo Hoo
March 1, 2009 - 16:00 ET by pocomocoTHE TRUTH HURTS - DOESN'T IT, BILL?
No Surprise
March 1, 2009 - 16:18 ET by rammingspeedCCN had no twitters supportive of Limbaugh because only radical left wing nutballs watch CNN. Any sensible person watching CNN is doing so only out of morbid fascination of the abomination. They'll twitter places that normal people follow.
Would You Believe That CNN's Bill Schneider Was Once A
March 1, 2009 - 19:38 ET by Rush FanCONSERVATIVE? In his younger day, he was a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI) conservative think tank.
Remember the truism: "Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has no heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains."
Well, is there any better proof that liberal 64 year old Schneider has no brains?
------------------------------------------------
No wonder the country is in a mess;
half the people are below median
intelligence.
-----------------------------------------------------
“Some of you people in the media, I'm serious, you tell me why he has to succeed regardless. You tell me what it is about Barack Obama that makes it imperative his policies, regardless what they are, succeed. You tell me. And then let me ask you some questions. Did Obama and the Democrats hope Bush succeeded? Do they hope Republicans succeed? Does Obama hope I succeed or does he want people to stop listening to me? You people in the media, answer these questions for me.” ~ Rush Limbaugh
AOL has a poll on
March 1, 2009 - 20:37 ET by JAJTAOL has a poll on Limbaugh's speech and he got 65% thumbs up and 35 % thumbs down and so far a total of 111,708 people voted..
when anyone attacks you hard wiht just emotions and no evidence, you know Limbaugh is doing/saying something right on.
Limbaugh's speech: Disappointing,
March 2, 2009 - 00:55 ET by JerLimbaugh's speech: Disappointing, divisive, demagogic, disingenuous, dangerous...
and entirely predictable.
Jer
The same time worn BS from
March 2, 2009 - 02:53 ET by SlicksterThe same time worn BS from the left, attack the messenger. The speech was right on and done without a teleprompter.
Kudos to Rush for speaking
March 2, 2009 - 03:09 ET by JerKudos to Rush for speaking telepromterless. But it would make no difference if the speech had been delivered by Mother Teresa, it was--to me--just as I described. Of course, I'm fully aware my opinion differs from yours and that of the vast majority here regarding Limbaugh's message.
Jer
Jerk
March 2, 2009 - 07:09 ET by Sergeant ROCKWhich is why Daily Koz is a more suitable site for you.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Interesting advice from NB's
March 2, 2009 - 08:46 ET by JerInteresting advice from NB's premier name caller.
Jer
Obama's governance:
March 2, 2009 - 06:28 ET by Jack BauerObama's governance: Disappointing, divisive, demagogic, disingenuous, dangerous...
and entirely predictable -- as by so many NBers for over a year.
But what's REALLY dangerous -- he's supposed to be the President.
You know, the guy in charge. And not a radio personality. Get a grip Jer.
And unlike you, I'll offer facts to back up my claims:
Disappointing: An orgy of spending lust that's bordering on fiscal insanity (as noted by the stock exchanges worldwide). Even in their wildest dreams the socialist never realized this was going to happen. Or maybe they did.
Divisive: A relentless strategy of class warfare with an ever morphing downward definition of who constituties what class and how they are to be punished. His AG's appalling display of racism barely one week into office. The salamiification of America into small controllable "groups" or "victims" Obama puts the D into divisive.
Demagogic: See above. Plus -- what is it with an actual President continually demeaning Radio Talk Show hosts who disagree with his policies -- and naming them? That shows a really dangerous and nasty streak of demagoguery. I don't even recall Nixon publicly railing against and naming his media enemies.
Disingenuous: Or rather flat out lies. This guy just lies and lies and lies. One example his so-called Iraq plan for withdrawal is nothing more than a dustdown of what Bush was doing anyway. AND contrary to every lying campaign promise, he's going to be leaving 50,000 troops in Iraq -- what for? Maybe a 100 years? Just a figure of speech, doncha know.
Dangerous: Just look at Hillary "Poodle" Clinton's latest pathetic forays abroad. "Please Mr Chicommie, buy the $3 trillion mortage on our kids for the next 50 years." Korea -- no problem there. Iran -- about to get the A-bomb? Barack Obama: Talk softly and carry a paper stick.
But just as a matter of fact: tell me what is DANGEROUS about a guy on the radio DISSENTING with the President?
Even if I agreed with your opinion of Rush Limbaugh -- what's DANGEROUS about one man expressing HIS opinion in a public forum?
That I do not get at all. I hate Olbermann -- but is he dangerous for expressing his asinine opinions? When is free speech DANGEROUS? And who gets to decide?
media war
March 2, 2009 - 06:28 ET by AgnosticThis is yet another example of how the media controls the message to the majority of people. This is simply the creation of a common enemy, Conservatives, and using a polarizing personality, Rush, to use the most effective weapon in the liberal arsenal -- the stereotype. Rush may be well liked among conservatives but his boasting and comedic arrogance turn off many listeners, especially women. The media will turn a general dislike over his personality into a dismissal of his conservative ideas and eventually attempt to further label conservatism as an evil in society. This is already done but the platform being used now is too hysterical to make any true progress. That is why they have to give a name to their enemy. The media know they cannot be caught debating the merits of ideas because they will lose either in context or in historical records. The must attack a fallable character who can be stereotyped and especially one that has made mistakes. Rush may have a strong following and I would dare to predict that after this latest attack will have even more fans but for every fan he garners the medial will create two more enemies among the majority of people who are not engaged enough to know the difference between a bad philosophy and a bad review.
A person may be won over with logic and reason but the masses must be bought with spectacle and platitudes. - 2008 Elections
A fair point, Jack.
March 2, 2009 - 09:09 ET by Jer"And unlike you, I'll offer facts to back up my claims"
--A fair point, Jack. I had already read every word of Rush's address, but I didn't have the time then or now to elaborate on my objections, but I will have more to say over the next couple of days.
"I hate Olbermann -- but is he dangerous for expressing his asinine opinions? When is free speech DANGEROUS? And who gets to decide?"
--One quick note: I don't "hate" Rush, and I certainly don't believe he should be muzzled. But I do believe his message--not his conservative principles--to be, at least potentially, dangerous. His intent appears to me to be designed to inflame rather than illuminate.
As I said...more later.
Jer
Jer finally made it to D in the dictionary.
March 2, 2009 - 07:43 ET by JWFEveryone should congratulate him. Tomorrow, he tries out emollition & eboulement.
Whazza matter mr. jer? Did the whole defining of conservatism stick in your craw?
Hmmm. The principles found in the Declaration of Independence & the Constituion. I have heard that somewhere before. Hmmmm. Now where was that? Hmmmmm.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
Disappointing? I was not
March 2, 2009 - 07:45 ET by BDDisappointing? I was not disappointed. In fact, it excited me in that for the first time in a long time I heard someone on the national news stating opinions similar to my own.
Divisive? How so? If anything is was counter to divisiveness. How is it divisive to state the obvious, that a person should be albe to have greater control of their financial future and thus greater responsibility? Especially when it is your enemy who divides people - in this case by race, creed, and income level?
Demagogic? Really? And Hope and Change is not?
Disingenuous? You are stating that Limbaugh does not believe that which he expresses? I find THAT incredible.
and entirely predictable. True, he has said it all before, but not before THIS audience (Two networks minimum.) THus no more predictable than Hopey Changey.
Please find other attacks.