In a bigtime case of the pot calling the kettle black, liberal talk radio host Ed Schultz is attacking the credibility of Air America radio host Randi Rhodes concerning her highly dubious story about her non-mugging last Sunday outside an Irish bar in New York. Brian Maloney of the Radio Equalizer has been on top of this Randi Rhodes "mugging" story from the beginning. Maloney yesterday highlighted the credibility problems of Rhodes' lame explanation on the air Thursday of her non-mugging:
Sadly, the explanation of events given during a seven-minute opening segment yesterday simply doesn't hold water, especially her reason for initially telling others it was a mugging. Rhodes claims doctors told her she might have been attacked because they couldn't find any evidence she'd fainted.
Without a shred of real evidence to back that up, why make a statement like that? And if she did feel there had been an attack, then why not call the police at once?
You can hear Randi "explain" why she incorrectly claimed to be mugged and allowed her fellow Air America talk host, Jon Elliott, hang out to dry by promoting Randi's incorrect mugging story on YouTube. Judging from the YouTube comments on her commentary, it appears that Randi's explanation lacks credibility even among those who agree with her political views:
In all fairness, she is one of the few hosts on AAR who, at least, has cred AS a broadcaster. That much said, she was wrong for saying she was allegedly mugged.
Personal responsibility, Babe. You should apply that to yourself and admit that you are a drunk that passes out in the alley.
Among those to cast aspersions upon Randi's credibility was Ed Schultz who, as reported by the Radio Equalizer, didn't even wait until Randi's on-air explanation to begin slamming her on Wednesday:
"We're all rooting for you to be OK. But you got some 'splaining to do here, girl. You know, how did you get your teeth kicked out or knocked out or how did you fall down or did you get into a fight? It's not fair to those of us who are out there in the progressive format trying to defend you, go to bat for you, help you, be a part of you, see you succeed and everything else. This is about the goofiest damn story I think I've ever heard in my life."
That Schultz slammed Randi's veracity is not really surprising. There is no love lost between Big Ed and Air America as you can hear in this incredible rant that Schultz went on against that radio network last February. In addition, there is quite a bit of animosity directed towards Randi and her "mugging" story by Ed's fans on the Ed Schultz Message Board:
What an asshat, Randi. She's giving a partial truth at best. She admits being at the Irish Pub, going outside for a smoke then the next thing she knew she was face down on the sidewalk. She wrote an email to management that she'd been mugged almost immediately after getting home so her shift on Monday would be covered.
I personally never had a boss that liked being lied to. She should apologize to John Elliot.
Yep, she lied. Two sentence message to AAR. The first five minutes of her show were as sad as they were hilarious. Bizarre cover story about not knowing if she was hit or fainted, not eating anything before going into the bar, not hearing anything about the story until her Ex called her. She lawyed up, hid from the press--because..and these are HER words...."None of them asked me how I was doing!"
I had to tune in yesterday. I had to hear what she had to say on this attack. People here are right, she did send an email to Air America that said something about being mugged. She admitted that much on the air. She was ALL OVER the place with her explanation. She mentioned that she hadn't eaten... I don't know if that was to explain why she was drunk or an indication that it was a blood sugar kind of thing. The whole thing was PATHETIC. "Nobody cared to ask me how I was..." Of course, they never got that far, they were too busy addressing the elephant in the room which was, "Were you mugged or not?" Then she goes and has her ATTORNEY field questions. Brilliant.
Ed's loyal fans shouldn't feel too smug about Randi's obvious lack of credibility. Their hero, Big Eddy, has bigtime credibilty problems of his own as I pointed out in a September NewsBusters blog. Although Schultz has loudly challenged any conservative radio talk show host to debate him, the reality is that Big Eddy, via his producer, James, has been backing down from his own challenge. The producer and cohost of the Steve Kane Show, Brian Craig, has repeatedly called James but to no avail since the Schultz show producer refuses to accept any offer to debate despite the challenge his boss so loudly put out over the air. So while Ed Schultz attacks the credibilty of Randi Rhodes, he definitely has credibilty problems of his own due to his failure to live up to his debate challenge.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Who is that ...........
October 20, 2007 - 09:51 ET by BrillianceWho is that holding the beer? - Ed Schultz or Randi Roads
They both deserve each other
October 20, 2007 - 09:59 ET by kgPerhaps Mister Schultz has experienced falling down so drunk his body
reflexes didn't break his fall either. But being the good liberal he is, he
immediately jumps to conclusions.
Ms Rhodes, on the other hand, played her hand well by claiming to be the
victim, like a good liberal should. As usual, the claim didn't hold water.
They both deserve each other.
I think we can now
October 20, 2007 - 10:05 ET by Gat New YorkI think we can now confidentally say that Randi Rhodekill is indictative of the irresponsibility and immaturaty of the loone left on tha hapless radio show.
Also it is evident that she fell down drunk and probably should seek help. with A.A.
The fact that, afterwards,
October 20, 2007 - 10:07 ET by motherbeltThe fact that, afterwards, they could find "no reason" for her to faint, doesn't mean she didn't faint. Fainting doesn't leave evidence behind...the reason is discovered by investigation. If they didn't consider alcohol and rule it out as a cause, they can't say there was "no reason" for her to faint.
Truth?
October 20, 2007 - 10:18 ET by DanoYou talk about an "Inconvenient truth"? They all seem to make it up as they go.
"They will lie even if the truth fit better"
Rhodes claims doctors told
October 20, 2007 - 10:27 ET by drillanwrRhodes claims doctors told her she might have been attacked because they couldn't find any evidence she'd fainted.
I'm NOT a medical professional ... But, (aside from a CAT showing a brain tumor or an echo-card showing a cardio irregularity), exactly what sort of test is done to decide if one had fainted? ... Besides blood alcohol level, of course. ... The fact that she claims to NOT recall what happened is, at the very least, a fainting spell ... at the very most, (sans brain/heart condition) an alcohol induced black out ...
What the hell's wrong with admitting you were drunk off your arse, Randi? You could have turned this into a lesson lived to warn others about getting so smashed that something terrible could happen when you don't have control over yourself or your surroundings while drunk out of your gumball machine ...
Ahhh ... But liberal reasoning ensues ... The logical explanation isn't good enough ... Gotta make something up.
My prediction: Watch for Randi Rhodes to admit she has an alcohol problem in the very near future. Gives her:
1) cover for the outlandish story
2) instant victimhood so all is forgiven
3) a reason to blame Bush and the war for her addiction
Rhodes claims doctors
October 20, 2007 - 10:30 ET by Jack BauerSo let's just reverse that "comment" and see what happens.
Rhodes claims doctors told her she might have fainted because they couldn't find any evidence she'd been attacked?
Gee, JB, you mean Randi
October 20, 2007 - 10:33 ET by drillanwrGee, JB, you mean Randi might be hearing things the way SHE wants to hear them ... Why, that would be unheard of for a liberal (See: MM = Rush Limbaugh "phony soldier(s)")
Maybe she needs to go into
October 20, 2007 - 10:43 ET by Jack BauerMaybe she needs to go into therapy to undergo hypnosis and see if she can recover these "supressed memories".
It'll probably turn out that, not only was she attacked, she was also sexually abused as a child. I think a conservative talk show host will prove the villain of the piece.
I think she is leading up
October 20, 2007 - 10:59 ET by Gat New YorkI think she is leading up to be abducted by aliens. This way she can go in one of two directions:
1. If it were illegal aliens blame Bush for this problem.
2. If it were aliens from another planet, blame Bush for creating the global climate that would make it appealing to life forms from another planet.
Wonder if the E/R docs
October 20, 2007 - 11:09 ET by drillanwrWonder if the E/R docs checked to see if she'd been "probed" ...
Sorry, forgot it's breakfast/brunch hour ...
I was late for work once so
October 20, 2007 - 12:30 ET by Jack BauerI was late for work once so I tried the old, "sorry I'm late I was abducted by aliens and probed"
But my cynical boss never believed me.
Dan, JB
October 20, 2007 - 15:41 ET by drillanwrYa should've shown him the evidence ...
See my comment above
October 20, 2007 - 12:01 ET by motherbeltfor my opinion on "causes" of fainting.
Mean Spirited
October 20, 2007 - 10:54 ET by AndanteYou are all so mean spirited. If I ever meet Ms. Rhodes I'm going to buy her a beer to show my compassion.
"buy her a beer" Not
October 20, 2007 - 11:01 ET by Gat New York"buy her a beer"
Not enough - you better be able to afford about a dozen beers.
You might also want to buy
October 20, 2007 - 11:24 ET by johnwaddYou might also want to buy her one of those face covering, organic pleasure bags. There is not a word to describe her beauty.
Re Beer
October 20, 2007 - 14:33 ET by AndanteNow see, there you go being mean again. I refuse to buy her more than one beer....keg.
. . . . I'll chip in for
October 20, 2007 - 20:16 ET by Gat New York. . . . I'll chip in for the funnel.
Yeah, better take out a
October 20, 2007 - 11:10 ET by drillanwrYeah, better take out a second mortgage ...
"Rhodes claims doctors told
October 20, 2007 - 12:13 ET by WhoIsJohnGalt"Rhodes claims doctors told her she might have been attacked because they couldn't find any evidence she'd fainted."
That makes no sense whatsoever. While I've known a lot of doctors who are educated beyond their intelligence (I've worked in a healthcare for almost twenty years), I can't imagine a doctor telling someone who presents with injuries and symptoms such as hers that she might have been attacked because there is no evidence that she fainted. That's the height of irresponsibility on the part of a medical professional.
Generally the first evidence that someone fainted is the knot on the head from hitting something on the way down. About the only clue that I know of for certain is that people who faint usually tend to fall forward, which would explaing her teeth leaving her mouth unexpectedly.
...much like the crap that she spits out constantly on her show.
Actually
October 20, 2007 - 18:11 ET by Jerry MackActually Shultz got it right. Imagine the hoopla if Sean had said something like this.
It's Saturday ... Think
October 20, 2007 - 18:20 ET by drillanwrIt's Saturday ...
Think SNL will do a skit, or mention it in their stupid SNL News Desk bit?
wouldn't have been a
October 20, 2007 - 18:24 ET by PKwouldn't have been a problem if someone hadn't have stepped on her hand on the way out.
c
I don't think that Randi is
October 20, 2007 - 23:12 ET by balboaI don't think that Randi is well-known enough to warrant SNL.
Save yourself AirAmerica
October 20, 2007 - 22:03 ET by okiehawk44Cut her loose before more of her background and predilictions come out.
TOO LATE...
October 20, 2007 - 22:56 ET by danybhoyShe has done her damage to Error Amerikkka already. Rhodes, along with that moron who wants to be MY senator, would not accept pay cuts at AAR at a time when they were cutting jobs because they were losing money bigtime. Programming sucks with no support staff. They then went into bankrupcy & were bought out by Mark Green. They still have no ratings & the stations they are on can barely be picked up. They are on XM though, so I will tune in once & a while to hear their kook thoughts.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin